Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Resumption after Interruption for Immune-Related Adverse Events, a Narrative Review

Early identification and multidisciplinary management of immune checkpoint inhibitors associated colitis can improve patient outcomes

Currently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown notable clinical efficacy in treating various malignant tumors, significantly improving patient prognosis. However, while ICIs enhance the body’s anti-tumor effects, they can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with ICI-associated colitis being one of the more prevalent forms. This condition can disrupt treatment, necessitate drug discontinuation, and adversely affect therapeutic outcomes. In severe cases, irAEs may even become life-threatening. A recent case report by Hong et al highlights the importance of vigilance for ICI-associated colitis in patients experiencing symptoms such as diarrhea and abdominal pain, which can arise both during and even after completion of ICI treatment. Early identification, multidisciplinary management, and continuous monitoring of patients are essential steps to further improve outcomes.

Treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Cancer is one of the most difficult diseases facing modern medicine, and increasing amounts of research and clinical treatments are being applied to the treatment of cancer. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, has revolutionized the treatment and overall survival of patients with several different types of cancer. Approximately one-third of patients treated with ICIs may experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated colitis (ICIC) is the most common irAE with an incidence of approximately 8-10%, ICIC usually presents as watery or bloody diarrhea, and if the symptoms are severe, ICI treatment must be interrupted or even terminated. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, and therapies of ICIC, focusing on the use of biologics, in order to propose treatment options in different situations to control immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis as soon as possible.

Methods

To find relevant articles for this narrative review paper, a combination of keywords such as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis, corticosteroids, biologics were searched for in PubMed databases.

Key Content and Findings

The pathogenesis of ICIC is complex and primarily involves antitumor effects and indirect damage to colonic tissues, as well as the activation of specific proinflammatory pathways. Corticosteroids (CSs) are the first line of treatment for ICIC, but steroid-refractory or steroid-resistant cases often occur. Patients with irAE colitis respond favorably to biologics, and patients with CS-resistant/refractory enterocolitis can benefit from the early use of biologics.

Conclusions

Biologics are currently recommended for the treatment of ICIC but are usually used as a supplement after the failure of first-line CS therapy. Patients with irAE colitis respond favorably to biologics, and patients with CS-resistant/refractory enterocolitis can benefit from the early use of biologics. Biologics (alone or in combination with CS) should be considered as an early therapy option for high-risk patients rather than just an escalation after a failure to respond to CS.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after immune-related adverse events: a retrospective study from VigiBase update in 2024 looking for emergent safety signals

OBJECTIVES

Limited information is available on the safety of a rechallenge with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after occurrence of an immune-related adverse event (irAE). We aim to identify potential emergent safety signals.

DESIGN

This is an update of our observational pharmacovigilance cohort study.

SETTING

We exanimated individual case safety reports from the WHO database VigiBase.

PARTICIPANTS

We included all individual case safety reports with ICI and rechallenged ICI.

INTERVENTIONS

We identified that incident irAE cases using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities V.26.1 related with at least one ICI administration were systematically collected until 1 March 2024.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the recurrence rate (expressed as a percentage with its 95% CI) of the initial irAE postrechallenge with the same ICI.

RESULTS

We identified 1016 irAEs cases from ICI rechallenges. Of these, 323 irAEs recurrences occurred (31.8%, 95% CI 28.1 to 34.0). The most common postrechallenge irAEs were nephritis (recurrence rate: 50%, 95% CI 25 to 75), skin irAEs (44%, 95% CI 31 to 58) and colitis (39%, 95% CI 33 to 44).

CONCLUSIONS

In this updated, largest cohort study on rechallenge (NCT04696250), we observed a 31.8% recurrence rate of the same irAE postrechallenge with the same ICI, building on our previous findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04696250.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future directions

Immunotherapy, remarkably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has significantly altered the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their success, the discontinuation of ICIs therapy may occur due to factors such as prior treatment completion, disease progression during ICIs treatment, or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As numerous studies highlight the dynamic nature of immune responses and the sustained benefits of ICIs, ICIs rechallenge has become an attractive and feasible option. However, the decision-making process for ICIs rechallenge in clinical settings is complicated by numerous uncertainties. This review systematically analyses existing clinical research evidence, classifying ICIs rechallenge into distinct clinical scenarios, exploring methods to overcome ICIs resistance in rechallenge instances, and identifying biomarkers to select patients likely to benefit from rechallenge. By integrating recent studies and new technologies, we offer crucial recommendations for future clinical trial design and provide a practical guideline to maximize the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy for NSCLC patients.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy on Surgical Outcomes and Time to Radiation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between immunotherapy-containing and standard chemotherapy regimens with treatment delays and postoperative complications in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. The effect of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was compared.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared 139 women treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-522 regimen) from August 2021 to September 2022 with 287 consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone prior to July 2021 and underwent surgery. Baseline characteristics, time to treatments, and surgical complications were compared using two-sample non-parametric tests. Linear regression evaluated association of irAEs with time to surgery and radiation. Logistic regression identified factors associated with surgical complications.

