Validation of Remote Dielectric Sensing (ReDS) in Monitoring Adult Patients Affected by COVID-19 Pneumonia

Effect of measurement procedure errors on assessing lung fluid via remote dielectric sensing system

The study assessed the impact of procedural errors on the remote dielectric sensing system (ReDS), a non-invasive lung fluid assessment technology, in an Asian cohort. Healthy volunteers underwent ReDS measurements following manufacturer's instructions, with two consecutive measurements one minute apart. A subset of 20 participants had modified procedure settings. Reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study included 86 healthy volunteers, and all ReDS measurements fell within the recommended normal range. The intra-rater reliability of ReDS measurements was excellent, with an ICC of 0.968. Among the subset of 20 subjects, deviations in height and weight did not significantly affect ReDS values. However, deviations in chest size by ± 3 cm had a noticeable impact on ReDS measures, and incorrect station selection led to fluctuations in ReDS readings. In conclusion, the ReDS system demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability and applicability in an Asian cohort. Procedural errors, such as chest size measurement and station selection, significantly influenced ReDS measurements. Adherence to standardized operating procedures is crucial to ensure accurate and consistent results. These findings highlight the importance of adherence to manufacturer instructions when utilizing ReDS for lung fluid assessment, thereby enhancing its reliability and clinical applicability.

Lung fluid content during 6MWT in patients with COPD with and without comorbid heart failure

BACKGROUND

Impact of lung fluid content changing during exercise has not been investigated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Using a novel point-of-care measurement system (remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system), we aimed to investigate changes in lung fluid content before and after 6-minute walk test (6MWT); especially, differences between patients with and without comorbid heart failure (HF) were evaluated.

METHODS

From June 2021 to July 2022, patients with COPD referred for 6MWT were prospectively enrolled. Measurements of lung fluid content by ReDS were conducted before and after 6MWT. Data on demographics, exacerbation history, spirometry and 6MWT were collected. Patients were also assessed for comorbid HF by cardiovascular evaluation. The main variables of interest were pre-6MWT ReDS, post-6MWT ReDS and post-pre ∆ReDS.

RESULTS

In total, 133 patients with COPD were included. Comparisons between patients with COPD with and without HF indicated similar pre-6MWT ReDS (26.9%±5.9% vs 26.5%±4.7%; p=0.751), but a significant difference in post-6MWT ReDS (29.7%±6.3% vs 25.7%±5.3%; p=0.002). Patients with COPD without HF exhibited a significant decrease in post-6MWT ReDS (from 26.5% to 25.7%; paired t-test p=0.001); conversely, those with HF displayed a remarkable increase in post-6MWT ReDS (from 26.9% to 29.7%; paired t-test p<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.93) for post-pre ∆ReDS in differentiating between patients with COPD with and without HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic changes in lung fluid content prior to and following 6MWT significantly differed between patients with COPD with and without HF. Measurements of lung fluid content by ReDS during exercise testing may be of merit to identify patients with COPD with unrecognised HF.

Clinical implications of remote dielectric sensing system to estimate lung fluid levels

The reduction of pulmonary congestion is an essential clinical target in the management of chronic heart failure. This proves to be challenging given the lack of a gold standard method to quantify the degree of pulmonary congestion both quickly and non-invasively. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a non-invasive electromagnetic energy-based technology to quantify lung fluid levels as a percentage within minutes. This technique, due to its high negative predictive value, may be a useful tool particularly to rule out primarily cardiac causes of dyspnea in ambulatory patients when the values are normal. Further studies are warranted to establish ReDS-guided management of congestive heart failure patients.

Pulmonary Edema in COVID-19 Treated with Furosemide and Negative Fluid Balance (NEGBAL): A Different and Promising Approach

In COVID-19, pulmonary edema has been attributed to “cytokine storm”. However, it is known that SARS-CoV2 promotes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 deficit, increases angiotensin II, and this triggers volume overload. Our report is based on COVID-19 patients with tomographic evidence of pulmonary edema and volume overload to whom established a standard treatment with diuretic (furosemide) guided by objectives: Negative Fluid Balance (NEGBAL approach). Retrospective observational study. We reviewed data from medical records: demographic, clinical, laboratory, blood gas, and chest tomography (CT) before and while undergoing NEGBAL, from 20 critically ill patients. Once the NEGBAL strategy was started, no patient required mechanical ventilation. All cases reverted to respiratory failure with NEGBAL, but subsequently two patients died from sepsis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The regressive analysis between PaO2/FiO2BAL and NEGBAL demonstrated correlation (p < 0.032). The results comparing the Pao2Fio2 between admission to NEGBAL to NEGBAL day 4, were statistically significant (p < 0.001). We noted between admission to NEGBAL and day 4 improvement in CT score (p < 0.001), decrease in the superior vena cava diameter (p < 0.001) and the decrease of cardiac axis (p < 0.001). Though our study has several limitations, we believe the promising results encourage further investigation of this different pathophysiological approach.