Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Management of Cancer Pain: a Meta Analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present investigation assesses efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on relief of cancer or chemotherapy-related pain. Patients with cancer experience a relatively high prevalence of pain that is reportedly undertreated. Therefore, this analysis is pertinent to determine if TENS is a useful complementary therapy considering its increase in accessibility and minimal side effect profile.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic search for eligible studies from PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Embase was performed. The present investigation elucidated any significant differences between change in numeric rating scale of average and maximum pain scores between a TENS and non-TENS group. A nonsignificant difference was reported between TENS and non-TENS, with a mean difference of - 0.393 (95% CI - 1.780, 0.993; P = 0.578). For change in maximum pain reported, a nonsignificant difference was also found, with a mean difference of 0.128 (95% CI - 1.158, 1.414; P = 0.845).

CONCLUSION

Related to various limitations of this meta-analysis, no definitive conclusions could be concluded regarding efficacy of TENS in the treatment of cancer or chemotherapy-related pain. Additional randomized primary studies with standardized treatment protocols and pain measurements are needed for future meta-analysis and recommendations for clinical practice.

Effectiveness of Massage Therapy for Cancer Pain, Quality of Life and Anxiety Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

To synthesise the effectiveness of massage therapy for cancer pain, quality of life and anxiety among patients with cancer.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the effects of massage therapy on cancer pain, quality of life or anxiety in patients with cancer pain were eligible. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation were used to assess the quality of studies. Outcomes were pooled using standardised mean differences and narratively synthesised when meta-analysis was not possible.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations were searched for English peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published from inception to 8 January 2024.

RESULTS

Thirty-six RCTs involving 3671 participants were included. Massage therapy significantly improved pain (pooled SMD = -0.51, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.33), quality of life (pooled SMD = 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-0.78 when higher scores indicate better quality of life; pooled SMD = -0.52, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.16 when higher scores indicate poorer quality of life) and anxiety (pooled SMD = -0.38, 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.18) post-intervention. All outcomes had very low certainty of evidence. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

This review found that massage therapy is beneficial to patients with cancer in improving pain, quality of life and anxiety. Healthcare institutions and healthcare professionals should recognise the value of massage therapy to enhance the care of patients with cancer pain.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023407311.

Complimentary Role of Comprehensive Palliative Care Treatment to Intrathecal Therapy: Case Report

Intrathecal therapy with implanted devices is often reported in some recommendations.for the management of difficult cancer pain However, data is often biased by optimistic view and poor assessment. We report a case of patient in which a comprehensive and complex palliative care treatment was effective in managing a patient who was implanted a subcutaneous port for intrathecal analgesia This patient had many characteristics of a difficult pain, really defined as refractory due to various negative prognostic pain factors, such as neuropathic pain and psychological distress.. A comprehensive pain management with a balanced approach including both interventional therapy and palliative care simultaneously, allowed to achieve optimal pain control. Terms such as intractable or refractory pain, have been ambiguously used in literature to select patients as candidates for implated pumps. A meaningful evaluation and a comprehensive treatment should be mandatory when using intrathecal anlgesia in patients with very difficult pain conditions.

Adapted physical activity programs for the prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal pain induced by aromatase inhibitors in non-metastatic breast cancer patient: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Aromatase inhibitor is associated with a high incidence of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Syndrome (AIMSS) in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to identify available information regarding the frameworks, models, or strategies of adapted physical activity (APA) programs implemented for the prevention and management of AIMSS.

METHODS

Search was realized by two independent reviewers in six databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data of included articles were extracted, and risk of bias analyzed.

RESULTS

Finally, 14 were included. No study has examined APA in the prevention of AIMSS. There is no solid evidence supporting the impact of APA on the management of AIMSS. However, evidence suggests that an APA program can reduce the worst joint pain and improve the quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Future research will enlighten clinical practices with the development of personalized APA programs in hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

Traditional laxatives in preventing opioid-induced constipation in adult patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) affects up to 90% of patients with cancer receiving long-term opioid-related analgesic therapy, resulting in various potential complications, compromised pain management and decreased quality of life. Laxatives stimulate or facilitate bowel evacuation. Traditional laxatives, such as polyethylene glycol and lactulose, are widely used because of their low cost, easy accessibility and tolerability. OIC prophylaxis with laxatives is recommended for patients receiving opioid therapy. However, systematic reviews that support this practice are lacking. They have primarily focused on patients with existing constipation and the effectiveness of other pharmacological therapies. Thus, we are conducting a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional laxatives in preventing OIC in adult patients with cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 statement was used to guide the reporting of this protocol. Database searches will be performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and EBSCO from inception to a date within 6 months of the submission of the full systematic review (estimated 31 December 2024). Reference lists will also be accessed for additional studies, including Google Scholar, for the inclusion of grey literature. A combination of Medical Subject Headings/Emtree and free-text terms will be used when searching the core concepts of 'OIC', 'laxative' and 'cancer.' The eligibility criteria will be defined by the type of population (patients with cancer receiving opioid therapy), type of intervention (traditional laxatives) and type of study (randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials). Two reviewers will independently select eligible studies, extract data and assess the methodological risk of bias. A third reviewer will be invited to reach a consensus if necessary. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required, as patients will not be included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We will publish this study in a peer-reviewed journal and communicate the results at open conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42024507127.

Cancer-related pain in long-term survivors of oncological diseases: results of a survey on the current care situation

PURPOSE

The increasing survival rates of oncology patients have led to a corresponding increase in long-time survivors living with chronic cancer-related pain. Data is scarce on the care situation for this distinct clinical entity and on specific therapy requirements, such as interdisciplinary, multimodal pain therapy (IMPT). Our cross-sectional study aimed to assess the current care situation, distinct chronification factors, and optimization potential. This survey addresses this need in Germany, but also provides results with international implications.

METHODS

Via an online survey, German Pain Society members involved in the treatment of long-time survivors with chronic cancer-related pain assessed the current care situation, chronification factors, specific treatment needs, and the required practitioner's expertise. The German Pain Society's Cancer Pain Working Group created the non-validated questionnaire using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine Pain Society members across 70% of Germany's postal regions answered our survey. Respondents (primarily physicians, and 75% with + 6 years of experience) assessed the care situation as worse for chronic cancer-related pain compared to acute pain. Only 10% of the sites provided specific therapy for chronic cancer-related pain (mostly via outpatient treatment). Compared to non-cancer-related pain, additional, cancer-specific chronification factors were assumed, especially at psychological levels, and these need incorporating into therapies. A majority of practitioners recommended cancer-specific IMPT and specific pain expertise for this distinct clinical entity.

CONCLUSIONS

Members from the German Pain Society assume that there are relevant deficits in the care of long-term survivors with chronic cancer-related pain. The situation may be assessed differently by other groups, e.g., oncologists, and the data relates to Germany. Nevertheless, considering the raising survival rates, it can be supposed that there is reason to be concerned about an increasing care deficit. Thus, besides expanding the range of available treatment and raising awareness, IMPT with specially trained personnel should be developed to address the care needs of cancer survivors experiencing chronic cancer-related pain.

Exploring shared targets in cancer immunotherapy and cancer-induced bone pain: Insights from preclinical studies

Cancer casts a profound shadow on global health, with pain emerging as one of the dominant and severe complications, particularly in advanced stages. The effective management of cancer-induced pain remains an unmet need. Emerging preclinical evidence suggests that targets related to tumor immunotherapy may also modulate cancer-related pain pathways, thus offering a promising therapeutic direction. This review, focusing on more than ten molecular targets that link cancer immunotherapy and cancer-induced bone pain, underscores their potential to tackle both aspects in the context of comprehensive cancer care. Emphasizing factors such as types of cancer, drug administration methods, and sex differences in the analgesic efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents provides neuroscientific insights into personalized pain management for patients with cancer.

