Tet1 Suppresses p21 to Ensure Proper Cell Cycle Progression in Embryonic Stem Cells

Epistatic interactions between NMD and TRP53 control progenitor cell maintenance and brain size

Mutations in human nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) factors are enriched in neurodevelopmental disorders. We show that deletion of key NMD factor Upf2 in mouse embryonic neural progenitor cells causes perinatal microcephaly but deletion in immature neurons does not, indicating NMD's critical roles in progenitors. Upf2 knockout (KO) prolongs the cell cycle of radial glia progenitor cells, promotes their transition into intermediate progenitors, and leads to reduced upper-layer neurons. CRISPRi screening identified Trp53 knockdown rescuing Upf2KO progenitors without globally reversing NMD inhibition, implying marginal contributions of most NMD targets to the cell cycle defect. Integrated functional genomics shows that NMD degrades selective TRP53 downstream targets, including Cdkn1a, which, without NMD suppression, slow the cell cycle. Trp53KO restores the progenitor cell pool and rescues the microcephaly of Upf2KO mice. Therefore, one physiological role of NMD in the developing brain is to degrade selective TRP53 targets to control progenitor cell cycle and brain size.

Catalytic-dependent and -independent roles of TET3 in the regulation of specific genetic programs during neuroectoderm specification

The ten-eleven-translocation family of proteins (TET1/2/3) are epigenetic regulators of gene expression. They regulate genes by promoting DNA demethylation (i.e., catalytic activity) and by partnering with regulatory proteins (i.e., non-catalytic functions). Unlike Tet1 and Tet2, Tet3 is not expressed in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) but is induced upon ESC differentiation. However, the significance of its dual roles in lineage specification is less defined. By generating TET3 catalytic-mutant (Tet3m/m) and knockout (Tet3-/-) mouse ESCs and differentiating them to neuroectoderm (NE), we identify distinct catalytic-dependent and independent roles of TET3 in NE specification. We find that the catalytic activity of TET3 is important for activation of neural genes while its non-catalytic functions are involved in suppressing mesodermal programs. Interestingly, the vast majority of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in Tet3m/m and Tet3-/- NE cells are hypomethylated. The hypo-DMRs are associated to aberrantly upregulated genes while the hyper-DMRs are linked to downregulated neural genes. We find the maintenance methyltransferase Dnmt1 as a direct target of TET3, which is downregulated in TET3-deficient NE cells and may contribute to the increased DNA hypomethylation. Our findings establish that the catalytic-dependent and -independent roles of TET3 have distinct contributions to NE specification with potential implications in development.

JMJD3 regulate H3K27me3 modification via interacting directly with TET1 to affect spermatogonia self-renewal and proliferation

BACKGROUND

In epigenetic modification, histone modification and DNA methylation coordinate the regulation of spermatogonium. Not only can methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 (TET1) function as a DNA demethylase, converting 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, it can also form complexes with other proteins to regulate gene expression. H3K27me3, one of the common histone modifications, is involved in the regulation of stem cell maintenance and tumorigenesis by inhibiting gene transcription.

METHODS

we examined JMJD3 at both mRNA and protein levels and performed Chip-seq sequencing of H3K27me3 in TET1 overexpressing cells to search for target genes and signaling pathways of its action.

RESULTS

This study has found that JMJD3 plays a leading role in spermatogonia self-renewal and proliferation: at one extreme, the expression of the self-renewal gene GFRA1 and the proliferation-promoting gene PCNA was upregulated following the overexpression of JMJD3 in spermatogonia; at the other end of the spectrum, the expression of differentiation-promoting gene DAZL was down-regulated. Furthermore, the fact that TET1 and JMJD3 can form a protein complex to interact with H3K27me3 has also been fully proven. Then, through analyzing the sequencing results of CHIP-Seq, we found that TET1 targeted Pramel3 when it interacted with H3K27me3. Besides, TET1 overexpression not only reduced H3K27me3 deposition at Pramel3, but promoted its transcriptional activation as well, and the up-regulation of Pramel3 expression was verified in JMJD3-overexpressing spermatogonia.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our study identified a novel link between TET1 and H3K27me3 and established a Tet1-JMJD3-H3K27me3-Pramel3 axis to regulate spermatogonia self-renewal and proliferation. Judging from the evidence offered above, we can safely conclude that this study provides new ideas for further research regarding the mechanism of spermatogenesis and spermatogenesis disorders on an apparent spectrum.

