RNA Polymerase I Is Uniquely Vulnerable to the Small-Molecule Inhibitor BMH-21

Global kinetic mechanism describing single nucleotide incorporation for RNA polymerase I reveals fast UMP incorporation

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is responsible for synthesizing ribosomal RNA, which is the rate limiting step in ribosome biogenesis. We have reported wide variability in the magnitude of the rate constants defining the rate limiting step in sequential nucleotide additions catalyzed by Pol I. in this study we sought to determine if base identity impacts the rate limiting step of nucleotide addition catalyzed by Pol I. To this end, we report a transient state kinetic interrogation of AMP, CMP, GMP, and UMP incorporations catalyzed by Pol I. We found that Pol I uses one kinetic mechanism to incorporate all nucleotides. However, we found that UMP incorporation is faster than AMP, CMP, and GMP additions. Further, we found that endonucleolytic removal of a dimer from the 3' end was fastest when the 3' terminal base is a UMP. It has been previously shown that both downstream and upstream template sequence identity impacts the kinetics of nucleotide addition. The results reported here show that the incoming base identity also impacts the magnitude of the observed rate limiting step.

Reversible Kinetics in Multi-nucleotide Addition Catalyzed by S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II Reveal Slow Pyrophosphate Release

Eukaryotes express at least three nuclear DNA dependent RNA polymerases (Pols). Pols I, II, and III synthesize ribosomal (r) RNA, messenger (m) RNA, and transfer (t) RNA, respectively. Pol I and Pol III have intrinsic nuclease activity conferred by the A12.2 and C11 subunits, respectively. In contrast, Pol II requires the transcription factor (TF) IIS to confer robust nuclease activity. We recently reported that in the absence of the A12.2 subunit Pol I reverses bond formation by pyrophosphorolysis in the absence of added PPi, indicating slow PPi release. Thus, we hypothesized that Pol II, naturally lacking TFIIS, would reverse bond formation through pyrophosphorolysis. Here we report the results of transient-state kinetic experiments to examine the addition of nine nucleotides to a growing RNA chain catalyzed by Pol II. Our results indicate that Pol II reverses bond formation by pyrophosphorolysis in the absence of added PPi. We propose that, in the absence of endonuclease activity, this bond reversal may represent kinetic proofreading. Thus, given the hypothesis that Pol I evolved from Pol II through the incorporation of general transcription factors, pyrophosphorolysis may represent a more ancient form of proofreading that has been evolutionarily replaced with nuclease activity.

Chromatin damage generated by DNA intercalators leads to degradation of RNA Polymerase II

In cancer therapy, DNA intercalators are mainly known for their capacity to kill cells by inducing DNA damage. Recently, several DNA intercalators have attracted much interest given their ability to inhibit RNA Polymerase I transcription (BMH-21), evict histones (Aclarubicin) or induce chromatin trapping of FACT (Curaxin CBL0137). Interestingly, these DNA intercalators lack the capacity to induce DNA damage while still retaining cytotoxic effects and stabilize p53. Herein, we report that these DNA intercalators impact chromatin biology by interfering with the chromatin stability of RNA polymerases I, II and III. These three compounds have the capacity to induce degradation of RNA polymerase II and they simultaneously enable the trapping of Topoisomerases TOP2A and TOP2B on the chromatin. In addition, BMH-21 also acts as a catalytic inhibitor of Topoisomerase II, resembling Aclarubicin. Moreover, BMH-21 induces chromatin trapping of the histone chaperone FACT and propels accumulation of Z-DNA and histone eviction, similarly to Aclarubicin and CBL0137. These DNA intercalators have a cumulative impact on general transcription machinery by inducing accumulation of topological defects and impacting nuclear chromatin. Therefore, their cytotoxic capabilities may be the result of compounding deleterious effects on chromatin homeostasis.

Transcription elongation mechanisms of RNA polymerases I, II, and III and their therapeutic implications

Transcription is a tightly regulated, complex, and essential cellular process in all living organisms. Transcription is comprised of three steps, transcription initiation, elongation, and termination. The distinct transcription initiation and termination mechanisms of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III (Pols I, II, and III) have long been appreciated. Recent methodological advances have empowered high-resolution investigations of the Pols' transcription elongation mechanisms. Here, we review the kinetic similarities and differences in the individual steps of Pol I-, II-, and III-catalyzed transcription elongation, including NTP binding, bond formation, pyrophosphate release, and translocation. This review serves as an important summation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) Pol I, II, and III kinetic investigations which reveal that transcription elongation by the Pols is governed by distinct mechanisms. Further, these studies illustrate how basic, biochemical investigations of the Pols can empower the development of chemotherapeutic compounds.

Quantifying the impact of initial RNA primer length on nucleotide addition by RNA polymerase I

Transient state kinetic studies of eukaryotic DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (Pols) in vitro provide quantitative characterization of enzyme activity at the level of individual nucleotide addition events. Previous work revealed heterogeneity in the rate constants governing nucleotide addition by yeast RNA polymerase I (Pol I) for each position on a template DNA. In contrast, the rate constants that described nucleotide addition by yeast RNA polymerase II (Pol II) were more homogeneous. This observation led to the question, what drives the variability of rate constants governing RNA synthesis by Pol I? Are the kinetics of nucleotide addition dictated by the position of the nascent RNA within the polymerase or by the identity of the next encoded nucleotide? In this study, we examine the impact of nucleotide position (i.e. nascent RNA primer length) on the rate constants governing nine sequential nucleotide addition events catalyzed by Pol I. The results reveal a conserved trend in the observed rate constants at each position for all primer lengths used, and highlight that the 9-nucleotide, or 9-mer, RNA primer provides the fastest observed rate constants. These findings suggest that the observed heterogeneity of rate constants for RNA synthesis by Pol I in vitro is driven primarily by the template sequence.

Protocol for monitoring and analyzing single nucleotide incorporation by S. cerevisiae RNA polymerases

Here we present an optimized protocol for monitoring and analyzing single nucleotide incorporation by RNA polymerases. This protocol describes the assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase I elongation complexes in a promoter-independent system in vitro. We describe how to collect a time course using a quench-flow, a rapid mixing instrument, and subsequently resolve reactions on a polyacrylamide gel. Finally, we detail how to quantify the gel images. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Appling et al. (2015).1.

Regulation of RNA Polymerase I Stability and Function

RNA polymerase I is a highly processive enzyme with fast initiation and elongation rates. The structure of Pol I, with its in-built RNA cleavage ability and incorporation of subunits homologous to transcription factors, enables it to quickly and efficiently synthesize the enormous amount of rRNA required for ribosome biogenesis. Each step of Pol I transcription is carefully controlled. However, cancers have highjacked these control points to switch the enzyme, and its transcription, on permanently. While this provides an exceptional benefit to cancer cells, it also creates a potential cancer therapeutic vulnerability. We review the current research on the regulation of Pol I transcription, and we discuss chemical biology efforts to develop new targeted agents against this process. Lastly, we highlight challenges that have arisen from the introduction of agents with promiscuous mechanisms of action and provide examples of agents with specificity and selectivity against Pol I.