[Treatment of cancer-related pain-From pharmacotherapy to invasive procedures]

Depending on the stage of the tumor up to 80% of the patients suffer from cancer-related pain but treatment is often inadequate. Multiple causes can trigger pain and these can be due to the tumor itself, its secondary consequences but also treatment related. A differentiated assessment and individually tailored treatment of cancer-related pain not only improve the quality of life but also reduce the risk of pain chronification. A differentiation between nociceptive pain and pain caused by hypersensitivity is a mandatory requirement for adequate pharmacotherapy. There is a risk of inadequate pain control, particularly with a lack of consideration and treatment of hypersensitivity, e.g., with anticonvulsants or analgesic antidepressants. Opioids are an integral part of drug treatment for cancer-related pain and especially for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain. The risk of abuse should be considered. Other substance groups are suitable for special pain situations or in cases refractory to treatment. Nonpharmacological treatment options should also be considered, in particular by offering low-threshold access to psychotherapeutic or psycho-oncological options. Invasive procedures can be a useful supplement. These range from patient-controlled subcutaneous or intravenous infusion pump systems and intrathecal drug administration up to neurolytic and ablative procedures. Due to the invasiveness of these procedures, an interdisciplinary approach is recommended to confirm the indications.

The relationship between the quality of oncology nursing care and the resiliency and hope of patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer require emotional support in addition to specialised medical treatments for their physical ailments. The quality of nursing care, resilience and hope can influence a person's cancer trajectory, and understanding these factors and their relationship can be influential in improving the process for these patients.

AIM

This study examined the relationship between the quality of oncology nursing care and resilience and hope in patients with cancer.

METHODS

The present study is a descriptive analytics study conducted on 160 patients with cancer from April-August 2023. The data collection tools included four questionnaires: a demographic information questionnaire, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RSC), the Snyder Hope Scale, and the Oncology Nursing Care Quality Scale. The data were analysed using SPSS version 22 statistical software.

RESULTS

In examining the relationship between demographic 'variables' and 'resilience', marital status and place of residence had statistically significant correlations (P<0.05). Place of residence, education level, job and first cancer treatment (P=0.004) had statistically significant correlations with hope (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between the quality of oncology nursing (QON) and its domain with two variables: 'resilience' (P=0.76) and 'hope' (P=0.37). However, a statistically significant relationship existed between the variables 'resilience' and 'hope' (P<0.001). The linear regression model results showed that among the entered demographic variables, only the variable 'hope' predicted resilience (P<0.001; R=27%). Additionally, the 'resilience' variables (P<0.001) and the 'first cancer treated' variable (P=0.001; R=34%) were predictors of 'hope'.

CONCLUSION

Given the interrelationship between 'resilience' and 'hope' for patients with cancer, it is necessary to focus on the factors that impact these qualities. In addition, paying attention to the concept of resilience can improve the level of hope in patients with cancer. Based on the results, it is recommended that interventions to increase QON in patients with cancer be planned and implemented.

Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement

The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.

Unraveling impact and potential mechanisms of baseline pain on efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients: a retrospective and bioinformatic analysis

Objective

Pain is a prevalent discomfort symptom associated with cancer, yet the correlations and potential mechanisms between pain and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy remain uncertain.

Methods

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the inpatient department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, were retrospectively enrolled. Through cox regression analysis, prognostic factors and independent prognostic factors affecting the efficacy of ICIs were identified, and a nomogram model was constructed. Hub cancer-related pain genes (CRPGs) were identified through bioinformatic analysis. Finally, the expression levels of hub CRPGs were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

Before PSM, a total of 222 patients were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate cox analysis indicated that bone metastasis and NRS scores were independent prognostic factors for the efficacy of ICIs. After PSM, a total of 94 people were enrolled in this study. Univariate cox analysis and multivariate cox analysis indicated that age, platelets, Dnlr, liver metastasis, bone metastasis, and NRS scores were independent prognostic factors for the efficacy of ICIs. A nomogram was constructed based on 6 independent prognostic factors with AUC values of 0.80 for 1-year, 0.73 for 2-year, and 0.80 for 3-year survival. ELISA assay results indicated that the level of CXCL12 significantly decreased compared to baseline after pain was relieved.

Conclusion

Baseline pain is an independent prognostic factor affecting the efficacy of ICIs in lung cancer, potentially through CXCL12-mediated inflammation promotion and immunosuppression.

Changes in perceived distress among patients receiving inpatient palliative care

CONTEXT

Understanding the impact of palliative care on patient outcomes is crucial for enhancing end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine changes in perceived distress among patients receiving inpatient palliative care.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from a palliative care unit in central Taiwan between January and December 2021. Patients were categorized into "survived to discharge" and "non-survivor" groups based on discharge status. The Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS) was used to measure subjective distress daily during hospitalization. SAS scores on the admission day were compared to days 3 and 7, with changes analyzed using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were included in the study. Significant differences in symptom intensity changes were observed for sleep disturbance, appetite problems, bowel issues, breathing difficulties, fatigue, and pain during the first week of hospitalization. In the "non-survivor" group, improvements in pain were noted over time; however, distress related to appetite, bowel function, and fatigue worsened. Conversely, the "survived to discharge" group showed continuous improvement in sleep disturbance and breathing distress throughout the hospitalization period.

CONCLUSION

This study offers insights into how inpatient palliative care differentially influences perceived distress based on patients' end-of-life stage. Enhancements in palliative care approaches are needed to more comprehensively support patients, particularly those nearing the end of life.

Cancer pain self-management interventions in adults: scoping review

BACKGROUND

The predominant trend in cancer treatment now leans towards outpatient care, placing the responsibility of pain management largely on the patients themselves. Moreover, a significant portion of treatment for advanced cancer occurs in the home environment, so patient self-management becomes increasingly crucial for the effective treatment of cancer pain.

OBJECTIVES

To map self-management for pain in patients with cancer at all phases of the disease before examining the potential of pain self-care interventions for ill patients with cancer.

METHODS

A search was conducted on six electronic databases to locate studies published in English, from 2013 to 2023. We followed Arskey and O'Malley's Scoping Reviews guidelines.

RESULTS

This study thoroughly examined the provision of cancer pain self-management by healthcare professionals and identified four intervention types from 23 studies. Education emerged as the most prevalent form of self-management for cancer pain.

CONCLUSION

Guiding patients in managing their pain effectively, starting from their hospitalisation and extending to their discharge.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Is it an Effective Treatment for Cancer Pain?

Cancer is a major public health issue, with an estimated 20 million new cases and 9.7 million cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2022. Approximately 44.5% of patients experience cancer pain, significantly impacting their quality of life and causing physical and psychological burdens. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, shows potential in managing cancer pain. This review summarizes current research on rTMS for cancer pain, focusing on pain directly caused by tumors, pain from cancer treatments, postoperative pain, and cancer-related symptoms. Additionally, rTMS shows promise in improving cancer-related fatigue, anxiety, depression, and cognitive dysfunction, which can indirectly reduce cancer pain. The analgesic mechanisms of rTMS include inhibiting nociceptive signal transmission in the spinal cord, modulating hemodynamic changes in brain regions, and promoting endogenous opioid release. High-frequency stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) has shown significant analgesic effects, improving patients' emotional and cognitive functions and overall quality of life. rTMS has a favorable safety profile, with most studies reporting no severe adverse events. In conclusion, rTMS holds substantial potential for cancer pain management, offering a non-invasive and multifaceted therapeutic approach. Continued research and clinical application are expected to establish rTMS as an essential component of comprehensive cancer pain treatment strategies, significantly enhancing the overall well-being of patients with cancer.

