Stromal Senescence following Treatment with the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib Alters the Lung Metastatic Niche and Increases Metastasis of Drug-Resistant Mammary Cancer Cells

Endothelium as a Source of Cardiovascular Toxicity From Antitumor Kinase Inhibitors

Kinase inhibitors (KIs) targeting oncogenic molecular pathways have revolutionized cancer therapy. By directly targeting specific tumor-driving kinases, targeted therapies have fewer side effects compared with chemotherapy. Despite the enhanced specificity, cardiovascular side effects have emerged with many targeted cancer therapies that limit long-term outcomes in patients with cancer. Endothelial cells lining all blood vessels are critical to cardiovascular health and are also exposed to circulating levels of systemic anticancer therapies. Both on- and off-target perturbation of signaling pathways from KIs can cause endothelial dysfunction, resulting in cardiovascular toxicity. As such, the endothelium is a potential source, and also a therapeutic target for prevention, of cardiovascular toxicity. In this review, we examine the evidence for KI-induced endothelial cell dysfunction as a mechanism for the cardiovascular toxicities of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, BCR-Abl (breakpoint cluster region-Abelson proto-oncogene) KIs, Bruton tyrosine inhibitors, and emerging information regarding endothelial toxicity of newer classes of KIs.

Too big not to fail: emerging evidence for size-induced senescence

Cellular senescence refers to a permanent and stable state of cell cycle exit. This process plays an important role in many cellular functions, including tumor suppression. It was first noted that senescence is associated with increased cell size in the early 1960s; however, how this contributes to permanent cell cycle exit was poorly understood until recently. In this review, we discuss new findings that identify increased cell size as not only a consequence but also a cause of permanent cell cycle exit. We highlight recent insights into how increased cell size alters normal cellular physiology and creates homeostatic imbalances that contribute to senescence induction. Finally, we focus on the potential clinical implications of these findings in the context of cell cycle arrest-causing cancer therapeutics and speculate on how tumor cell size changes may impact outcomes in patients treated with these drugs.

Influence of tumor microenvironment on the different breast cancer subtypes and applied therapies

Despite the significant improvements made in breast cancer therapy during the last decades, this disease still has increasing incidence and mortality rates. Different targets involved in general processes, like cell proliferation and survival, have become alternative therapeutic options for this disease, with some of them already used in clinic, like the CDK4/6 inhibitors for luminal A tumors treatment. Nevertheless, there is a demand for novel therapeutic strategies focused not only on tumor cells, but also on their microenvironment. Tumor microenvironment (TME) is a very complex and dynamic system that, more than surrounding and supporting tumor cells, actively participates in tumor development and progression. During the last decades, it has become clear that the cellular and acellular components of TME differ between the various breast cancer subtypes and shape the differences regarding their severity and prognosis. The pivotal role of the TME in controlling tumor growth and influencing responses to therapy represents a potential source for novel targets and therapeutic strategies. In this review, we present a description of the multiple therapeutic options used for different breast cancer subtypes, as well as the influence that the TME may exert on the development of the disease and on the response to the distinct therapies, which in some cases may explain their failure by the occurrence of relapses and resistance. Furthermore, the ongoing studies focused on the use of TME components for developing potential cancer treatments are described.

Effect of CDK4/6 Inhibitors on Tumor Immune Microenvironment

Cancer is an abnormal proliferation of cells that is stimulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and defective cell cycle regulation. The essential agent that drive the cell cycle, CDK4/6, would be activated by proliferative signals. Activated CDK4/6 results in the phosphorylation of the neuroblastoma protein (RB) and the release of the transcription factor E2F, which promotes the cell cycle progression. CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) has been currently a research focus, which inhibits the CDK4/6-RB-E2F axis, thereby reducing the cell cycle transition from G1 to S phase and mediating the cell cycle arrest. This action helps achieve an anti-tumor effect. Recent research has demonstrated that CDK4/6i, in addition to contributing to cell cycle arrest, is also essential for the interaction between the tumor cells and the host immune system, i.e., activating the immune system, strengthening the tumor antigen presentation, and reducing the number of regulatory T cells (Treg). Additionally, CDK4/6i would elevate the level of PD-L1, an immunosuppressive factor, in tumor cells, and CDK4/6i in combination with anti-PD-L1 therapy would more effectively reduce the tumor growth. Our results showed that CDK4/6i caused autophagy and senescence in tumor cells. Herein, the impact of CDK4/6i on the immune microenvironment of malignant tumors was mainly focused, as well as their interaction with immune checkpoint inhibitors in affecting anti-tumor immunity.

