Longitudinal Symptom Burden Trajectories in a Population-Based Cohort of Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Analysis

The sharks are circling: a qualitative study of living with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this phenomenological study was to gain an understanding of the intersection of continued treatment and quality of life in women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

This was a qualitative study in which women with MBC were interviewed about their perceptions how MBC affected their physical, emotional, and role functioning.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 16) were mostly Caucasian (86.7%) and non-Hispanic (93.3%). The mean age was 55.62 years. Most women were on their third or greater line of treatment (68.5%). Themes identified from analysis of the transcripts revealed the following: (1) shock and devastation of the initial diagnosis; (2) feeling as if the sharks are circling; (3) cancer is a rollercoaster with never-ending treatments; (4) individual definitions of quality of life; and (5) you are not the person you once were.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms, ongoing treatments, treatment changes, and disease progression negatively influence physical, emotional, and role function. Women with MBC define quality of life in different ways, and while symptoms and functional limitations are present, the cancer experience causes some to reevaluate their lives and focus on their individual priorities and values.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Although newly developed treatments increase survival among women with MBC, the symptoms, concerns, and issues surrounding QOL remain unresolved. The relatively high price of continuous treatment and disease exacerbation is indicative of the need for multi-pronged intervention strategies that address physical, mental, and emotional aspects of living with MBC.

Heterogeneity of posttraumatic stress, depression, and fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a latent class analysis

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivors may demonstrate elevated psychological distress, which can also hinder adherence to survivorship care plans. Our goal was to study heterogeneity of behavioral health and functioning in breast cancer survivors, and identify both risk and protective factors to improve targets for wellness interventions.

METHODS

Breast cancer survivors (n = 187) consented to complete self-reported psychological measures and to access their medical records. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to classify heterogeneous subpopulations based on levels of depression, post-traumatic stress, fear of cancer recurrence, cancer-related pain, and fatigue. Multinomial logistic regression and auxiliary analysis in a 3-step modeling conditional approach was used to identify characteristics of the group based on demographics, treatment history and characteristics, and current medication prescriptions.

RESULTS

Three subpopulations of breast cancer survivors were identified from the LCA: a modal Resilient group (48.2%, n = 90), a Moderate Symptoms group (34%, n = 65), and an Elevated Symptoms group (n = 17%, n = 32) with clinically-relevant impairment. Results from the logistic regression indicated that individuals in the Elevated Symptoms group were less likely to have a family history of breast cancer; they were more likely to be closer to time of diagnosis and younger, have received chemotherapy and psychotropic prescriptions, and have higher BMI. Survivors in the Elevated Symptoms group were also less likely to be prescribed estrogen inhibitors than the Moderate Symptoms group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified subgroups of breast cancer survivors based on behavioral, psychological, and treatment-related characteristics, with implications for targeted monitoring and survivorship care plans.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Results showed the majority of cancer survivors were resilient, with minimal psychological distress. Results also suggest the importance of paying special attention to younger patients getting chemotherapy, especially those without a family history of breast cancer.

Patient Preferences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

People with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have diverse medical, physical, and psychosocial needs that require multidimensional care. Understanding patient preferences is crucial to tailor treatments, services, and foster patient-centered care. A scoping review was performed to summarize the current evidence on the preferences of people with MBC regarding their care to identify knowledge gaps and key areas for future research. The Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases were searched. Twenty studies enrolling 3354 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Thirteen quantitative studies, four mixed methods studies, and three qualitative studies were included. Seven studies captured healthcare provider perspectives; thirteen studies evaluated patient preferences relating specifically to cancer treatments; three studies evaluated preferences relating to supportive care; and four studies evaluated communication and decision-making preferences. The current literature evaluating MBC patient preferences is heterogeneous with a focus on cancer treatments. Future research should explore patient preferences relating to multidisciplinary, multi-modal care that aims to improve quality of life. Understanding MBC patient preferences regarding their comprehensive care can help tailor healthcare delivery, enhance the patient experience, and improve outcomes.

Inter-subject variability of pleasant pain relief using a data-driven approach in healthy volunteers

Background

The offset of a painful and unpleasant sensation can elicit pleasure. This phenomenon, namely pleasant pain relief (PPR), is attracting growing interest in research. While the cold pressor test (CPT) has been frequently used to study the inhibition of pain by the administration of another painful stimulation (inhibitory conditioned pain modulation; ICPM), a preliminary study from our research team has shown that CPT can also elicit a robust and long-lasting PPR. However, its effects on pain relief and inhibition vary greatly between subjects. Although substantial research has been carried out on inter-individual variability in the case of ICPM, the same cannot be said of PPR. Therefore, the current study sought to identify clusters of healthy volunteers with similar dynamic pain responses during the CPT, using a data-driven approach, and to investigate the inter-subject variability for PPR and ICPM.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-two healthy volunteers were recruited. A sequential ICPM paradigm was carried out with CPT (water at 10°C) and a Peltier Thermode to evaluate pain intensity and unpleasantness. Moreover, PPR was measured for four minutes at CPT offset. Statistical analyses were performed using group-based trajectory modelling.

Results

Four trajectories (groups) were identified for CPT pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings with varying levels of tonic pain and pain sensitization (e.g., temporal summation). PPR scores were correlated with both pain ratings trajectories (p < 0.001). On the other hand, no differences were found between groups regarding ICPM efficacy (percentage pain inhibition).

Discussion

This study has provided a first step into the investigation of PPR and ICPM interindividual variability. Using a data-driven approach, it was shown that PPR at CPT offset differs between clusters of participants identified based on dynamic pain intensity and unpleasantness responses from CPT. Thus, it was brought to light that both the levels of tonic pain and pain sensitization underlie individual differences in PPR. The lack of correlation between CPT pain trajectories and ICPM efficacy may be explained by the hypotheses that eliciting ICPM requires only a certain threshold of stimulation which doesn’t need to be noxious. In the future, studies on the inter-subject variability of PPR in large samples of chronic pain patients are warranted.

Symptom burden, family resilience, and functional exercise adherence among postoperative breast cancer patients

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

•

Postoperative breast cancer patients self-report they have a higher level of family resilience.

•

Postoperative breast cancer patients with higher functional exercise adherence have less symptom burden.

•

Family resilience can indirectly alleviate postoperative breast cancer patients' symptom burden.