RESULTS

Age, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and mastectomy rates were similar among cohorts. No clinically relevant difference in time from end of neoadjuvant treatment to surgery was observed [KEYNOTE-522: median 32 (IQR 27, 43) days; non-KEYNOTE-522: median 31 (IQR 26, 37) days; P = 0.048]. Time to radiation did not differ (P = 0.7). A total of 26 patients (9%; non-KEYNOTE-522) versus 11 (8%; KEYNOTE-522) experienced postoperative complications (P = 0.6). In the KEYNOTE-522 cohort, 59 (43%) of 137 patients experienced 82 irAEs; 40 (68%) required treatment. Older age (P = 0.018) and ASA class 4 (P = 0.007) were associated with delays to surgery after adjusting for clinical factors. Experiencing ≥ 1 irAE was associated with delay to radiation (P = 0.029). IrAEs were not associated with surgical complications (P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed no clinically meaningful difference between times to surgery/adjuvant radiation or postoperative complications and type of preoperative chemotherapy. IrAEs were associated with delay to adjuvant radiation but not with postoperative complications or delay to surgery.

Evolving Practices in Immune-Related Adverse Event Management: Insights From the IMMUCARE Multidisciplinary Board

PURPOSE

The management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requires multidisciplinary boards to handle complex cases. This study aimed to examine the evolving practices of the IMMUCARE board and to evaluate its impact on clinical practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The IMMUCARE board gathers oncologists and organ specialists from the Cancerology Institute of the Lyon University Hospital since 2018. We conducted a retrospective analysis of its activity (participants' specialty, referred cases, and recommendations) from 2018 to 2021, coupled with a survey among the physicians who participated.

RESULTS

Across 68 board meetings, 245 cases from 195 patients were discussed. Each board had a median of six participants (IQR, 5-8). Participation rates varied across specialties and also over time (participation of nephrologists and rheumatologists significantly increased over time, whereas it decreased for endocrinologists). Most of the referred patients (89%) were treated at our center. Only 4% of referrals concerned eligibility for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), whereas the majority pertained to irAEs. The board recommended ICI interruption for 56% and steroids for 41% of them. Immunosuppressants were recommended in 17% of cases, with a notable increase over time. ICI reintroduction was debated in 50% of cases, and the board identified a definitive contraindication in 26% of them. The survey of 49 of 98 physicians showed that the board significantly affected immunosuppressant introduction and ICI rechallenge decisions. The board's educational and collaborative benefits were highlighted, but time constraints posed challenges.

CONCLUSION

Our 4-year analysis of irAE management practices reveals changing patterns in the distribution of cases presented and in specialists' involvement. Dedicated multidisciplinary boards remain essential, particularly for intricate cases. Expanding access to these boards is crucial to ensure comprehensive care for all patients.

Focus on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-related Intestinal Inflammation: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutical Approach

Recently, antitumor immunotherapies have witnessed a breakthrough with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors. Unfortunately, the use of ICIs has also led to the advent of a novel class of adverse events that differ from those of classic chemotherapeutics and are more reminiscent of autoimmune diseases, the immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Herein, we performed an insight of the main IRAEs associated with ICIs, focusing on gastroenterological IRAEs and specifically on checkpoint inhibitor colitis, which represents the most widely reported IRAE to date. We comprehensively dissected the current evidence regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of ICIs-induced colitis, touching upon also on innovative therapies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated gastritis: Patterns and management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used due to their effectiveness in treating various tumors. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are defined as adverse effects resulting from ICI treatment. Gastrointestinal irAEs are a common type of irAEs characterized by intestinal side effects, such as diarrhea and colitis, which may lead to the cessation of ICIs. Although irAE gastritis is rarely reported, it may lead to serious complications such as gastrorrhagia. Furthermore, irAE gastritis is often difficult to identify early due to its diverse symptoms. Although steroid hormones and immunosuppressants are commonly used to reverse irAEs, the best regimen and dosage for irAE gastritis remains uncertain. In addition, the risk of recurrence of irAE gastritis after the reuse of ICIs should be considered. In this editorial, strategies such as early identification, pathological diagnosis, management interventions, and immunotherapy rechallenge are discussed to enable clinicians to better manage irAE gastritis and improve the prognosis of these patients.

