Diagnostic Performance of Serum Biomarkers Fibroblast Growth Factor 21, Galectin-3 and Copeptin for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in a Sample of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

FGF21 protects against HFpEF by improving cardiac mitochondrial bioenergetics in mice

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), a metabolic hormone with pleiotropic effects, is beneficial for various cardiac disorders. However, FGF21's role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. Here, we show that elevated circulating FGF21 levels are negatively associated with cardiac diastolic function in patients with HFpEF. Global or adipose FGF21 deficiency exacerbates cardiac diastolic dysfunction and damage in high-fat diet (HFD) plus N[w]-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-induced HFpEF mice, whereas these effects are notably reversed by FGF21 replenishment. Mechanistically, FGF21 enhances the production of adiponectin (APN), which in turn indirectly acts on cardiomyocytes, or FGF21 directly targets cardiomyocytes, to negatively regulate pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4) production by activating PI3K/AKT signals, then promoting mitochondrial bioenergetics. Additionally, APN deletion strikingly abrogates FGF21's protective effects against HFpEF, while genetic PDK4 inactivation markedly mitigates HFpEF in mice. Thus, FGF21 protects against HFpEF via fine-tuning the multiorgan crosstalk among the adipose, liver, and heart.

Predictive Value of NT-proBNP, FGF21, Galectin-3 and Copeptin in Advanced Heart Failure in Patients with Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background and Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common initial presentations of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There are different cardiac biomarkers related to the pathophysiological mechanisms of HF in T2DM. The current research aims to identify additional biomarkers that could improve the diagnosis and prognosis of HFpEF, which is currently assessed using NT pro-BNP levels. NT pro-BNP is a valuable tool for diagnosing heart failure but may not always correlate with clinical symptom severity or can present normal levels in certain cases, such as obesity. Biomarkers like FGF-21 and galectin-3 could provide greater insight into heart failure severity, especially in diabetic patients. The main objective of the current study is to assess the performance of NT-proBNP, FGF21, Galectin-3 and Copeptin to discriminate between advanced and mild HF. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups: 67 patients in NYHA functional class I-II (mild HF) and 50 patients in NYHA III-IV (advanced HF). NT-pro BNP, FGF21, Galectin 3 and Copeptin serum levels were determined with the ELISA method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and binomial logistic regression analysis were used to measure the ability of the studied biomarkers to distinguish between advanced and mild HF patients. Results: In patients with T2DM with advanced HF, serum FGF21 level was significantly positively correlated with eGFR (ρ = 0.35, p = 0.0125) and triglycerides (ρ = 0.28, p = 0.0465) and significantly negatively correlated with serum levels of HDL cholesterol (ρ = -0.29, p = 0.0386) and with RV-RA gradient (ρ = -0.30, p = 0.0358). In patients with mild HF, serum FGF21 level was significantly negatively correlated with NT-proBNP levels (ρ = -0.37, p = 0.0022), E/e' ratio (ρ = -0.29, p = 0.0182), TR velocity (ρ = -0.24, p = 0.0470) and RV-RA gradient (ρ = -0.24, p = 0.0472). FGF21 (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79) and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82) demonstrated significant predictive value to discriminate T2DM patients with advanced HF from those with mild HF. Elevated values for FGF21 (≥377.50 ng/mL) or NTproBNP (≥2379 pg/mL) were significantly associated with increased odds of advanced HF after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Conclusions: NTpro-BNP and FGF21 have a similar ability to discriminate T2DM patients with advanced HF from those with mild HF. Univariable and multivariable logistic models showed that, FGF21 and NTproBNP were independent predictors for advanced HF in patients with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction and T2DM.

Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a metabolic disorder that has alarmingly increased in incidence in recent decades. One of the most serious complications of T2DM is diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), an often underrecognized yet severe condition that is a leading cause of mortality among diabetic patients. In the early stages of DCM, patients typically show no symptoms and maintain normal systolic and diastolic left ventricle function, making early detection challenging. Currently available clinical markers are often not specific enough to detect the early stage of DCM. Conventional biomarkers of cardiac mechanical stress and injury, such as natriuretic peptides (NPs) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI), have shown limited predictive value for patients with T2DM. NPs have proven efficacy in detecting diastolic dysfunction in diabetic patients when used alongside 2D echocardiography, but their utility as biomarkers is limited to symptomatic individuals. While cTnI is a reliable indicator of general cardiac damage, it is not specific to cardiac injury caused by high glucose levels or T2DM. This underscores the need for research into biomarkers that can enable early diagnosis and management of DCM to reduce mortality rates. Promising novel biomarkers that showed good performance in detecting diastolic dysfunction or heart failure in diabetic patients include galectin-3, ST2, FGF-21, IGFBP-7, GDF-15, and TGF-β. This review summarizes the current understanding of DCM biomarkers, aiming to generate new ideas for the early recognition and treatment of DCM by exploring related pathophysiological mechanisms.