Pain in Palliative Cancer Patients - Analysis of the German National Palliative Care Registry

CONTEXT

Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life in patients with progressive diseases such as cancer. Effective cancer pain management is a major challenge of palliative treatment. Empirical data on the prevalence of cancer pain, the efficiency of pain treatment and influencing factors are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we investigated pain in cancer patients treated on inpatient palliative care wards in Germany.

METHODS

N = 4779 data sets provided by the German Palliative Care Registry from yearly evaluation periods between 2015 and 2020 were included. Pain ratings were assessed by professionals through a checklist of symptoms and problems (HOPE-SP-CL).

RESULTS

More than half of the included patients suffered from moderate/severe pain at the beginning of inpatient palliative care and in 71% of these patients, pain relief was achieved at the end of inpatient treatment. Pain intensity, depression and ECOG performance status at admission were weak predictors of later pain relief. The highest pain intensity at the beginning and least pain relief were found in patients with bone and cartilage cancer. The highest percentage of adequate pain control (81%) was seen in 2020.

CONCLUSION

Data from the German Palliative Care Registry confirmed that although increasingly better addressed over the years, insufficiently controlled cancer pain remains a challenge for palliative care units. Patient-specific (e.g. psychological comorbidity) and cancer-related (e.g. bone or cartilage cancer) risk factors for poor pain treatment underline the need for individualized multimodal pain management including psychological support.

Pain, symptoms and therapy satisfaction in adult oncologic patients at admission to palliative care: An Italian prospective, multicenter, observational study

BACKGROUND

Pain in cancer patients is a complex clinical problem. Pain is systematically assessed and treated during palliative care, but little is known about how it is addressed before starting palliative care.

AIM

This study primarily analyzed pain, symptoms, ongoing therapy at patients' admittance to the palliative care unit, and the relationships between pain and tumor, comorbidities, performance status and quality of life (QoL). Notably, patient satisfaction with the received antalgic therapy was assessed.

METHODS

A multicentric, prospective, observational study was conducted in seven Italian palliative centers. The population consisted of adult cancer patients admitted to specialist palliative care units in hospice and home care.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 476 patients. Ninety-three patients reported moderate pain of 4.0 and worst pain of 5.9 at the initial medical examination. The pain was high, and QoL was lower in breakthrough pain. The pain was lower in older subjects when it was discontinuous and when it was also treated with corticosteroids. A total of 61% of the patients were unsatisfied with the prescribed pain therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Before the beginning of palliative care, physicians do not manage pain adequately. We support the idea that palliative care is not only intended for the last days of life but must be started early and simultaneously with oncological treatments. All that, in our opinion, is often ignored, and we hope that our study could have a positive influence and that the study results stimulate further research in this area with in-depth studies.

Patient-reported outcomes in neuro-oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide up-to-date evidence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in neuro-oncology, with a focus on the core constructs of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the use of PROs in clinical trials and clinical practice.[Supplemental Digital Content: Video Abstract PROs in Neuro-Oncology.mov].

RECENT FINDINGS

PROs are gaining importance in brain tumor research and medical care. For patients with a brain tumor, core PRO constructs are pain, difficulty communicating, perceived cognition, seizures, symptomatic adverse events, physical functioning and role and social functioning, which are assessed through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Initiatives have been taken to improve the reliability and robustness of PRO data, including standardization of items included in clinical trial protocols (the SPIRIT-PRO extension) and formulation of PRO priority objectives for use in clinical trials (the SISAQOL-Innovative Medicines Initiative). In brain tumor patients with cognitive impairment, caregiver-reported outcomes may complement or replace PROs to increase accuracy. The next key challenge will be to widely implement PROs and apply PRO data in clinical practice to benefit patients with brain tumors.

SUMMARY

PROs are clinically relevant endpoints providing information only known by the patient. Standardization of the use of PROs in clinical trials and wide implementation in clinical practice is needed to improve HRQoL of brain tumor patients.

Perceptions of the effects of recorded hypnosis and relaxation interventions for cancer survivors with chronic pain

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors with chronic pain experience pain relief with hypnosis and relaxation approaches; however, the effects of hypnosis and relaxation audio recording interventions on chronic pain have not yet been described from the perspective of the cancer survivor. The purpose of this study was to better understand cancer survivors' experiences using hypnosis and relaxation interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with 109 cancer survivors experiencing chronic pain were assigned to the hypnosis (n = 55) or relaxation (n = 54) audio recordings. Participants listened to audio recordings daily for four weeks. A structured interview was conducted post-treatment to explore participants' experience in using either the recorded hypnosis or relaxation intervention. Two reviewers independently conducted thematic analysis on all transcripts and then organized findings to identify salient themes.

RESULTS

Qualitative interviews were completed by 77 (71 %) of the participants. Cancer survivors who listened to either the hypnosis or relaxation audio recordings described similar effects of the interventions. Four major themes were identified: (1) pain relief, (2) control over pain, (3) improvement in other symptoms, and (4) positive experiences. Central to the participants' experiences, the interventions gave them another tool to manage their pain.

CONCLUSION

The unique perspectives of cancer survivors with chronic pain add to our understanding of the effectiveness of hypnosis and relaxation audio recordings in the management of chronic pain. These interventions are described as having both physical and psychological benefits for cancer survivors.

High-dose opioids in advanced cancer: use factors-retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate factors associated with high-dose opioid use in patients with advanced cancer and examine the effect of high-dose opioid use on patients' survival.

METHODS

This study retrospectively searched the medical records of 416 patients with advanced cancer in a home-based hospice in central China. Age, sex, type of cancer, type of pain, the maximum oral morphine equivalent daily dose, type of opioid, preadmission oral morphine equivalent daily dose, lung cancer or not, bone metastases, opioid switch and survival time were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 416 subjects included from the 455 eligible participants (91.4%). 80 patients (19.2%) received high-dose opioids at home. Male (OR 2.471; 95% CI 1.054 to 5.792; p=0.037), preadmission morphine equivalent daily dose (OR 1.022; 95% CI 1.016 to 1.028; p=0.000) and the use of morphine at maximum morphine equivalent daily dose (OR 5.123; 95% CI 1.249 to 21.014; p=0.023) were positively predicted high-dose opioid use. No difference in survival was found when comparing the high-dose and very high-dose opioid use groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Male home-based patients with advanced cancer who use morphine and have greater preadmission opioid doses should be aware of the necessity for high-dose opioid use. Regulated opioid use in adequate amounts does not shorten survival.

Real-world usage pattern, effectiveness and safety of oral tramadol/dexketoprofen trometamol fixed-dose combination in moderate-to-severe acute pain in Asia: a prospective, multicentre, observational study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the usage pattern, effectiveness and safety of oral tramadol 75 mg and dexketoprofen trometamol 25 mg fixed-dose combination (TRAM/DKP FDC) in the short-term treatment of moderate-to-severe acute pain in real-world clinical practice in Asia.

DESIGN

Real-world, prospective, multicentre, observational, phase IV study.