Association of CD8 + T cells expressing nivolumab-free PD-1 with clinical status in a patient with relapsed refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma

A 37-year-old man with refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) underwent PD-1 blockade therapy with nivolumab, which resulted in a partial response. However, treatment was discontinued due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including myasthenia gravis and myositis. Retreatment with nivolumab resulted in a complete metabolic response and hepatic irAE. Subsequently, nivolumab was administered at extended dosing intervals. Intermittent infusion of ten doses of nivolumab for a total dose of 2400 mg/body helped control the relapsed/refractory cHL over three years. During nivolumab treatment, disease progression and emergence of irAEs were associated with the proportion of CD8 + T cells expressing nivolumab-free PD-1 relative to the total number of CD8 + T cells. The findings in this nivolumab-sensitive patient highlight the clinical utility of monitoring immune cells expressing nivolumab-free PD-1 in patients with cHL who have been treated with nivolumab and have experienced irAEs.

Development of an eHealth Tool for Capturing and Analyzing the Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Cancer Treatment

Introduction

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many different types of cancer, but it is associated with a myriad of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been identified as valuable tools for continuously collecting patient-centered data and are frequently used in oncology trials. However, few studies still research an ePRO follow-up approach on patients treated with Immunotherapy, potentially reflecting a lack of support services for this population.

Methods

The team co-developed a digital platform (V-Care) using ePROs to create a new follow-up pathway for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. To operationalize the first 3 phases of the CeHRes roadmap, we employed multiple methods that were integrated throughout the development process, rather than being performed in a linear fashion. The teams employed an agile approach in a dynamic and iterative manner, engaging key stakeholders throughout the process.

Results

The development of the application was categorized into 2 phases: "user interface" (UI) and "user experience" (UX) designs. In the first phase, the pages of the application were segmented into general categories, and feedback from all stakeholders was received and used to modify the application. In phase 2, mock-up pages were developed and sent to the Figma website. Moreover, the Android Package Kit (APK) of the application was installed and tested multiple times on a mobile phone to proactively detect and fix any errors. After resolving some technical issues and adjusting errors on the Android version to improve the user experience, the iOS version of the application was developed.

Discussion

By incorporating the latest technological developments, V-Care has enabled cancer patients to have access to more comprehensive and personalized care, allowing them to better manage their condition and be better informed about their health decisions. These advances have also enabled healthcare professionals to be better equipped with the knowledge and tools to provide more effective and efficient care. In addition, the advances in V-Care technology have allowed patients to connect with their healthcare providers more easily, providing a platform to facilitate communication and collaboration. Although usability testing is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and user experience of the app, it can be a significant investment of time and resources.

Conclusion

The V-Care platform can be used to investigate the reported symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and to compare them with the results from clinical trials. Furthermore, the project will utilize ePRO tools to collect symptoms from patients and provide insight into whether the reported symptoms are linked to the treatment.

Clinical Relevance

V-Care provides a secure, easy-to-use interface for patient-clinician communication and data exchange. Its clinical system stores and manages patient data in a secure environment, while its clinical decision support system helps clinicians make decisions that are more informed, efficient, and cost-effective. This system has the potential to improve patient safety and quality of care, while also helping to reduce healthcare costs.

Immunotherapy Resumption/Rechallenge in Melanoma Patients after Toxicity: Do We Have Another Chance?

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have radically changed the prognosis of several neoplasias, among them metastatic melanoma. In the past decade, some of these new drugs have appeared together with a new toxicity spectrum previously unknown to clinicians, until now. A common situation in daily practice is that a patient experiences toxicity due to this type of drug and we need to resume or rechallenge treatment after resolving the adverse event. Methods: A PubMed literature review was carried out. Results: The published data regarding the resumption or rechallenge of ICI treatment in melanoma patients is scarce and heterogeneous. Depending on the study reviewed, the recurrence incidence of grade 3–4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) ranged from 18% to 82%. Conclusion: It is possible to resume or rechallenge, but each patient should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team for close monitoring and assessment of the risk/benefit ratio before initiating treatment.

Check this out: treatment paradigms in immune-checkpoint inhibitor colitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become a pillar of cancer therapy for many people around the world. However, up to two-thirds of all patients undergoing ICI therapy will have immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including immune-checkpoint inhibitor colitis (ICIC). This review summarizes the most valuable and currently available information about the mechanism, diagnosis, and management of ICIC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings include several developments on the leading theories for the mechanisms of ICIC such as the role of the gut microbiome. New emerging therapy strategies include tocilizumab, ustekinumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors.