CDKN1A/p21 in Breast Cancer: Part of the Problem, or Part of the Solution?

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (Cip1/Waf1/CDKN1A/p21) is a well-established protein, primarily recognised for its pivotal role in the cell cycle, where it induces cell cycle arrest by inhibiting the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Over the years, extensive research has shed light on various additional mechanisms involving CDKN1A/p21, implicating it in processes such as apoptosis, DNA damage response (DDR), and the regulation of stem cell fate. Interestingly, p21 can function either as an oncogene or as a tumour suppressor in these contexts. Complicating matters further, the expression of CDKN1A/p21 is elevated in certain tumour types while downregulated in others. In this comprehensive review, we provide an overview of the multifaceted functions of CDKN1A/p21, present clinical data pertaining to cancer patients, and delve into potential strategies for targeting CDKN1A/p21 as a therapeutic approach to cancer. Manipulating CDKN1A/p21 shows great promise for therapy given its involvement in multiple cancer hallmarks, such as sustained cell proliferation, the renewal of cancer stem cells (CSCs), epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell migration, and resistance to chemotherapy. Given the dual role of CDKN1A/p21 in these processes, a more in-depth understanding of its specific mechanisms of action and its regulatory network is imperative to establishing successful therapeutic interventions.

Ratios of monocytes and neutrophils to lymphocytes in the blood predict benefit of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in metastatic breast cancer

Biomarkers to identify metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients resistant to CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) are currently missing. We evaluated the usefulness of the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as predictive markers for de novo resistance to CDK4/6i. Various blood cell counts and MLR, NLR, PLR were recorded before treatment initiation (baseline) and four weeks later from 97 mBC patients receiving endocrine therapy (ET) alone or in combination with CDK4/6i. Binary blood cell count/ratios (mean = cut-off) were related to outcome using Cox regression. High MLR (p = 0.001) and high NLR (p = 0.01) at baseline significantly correlated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in the CDK4/6i cohort, independent of any other clinical parameter as determined by multivariate Cox regression. Both, high MLR (p = 0.008) and high NLR (p = 0.043) as well as a decrease in PLR after four weeks of CDK4/6i first line treatment (p = 0.01) indicated a shorter overall survival. Moreover, decreasing PLR (p = 0.043) and increasing mean corpuscular volume (MCV; p = 0.011) within the first cycle of CDK4/6i correlated with a shorter PFS and decreasing MLR (p = 0.039) within the first cycle of first-line CDK4/6i was also correlated with shorter PFS. In summary, easily assessable blood cell parameter were shown to have predictive, monitoring and prognostic value and thus, could, in future, be used for individualized CDK4/6i therapy management. Most importantly, the imbalance of NLR and MLR at baseline might serve as predictive marker for de novo resistance to CDK4/6i in mBC patients.

The Evolving Pathways of the Efficacy of and Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

The approval of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) has remarkably improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), becoming the new standard of care treatment in these patients. Despite the efficacy of this therapeutic combination, intrinsic and acquired resistance inevitably occurs and represents a major clinical challenge. Several mechanisms associated with resistance to CDK4/6i have been identified, including both cell cycle-related and cell cycle-nonspecific mechanisms. This review discusses new insights underlying the mechanisms of action of CDK4/6i, which are more far-reaching than initially thought, and the currently available evidence of the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i in BC. Finally, it highlights possible treatment strategies to improve CDK4/6i efficacy, summarizing the most relevant clinical data on novel combination therapies involving CDK4/6i.