SETTING

13 tertiary-care hospital sites across the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients aged 18-80 years prescribed TRAM/DKP FDC for the short-term (up to 5 days) treatment of moderate-to-severe acute pain.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients prescribed TRAM/DKP FDC with different types of postsurgical and non-surgical treatments, and the average dosing frequency and duration of TRAM/DKP FDC treatment. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥30% pain reduction at 8 hours post the first dose (pain severity was assessed using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale); patient satisfaction at the end of treatment (based on a 5-point Patient Global Evaluation Scale (PGE)) and safety including the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

RESULTS

Among 599 patients (median age 44 years, 61.3% female) enrolled in this study, 68.61% (n=411) were postsurgical and 31.39% (n=188) were non-surgical patients. TRAM/DKP FDC was prescribed in a diverse group of postsurgical patients (eg, orthopaedic, general and cancer surgery) as well as in non-surgical conditions (eg, lower back pain and musculoskeletal pain). In the majority of patients, TRAM/DKP FDC was prescribed every 8 hours (65.94%) and for 5 days (78.80%). There was a significant reduction in pain intensity throughout the study and 65% of patients achieved ≥30% pain reduction from baseline at 8 hours post the first dose of TRAM/DKP FDC on day 1. 95.69% of patients were satisfied with the treatment (rated good, very good and excellent on the PGE scale). Overall, 13.9% of patients reported ADRs; most were mild to moderate in severity. The most common ADRs were nausea, vomiting and dizziness.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that TRAM/DKP FDC was used in diverse types of postsurgical and non-surgical patients in the real-world setting in Asia. It effectively reduced pain and was well tolerated with a high level of patient satisfaction.

Impact of pain on functional status and quality of life in Jordanian women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently, breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer affecting women, and the number of newly diagnosed cases continues to increase both in Jordan and globally. Upon receiving a cancer diagnosis, the suffering experienced by patients intensifies as they grapple with the debilitating side effects that hinder their ability to carry out routine activities.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the impact of cancer pain on functional status and quality of life (QOL) among Jordanian women with breast cancer.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional design and structured interviews were conducted in the Oncology Unit at Al-Bashir Hospital with a sample of 150 eligible Jordanian women with breast cancer who provided data on pain and functional status, and QOL using four Arabic questionnaires (brief pain inventory, functional status SF-12 questionnaire, and quality of life index) to measure pain and functional status and QOL, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and regression statistical test were utilized to analyze the study data.

RESULTS

A Significant positive correlation (r = 0.342) was found between cancer pain and functional status interference, a significant negative correlation (r = -0.134) between quality of life and functional status interference, and a significant negative correlation (r = -0.211) between pain and quality of life. Patients with higher intensity of cancer pain are more likely to experience low functional status and poor QOL.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer patients experience alterations in their quality of life as a result of cancer-related pain, which has a detrimental impact on their ability to carry out daily activities and disrupts their functional abilities. Healthcare providers must take these alterations into account and effectively handle them. Understanding the relationship between cancer pain and breast cancer can aid nurses in managing symptoms and providing holistic care, ultimately improving the quality of life.

Comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics, quality of life, and pain management in cancer patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Pain is the most common complaint among cancer patients, significantly impairing their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There is limited evidence on the characteristics of pain among cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pain, factors influencing pain intensity, and the association of pain severity with quality of life (QoL) among cancer patients. Secondary objectives included investigating perceived barriers to pain management and medication adherence among these patients.

METHODS

This multi-center, cross-sectional study enrolled adult patients (over 18 years old) with reported cancer diagnoses experiencing pain. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, educational status), clinical characteristics (e.g. cancer diagnosis, staging), and pain characteristics (e.g., duration, type, location, medicines used for pain management, etc.) were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain management Index, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Barriers Questionnaire II, Medication Adherence Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Four hundred and eight patients participated in the study. The mean ± SD age was 54.87 ± 15.65, with 226 patients (55.4%) being female. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical (17.6%), lung (11.8%), and colon/rectum (12.0%) cancers. The most common pain locations were the head and neck (27.0%); a majority (55.6%) reported pain duration of more than 3 months. Nociceptive pain was reported by 42.4% of patients; the mean ± SD of NRS was 4.31 ± 2.69, with 32.4% of patients experiencing moderate pain. Patients with mixed pain type (B = 1.458, p < 0.001) or pain in multiple sites (B = 1.175, p < 0.001), lower Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (B = -1.308, p < 0.001), and specific cancer diagnoses such as prostate (B = -2.045, p = 0.002), pancreatic (B = 1.852, p = 0.004), oesophageal (B = 1.674, p = 0.012), and ovarian cancer (B = 1.967, p = 0.047), experienced varying degrees of increased NRS score. The combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment modality was associated with a lower NRS score (B = -0.583, p = 0.017). A significant inverse relationship was observed between pain severity and global health status/QoL (B = -37.36, p < 0.001. Key barriers to pain management included moderate perceptions of physiological effects, communication issues between doctors and patients, and concerns about the harmful effects of pain medicine. The prevalence of non-adherence to pain medications was 13.97%.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study highlights the multi-faceted nature of pain management and QoL for cancer patients in Nepal with low-resource settings. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of pain perception in cancer patients, with mixed pain types, pain in multiple sites, lower KPS, and specific cancer diagnoses, all contributing significantly to pain severity. Additionally, pain severity was associated with declining QoL. These findings contribute valuable insights into the complex aspects of cancer pain and its broader implications for the well-being of patients, offering a foundation for targeted interventions and improved pain management strategies in the context of cancer care in low-resource settings.

BRAFV600E/p-ERK/p-DRP1(Ser616) Promotes Tumor Progression and Reprogramming of Glucose Metabolism in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Background: Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with the BRAFV600E mutation is associated with a poorer prognosis. BRAF inhibitors may demonstrate limited efficacy due to emerging drug resistance. The Warburg effect may have cancer therapeutic implications. It is not known if the BRAFV600E mutation is associated with altered glucose metabolism in PTC. Methods: This study examined the effect of BRAFV600E and dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) on various cellular processes in PTC cells, including cell proliferation, migration, invasion, mitochondrial fission, glucose metabolism, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and apoptosis. We used RT-qPCR to assess the expression of key glycolytic enzymes in thyroid cancer tissues. Additionally, the regulatory interaction between BRAFV600E and DRP1 was investigated through Western blot and immunohistochemical staining. We further evaluated the impact of DRP1 in PTC and the inhibitory effects of dabrafenib and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) in vitro and in vivo. Results: We found that the BRAFV600E mutation significantly augments aerobic glycolysis while suppressing oxidative phosphorylation in PTC. We identified the BRAFV600E/p-ERK/p-DRP1(Ser616) signaling pathway as a critical mediator in PTC progression. First, the BRAFV600E/p-ERK/p-DRP1(Ser616) signaling pathway enhances cell proliferation by upregulating hexokinase 2 expression and thereby increasing aerobic glycolysis. Second, it inhibits apoptosis by promoting mitochondrial fission and reducing ROS levels. Moreover, we demonstrated that the combination therapy of 2-DG and dabrafenib markedly impedes the progression of BRAFV600E-positive PTC. Conclusion: The BRAFV600E/p-ERK/p-DRP1(Ser616) signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in glucose metabolism reprogramming, contributing to the aggressiveness and progression of BRAFV600E-positive PTC. Our findings suggest that a combined therapeutic approach using 2-DG and dabrafenib has the potential to improve the outcome of PTC patients with BRAFV600E.

Prevalence of opioid misuse in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Long-term consequences of opioid consumption, such as misuse, have been a major concern in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Potentially opioid misuse may also be a consequence in patients with cancer in opioid treatment which encouraged us to undertake this systematic review assessing the frequency of opioid misuse in this population.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The search strategy comprised words related to cancer, opioid misuse, and frequency. PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and Cinahl were searched from inception to July 2023. Prospective studies were selected and analysed regarding frequency, study characteristics, and quality. A meta-analysis was possible to carry out for a sub-group (opioid misuse risk).

