1
|
Franko J, Raman S, Patel S, Petree B, Lin M, Tee MC, Le VH, Frankova D. Survival and cancer recurrence after short-course perioperative probiotics in a randomized trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2024; 60:59-64. [PMID: 38479940 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The long-term impact of perioperative probiotics remains understudied while mounting evidence links microbiome and oncogenesis. Therefore, we analyzed overall survival and cancer recurrence among patients enrolled in a randomized trial of perioperative probiotics. METHODS 6-year follow-up of surgical patients participating in a randomized trial evaluating short-course perioperative oral probiotic VSL#3 (n = 57) or placebo (n = 63). RESULTS Study groups did not differ in age, preoperative hemoglobin, ASA status, and Charlson comorbidity index. There was a significant difference in preoperative serum albumin (placebo group 4.0 ± 0.1 vs. 3.7 ± 0.1 g/dL in the probiotic group, p = 0.030). Thirty-seven deaths (30.8 %) have occurred during a median follow-up of 6.2 years. Overall survival stratified on preoperative serum albumin and surgical specialty was similar between groups (p = 0.691). Age (aHR = 1.081, p = 0.001), serum albumin (aHR = 0.162, p = 0.001), and surgical specialty (aHR = 0.304, p < 0.001) were the only predictors of overall survival in the multivariate model, while the placebo/probiotic group (aHR = 0.808, p = 0.726) was not predictive. The progression rate among cancer patients was similar in the probiotic group (30.3 %, 10/33) compared to the placebo group (21.2 %, 7/33; p = 0.398). The progression-free survival was not significantly different (unstratified p = 0.270, stratified p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative short-course use of VSL#3 probiotics does not influence overall or progression-free survival after complex surgery for visceral malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Franko
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA.
| | - Shankar Raman
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Shiv Patel
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Brandon Petree
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Mayin Lin
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - May C Tee
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA; Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Viet H Le
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Daniela Frankova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McFarland LV, Hecht G, Sanders ME, Goff DA, Goldstein EJC, Hill C, Johnson S, Kashi MR, Kullar R, Marco ML, Merenstein DJ, Millette M, Preidis GA, Quigley EMM, Reid G, Salminen S, Sniffen JC, Sokol H, Szajewska H, Tancredi DJ, Woolard K. Recommendations to Improve Quality of Probiotic Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2346872. [PMID: 38064222 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Systematic reviews and meta-analyses often report conflicting results when assessing evidence for probiotic efficacy, partially because of the lack of understanding of the unique features of probiotic trials. As a consequence, clinical decisions on the use of probiotics have been confusing. Objective To provide recommendations to improve the quality and consistency of systematic reviews with meta-analyses on probiotics, so evidence-based clinical decisions can be made with more clarity. Evidence Review For this consensus statement, an updated literature review was conducted (January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022) to supplement a previously published 2018 literature search to identify areas where probiotic systematic reviews with meta-analyses might be improved. An expert panel of 21 scientists and physicians with experience on writing and reviewing probiotic reviews and meta-analyses was convened and used a modified Delphi method to develop recommendations for future probiotic reviews. Findings A total of 206 systematic reviews with meta-analysis components on probiotics were screened and representative examples discussed to determine areas for improvement. The expert panel initially identified 36 items that were inconsistently reported or were considered important to consider in probiotic meta-analyses. Of these, a consensus was reached for 9 recommendations to improve the quality of future probiotic meta-analyses. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, the expert panel reached a consensus on 9 recommendations that should promote improved reporting of probiotic systematic reviews with meta-analyses and, thereby, assist in clinical decisions regarding the use of probiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne V McFarland
- McFarland Consulting, Seattle, Washington
- Public Health Reserve Corp, Seattle Washington
| | - Gail Hecht
- Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Mary E Sanders
- International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, Colorado
| | - Debra A Goff
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus
| | | | - Colin Hill
- International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Stuart Johnson
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- Departments of Medicine and Research, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois
| | - Maryam R Kashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, AdventHealth Medical Group, Orlando, Florida
| | | | - Maria L Marco
- Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis
| | - Daniel J Merenstein
- Research Programs Family Medicine, Department of Human Science, Georgetown University School of Health, Washington, DC
| | - Mathieu Millette
- Bio-K Plus, a Kerry Company, Laval, Quebec, Canada
- INRS-Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Geoffrey A Preidis