SUMMARY

The occurrence of irAEs remains a limiting factor for the use of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. Prompt diagnosis of ICIC with endoscopy and histologic confirmation can lead to early utilization of known effective treatments such as corticosteroids, infliximab, vedolizumab, and other emerging therapy strategies. We summarize the key points of this review article in our abstract video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/COG/A44.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy increases systemic SDF-1, cardiac DAMPs Fibronectin-EDA, S100/Calgranulin, galectine-3, and NLRP3-MyD88-chemokine pathways

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed the oncology clinic in recent years, improving survival expectations in cancer patients. ICI therapy have a broad spectrum of side effects from endocrinopathies to cardiovascular diseases. In this study, pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects of short-term ICIs therapy in preclinical models were analyzed.

Methods

Firstly, in a human in vitro model, human cardiomyocytes co-cultured with hPBMC were exposed to ICIs (with CTLA-4 or PD-1 blocking agents, at 200 nM) for 72 h. After treatment, production of DAMPs and 12 cytokines were analyzed in the supernatant through colorimetric and enzymatic assays. C57/Bl6 mice were treated with CTLA-4 or PD-1 blocking agents (15 mg/kg) for 10 days. Before (T0), after three days (T3) and after treatments (T10), ejection fraction, fractional shortening, radial and longitudinal strain were calculated by using bidimensional echocardiography (Vevo 2100, Fujfilm). Fibrosis, necrosis, hypertrophy and vascular NF-kB expression were analyzed through Immunohistochemistry. Myocardial expression of DAMPs (S100- Calgranulin, Fibronectin and Galectine-3), MyD88, NLRP3 and twelve cytokines have been analyzed. Systemic levels of SDF-1, IL-1β, and IL-6 were analyzed before, during and after ICIs therapy.

Results

Radial and longitudinal strain were decreased after 10 days of ICIs therapy. Histological analysis of NF-kB expression shows that short-term anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 treatment increased vascular and myocardial inflammation. No myocardial hypertrophy was seen with the exception of the pembrolizumab group. Myocardial fibrosis and expression of galectin-3, pro-collagen 1-α and MMP-9 were increased after treatment with all ICIs. Both anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 treatments increased the expression of DAMPs, NLRP3 inflammasome and MyD88 and induced both in vitro and in vivo the secretion of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6. Systemic levels of SDF-1, IL-1β and IL-6 were increased during and after treatment with ICIs.

Conclusions

Short therapy with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blocking agents increases vascular expression of NF-kB, systemic SDF-1, IL-1β, IL-6 levels and myocardial NLRP3, MyD88 and DAMPs expression in preclinical models. A pro-inflammatory cytokine storm was induced in myocardial tissues and in cultured cardiac cells after ICIs therapy. The overall picture of the study suggests new putative biomarkers of ICIs-mediated systemic and myocardial damages potentially useful in clinical cardioncology.

Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Practical Guide to Identifying High-Risk Patients and Rechallenging Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a range of complications associated with the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Two major classes of ICIs widely used are Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Programmed Cell death-1 (PD-1)/Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. High-grade irAEs are life-threatening and often cause a severe decline in performance status in such that patients do not qualify for any further anticancer treatments. It is difficult to generalize the evidence in the current literature on risk factors or biomarkers for the entire class of ICIs as the studies so far are either disease-specific (e.g., lung cancer or melanoma) or ICI agent-specific (e.g., pembrolizumab, ipilimumab) or irAE-specific (e.g., pneumonitis or gastritis). In this review, risk factors and biomarkers to consider before initiating or monitoring ICI are listed with a practical purpose in day-to-day practice. Risk factors are grouped into demographics and social history, medical history, and medication history, tumor-specific and agent-specific risk factors. A higher risk of irAE is associated with age <60 years, high body mass index, women on CTLA4 and men on PD-1/PD-L1 agents, and chronic smokers. Patients with significant kidney (Stage IV-V), cardiac (heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, hypertension), and lung (asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are at a higher risk of respective organ-specific irAEs. Pre-existing autoimmune disease and chronic use of certain drugs (proton pump inhibitors, diuretics, anti-inflammatory drugs) also increase the irAE-risk. Biomarkers are categorized into circulating blood counts, cytokines, autoantibodies, HLA genotypes, microRNA, gene expression profiling, and serum proteins. The blood counts and certain protein markers (albumin and thyroid-stimulating hormone) are readily accessible in current practice. High neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, eosinophil/monocyte/lymphocyte counts; TSH and troponins at diagnosis and drop in the white count and lymphocyte count can predict irAE. Other biomarkers with limited evidence are cytokines, autoantibodies, HLA genotypes, microRNA, and gene expression profiling. With fast-expanding approvals for ICIs in various cancer types, knowledge on risk factors and biomarkers can help providers assess the irAE-risk of their patients. Prospective disease and agent-specific studies are needed to provide further insight on this essential aspect of ICI therapy.