RESULTS

From 585 abstracts screened, six articles were included. Only prevalence data were found. The prevalence of opioid misuse ranged from 5.7% to 84%, while the prevalence of opioid misuse risk varied from 2.4% to 35.4%. The pooled prevalence of opioid misuse risk was 12.3% (95% CI: 0.8-36.3; I2 = 98.4%, 95% CI: 97.2-99.1). The studies differed regarding, e.g., methods, misuse definitions, and assessment instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies were identified and large differences in prevalence for opioid misuse and opioid misuse risk were observed. Methodological disparities and the studies quality underscore the importance of improved studies in the future.

Transcranial direct current stimulation in the management of pain in oncology patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in pain management in subjects with oncologic process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Several databases were searched in December 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials that evaluated the application of tDCS on pain in adults with oncologic process were selected. Random-effects meta-analysis with 95%CI were used to quantify the change scores in pain between tDCS and control groups.

RESULTS

Six trials with 482 participants were included. There were significant differences in favor of tDCS in pain intensity in surgical oncology patients compared to sham stimulation (p < 0.001). Non-surgical patients showed no significant effect. Meta-regression analysis in this group of patients showed that the timing of the evaluation moderated the effect of tDCS on pain (p= .042), with longer time after tDCS being associated with greater pain reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a-tDCS for at least 20 min, with a current density higher than 0.057 mA/cm2, applied over M1, left DLPFC, or the insula area, between 2-5 sessions appears to be an effective and safe treatment of pain in surgical oncology patients compared to sham. The tDCS appears to be more effective for high-intensity pain, and in the long term.

Prognosis and risk factor assessment of patients with advanced lung cancer with low socioeconomic status: model development and validation

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer, a major global health concern, disproportionately impacts low socioeconomic status (SES) patients, who face suboptimal care and reduced survival. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic performance of traditional Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) regression and machine learning models, specifically Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), in patients with advanced lung cancer with low SES.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHOD

The 949 patients with advanced lung cancer with low SES who entered the hospice ward of a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China, from January 2012 to December 2021 were randomized into training and testing groups in a 3:1 ratio. CoxPH regression methods and four machine learning algorithms (DT, RF, SVM, and XGBoost) were used to construct prognostic risk prediction models.

RESULTS

The CoxPH regression-based nomogram demonstrated reliable predictive accuracy for survival at 60, 90, and 120 days. Among the machine learning models, XGBoost showed the best performance, whereas RF had the lowest accuracy at 60 days, DT at 90 days, and SVM at 120 days. Key predictors across all models included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, quality of life (QOL) score, and cough symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

CoxPH, DT, RF, SVM, and XGBoost models are effective in predicting mortality risk over 60-120 days in patients with advanced lung cancer with low SES. Monitoring KPS, QOL, and cough symptoms is crucial for identifying high-risk patients who may require intensified care. Clinicians should select models tailored to individual patient needs and preferences due to varying prediction accuracies.

REPORTING METHOD

This study was reported in strict compliance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

[Influence of health care crises on the treatment of cancer pain: a presentation using the example of the COVID-19 pandemic from the provider's perspective]

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic led to significantly restricted access to pain medicine services. Patients with cancer-related pain are considered a vulnerable group in terms of care deficits. A questionnaire among providers providing treatment to this group was used to assess limitations and solutions in this critical situation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The online survey, developed by the 'Tumour Pain Working Group' of the German Pain Society using the Delphi method, included questions on site structure, pandemic-related care problems, and burdens experienced by those treating patients. It was distributed several times via the mailing lists of the German Pain Society and the 'Palliative Medicine Working Group' of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

RESULTS

In all, 175 fully completed questionnaires were analysed. Over 75% of participants reported pandemic-related staff shortages and closures of pain medicine facilities, with 32% of facilities temporarily not treating elective pain patients and 13% not treating any emergencies. Care was hampered by numerous logistical problems such as very frequent pandemic-related cancellations by patients or in the transmission of prescriptions. Alternative forms of consultation by telephone or telemedicine, rarely used before the pandemic, were reported by 79 and 31% of respondents respectively, but deficiencies were noted. In addition, 52.1% of respondents complained of severe and 26.8% of moderate psychological stress due to the pandemic, and 74.1% evaluated working conditions as moderately to severely difficult. Medical training was still possible for 86% through format changes.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed numerous deficits in the care of patients with cancer-related pain, as well as burdens on healthcare providers. The development of new concepts could help to ensure better care in future crisis situations.

Shifting Views on Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

CONTEXT

Strong opioids are the cornerstone in the treatment of cancer-related pain.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare analgesic effectiveness of different strong opioids for the treatment of cancer-related pain.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for RCTs that compared strong opioids for treatment of cancer-related pain against one another. A network meta-analysis was conducted and the related Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking (SUCRA)-based treatment ranks were calculated. Primary outcome was pain intensity (numerical rating scale (NRS)) and/or the percentage of patients with ≥50% pain reduction, after 1 and 2-4 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs (1813 patients) were included. Methadone showed, with a high certainty of evidence, increased ORs for treatment success at 1 week, compared with morphine, buprenorphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone, range 3.230-36.833. Methadone had the highest likelihood to be the treatment of preference (ToP) (SUCRA 0.9720). For fentanyl, ORs were lower, however significant and with high certainty. After 2-4 weeks, methadone again showed the highest likelihood for ToP, however, with moderate certainty and nonsignificant ORs. The combination of morphine/methadone, compared with morphine, buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, and oxycodone achieved a treatment effect of mean NRS difference after 2-4 weeks between -1.100 and -1.528 and had the highest likelihood for ToP.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that methadone possibly deserves further promotion as first-line treatment for the treatment of cancer-related pain.

Examining clinical pharmacist interventions and identifying opioid medication-related issues in patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Opioid medications are crucial for managing pain among patients with cancer. Yet, inappropriate prescribing and medication issues can compromise patient safety and quality of care. Clinical pharmacists play a significant role in optimizing opioid therapy and addressing issues related to opioid medication use.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine clinical pharmacist interventions and identify opioid medication-related issues in patients with cancer.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective observational study at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center in Lahore, Pakistan, conducting a chart review from 1st July 2021 to 31st December 2021.

RESULTS

Out of 10,534 opioid medication orders, we documented a total of 974 interventions based on our inclusion criteria. Tramadol and morphine accounted for most of these interventions, comprising 49.27% (n = 475) and 40.04% (n = 386), respectively. Regarding clinical significance, 41.70% (n = 406) were deemed significant, while 37.36% (n = 365) were somewhat significant. The majority of interventions, i.e., 54.05% (n = 521), primarily aimed at optimizing patient outcomes, followed by a secondary aim of improvements in communication, i.e., 25.52% (n = 246).

CONCLUSION

This study establishes the evaluation of clinical pharmacist interventions on opioid medication use in patients with cancer, an issue particularly in oncology settings in Pakistan. The findings emphasize the crucial role of clinical pharmacists in addressing issues related to opioid issue medications, thus improving patient safety and optimizing opioid use for patient well-being.

Association between sensory processing sensitivity and quality of life among cancer patients: a mediation and moderation of resilience and social determinants

BACKGROUND

Individuals with sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) tend to be overreactive in response to negative environmental stimuli. More is known about the positive relationship between SPS and quality of life (QoL); nevertheless, less is known regarding the roles of resilience and social determinants in this association. This research aimed to investigate the potential mediation effect of resilience and the moderation effect of social determinants on the relationship between SPS and QoL in a large sample of Chinese cancer patients.

METHODS

We used the most recent datasets from an ongoing project conducted in southwest China. A two-stage random sampling strategy with a probability proportionate to sample size (PPS) design was adopted. The associations between resilience, SPS, and QoL were evaluated using a linear regression model. Path analysis was adopted to examine the mediation of resilience.

