The Feasibility and Acceptability of Resilience Coaching for Adolescent Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Single-Arm Pilot Trial

Rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial of a resilience-building intervention in adults with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) are at risk for lower quality of life (QOL) and psychological health. Behavioral interventions to meet their psychosocial needs are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention in ACHD and its efficacy in increasing resilience in this population.

METHODS

We designed a phase II randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with moderate or complex ACHD, physiological stages C or D. Enrolled participants will be randomized to receive PRISM or usual care. PRISM is a manualized, skills-based behavioral intervention comprised of four one-on-one sessions targeting resilience resources (stress-management, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, meaning making), an optional session on advance care planning, and a facilitated family meeting. Participants in both groups will complete study questionnaires at enrollment and 3-months later. The primary aim is to describe feasibility, namely the proportions of patients who a) enroll in the study among those eligible, and b) complete the PRISM intervention among those randomized to that arm. We will also evaluate PRISM's efficacy by using linear regression models to compare changes in mean resilience scores between assigned groups. In exploratory analyses, we will evaluate effects on QOL, psychological distress, perceived competence for health care management, and comfort with advance care planning.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide rigorous evidence to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a brief intervention to promote resilience and psychosocial health in ACHD. Findings may guide the development of a future multi-site effectiveness study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04738474.

Implementation of an electronic health record system during global surgical outreach: A prospective evaluation of success and sustainability

BACKGROUND

The burden of musculoskeletal conditions continues to grow in low- and middle-income countries. Among thousands of surgical outreach trips each year, few organizations electronically track patient data to inform real-time care decisions and assess trip impact. We report the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) system utilized at point of care during an orthopedic surgical outreach trip.

METHODS

In March 2023, we implemented an EHR on an orthopedic outreach trip to guide real-time care decisions. We utilized an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 3 design to evaluate implementation success. Success was measured using outcomes adopted by the World Health Organization, including acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, fidelity, and sustainability. Clinical outcome measures included adherence to essential quality measures and follow-up numerical rating system (NRS) pain scores.

RESULTS

During the 5-day outreach trip, 76 patients were evaluated, 25 of which underwent surgery beforehand. The EHR implementation was successful as defined by: mean questionnaire ratings of acceptability (4.26), appropriateness (4.12), feasibility (4.19), and adoption (4.33) at least 4.00, WHO behaviorally anchored rating scale ratings of fidelity (6.8) at least 5.00, and sustainability (80%) at least 60% follow-up at 6 months. All clinical quality measures were reported in greater than 80% of cases with all measures reported in 92% of cases. NRS pain scores improved by an average of 2.4 points.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate successful implementation of an EHR for real-time clinical use on a surgical outreach trip. Benefits of EHR utilization on surgical outreach trips may include improved documentation, minimization of medical errors, and ultimately improved quality of care.

Key Psychosocial Health Outcomes and Association With Resilience Among Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) can negatively impact quality of life (QOL). Strengthening resilience may improve this and other psychosocial outcomes important for living a meaningful life.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe resilience and key psychosocial health outcomes in ACHD and evaluate the associations between resilience and these outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of outpatients with moderate or complex ACHD between May 2021 and June 2022. Participants completed surveys at baseline and 3 months, evaluating resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10), health-related QOL (EQ5D-3L, linear analog scale), health status (Euroqol visual analog scale), self-competence (Perceived Competence Scale), and psychological symptom burden (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and distress (Kessler-6).

RESULTS

The mean participant age (N = 138) was 41 ± 14 years, 51% were female, and 83% self-identified as non-Hispanic White. ACHD was moderate for 75%; 57% were physiologic class B. Mean baseline resilience score (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10) was 29.20 ± 7.54. Participants had relatively good health-related QOL, health status, and self-competence, and low psychological symptom burden and distress. Higher baseline resilience was associated with better values of all outcomes at 3 months (eg, 1 point higher resilience was associated with 0.92 higher linear analog scale; 95% CI: 0.52-1.32) with or without adjustment for demographics. After further adjusting for the baseline psychosocial measure, only the association between resilience and QOL measures at 3 months remained statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Resilience is positively associated with health-related QOL for outpatients with moderate or complex ACHD, though relationships are small in magnitude. Study findings can guide the application of resilience-building interventions to the ACHD population.

Conservative Management of Acute Sports-Related Concussions: A Narrative Review

This review explores the application of the conservative management model for pain to sports-related concussions (SRCs), framing concussions as a distinct form of pain syndrome with a pathophysiological foundation in central sensitization. Drawing parallels with proven pain management models, we underscore the significance of a proactive approach to concussion management. Recognizing concussions as a pain syndrome allows for the tailoring of interventions in alignment with conservative principles. This review first covers the epidemiology and controversies surrounding prolonged concussion recovery and persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). Next, the pathophysiology of concussions is presented within the central sensitization framework, emphasizing the need for early intervention to mitigate the neuroplastic changes that lead to heightened pain sensitivity. Five components of the central sensitization process specific to concussion injuries are highlighted as targets for conservative interventions in the acute period: peripheral sensitization, cerebral metabolic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, glymphatic system dysfunction, and pain catastrophizing. These proactive interventions are emphasized as pivotal in accelerating concussion recovery and reducing the risk of prolonged symptoms and PPCS, in line with the philosophy of conservative management.

Attrition from Face-to-Face Pediatric Outpatient Chronic Pain Interventions: A Narrative Review and Theoretical Model

There is limited understanding of attrition (premature treatment withdrawal and non-completion) from pediatric chronic pain services. This narrative review aimed to summarize attrition prevalence from face-to-face pediatric outpatient chronic pain interventions, identify associated factors and develop a theoretical model to account for attrition in this setting. A comprehensive search of the published literature revealed massive variability (0-100%) in the reported attrition rates from pediatric chronic pain interventions that varied in type and format (individual vs. group, single discipline vs. interdisciplinary, psychological only vs. multiple combined interventions, of different durations). The factors associated with attrition from pediatric chronic pain programs varied between the studies: some have assessed patient sex, psychological and other comorbidities, avoidance strategies, missed schooling, family composition/tensions, caregiver catastrophizing, scheduling, caregiver leave and clinic access. A theoretical model is presented depicting youth, caregiver and service factors that may impact attrition from pediatric chronic pain interventions. Where available, literature is drawn from the pediatric chronic pain context, but also from adult chronic pain and pediatric weight management fields. The implications for research and clinical practice are discussed, including improved reporting, patient screening and targeted supports to promote intervention completion. This review contributes to a better understanding of attrition, which is crucial for optimizing pediatric chronic pain service outcomes.