TET1 regulates stem cell properties and cell cycle of Cancer stem cells in triple-negative breast cancer via DNA demethylation

The role of cancer stem cells in metastasis, recurrence, and resistance to conventional therapies is significant. Addressing these cells could potentially decrease cancer reoccurrences and mortality rates. TET1, a crucial gene involved in stem cell self-renewal and potency, may also play a part in cancer stem cells, which warrants further research. To explore the role of TET1 in cancer stem cells, we conducted experiments involving loss and gain. We then analyzed factors such as migration, invasion, cell cycle, cell viability, mammosphere formation, and the CD44+/CD24- subpopulation of cancer cells. We also investigate the influence of TET1 on CCNB1, CDK1, and OCT4. Our study reveals that TET1 can regulate the phenotype of cancer stem cells via OCT4. Additionally, it can control the cell cycle by increasing CDK1 and CCNB1 levels. These findings suggest that targeting DNA methylation and TET1 could be an effective strategy to overcome obstacles posed by Cancer stem cells. Our research also indicates that TET1 can influence the phenotype of cancer stem cells and the cell cycle of breast cancer cells potentially through OCT4, CCNB1, and CDK1. This highlights the importance of TET1 in breast cancer cases and suggests a potential therapeutic approach through DNA methylation and modulation of TET1.

CDKN1A/p21 in Breast Cancer: Part of the Problem, or Part of the Solution?

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (Cip1/Waf1/CDKN1A/p21) is a well-established protein, primarily recognised for its pivotal role in the cell cycle, where it induces cell cycle arrest by inhibiting the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Over the years, extensive research has shed light on various additional mechanisms involving CDKN1A/p21, implicating it in processes such as apoptosis, DNA damage response (DDR), and the regulation of stem cell fate. Interestingly, p21 can function either as an oncogene or as a tumour suppressor in these contexts. Complicating matters further, the expression of CDKN1A/p21 is elevated in certain tumour types while downregulated in others. In this comprehensive review, we provide an overview of the multifaceted functions of CDKN1A/p21, present clinical data pertaining to cancer patients, and delve into potential strategies for targeting CDKN1A/p21 as a therapeutic approach to cancer. Manipulating CDKN1A/p21 shows great promise for therapy given its involvement in multiple cancer hallmarks, such as sustained cell proliferation, the renewal of cancer stem cells (CSCs), epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell migration, and resistance to chemotherapy. Given the dual role of CDKN1A/p21 in these processes, a more in-depth understanding of its specific mechanisms of action and its regulatory network is imperative to establishing successful therapeutic interventions.

G1 Dynamics at the Crossroads of Pluripotency and Cancer

G1 cell cycle phase dynamics are regulated by intricate networks involving cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), and CDK inhibitors, which control G1 progression and ensure proper cell cycle transitions. Moreover, adequate origin licensing in G1 phase, the first committed step of DNA replication in the subsequent S phase, is essential to maintain genome integrity. In this review, we highlight the intriguing parallels and disparities in G1 dynamics between stem cells and cancer cells, focusing on their regulatory mechanisms and functional outcomes. Notably, SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and the pluripotency reprogramming facilitator c-MYC, known for their role in establishing and maintaining stem cell pluripotency, are also aberrantly expressed in certain cancer cells. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the regulatory role of these pluripotency factors in G1 dynamics in the context of stem cells and cancer cells, which may offer new insights into the interconnections between pluripotency and tumorigenesis.

