1
|
Varachev V, Susova O, Mitrofanov A, Naskhletashvili D, Krasnov G, Ikonnikova A, Bezhanova S, Semenova V, Sevyan N, Prozorenko E, Ammour Y, Bekyashev A, Nasedkina T. Genomic Profiling in Glioma Patients to Explore Clinically Relevant Markers. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:13004. [PMID: 39684714 PMCID: PMC11641329 DOI: 10.3390/ijms252313004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2024] [Revised: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of brain tumors, among which the most aggressive subtype is glioblastoma, accounting for 60% of cases in adults. Available systemic treatment options are few and ineffective, so new approaches to therapies for glioblastoma are in high demand. In total, 131 patients with diffuse glioma were studied. Paired tumor–normal samples were sequenced on the Illumina platform; the panel included 812 genes associated with cancer development. Molecular profiles in clinically distinct groups were investigated. In low-grade glioma (LGG) patients (n = 18), the most common mutations were IDH1/2 (78%), ATRX (33%), TP53 (44%), PIK3CA (17%), and co-deletion 1p/19q (22%). In high-grade glioma (HGG) patients (n = 113), more frequently affected genes were CDKN2A/B (33%), TERTp (71%), PTEN (60%), TP53 (27%), and EGFR (40%). The independent predictors of better prognosis were tumor grade and IDH1/2 mutations. In IDH—wildtype glioblastoma patients, a history of other precedent cancer was associated with worse overall survival (OS), while re-operation and bevacizumab therapy increased OS. Also, among genetic alterations, TERTp mutation and PTEN deletion were markers of poor prognosis. Nine patients received molecular targeted therapy, and the results were evaluated. The search for molecular changes associated with tumor growth and progression is important for diagnosis and choice of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viacheslav Varachev
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (V.V.); (G.K.); (A.I.); (V.S.)
| | - Olga Susova
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Alexei Mitrofanov
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - David Naskhletashvili
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - George Krasnov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (V.V.); (G.K.); (A.I.); (V.S.)
| | - Anna Ikonnikova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (V.V.); (G.K.); (A.I.); (V.S.)
| | - Svetlana Bezhanova
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Vera Semenova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (V.V.); (G.K.); (A.I.); (V.S.)
| | - Nadezhda Sevyan
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Evgenii Prozorenko
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Yulia Ammour
- I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera, 105064 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Ali Bekyashev
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 115478 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.); (A.M.); (D.N.); (S.B.); (N.S.); (E.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Tatiana Nasedkina
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (V.V.); (G.K.); (A.I.); (V.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Motomura K, Sasaki K, Sugii N, Yamaguchi S, Inoue H, Oshima A, Tanaka K, Otani Y, Shirahata M, Shibahara I, Nagane M, Tsuzuki S, Matsutani T, Tsukamoto Y, Kijima N, Asano K, Ohno M, Inoue A, Mineharu Y, Miyake K, Mitobe Y, Hanihara M, Kawanishi Y, Deguchi S, Saito M, Matsuda R, Ujifuku K, Arita H, Sato Y, Yamashita S, Yonezawa U, Yamaguchi J, Momii Y, Ogawa T, Kambe A, Ohba S, Fukai J, Saito N, Kinoshita M, Sumi K, Otani R, Uzuka T, Takebe N, Koizumi S, Saito R, Arakawa Y, Narita Y. Cost of medical care for malignant brain tumors at hospitals in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group brain-tumor study group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:1123-1131. [PMID: 39223700 PMCID: PMC11456849 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate what treatment are selected for malignant brain tumors, particularly glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), in real-world Japan and the costs involved. METHODS We conducted a questionnaire survey regarding treatment selections for newly diagnosed GBM and PCNSL treated between July 2021 and June 2022 among 47 institutions in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Brain Tumor Study Group. We calculated the total cost and cost per month of the initial therapy for newly diagnosed GBM or PCNSL. RESULTS The most used regimen (46.8%) for GBM in patients aged ≤74 years was 'Surgery + radiotherapy concomitant with temozolomide'. This regimen's total cost was 7.50 million JPY (Japanese yen). Adding carmustine wafer implantation (used in 15.0%), TTFields (used in 14.1%), and bevacizumab (BEV) (used in 14.5%) to the standard treatment of GBM increased the cost by 1.24 million JPY for initial treatment, and 1.44 and 0.22 million JPY per month, respectively. Regarding PCNSL, 'Surgery (biopsy) + rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) therapy' was the most used regimen (42.5%) for patients of all ages. This regimen incurred 1.07 million JPY per month. The three PCNSL regimens based on R-MPV therapy were in ultra-high-cost medical care (exceeding 1 million JPY per month). CONCLUSIONS Treatment of malignant brain tumors is generally expensive, and cost-ineffective treatments such as BEV are frequently used. We believe that the results of this study can be used to design future economic health studies examining the cost-effectiveness of malignant brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuya Motomura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keita Sasaki
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Narushi Sugii
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamaguchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North 15, West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Inoue
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-1-1, Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Akito Oshima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Tanaka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Otani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, kita-ku, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mitsuaki Shirahata
- Department of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Ichiyo Shibahara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Motoo Nagane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoo Matsutani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Tsukamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kijima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Asano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Zaifu-cho 5, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Makoto Ohno
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Inoue
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime university school of medicine, 454, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan
| | - Yohei Mineharu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho Shogoin Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keisuke Miyake
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Yuta Mitobe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yamagata University Hospital, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Mitsuto Hanihara
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Yu Kawanishi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan
| | - Shoichi Deguchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shimonagakubo 1007, Nagaizumi, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masato Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Medical University, 2-1-1-1 Midorigaoka Higashi, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Matsuda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Shijo-cho 840, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kenta Ujifuku
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Arita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichi Sato
- Department of Neurosurgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba, Shiwa, Iwate, Japan
| | - Shinji Yamashita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miyazaki University, 5200 Kihara Kiyotake, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Ushio Yonezawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Minamiku Kasumi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Junya Yamaguchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Momii
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka Hasama-machi Yufu, Oita, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ogawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kambe
- Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | - Shigeo Ohba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Junya Fukai
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Norihiko Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-22-36, Ohashi, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kinoshita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Koichiro Sumi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchikamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryohei Otani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Uzuka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-machi, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takebe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-kofukai, 2-4-20 Ohgimachi, Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Koizumi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ryuta Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Arakawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho Shogoin Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pankiw M, Brezden-Masley C, Charames GS. Comprehensive genomic profiling for oncological advancements by precision medicine. Med Oncol 2023; 41:1. [PMID: 37993657 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-02228-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
Considerable advancements in next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have sparked the use of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) as a guiding tool for precision-centered oncological treatments. The past two decades have seen the completion of the human genome project, and the consequential invention of NGS. High-throughput sequencing technologies support the discovery and commonplace use of individualized cancer treatments, specifically immune-centered checkpoint inhibitor therapies, and oncogene and tumor suppressor gene targeted therapies. Nevertheless, CGP is not commonly used in all clinical settings. This review investigates the clinically relevant applications of CGP. Studies published between the years 2000-2023 have shown substantial evidence of the benefits of integrating CGP into routine care practice, while also making important comparisons to current-standard oncological treatment strategies. Findings of a comprehensive genomic profile includes predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic biomarkers, together with somatic mutation identification which can indicate the efficacy of immunotherapies and molecularly guided therapies. This review highlights the importance of CGP in identifying driver mutations in tumors that subsequently can be effectively targeted with molecular therapeutics and lead to drug discovery, allowing for increased precision in treating tumors selectively based on their specific genetic mutations, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Pankiw
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Brezden-Masley
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George S Charames
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Lab Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Mount Sinai Services, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Onishi S, Yamasaki F, Kuraoka K, Taguchi A, Takayasu T, Akagi K, Hinoi T. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of glioblastoma as an initial malignancy of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD): two case reports and a literature review. BMC Med Genomics 2023; 16:6. [PMID: 36647049 PMCID: PMC9843912 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-022-01403-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) results from a biallelic germline pathogenic variant in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene. The most common CMMRD-associated malignancies are brain tumors; an accurate diagnosis is challenging when a malignant brain tumor is the only tumor at presentation. We describe two cases of glioblastoma as the initial CMMRD malignancy and discuss current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION Two children with brain tumors without remarkable family history had biallelic pathogenic germline variants in PMS2. Patient 1: A 6-year-old girl presented biallelic PMS2 germline pathogenic variants. Glioblastomas at the left frontal lobe and right temporal lobe were resistant to immune-checkpoint inhibitor, temozolomide, and bevacizumab. Patient 2: A 10-year-old boy presented biallelic PMS2 germline variants. His glioblastoma with primitive neuroectodermal tumor-like features responded to chemoradiotherapy, but he developed advanced colon cancer and acute lymphocytic leukemia. In both patients, only a monoallelic PMS2 germline variant was detected by conventional gene tests. PMS2 immunohistochemistry showed lack of staining at both the tumors and normal tissue as vascular endothelial cells. Further gene tests revealed large genomic deletion including the entire PMS2 gene, confirming biallelic PMS2 germline variants. CONCLUSION Conventional multi-gene panel tests are insufficient for detecting large deletions of MMR genes, resulting in misdiagnoses of CMMRD as Lynch syndrome. PMS2 variants have low cancer penetrance; family histories may thus be absent. Long-range gene analyses or immunohistochemical staining of MMR proteins in normal tissue should be considered for pediatric brain tumors with a single allele MMR variant when CMMRD is suspected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shumpei Onishi
- grid.257022.00000 0000 8711 3200Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan ,grid.416698.4Department of Neurosurgery, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, National Hospital Organization, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Fumiyuki Yamasaki
- grid.257022.00000 0000 8711 3200Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazuya Kuraoka
- grid.440118.80000 0004 0569 3483Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Akira Taguchi
- grid.257022.00000 0000 8711 3200Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takayasu
- grid.257022.00000 0000 8711 3200Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kiwamu Akagi
- grid.416695.90000 0000 8855 274XDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takao Hinoi
- grid.470097.d0000 0004 0618 7953Department of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551 Japan
| |
Collapse
|