RESULTS

Resilience was positively associated with quality of life, while increased sensory processing sensitivity was negatively associated with quality of life. The restricted cubic spline analysis revealed that as resilience increased, the coefficients of quality of life rapidly increased across all domains. Conversely, the coefficients for quality of life gradually decreased with the escalation of sensory processing sensitivity. Resilience was a significant mediator, accounting for 21.88% of the total SPS-QoL association. The mediation effect of resilience varied across ethnicity and sex.

CONCLUSION

Sensory processing sensitivity was significantly associated with quality of life in cancer patients, and promoting resilience could mitigate this negative impact. However, the effect of resilience varies across sex and ethnicity. Therefore, targeted resilience promotion interventions, especially those integrating social characteristics, should be considered for implementation.

Cannabis and opioid perceptions, co-use, and substitution among patients across 4 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers

Prescription opioids are used for managing pain in persons with cancer, however, there are socioeconomic and racial disparities in medication access. Cannabis is increasingly used for cancer symptom management and as an opioid alternative. Limited data are available about patterns of opioid and cannabis use among patients with cancer. We used survey data from 4 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in 3 states (n = 1220) to assess perceptions, use of cannabis and opioids for pain, their substitution, and racial and ethnic differences in each outcome. Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to use opioids for pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; P = .035) and more likely to report that cannabis was more effective than opioids (OR = 2.46; P = .03). Race effects were mitigated (P > .05) after controlling for socioeconomic factors. Further research is needed to understand cannabis and opioid use patterns and how overlapping social determinants of health create a disadvantage in cancer symptom management for Black patients.

Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer pain significantly impacts individuals' quality of life, with opioids being employed as the primary means for pain relief. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the adverse reactions and effectiveness of opioids such as morphine. Hydromorphone, recognized as a potent opioid, is a viable alternative for managing cancer-related pain. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness and safety characteristics of hydromorphone in comparison to other opioids, as well as different methods of administering this medication within the scope of cancer pain treatment.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on December 25th, 2023. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic investigation of databases was carried out, and suitable studies were chosen according to predetermined criteria (PICO framework). The meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

This review included 18 RCTs with 2271 patients who compared hydromorphone with morphine, oxycodone, or fentanyl, as well as other types of hydromorphone. Hydromorphone demonstrated efficacy similar to that of morphine and oxycodone in reducing cancer pain intensity, decreasing additional analgesic consumption, and improving quality of life. However, morphine showed slight superiority over hydromorphone in reducing breakthrough pain. Adverse events were comparable between hydromorphone and morphine or oxycodone. Patient-controlled and clinician-controlled hydromorphone administration routes yielded similar outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of this study substantiate the efficacy of hydromorphone in the management of cancer-related pain, demonstrating similar levels of effectiveness and safety as morphine and oxycodone. These findings are consistent with prior comprehensive analyses, suggesting that hydromorphone is a feasible choice for alleviating cancer-associated pain. Additional investigations are warranted to determine its efficacy in distinct patient cohorts and for different modes of administration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero registration ID: CRD42024517513. Link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails .

Management of Refractory Cancer Pain with Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation

Background

Intrathecal pumps (ITPs) are indicated for refractory cancer pain and decrease systemic opioid requirements. While not yet indicated for cancer pain, spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used off-label for cancer pain, with increasing evidence of their efficacy.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent both ITP and at least SCS trial for cancer pain. Primary outcomes were pain numeric rating scale (NRS) and daily morphine equivalents (MEQs).

Results

Seventeen patients were identified. Both ITP and SCS were associated with significant decreases in pain ratings at the 3-month follow-up, but this decrease became nonsignificant subsequently. ITP, but not SCS, was associated with a significant decrease in MEQ.

Conclusions

ITP and SCS may both provide efficacy for cancer pain, but the opioid-sparing effects of SCS may be limited. ITP and SCS may potentially be complementary in their ability to provide relief from cancer-related pain.

The Impact of Pain on Mobility in Patients with Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Provide an overview of how pain impacts mobility in patients with cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and on Google Scholar using search terms, cancer pain with mobility, acute and chronic pain syndromes, enhanced recovery after surgery, nursing care, and rehabilitation. Peer-reviewed research studies, review articles, and pain guidelines and position papers were reviewed to provide an overview on cancer pain, its impact on mobility, and the nurse's role in managing pain and optimizing mobility and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Firty-two references were included in this overview. This body of literature is replete with studies on the management of pain; however, the tie between pain and mobility has not been well described aside from the breakthrough pain literature. This manuscript weaves these two important concepts together to better inform nurses and other clinicians regarding the importance of managing pain to even begin mobilizing patients, especially following surgery and for other painful conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncology nurses play an integral role in assessing and managing cancer pain. It is important for nurses to recognize how their pain management interventions lead to improved mobility and functioning in patients with cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses comprise the largest workforce around the globe and are well-equipped to assess and manage cancer pain in all cancer care settings. As leaders within the healthcare team, making recommendations to better control pain and communicating with other team members regarding the pain plan is essential in improving mobility in patients with cancer.

A ratiometric electrochemical biosensor based on ARGET ATRP for detection of HER2 gene

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a common proto-oncogene, is overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer patients. It is essential to track HER2 expression for early breast cancer diagnosis. Herein, a ratiometric electrochemical biosensor for detection of HER2 based on activators generated by electron transfer for atom transfer radical polymerisation (AGET ATRP) and hairpin DNA was developed. Specifically, hairpin DNA was first self-assembled on the gold electrode by Au-S bond. Upon capturing HER2, the stem-loop structure of hairpin DNA was unfolded, the signal value of methylene blue (MB) decreased as it moved away from the electrode surface. cDNA was linked with HER2 by complementary base pairing to introduce amino group. Then, the initiator 2-bromo-2-methylpropionic acid (BMP) were connected to the amino group on the cDNA to activate ARGET ATRP. The detection performance of biosensors for HER2 was explored by the ratio signal between two signal molecules. Under optimal conditions, this ratiometric electrochemical biosensor shows good selectivity and stability with a wide detection range of 1-1 × 106 pM and a detection limit of 78.47 fM. Furthermore, the biosensor exhibits satisfactory anti-interference ability due to the hairpin DNA and dual signal system, and has promising application prospects in the detection of other DNA disease markers.

Systemic administration of Resolvin D1 reduces cancer-induced bone pain in mice: Lack of sex dependency in pain development and analgesia

AIMS

Bone cancer produces severe pain that is treated with opioids, but serious side effects limit opioid utilization. There is therefore a need to develop effective and safe non-opioid alternatives. The lipid mediator, Resolvin D1 (RvD1), could be a prospective candidate for cancer pain treatment. To assess RvD1 and other potential candidates, appropriate animal models that recapitulate clinical features must be used. Although several preclinical models of cancer pain have been developed, the influence of sex on the development of cancer pain and the effectiveness of RvD1 have not been studied.

RESULTS

Using a mouse model of fibrosarcoma growth in and around the calcaneus bone, we demonstrated that the mechanical hyperalgesia in the tumor-bearing hind paw develops independently of sex, except that it developed a little sooner in female mice. A single intravenous injection of RvD1 (0.001-10 μg/kg) decreased hyperalgesia in both sexes with similar potency (ED50 = 0.0015 μg/kg) and efficacy. Repeated daily administration of 10 μg/kg RvD1 prolonged the analgesic effect and completely abolished hyperalgesia. This was also independent of sex.

CONCLUSION

In this preclinical mouse model of bone cancer pain, the development of pain and the analgesic effectiveness of RvD1 are not influenced by sex.

Pain Intensity and Satisfaction of Pain Relief in Discharged Cancer Patients: A Large Sample Study in China

BACKGROUND

Many studies have focused on the quality of pain management in hospitalized patients with cancer pain, while what happens after discharge remains unclear.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pain intensity and satisfaction of pain relief among a large sample of Chinese patients with cancer pain after discharge.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational research.

