Longitudinal Body Composition Changes Detected by [(18)F]FDG PET/CT during and after Chemotherapy and Their Prognostic Role in Elderly Hodgkin Lymphoma

Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in lymphoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Findings regarding the relationship between sarcopenia and lymphoma have been inconsistent across studies. This study investigated the association between sarcopenia and lymphoma. We systematically searched the Embase, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases from inception to 31 March 2024 to identify relevant studies. Two researchers independently extracted and evaluated studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty-six studies with 3659 participants were included. Sarcopenic lymphoma patients had poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.47-2.41; p < 0.001). The heterogeneity was high (I2=80%). However, the result of the Egger test indicated a significant publication bias (p < 0.001). After employing the trim and fill method to adjust for this bias, the HR of OS became non-significant (p > 0.05). The progression-free survival (PFS) was worse in sarcopenic patients (HR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.37-2.29; p < 0.001; I2=70%). There was no significant publication bias (p > 0.05). In the subgroup analyses, sarcopenia was a negative predictor of OS in lymphoma patients who undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (HR  = 1.61;95% CI: 1.19-2.18; I2=30%). Male lymphoma patients with sarcopenia had a significantly worse OS (HR = 2.29; 95% CI:1.24-4.24; p = 0.009). Among patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), those with sarcopenia defined by temporal muscle thickness (TMT) exhibited significantly worse OS (HR = 2.20; 95% CI:1.04-4.65; p = 0.039; I2=68%). Sarcopenia is associated with worse PFS in lymphoma patients. Subgroup analyses indicate that sarcopenia is a negative predictor of OS after HCT, and male lymphoma patients who suffer from sarcopenia have higher mortality. Sarcopenia defined by TMT is also a negative predictor of OS for patients with PCNSL.

Prevalence and prognostic value of baseline sarcopenia in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review

Background

The correlation between sarcopenia and hematological malignancy prognosis is still controversial. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: To explore sarcopenia's prevalence and prognostic value in hematologic malignancies.

Data sources and methods

We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library through Ovid SP using an appropriate search strategy on August 28, 2022, and updated the search results on January 9, 2023. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Relationships between sarcopenia and prognostic value were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. HR means the probability of something undesirable, i.e., death or disease progression.

Results

The search identified more than 3992 studies, and 21 (3354 patients, median or mean age ranging from 36 to 78 years) were finally included. The risk of bias in the studies was low to medium. All included studies were diagnosed based on low muscle mass (LMM). Muscle mass was assessed mainly through imaging technologies, and different cut-offs were applied to determine LMM. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 44.5%, which could fluctuate by age. Subgroup analysis showed that older people had a higher sarcopenic rate than the non-elderly group. Sarcopenia resulted in an inferior prognosis [overall survival: HR 1.821, 95% CI 1.415-2.343; progression-free survival: HR 1.703, 95% CI 1.128-2.571).

Conclusion

Sarcopenia has a prevalence of over 30% in malignant hematologic patients and is associated with a poorer prognosis. Future studies with a standardized sarcopenia diagnostic criterion were needed to investigate sarcopenia's prevalence and prognostic effects in hematologic malignancies.

Prevalence and effect on survival of pre-treatment sarcopenia in patients with hematological malignancies: a meta-analysis

Background & aims

Evidence regarding the prevalence of pre-treatment sarcopenia and its impact on survival in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) varies across studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize this discrepancy.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were systematically searched for relevant studies. Outcomes assessed were: prevalence of pre-treatment sarcopenia, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and complete response (CR). Weighted mean proportion, odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a fixed-effects and a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 27 retrospective cohort studies involving 4,991 patients were included in this study. The prevalence of pre-treatment sarcopenia was 37.0% (95% CI: 32.0%-42.0%) in HM patients <60 years and 51.0% (95% CI: 45.0%-57.0%) in≥60 years. Patients with leukemia had the lowest prevalence, compared with those with other HM (38.0%; 95% CI: 33.0%-43.0%; P = 0.010). The presence of sarcopenia was independently associated with poor OS (HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.41-1.75) and PFS (HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.22-1.83) throughout treatment period, which may be partially attributed to decreased CR (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41-0.72), particularly for BMI ≥ 25 (P = 0.020) and males (P = 0.020).

Conclusion

Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in patients with HM and an adverse prognostic factor for both survival and treatment efficacy. HM and sarcopenia can aggravate each other. We suggest that in future clinical work, incorporating sarcopenia into risk scores will contribute to guide patient stratification and therapeutic strategy, particularly for the elderly.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42023392550).

Impact of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Analysis of Abdominal Adipose Tissue in Patients with Lymphoma

Quantitative abdominal adipose tissue analysis is important for obtaining information about prognosis and clinical outcomes on a wide array of diseases. In recent years, the effects of abdominal adipose tissue compartments in patients with lymphoma and the changes in their distribution after therapies have been studied. This information could facilitate the improvement of therapies in patients with lymphoma, to prevent or treat both visceral obesity and sarcopenia. Opportunistic analysis of body composition on computed tomography (CT) images might contribute to the improvement of patient management and clinical outcomes together with implementation of targeted patient-tailored therapies. The purpose of this literature review is to describe the role of CT to evaluate abdominal adipose tissue quantity and distribution in patients with lymphoma.

Current Therapeutic Targets in Cancer Cachexia: A Pathophysiologic Approach

Significant progress in our understanding of cancer cachexia has occurred in recent years. Despite these advances, no pharmacologic agent has achieved US Food and Drug Administration approval for this common and highly morbid syndrome. Fortunately, improved understanding of the molecular basis of cancer cachexia has led to novel targeted approaches that are in varying stages of drug development. This article reviews two major thematic areas that are driving these pharmacologic strategies, including those targeting signal mediators at the level of the CNS and skeletal muscle. Additionally, pharmacologic strategies are being tested in combination with targeted nutrients, nutrition therapy, and exercise to treat cancer cachexia. To this end, we highlight recently published and ongoing trials evaluating cancer cachexia therapies in these specific areas.

Adverse effects of systemic cancer therapy on skeletal muscle: myotoxicity comes out of the closet

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic cancer therapy-associated skeletal muscle wasting is emerging as a powerful impetus to the overall loss of skeletal muscle experienced by patients with cancer. This review explores the clinical magnitude and biological mechanisms of muscle wasting during systemic cancer therapy to illuminate this adverse effect. Emerging strategies for mitigation are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical findings include precise, specific measures of muscle loss over the course of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. All these therapeutic classes associate with quantitatively important muscle loss, independent of tumor response. Parallel experimental studies provide understanding of the specific molecular basis of wasting, which can include inhibition of protein synthesis, proliferation and differentiation, and activation of inflammation, reactive oxygen species, autophagy, mitophagy, apoptosis, protein catabolism, fibrosis and steatosis in muscle. Strategies to mitigate these muscle-specific adverse effects of cancer therapy remain in the earliest stages of development.

SUMMARY

The adverse side effect of cancer therapy on skeletal muscle has been largely ignored in the development of cancer therapeutics. Given the extent to which loss of muscle mass and function can bear on patients' function and quality of life, protection/mitigation of these side effects is a research priority.