Diagnostic and predictive abilities of myokines in patients with heart failure

Myokines are defined as a heterogenic group of numerous cytokines, peptides and metabolic derivates, which are expressed, synthesized, produced, and released by skeletal myocytes and myocardial cells and exert either auto- and paracrine, or endocrine effects. Previous studies revealed that myokines play a pivotal role in mutual communications between skeletal muscles, myocardium and remote organs, such as brain, vasculature, bone, liver, pancreas, white adipose tissue, gut, and skin. Despite several myokines exert complete divorced biological effects mainly in regulation of skeletal muscle hypertrophy, residential cells differentiation, neovascularization/angiogenesis, vascular integrity, endothelial function, inflammation and apoptosis/necrosis, attenuating ischemia/hypoxia and tissue protection, tumor growth and malignance, for other occasions, their predominant effects affect energy homeostasis, glucose and lipid metabolism, adiposity, muscle training adaptation and food behavior. Last decade had been identified 250 more myokines, which have been investigating for many years further as either biomarkers or targets for heart failure management. However, only few myokines have been allocated to a promising tool for monitoring adverse cardiac remodeling, ischemia/hypoxia-related target-organ dysfunction, microvascular inflammation, sarcopenia/myopathy and prediction for poor clinical outcomes among patients with HF. This we concentrate on some most plausible myokines, such as myostatin, myonectin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, muslin, fibroblast growth factor 21, irisin, leukemia inhibitory factor, developmental endothelial locus-1, interleukin-6, nerve growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-1, which are suggested to be useful biomarkers for HF development and progression.

Methods to predict heart failure in diabetes patients

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular disease and powerful predictor for new-onset heart failure (HF).

AREAS COVERED

We focus on the relevant literature covering evidence of risk stratification based on imaging predictors and circulating biomarkers to optimize approaches to preventing HF in DM patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Multiple diagnostic algorithms based on echocardiographic parameters of cardiac remodeling including global longitudinal strain/strain rate are likely to be promising approach to justify individuals at higher risk of incident HF. Signature of cardiometabolic status may justify HF risk among T2DM individuals with low levels of natriuretic peptides, which preserve their significance in HF with clinical presentation. However, diagnostic and predictive values of conventional guideline-directed biomarker HF strategy may be non-optimal in patients with obesity and T2DM. Alternative biomarkers affecting cardiac fibrosis, inflammation, myopathy, and adipose tissue dysfunction are plausible tools for improving accuracy natriuretic peptides among T2DM patients at higher HF risk. In summary, risk identification and management of the patients with T2DM with established HF require conventional biomarkers monitoring, while the role of alternative biomarker approach among patients with multiple CV and metabolic risk factors appears to be plausible tool for improving clinical outcomes.

Epidemiology of heart failure in diabetes: a disease in disguise

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) without symptoms, and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent the most common phenotypes of HF in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in these individuals. However, diagnostic criteria for HF have changed over the years, resulting in heterogeneity in the prevalence/incidence rates reported in different studies. We aimed to give an overview of the diagnosis and epidemiology of HF in type 2 diabetes, using both a narrative and systematic review approach; we focus narratively on diagnosing (using the 2021 European Society of Cardiology [ESC] guidelines) and screening for HF in type 2 diabetes. We performed an updated (2016-October 2022) systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence and incidence of HF subtypes in adults ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes, using echocardiographic data. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched and data were assessed using random-effects meta-analyses, with findings presented as forest plots. From the 5015 studies found, 209 were screened using the full-text article. In total, 57 studies were included, together with 29 studies that were identified in a prior meta-analysis; these studies reported on the prevalence of LVSD (n=25 studies, 24,460 individuals), LVDD (n=65 studies, 25,729 individuals), HFrEF (n=4 studies, 4090 individuals), HFmrEF (n=2 studies, 2442 individuals) and/or HFpEF (n=8 studies, 5292 individuals), and on HF incidence (n=7 studies, 17,935 individuals). Using Hoy et al's risk-of-bias tool, we found that the studies included generally had a high risk of bias. They showed a prevalence of 43% (95% CI 37%, 50%) for LVDD, 17% (95% CI 7%, 35%) for HFpEF, 6% (95% CI 3%, 10%) for LVSD, 7% (95% CI 3%, 15%) for HFrEF, and 12% (95% CI 7%, 22%) for HFmrEF. For LVDD, grade I was found to be most prevalent. Additionally, we reported a higher incidence rate of HFpEF (7% [95% CI 4%, 11%]) than HFrEF 4% [95% CI 3%, 7%]). The evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of the diagnostic criteria over the years. The systematic section of this review provides new insights on the prevalence/incidence of HF in type 2 diabetes, unveiling a large pre-clinical target group with LVDD/HFpEF in which disease progression could be halted by early recognition and treatment.Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42022368035.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on association between galectin-3 and H2FPEF score in patients with unexplained dyspnea and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the association between Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and the H2FPEF score in patients with unexplained dyspnea and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on patients with unexplained dyspnea and a preserved LVEF in the Cardiology Department of Elazıg Medical Park Hospital, Turkey. The patients were evaluated based on the presence of DM and the H2FPEF score. Gal-3 levels were compared between groups, and the effect of DM on Gal-3 was assessed. The level of statistical significance in all tests was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

Gal-3 and H2FPEF scores were higher in patients with DM (p < .001 and p = .027, respectively). Gal-3 and HbA1C values were elevated in patients with moderate to high H2FPEF scores (p < .01 and p = .036, respectively). DM and Hypertension were more prevalent in patients with moderate to high H2FPEF scores (p = 0.024, p < 0.001, respectively). A strong correlation was observed between Gal-3 and the H2FPEF score (r = 0.375, p < .001). Gal-3 could predict patients with a moderate to high H2FPEF score using a cut-off value of 14.7, with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 67% (AUC: 0.702).