SETTINGS AND SAMPLE

ABOUT: 1,013 patients were recruited in a tertiary cancer hospital, and their residence addresses were distributed in 6 geographical regions, including 26 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions.

METHODS

The 1,013 patients with cancer pain were discharged from the wards of a national cancer hospital in China from July 2020 to October 2021. A nurse in the pain clinic followed the patients based on a whole-process information system and collected the data after the cancer pain patients were discharged. The study methods followed the STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

The average age of 1,013 discharged patients was 61.30 (±12.56) years. Moderate and severe background pain (BGP) was reported in 749 patients (73.94%), and more than 3 instances of breakthrough pain (BTP) in the past 24 hours were reported in 541 patients (53.41%). More severe BGP was associated with more frequent BTP (p < .01). In addition, there were 572 patients (56.47%) whose satisfaction with pain relief was lower than 70%. More severe BGP was associated with a lower satisfaction degree (r = -0.796, p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain among discharged Chinese patients with cancer is poorly managed, and there is a low degree of satisfaction with pain relief. Nurses can do more work to assist cancer patients in managing pain more effectively by ensuring they have a plan to report and manage pain after discharge.

Enkephalins and Pain Modulation: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Perspectives

Enkephalins, a subclass of endogenous opioid peptides, play a pivotal role in pain modulation. Enkephalins primarily exert their effects through opioid receptors located widely throughout both the central and peripheral nervous systems. This review will explore the mechanisms by which enkephalins produce analgesia, emotional regulation, neuroprotection, and other physiological effects. Furthermore, this review will analyze the involvement of enkephalins in the modulation of different pathologies characterized by severe pain. Understanding the complex role of enkephalins in pain processing provides valuable insight into potential therapeutic strategies for managing pain disorders.

Prevalence and characterization of pain in radiation oncology: the PREDORT multicenter cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Pain in cancer patients has enormous impact on their quality-of-life. Radiation therapy (RT) is a cornerstone in cancer treatment. The objective of the PREDORT study is to estimate the prevalence of pain in patients attending at Radiation Oncology (RO) Services.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter study was designed for patients treated at the RO Services of reference hospitals. Patients were seen in their initial Nursing consultation, during which key data was collected, including demographic and comorbidities data, medical history, and oncological and pain characteristics. The study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Navarra, and all patients signed the Informed Consent.

RESULTS

Of the 860 participating patients, 306 reported some type of pain, which implies a prevalence of 35.6%. Of them, 213 identified a cause of oncological origin. The proportion of pain was similar among sexes, but the proportion of non-cancer pain was higher among women (p < 0.05). Regarding pain intensity, the magnitude of breakthrough pain in patients with oncological pain is nearly 1 point greater than in patients with non-oncological pain (7.53 vs 6.81; p = 0.064). Cancer pain is more likely to be limiting of normal life than non-cancer pain (59% versus 38%, p < 0.001). Regarding analgesic treatment, only 60/306 patients (19.6%) were receiving strong opioids. There were 68 patients with pain without any treatment (22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pain in cancer patients referred to RO services is 35.6%, with the prevalence of exclusively oncological pain being 24.8%. Understanding and addressing oncological pain is essential to provide comprehensive care to patients.

Cannabis Use Is Associated with Pain Severity and Interference Among Cancer Survivors

Context

Cannabis use for symptom management among individuals with cancer is increasingly common.

Objectives

We sought to describe the (1) prevalence and characteristics of cannabis use, (2) perceived therapeutic benefits of cannabis use, and (3) examine how use of cannabis was associated with self-reported pain, mood, and general health outcomes in a representative sample of patients treated at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute.

Methods

We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional survey developed in conjunction with 11 other NCI-designated cancer centers and distributed to eligible individuals. The survey inquired about characteristics of cannabis use, perception of therapeutic benefits, pain, mood, and general health. Responses were population weighted. We examined the association of cannabis use with self-reported pain, mood, and general health using logistic regression controlling for relevant sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 523 individuals were included in our analytic sample. A total of 54% endorsed using cannabis at any time since their cancer diagnosis and 42% endorsed using cannabis during active treatment. The most commonly endorsed reasons for use included the following: sleep disturbance (54.7%), pain (47.1%), and mood (42.6%). We found that moderate pain was associated with more than a twofold (odds ratio = 2.4 [95% confidence interval = 1.3-4.6], p = 0.002) greater likelihood of self-reported cannabis use. Depressed mood and general health were not associated with cannabis use.

Conclusions

In a state that had early adoption of medical and recreational cannabis legislation, a high number of cancer survivors report cannabis use. Moderate or more severe pain was associated with an increased likelihood to use cannabis, while mood and general health were not associated. Oncologists should be aware of these trends and assess use of cannabis when managing long-term symptoms of cancer and its treatments.

Pain prevalence and pain relief in end-of-life care - a national registry study

BACKGROUND

Despite pain control being a top priority in end-of-life care, pain continues to be a troublesome symptom and comprehensive data on pain prevalence and pain relief in patients with different diagnoses are scarce.

METHODS

The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) was used to retrieve data from 2011 to 2022 about pain during the last week of life. Data were collected regarding occurrence of pain, whether pain was relieved and occurrence of severe pain, to examine if pain differed between patients with cancer, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia. Binary logistic regression models adjusted for sex and age were used.

RESULTS

A total of 315 000 patients were included in the study. Pain during the last week of life was more commonly seen in cancer (81%) than in dementia (69%), heart failure (68%) or COPD (57%), also when controlled for age and sex, p < 0.001. Severe forms of pain were registered in 35% in patients with cancer, and in 17-21% in non-cancer patients. Complete pain relief (regardless of pain intensity) was achieved in 73-87% of those who experienced pain, depending on diagnosis. The proportion of patients with complete or partial pain relief was 99.8% for the whole group.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of pain, including severe pain, was less common in patients with heart failure, COPD or dementia, compared to patients with cancer. Compared with cancer, pain was more often fully relieved for patients with dementia, but less often in heart failure and COPD. As severe pain was seen in about a third of the cancer patients, the study still underlines the need for better pain management in the imminently dying.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No trial registration was made as all patients were deceased and all data were retrieved from The Swedish Register of Palliative Care database.

Spanish Society of Medical Oncology recommendations for comprehensive assessment and care of cancer survivors' needs

This article reviews the contemporary and inclusive definition of cancer survivorship, including patients with and without disease who have completed or continue to undergo treatment. The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) describes in this article the needs of these patients and outlines a care model based on an estimation of cancer incidence and identification of patient needs, to enable the provision of practical actions to achieve effective care. The objectives of this review are to identify the main effects of cancer on survivors and to establish appropriate ways of measuring these effects, as well as discussing the management of physical, psychological and social, occupational, financial, and other health-related needs. We suggest a multidisciplinary care model and training programs for the different professionals involved in care, and highlight challenges and the future role of the SEOM and health-care policy in ensuring optimum care of cancer survivors.

Opioid Access among Advanced Cancer Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Asia

CONTEXT

Most cancer-associated pain is experienced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to inequitable access to opioids.

OBJECTIVE

To determine opioid access as estimated by both patients and providers and to understand patient and facility-level factors influencing access among patients with advanced cancer in LMICs in Asia using the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.

METHODS

The APPROACH cross-sectional study was conducted in seven LMICs in Asia, involving in-depth surveys with providers and advanced cancer patients. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used to assess predisposing (i.e. individual factors), enabling (i.e. health care system and facility-level resources) and need (i.e. pain severity) factors predicting opioid access.