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston
| | - Eamonn M M Quigley
- Lynda K and David M. Underwood Center for Digestive Disorders, Houston Methodist Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - Gregor Reid
- St Joseph's Hospital, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seppo Salminen
- Functional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jason C Sniffen
- Infectious Disease Consultants, Altamonte Springs, Florida
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Section, University of South Florida, Tampa
| | - Harry Sokol
- Gastroenterology Department, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Paris, France
- Paris Centre for Microbiome Medicine FHU, Paris, France
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Micalis & AgroParisTech, Jouy en Josas, France
| | - Hania Szajewska
- Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Daniel J Tancredi
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinelli S, Lamminpää I, Dübüş EN, Sarıkaya D, Niccolai E. Synergistic Strategies for Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: Unveiling the Benefits of Immunonutrition and Microbiota Modulation. Nutrients 2023; 15:4408. [PMID: 37892482 PMCID: PMC10610426 DOI: 10.3390/nu15204408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of highly prevalent malignant tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Globally, one in four cancer cases and one in three cancer deaths are estimated to be GI cancers. They can alter digestive and absorption functions, leading to severe malnutrition which may worsen the prognosis of the patients. Therefore, nutritional intervention and monitoring play a fundamental role in managing metabolic alterations and cancer symptoms, as well as minimizing side effects and increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In this scenario, the use of immunonutrients that are able to modulate the immune system and the modification/regulation of the gut microbiota composition have gained attention as a possible strategy to improve the conditions of these patients. The complex interaction between nutrients and microbiota might contribute to maintaining the homeostasis of each individual's immune system; therefore, concurrent use of specific nutrients in combination with traditional cancer treatments may synergistically improve the overall care of GI cancer patients. This work aims to review and discuss the role of immunonutrition and microbiota modulation in improving nutritional status, postoperative recovery, and response to therapies in patients with GI cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Martinelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| | - Ingrid Lamminpää
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| | - Eda Nur Dübüş
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey; (E.N.D.); (D.S.)
| | - Dilara Sarıkaya
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey; (E.N.D.); (D.S.)
| | - Elena Niccolai
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cogo E, Elsayed M, Bhardwaj S, Cooley K, Aycho C, Liang V, Papadogianis P, Psihogios A, Seely D. Mistletoe Extracts during the Oncological Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Randomized Controlled Trials. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8196-8219. [PMID: 37754510 PMCID: PMC10529072 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mistletoe extract (ME) use during the oncological perioperative period. METHODS Details registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). RESULTS Seven RCTs (comprising 663 participants in nine reports) and three nonrandomized studies were included. In five RCTs, ME was evaluated as adjunctive care and the control group had no additional intervention, whereas in two RCTs, ME was compared head-to-head against common cancer treatments (i.e., etoposide or bacillus Calmette-Guérin) with the intervention groups not receiving standard care. Meta-analyses found no evidence for a difference between ME and no added therapy for mortality and recurrence (RR, 95% CI: 1.00, 0.79-1.27; and 1.03, 0.79-1.33, respectively). Two RCTs reported beneficial effects of ME on immune cells, specifically natural killer cells, in colorectal cancer, and one RCT reported quality of life improvement. Two RCTs reported ME discontinuations due to adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities. Nevertheless, no safety signals were detected from these 10 studies. Quality appraisal revealed a substantial risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary data are encouraging for mistletoe extracts, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer. However, the evidence is limited by the number of studies, an evaluation of different outcomes, and methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Cogo
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
| | - Mohamed Elsayed
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt
- The Centre for Health Innovation, Ottawa, ON K2P 0M7, Canada
| | - Sukriti Bhardwaj
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
| | - Kieran Cooley
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
- Pacific College of Health Sciences, San Diego, CA 92108, USA
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Lismore 2480, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, Australia
| | - Christilynn Aycho
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
| | - Vivian Liang
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
| | - Peter Papadogianis
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
| | - Athanasios Psihogios
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
| | - Dugald Seely
- Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada; (E.C.); (M.E.); (S.B.); (K.C.); (C.A.)
