A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures

Use of focus point for plane acquisition to improve reproducibility in fetal biometry

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of fetal biometry using a 'focus point' to assist the acquisition of the relevant plane.

METHODS

This was a study of 80 women with a singleton non-anomalous pregnancy who attended University College London Hospital, London, UK, between 18 and 37 weeks' gestation. Planes to measure head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were obtained four times by two different sonographers with different levels of experience, who were blinded to one another; the first set of images was obtained with reference to a standard image, and the second set of images was obtained using the focus point technique. The focus point was defined as a unique fetal anatomical landmark in each plane (cavum septi pellucidi for HC, two-thirds of the umbilical vein for AC and one of the two extremities of the diaphysis for FL). Once identified, the focus point was maintained in view while the sonographer rotated the probe along three axes (x, y, z) to acquire the relevant plane. Sonographers were either in training or had > 3000 scans worth of experience. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were assessed using Bland-Altman plots, and absolute values and percentages for mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were reported.

RESULTS

Overall reproducibility was good, with all 95% LoA < 8%. Reproducibility was improved by use of the focus point compared with the standard technique for both intraobserver comparison (95% LoA, < 4% vs < 6%) and interobserver comparison (95% LoA, < 7% vs < 8%). These findings were independent of sonographer seniority and plane acquired.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of fetal biometry assessment is improved with use of the focus point for plane acquisition, regardless of sonographer experience. We propose that this method should be implemented in clinical practice and training programs in fetal biometry. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Neurosonographic Measurements of the Fetal Anterior Complex in Singleton Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To construct reference ranges of the fetal cerebral anterior complex, including ventricular index (VI), anterior horn of lateral ventricle width (AW), and cavum septi pellucidi (CSP) width, as a function of gestational age (GA), in Thai fetuses.

METHODS

Low-risk pregnancies were recruited to measure fetal anterior complex on axial transventricular and coronal transcaudate planes using transabdominal ultrasound. The downside and upside hemisphere were defined as cerebral hemisphere located distal and proximal to the transducer, respectively. The five variables, downside/upside VI, downside/upside AW and CSP width, were measured from each fetus. Best-fit models in predicting mean and standard deviation for each value as a function of GA were constructed, using regression analysis. Distributions of Z-scores of all values based on GA were created to evaluate the fitness of models. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-/intraobserver variability.

RESULTS

A total of 395 fetuses were measured for anterior complex. All parameters changed with GA with quadratic function. The models for predicting means and standard deviation of the five parameters as well as percentile charts were created. All models were proven well-fitted. The intra-/interobserver reliability coefficients of all values showed excellent agreement.

CONCLUSION

The reference ranges of the fetal anterior complex, including VI, AW, and CSP, in axial transventricular and coronal transcaudate planes have been established and available for clinical use.

Corpus callosal reference ranges: systematic review of methodology of biometric chart construction and measurements obtained

OBJECTIVE

Adequate reference ranges of size of the corpus callosum (CC) are necessary to improve characterization of CC abnormalities and parental counseling. The objective of this study was to evaluate the methodology used in studies developing references charts for CC biometry.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies on fetal CC biometry using a set of predefined quality criteria of study design, statistical analysis and reporting methods. We included observational studies whose primary aim was to create ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging charts for CC size in a normal population of fetuses. Studies were scored against a predefined set of independently agreed methodological criteria, and an overall quality score was given for each study.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality scores ranged between 17.4% and 95.7%. The greatest potential for bias was noted for the following items: sample selection and sample-size calculation, as only 17% of the studies were population-based and had consecutive or random recruitment of patients and with a justification of the sample size; number of measurements obtained for CC biometry, as only 17% of the studies performed more than one measurement per fetus and per scan; and description of characteristics of the study population, as only 8% of the studies clearly reported a minimum dataset of demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in methods and final biometric values of the fetal CC across the evaluated studies. The use of uniform methodology of the highest quality is essential in order to define a 'short' CC and provide appropriate parental counseling. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Training in Obstetric Ultrasound Biometry: Results from a Multicenter Reproducibility Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry measurements obtained by trainee (junior) and experienced sonographers (senior) in the contest of two training programs in obstetric ultrasound.