Comparative analysis of Tet2 catalytic-deficient and knockout bone marrow over time

TET2 is a member of the Ten-eleven translocation (Tet) family of DNA dioxygenases that regulate gene expression by promoting DNA demethylation (enzymatic activity) and partnering with chromatin regulatory complexes (nonenzymatic functions). TET2 is highly expressed in the hematopoietic lineage, where its molecular functions are the subject of continuous investigations because of the prevalence of TET2 mutations in hematologic malignancies. Previously, we have implicated Tet2 catalytic and noncatalytic functions in the regulation of myeloid and lymphoid lineages, respectively. However, the impact of these functions of Tet2 on hematopoiesis as the bone marrow ages remains unclear. Here, we conducted comparative transplantations and transcriptomic analyses of 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month-old Tet2 catalytic mutant (Mut) and knockout (KO) bone marrow. Tet2 Mut bone marrow of all ages exclusively caused hematopoietic disorders of the myeloid lineage. In contrast, young Tet2 KO bone marrow developed both lymphoid and myeloid diseases, whereas older Tet2 KO bone marrow predominantly elicited myeloid disorders with shorter latency than age-matched Tet2 Mut bone marrow. We identified robust gene dysregulation in Tet2 KO Lin- cells at 6 months that involved lymphoma and myelodysplastic syndrome and/or leukemia-causing genes, many of which were hypermethylated early in life. There was a shift from lymphoid to myeloid gene deregulation in Tet2 KO Lin- cells with age, underpinning the higher incidence of myeloid diseases. These findings expand on the dynamic regulation of bone marrow by Tet2 and show that its catalytic-dependent and -independent roles have distinct impacts on myeloid and lymphoid lineages with age.

Tet2 regulates Sin3a recruitment at active enhancers in embryonic stem cells

Tet2 is a member of the Ten-eleven translocation (Tet1/2/3) family of enzymes and is expressed in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). It demethylates DNA (catalytic functions) and partners with chromatin modifiers (noncatalytic functions) to regulate genes. However, the significance of these functions in ESCs is less defined. Using Tet2 catalytic mutant (Tet2m/m) and knockout (Tet2-/-) ESCs, we identified Tet2 target genes regulated by its catalytic dependent versus independent roles. Tet2 was enriched at their active enhancers and promoters to demethylate them. We also identified the histone deacetylase component Sin3a as a Tet2 partner, co-localizing at promoters and active enhancers. Tet2 deficiency diminished Sin3a at these regions. Tet2 and Sin3a co-occupancy overlapped with Tet1. Combined loss of Tet1/2, but not of their catalytic activities, reduced Sin3a at active enhancers. These findings establish Tet2 catalytic and noncatalytic functions as regulators of DNA demethylation and Sin3a recruitment at active enhancers in ESCs.

Metabolo-epigenetic interplay provides targeted nutritional interventions in chronic diseases and ageing

Epigenetic modifications are chemical modifications that affect gene expression without altering DNA sequences. In particular, epigenetic chemical modifications can occur on histone proteins -mainly acetylation, methylation-, and on DNA and RNA molecules -mainly methylation-. Additional mechanisms, such as RNA-mediated regulation of gene expression and determinants of the genomic architecture can also affect gene expression. Importantly, depending on the cellular context and environment, epigenetic processes can drive developmental programs as well as functional plasticity. However, misbalanced epigenetic regulation can result in disease, particularly in the context of metabolic diseases, cancer, and ageing. Non-communicable chronic diseases (NCCD) and ageing share common features including altered metabolism, systemic meta-inflammation, dysfunctional immune system responses, and oxidative stress, among others. In this scenario, unbalanced diets, such as high sugar and high saturated fatty acids consumption, together with sedentary habits, are risk factors implicated in the development of NCCD and premature ageing. The nutritional and metabolic status of individuals interact with epigenetics at different levels. Thus, it is crucial to understand how we can modulate epigenetic marks through both lifestyle habits and targeted clinical interventions -including fasting mimicking diets, nutraceuticals, and bioactive compounds- which will contribute to restore the metabolic homeostasis in NCCD. Here, we first describe key metabolites from cellular metabolic pathways used as substrates to "write" the epigenetic marks; and cofactors that modulate the activity of the epigenetic enzymes; then, we briefly show how metabolic and epigenetic imbalances may result in disease; and, finally, we show several examples of nutritional interventions - diet based interventions, bioactive compounds, and nutraceuticals- and exercise to counteract epigenetic alterations.

Fundamental and Applied Advances in Stem Cell Therapeutic Research

We are pleased to present this Special Issue of Cells, entitled 'Feature Papers in Stem Cells' [...].