- The Centre for Health Innovation, Ottawa, ON K2P 0M7, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
A wound is an injury to the skin or damage to the body tissue. The healing process differs between various kinds of wounds. Treatment of hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds becomes challenging for healthcare practitioners, especially if patients have underlying health complications such as diabetes. Infection of wounds is another factor that interferes with the healing process and extends its duration. Active research is being conducted into the development of advanced wound dressing technologies. These wound dressings are intended to manage the exudate, reduce bacterial infection and speed up the healing process. Probiotics have been receiving much attention because of their potential application in the clinical field, especially in diagnostics and treatment strategies of various infectious and non-infectious diseases. The host immune-modulatory response and antimicrobial activity of probiotics are expanding their role in the development of improved wound dressing technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanmugaraja Meenakshi
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam-603103, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ramadevi Santhanakumar
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam-603103, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Role of Probiotics in Inflammation Associated with Major Surgery: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15061331. [PMID: 36986061 PMCID: PMC10059922 DOI: 10.3390/nu15061331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Gut microbiota is well-known for its ability to maintain intestinal homeostasis. However, the disruption of this homeostasis, known as dysbiosis, leads to multiple consequences, including local and systemic inflammation. Surgery-induced inflammation is a major concern for patients, as it leads to many infectious and non-infectious complications. Objective: The purpose of this review was to explore the role of probiotics and symbiotics in surgery-induced inflammation and to determine if their use is effective in combatting inflammation and its complications Methods and Materials: A literature search was conducted, and articles published only in English, until December 2022 were included. The results are reported in the form of a narrative review. Results: The perioperative use of probiotics and/or symbiotics results in lower risk of infectious complications, including reduced rates of surgical site infections, respiratory and urinary tract infections, shorter hospital stays, and fewer days of antibiotic administration. It also contributes to reducing non-infectious complications, as it mitigates systemic and local inflammation via maintenance of the intestinal barrier, improves intestinal mobility, and is associated with lower rates of postoperative pain and anastomotic leak. Conclusions: Restoring gut microbiota after disruptions caused by surgery may accelerate local healing processes, attenuate systemic inflammation, and may thus prove beneficial to certain populations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Drobner JC, Lichtbroun BJ, Singer EA, Ghodoussipour S. Examining the Role of Microbiota-Centered Interventions in Cancer Therapeutics: Applications for Urothelial Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231164196. [PMID: 36938621 PMCID: PMC10028658 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231164196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern advances in genomic and molecular technologies have sparked substantial research on the human intestinal microbiome over the past decade. A deeper understanding of the microbiome has illuminated that dysbiosis, or a disruption in the microbiome, is associated with inflammatory disease states and carcinogenesis. Novel therapies that target the microbiome and restore healthy flora may have value in dampening the immunopathologic state induced by dysbiosis. A narrative review of the literature on the use of microbiota-centered interventions (MCIs) was conducted. Several randomized clinical trials show that MCIs can augment response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with metastatic cancer. Clinical trials have also demonstrated that modulation of the intestinal microbiome can enhance recovery and reduce infectious complications in the surgical management of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Overall, these major discoveries suggest future clinical applications of MCIs for a wide range of immune-mediated conditions. These results may also translate to improved patient outcomes in systemic immunotherapy for urothelial carcinoma as well as in patients recovering from radical cystectomy (RC), which is complicated by high infection rates. Further research is needed to evaluate the optimal bacterial composition of microbiota-centered therapies and the specific cellular changes that lead to improved tumor antigen recognition after microbiota-centered therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake C Drobner
- Division of Urologic Oncology, 145249Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and 549472Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin J Lichtbroun
- Division of Urologic Oncology, 145249Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and 549472Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Eric A Singer
- Division of Urologic Oncology, 549472The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Division of Urologic Oncology, 145249Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and 549472Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kotzampassi K. What Surgeon Should Know about Probiotics. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14204374. [PMID: 36297058 PMCID: PMC9609430 DOI: 10.3390/nu14204374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Kotzampassi
- Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|