METHODS

This was a prospective study on 192 women recruited ensuring an even distribution throughout gestation (18-41 weeks), at University College London Hospital (UCLH), England (87 cases), and at Maternité Regionale Universitaire de Nancy (MRUN), France (105 cases). The training took place in two training centers with experience in ultrasound training and subspecialist training in fetal medicine. Measurements for head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were obtained twice by junior and senior sonographers, blind to their own and each other's measurements. Differences between and within sonographers were expressed in millimeters and as a percentage of fetal dimensions. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Reproducibility was overall high with 95% confidence intervals (CI) within <6% for intraobserver and <8% for interobserver reproducibility. Intraobserver reproducibility was lower within junior than within senior sonographers' measurements for HC (95% CI: <4% versus <3%) and FL (95% CI: <6% and < 5%). Intraobserver reproducibility was similar between the two centers/training programs (AC 95% CI: <6%). Cumulative interobserver reproducibility in both centers was similar to the reproducibility within a single site (95% CI: <5%, <8%, and <7% for HC, AC, and FL, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of fetal biometry measurement was high in centers with structured training programs regardless of sonographers' experience. Reproducibility was higher in sonographers who completed the training.

Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reproducibility of a standardized method of measuring the Cesarean section (CS) scar, CS scar niche and their position relative to the internal os of the uterine cervix by transvaginal ultrasound in pregnant women with a previous full-dilatation CS.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center reproducibility study on women with a singleton pregnancy and a previous full-dilatation CS who underwent transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical length and CS scar characteristics at 14-24 weeks' gestation. The CS scar was identified as a hypoechogenic linear discontinuity of the myometrium at the anterior wall of the lower uterine segment or cervix. The CS scar niche was identified as an indentation at the site of the scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. The CS scar position was evaluated by measuring the distance to the internal cervical os. CS scar niche parameters, including its length, depth, width, and residual and adjacent myometrial thickness, were assessed in the sagittal and transverse planes. Qualitative reproducibility was assessed by agreement regarding visibility of the CS scar and niche. Quantitative reproducibility of CS scar measurements was assessed using three sets of images: (1) real-time two-dimensional (2D) images (real-time acquisition and caliper placement on 2D images by two operators), (2) offline 2D still images (offline caliper placement by two operators on stored 2D images acquired by one operator) and (3) three-dimensional (3D) volume images (volume manipulation and caliper placement on 2D images extracted by two operators). Agreement on CS scar visibility and the presence of a niche was analyzed using kappa coefficients. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative measurements was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

To achieve the desired statistical power, 72 women were recruited. The CS scar was visualized in > 80% of images. Interobserver agreement for scar visualization and presence of a niche in real-time 2D images was excellent (kappa coefficients of 0.84 and 0.85, respectively). Overall, reproducibility was higher for real-time 2D and offline 2D still images than for 3D volume images. The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for intraobserver reproducibility were between ± 1.1 and ± 3.6 mm for all sets of images; the 95% LOA for interobserver reproducibility were between ± 2.0 and ± 6.3 mm. Measurement of the distance from the CS scar to the internal cervical os was the most reproducible 2D measurement (intraobserver and interobserver 95% LOA within ± 1.6 and ± 2.7 mm, respectively). Overall, niche measurements were the least reproducible measurements (intraobserver 95% LOA between ± 1.6 and ± 3.6 mm; interobserver 95% LOA between ± 3.1 and ± 6.3 mm). There was no consistent difference between measurements obtained by reacquisition of 2D images (planes obtained twice and caliper placed), caliper placement on 2D stored images or volume manipulation (planes obtained twice and caliper placed).

CONCLUSIONS

The CS scar position and scar niche in pregnant women with a previous full-dilatation CS can be assessed in the second trimester of a subsequent pregnancy using either 2D or 3D volume ultrasound imaging with a high level of reproducibility. Overall, the most reproducible CS scar parameter is the distance from the CS scar to the internal cervical os. The method proposed in this study should enable clinicians to assess the CS scar reliably and may help predict pregnancy outcome. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.