RESULTS

Among patient participants (n=1,933), approximately 40% reported opioid use. Meanwhile 80% of facilities, as reported by providers, indicated at least half of their advanced cancer patients receive oral morphine prescriptions. Predisposing characteristics factored in the least in the model, with patient education positively associated with access (Odds ratio (OR): 1.01; 95% CI=1.00, 1.03). Facility-level enabling resources, factoring the most, included oral morphine prescription duration >14 days (OR: 1.27; 95% CI=1.05, 1.53) and the extent of physician palliative care training (extensive (>160 hours) OR: 3.95; CI=3.19, 4.88; basic (up to 40 hours) OR: 1.03; CI=1.03, 1.04). Patient need as indicated by greater pain severity predicted access (OR: 1.55; CI=1.47, 1.64).

CONCLUSION

Study findings emphasize the importance of palliative care training-even a minimal amount-in supporting access to opioids for advanced cancer patients. This study also highlights pragmatic site-level policies, such as extended morphine prescription durations, enabling access.

Current evidence supporting associations of DNA methylation measurements with survivorship burdens in cancer survivors: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Identifying reliable biomarkers that reflect cancer survivorship symptoms remains a challenge for researchers. DNA methylation (DNAm) measurements reflecting epigenetic changes caused by anti-cancer therapy may provide needed insights. Given lack of consensus describing utilization of DNAm data to predict survivorship issues, a review evaluating the current landscape is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

Provide an overview of current studies examining associations of DNAm with survivorship burdens in cancer survivors.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted including studies if they focused on cohorts of cancer survivors, utilized peripheral blood cell DNAm data, and evaluated the associations of DNAm and survivorship issues.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were identified, with majority focused on breast (n = 7) or childhood cancer (n = 9) survivors, and half studies included less than 100 patients (n = 11). Survivorship issues evaluated included those related to neurocognition (n = 5), psychiatric health (n = 3), general wellness (n = 9), chronic conditions (n = 5), and treatment specific toxicities (n = 4). Studies evaluated epigenetic age metrics (n = 10) and DNAm levels at individual CpG sites or regions (n = 12) for their associations with survivorship issues in cancer survivors along with relevant confounding factors. Significant associations of measured DNAm in the peripheral blood samples of cancer survivors and survivorship issues were identified.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Studies utilizing epigenetic age metrics and differential methylation analysis demonstrated significant associations of DNAm measurements with survivorship burdens. Associations were observed encompassing diverse survivorship outcomes and timeframes relative to anti-cancer therapy initiation. These findings underscore the potential of these measurements as useful biomarkers in survivorship care and research.

Validity of central pain processing biomarkers for predicting the occurrence of oncological chronic pain: a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Despite recent improvements in cancer detection and survival rates, managing cancer-related pain remains a significant challenge. Compared to neuropathic and inflammatory pain conditions, cancer pain mechanisms are poorly understood, despite pain being one of the most feared symptoms by cancer patients and significantly impairing their quality of life, daily activities, and social interactions. The objective of this work was to select a panel of biomarkers of central pain processing and modulation and assess their ability to predict chronic pain in patients with cancer using predictive artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.

METHODS

We will perform a prospective longitudinal cohort, multicentric study involving 450 patients with a recent cancer diagnosis. These patients will undergo an in-person assessment at three different time points: pretreatment, 6 months, and 12 months after the first visit. All patients will be assessed through demographic and clinical questionnaires and self-report measures, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and electroencephalography (EEG) evaluations. We will select the variables that best predict the future occurrence of pain using a comprehensive approach that includes clinical, psychosocial, and neurophysiological variables.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the links between poor pain modulation mechanisms at precancer treatment in patients who will later develop chronic pain and to clarify the role of treatment modality (modulated by age, sex and type of cancer) on pain. As a final output, we expect to develop a predictive tool based on AI that can contribute to the anticipation of the future occurrence of pain and help in therapeutic decision making.

The role of specialist palliative care in individuals "living beyond cancer": a narrative review of the literature

PURPOSE

Many patients living beyond cancer experience significant unmet needs, although few of these patients are currently reviewed by specialist palliative care teams (SPCTs). The aim of this narrative review was to explore the current and potential role of SPCTs in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

A search strategy was developed for Medline, and adapted for Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo. Additionally, websites of leading oncology, cancer survivorship, and specialist palliative care organisations were examined. The focus of the search was on individuals living beyond cancer rather than other groups of cancer survivors.

RESULTS

111 articles were retrieved from the search for full text review, and 101 other sources of information were identified after hand searching the reference lists of the full text articles, and the aforesaid websites. The themes of the review encompass the definition of palliative care/specialist palliative care, current models of specialist palliative care, core activities of SPCTs, relevant expertise of SPCTs, and potential barriers to change in relation to extending their support and expertise to individuals living beyond cancer. The review identified a paucity of evidence to support the role of SPCTs in the management of patients living beyond cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals living beyond cancer have many unmet needs, and specific services are required to manage these problems. Currently, there is limited evidence to support the role of specialist palliative care teams in the management of this cohort of people, and several potential barriers to greater involvement, including limited resources, and lack of relevant expertise.

Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks After Intrathecal Drug Delivery System and an External Pump Implantation in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

To determine risk factors associated with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs) after intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) and external pump implantation.

METHODS

The clinical data of 248 patients with advanced cancer who underwent IDDS implantation from January 2021 to December 2022 at the Department of Pain Medicine at the Hunan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), tumour type, albumin levels, haemoglobin levels, history of diabetes and pre- and postoperative anti-tumour therapy was collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Postoperative CSFLs occurred in 7 of 231 patients (3.30%). Statistical analysis indicated that gender, age, height, weight, BMI, tumour type, albumin levels, haemoglobin levels, history of diabetes, pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, pre- and postoperative radiotherapy, preoperative immunotherapy and postoperative targeted therapy were not independent factors for CSFLs. Preoperative targeted therapy [odds ratio (OR): 16.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42, 195.56; P = 0.01] and postoperative immunotherapy (OR: 13.38; 95% CI: 1.60, 111.65; P = 0.017) were factors associated with an increased postoperative CSFL rate. Of the two locations where CSFLs can occur, the back (puncture site of catheter, n = 4) and the hypochondriac region (location of infusion port implanted, n = 3), back CSFLs occurred earlier than in the hypochondriac region (18.25 ± 6.45 vs 115 ± 62.02 days, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Based on the data from our study, the timing of preoperative targeted therapy and postoperative immunotherapy should be considered to prevent the occurrence of CSFLs in cancer pain patients who have an IDDS and external pump.

A comprehensive review on ziconotide

Managing severe chronic pain is a challenging task, given the limited effectiveness of available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. This issue continues to be a significant public health concern, requiring a substantial therapeutic response. Ziconotide, a synthetic peptide initially isolated from Conus magus in 1982 and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency in 2004, is the first-line intrathecal method for individuals experiencing severe chronic pain refractory to other therapeutic measures. Ziconotide produces powerful analgesia by blocking N-type calcium channels in the spinal cord, which inhibits the release of pain-relevant neurotransmitters from the central terminals of primary afferent neurons. However, despite possessing many favorable qualities, including the absence of tolerance development, respiratory depression, and withdrawal symptoms (largely due to the absence of a G-protein mediation mechanism), ziconotide's application is limited due to factors such as intrathecal administration and a narrow therapeutic window resulting from significant dose-related undesired effects of the central nervous system. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and clinically relevant summary of the literatures concerning the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of intrathecal ziconotide. It will also describe strategies intended to enhance clinical efficacy while reducing the incidence of side effects. Additionally, the review will explore the current efforts to refine the structure of ziconotide for better clinical outcomes. Lastly, it will prospect potential developments in the new class of selective N-type voltage-sensitive calcium-channel blockers.