Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions among women with transformation zone type 3

BACKGROUND

Inaccurate colposcopy diagnosis may lead to inappropriate management and increase the incidence of cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in women with transformation zone type 3 (TZ3).

METHODS

Records from 764 patients with TZ3 who underwent colposcopy-directed biopsy and/or endocervical curettage in Putuo Hospital China between February 2020 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. Colposcopy was carried out based on 2011 International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) and Colposcopy nomenclature. The diagnostic performance of colposcopy for identifying CIN2 + was evaluated compared with biopsies. The Kappa and McNemar tests were used to perform statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 11.0% had pathologic CIN2+. The relative sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of colposcopy for histologic CIN2 + were 51.2%, 96.5%, 64.2% and 94.1%, respectively. The senior colposcopists (80.6%) had a higher colposcopic accuracy to diagnose histologic CIN2 + than junior colposcopists (68.6%). In subgroup analyses, age group ≥ 60 years (70.3%) showed lowest diagnostic accuracy when compared with age groups of < 45 years (84.4%) and 45-59 years (74.9%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest an increased risk of diagnostic inaccuracy of colposcopy in identifying CIN2 + in those ≥ 60 years of age with TZ3, and the accuracy of colposcopy is required to be further improved.

Impact of the Corona Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment

BACKGROUND/AIM

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in disruptions to healthcare systems throughout the world. The numbers of cytology examinations, human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, and women referred for colposcopy decreased in many countries. There have been no reports on cervical cancer screening in Germany. This study aimed to describe changes in the numbers of colposcopies, cytology examinations, HPV tests, and histological results during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic years in order to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The numbers of colposcopies, cytology examinations, HPV tests, and histologic results were analyzed retrospectively for the period January 2018 to December 2022. The 2 years period before the pandemic (2018 and 2019) were compared with the 3 years period of the pandemic (2020-2022).

RESULTS

In total, 6,518 colposcopies were performed in 5,579 women. The numbers of colposcopies, cytology examinations, and high-risk HPV (hrHPV) tests increased during the pandemic years. The number of biopsies per year taken was stable (range=450-554). The relative numbers of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III/HSIL findings were stable, while the numbers of cervical cancers identified increased slightly from 15 (6.6%) in 2018 to 22 (7.4%) in 2022.

CONCLUSION

Increases in numbers of women examined and colposcopies were observed in the years 2021 and 2022 during the pandemic, in comparison to the preceding years. These also led to increases in the figures for cytology, hrHPV, histology, and operations. The onset of the pandemic occurred in the same year as a newly organized screening program started in Germany. The increases might therefore be due to the newly organized screening system.

Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based analysis software to support screening system of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Cervical cancer, the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide, often proves fatal and stems from precursor lesions caused by high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. Current screening methods, such as the Pap test, liquid-based cytology (LBC), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and HPV DNA testing, have limitations, requiring confirmation through colposcopy. This study introduces CerviCARE AI, an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis software, to address colposcopy challenges. It automatically analyzes Tele-cervicography images, distinguishing between low-grade and high-grade lesions. In a multicenter retrospective study, CerviCARE AI achieved a remarkable sensitivity of 98% for high-risk groups (P2, P3, HSIL or higher, CIN2 or higher) and a specificity of 95.5%. These findings underscore CerviCARE AI's potential as a valuable diagnostic tool for highly accurate identification of cervical precancerous lesions. While further prospective research is needed to validate its clinical utility, this AI system holds promise for improving cervical cancer screening and lessening the burden of this deadly disease.

Detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and assessing diagnostic performance of colposcopy among women with oncogenic HPV

BACKGROUND

HPV screening tests may improve cervical cancer risk stratification and better guide decisions about follow-up with colposcopy/biopsy. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) among women with oncogenic HPV types and evaluate the performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic CIN2 + at Putuo Hospital, Shanghai, China.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2020 to December 2022 among women who were referred to colposcopy. Women with high-risk (HR) HPV-positive, cytology testing and colposcopy-directed biopsy were included.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that high-grade colposcopic impression ((OR, 17.61%, 95%CI: 11.54-26.85%) was associated with the highest risk for detecting CIN2+, followed by HSIL + cytology (OR, 6.90%, 95%CI: 3.56-13.37%) and HPV16/18 positive (OR, 2.91%, 95%CI: 2.12-3.99%). Overall, CIN2 + was detected in 14.6% of 2007 women. HPV16/18 had higher CIN2 + risks than other HR-HPV genotypes (30.1% vs. 10.2%, P<0.001). Among women with low-grade cytology, 24.1% had CIN2+, and the risks for HPV16/18 (58.2%) were higher than for other HR-HPV(16.8%). For those with high-grade cytology, there was no significant difference between HPV groups ( 75.0% vs. 72.9%, P > 0.05). The diagnostic performance of colposcopy in diagnosis of CIN2 + by senior and junior colposcopists was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that referral to colposcopy is recommended in managing women with HR-HPV positive, and colposcopic impressions provide key clues for identification CIN2+.

Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous intraepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy 2011 terminology

BACKGROUND

Colposcopy is an important tool in diagnosing cervical cancer, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) issued the latest version of the guidelines in 2011. This study aims to systematically assess the accuracy of colposcopy in predicting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) / high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) under the 2011 IFCPC terminology.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for studies about the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia under the new IFCPC colposcopy terminology from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. Data were independently extracted by two authors and an overall diagnostic performance index was calculated under two colposcopic thresholds.

RESULTS

Totally, fifteen articles with 22,764 participants in compliance with the criteria were included in meta-analysis. When colposcopy was used to detect LSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95) and 0.51 (0.43-0.59), respectively. When colposcopy was used to detect HSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (0.58-0.76) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In accordance with the 2011 IFCPC terminology, the accuracy of colposcopy has improved in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. Colposcopy is now more sensitive with LSIL+ taken as the cut-off value and is more specific to HSIL+. These findings suggest we are avoiding under- or overdiagnosis both of which impact on patients' well-being.