CONCLUSIONS

Gal-3 serves as an independent predictor of the H2FPEF score in the presence of DM, and the diagnostic capability of Gal-3 for Heart Failure with preserved LVEF remains unaffected by DM.

Mechanism of fibroblast growth factor 21 in cardiac remodeling

Cardiac remodeling is a basic pathological process that enables the progression of multiple cardiac diseases to heart failure. Fibroblast growth factor 21 is considered a regulator in maintaining energy homeostasis and shows a positive role in preventing damage caused by cardiac diseases. This review mainly summarizes the effects and related mechanisms of fibroblast growth factor 21 on pathological processes associated with cardiac remodeling, based on a variety of cells of myocardial tissue. The possibility of Fibroblast growth factor 21 as a promising treatment for the cardiac remodeling process will also be discussed.

Elevated serum FGF21 levels predict heart failure during hospitalization of STEMI patients after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) has multiple cardioprotective effects including modulation of glucolipid metabolism, anti-inflammation, and anti-oxidative stress, but its association with the heart failure during hospitalization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been reported.

Methods

A total of 348 STEMI patients treated with emergency PCI were included from January 2016 to December 2018. Relevant biochemical indicators were measured by central laboratory. Serum FGF21 levels were measured by ELISA. The occurrence of heart failure during hospitalization was recorded. Patients' cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography.

Results

Serum FGF21 levels were significantly higher in the STEMI group with heart failure than in the group without heart failure (249.95 ± 25.52 vs. 209.98 ± 36.35, P < 0.001). Serum FGF21 levels showed a strong positive correlation with N-terminal precursor B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in STEMI patients (r = 0.749, P < 0.001). FGF21 was found to be an independent risk factor for the development of heart failure during hospitalization in STEMI patients by binary logistic regression analysis. The area under curve (AUC) for FGF21 to predict the development of heart failure during hospitalization in STEMI patients was 0.816 (95% CI [0.770-0.863]) according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Conclusion

Elevated serum FGF21 levels have been shown to be a strong predictor of heart failure during hospitalization in patients with STEMI after emergency PCI.

Fibroblast growth factor 21 in heart failure

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a peptide hormone involved in energy homeostasis that protects against the development of obesity and diabetes in animal models. Its level is elevated in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in humans. However, little is known about the role of FGF21 in heart failure (HF). HF is a major global health problem with a prevalence that is predicted to rise, especially in ageing populations. Despite improved therapies, mortality due to HF remains high, and given its insidious onset, prediction of its development is challenging for physicians. The emergence of cardiac biomarkers to improve prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of HF has received much attention over the past decade. Recent studies have suggested FGF21 is a promising biomarker candidate for HF. Preclinical research has shown that FGF21 is involved in the pathophysiology of HF through the prevention of oxidative stress, cardiac hypertrophy, and inflammation in cardiomyocytes. However, in the available clinical literature, FGF21 levels appear to be paradoxically raised in HF, potentially implying a FGF21 resistant state as occurs in obesity. Several potential confounding variables complicate the verdict on whether FGF21 is of clinical value as a biomarker. Further research is thus needed to evaluate whether FGF21 has a causal role in HF, and whether circulating FGF21 can be used as a biomarker to improve the prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis of HF. This review draws from preclinical and clinical studies to explore the role of FGF21 in HF.

Copeptin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Cardiovascular Diseases

Copeptin is the carboxyl-terminus of the arginine vasopressin (AVP) precursor peptide. The main physiological functions of AVP are fluid and osmotic balance, cardiovascular homeostasis, and regulation of endocrine stress response. Copeptin, which is released in an equimolar mode with AVP from the neurohypophysis, has emerged as a stable and simple-to-measure surrogate marker of AVP and has displayed enormous potential in clinical practice. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is currently recognized as a primary threat to the health of the population worldwide, and thus, rapid and effective approaches to identify individuals that are at high risk of, or have already developed CVD are required. Copeptin is a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in CVD, including the rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), mortality prediction in heart failure (HF), and stroke. This review summarizes and discusses the value of copeptin in the diagnosis, discrimination, and prognosis of CVD (AMI, HF, and stroke), as well as the caveats and prospects for the application of this potential biomarker.

Advances and Challenges in Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) with reduced (r) and preserved (p) ejection fraction (EF) continues to rise globally despite current advances in diagnostics and improvements to medical management [...]