Colposcopic accuracy in diagnosing squamous intraepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy 2011 terminology

BACKGROUND

Colposcopy is an important tool in diagnosing cervical cancer, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) issued the latest version of the guidelines in 2011. This study aims to systematically assess the accuracy of colposcopy in predicting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) / high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) under the 2011 IFCPC terminology.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for studies about the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia under the new IFCPC colposcopy terminology from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database. Data were independently extracted by two authors and an overall diagnostic performance index was calculated under two colposcopic thresholds.

RESULTS

Totally, fifteen articles with 22,764 participants in compliance with the criteria were included in meta-analysis. When colposcopy was used to detect LSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95) and 0.51 (0.43-0.59), respectively. When colposcopy was used to detect HSIL+, the combined sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (0.58-0.76) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In accordance with the 2011 IFCPC terminology, the accuracy of colposcopy has improved in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. Colposcopy is now more sensitive with LSIL+ taken as the cut-off value and is more specific to HSIL+. These findings suggest we are avoiding under- or overdiagnosis both of which impact on patients' well-being.

Case study of cervical cancer prevention in two sub-Saharan African countries: Rwanda and Sierra Leone

Background

Cervical cancer is a public health issue of global concern. It is a preventable disease but continues to threaten the lives of women, especially in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

We selected two African countries in sub-Saharan Africa (the Republic of Rwanda and the Republic of Sierra Leone) to show a good example of cervical cancer prevention and constrains hindering countries from effectively implementing cervical cancer programs. Secondary data were collected from the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the Global Burden of Cancer (GLOBOCAN), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the World Bank and from official websites of the selected countries. A descriptive analysis method was used to source data and compare variables such as the associated factors, disease burden, prevention programs, health workforce, success factors, and challenges.

Results

Rwanda achieved 93.3% human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of the three doses vaccinating girls in class 6, as a result of effective school-based platform delivery system and community partnership to identify girls who are out of school. Rwanda reduced the historical two-decade gap in vaccine introduction between high- and low-income countries. The country also introduced a nationwide cervical cancer screening and treatment program. An impressive decreased cervical cancer incidence rate in Rwanda in recent years was observed. Sierra Leone lags behind in terms of almost all cervical cancer prevention programs. Therefore, Sierra Leone needs more efforts to implement cervical cancer intervention programs at the national level, including HPV vaccination, and train and increase the number of health professionals, treatment, and palliative care services to accelerate cervical cancer activities.

Conclusion

The disease burden of cervical cancer for Rwanda and Sierra Leone is heavy. There remains huge room for improvement in preventing and controlling cervical cancer in these countries. The goal of cervical cancer elimination would not be feasible in countries without the awareness and will of the policymakers and the public, the compliance to fund cervical cancer programs, the prioritization of cervical cancer activities, the availability of resources, the adequate health workforce and infrastructure, the cross-sectional collaboration and planning, inter-sectorial, national, regional, and international partnerships.

A Multi-Center Study on the Negative Psychological Impact and Associated Factors in Chinese Healthcare Workers 1 Year After the COVID-19 Initial Outbreak

Objectives: The study aimed at analyzing the prevalence of five psychological outcomes (depression, anxiety, stress, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicidal ideation) among Chinese healthcare workers (HCWs), and measured the total possible negative psychological impact 1 year after the COVID-19 initial outbreak. Methods: A cross-sectional nationwide multi-center study was performed between November 2020 and March 2021 in China. A self-report questionnaire was applied, and three psychological scales were used. Binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk factors associated with each psychological outcome. Results: The findings demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative psychological impact on HCWs, which was still evident 1 year after the initial outbreak. Nurses showed higher depression and anxiety than other HCWs. Female gender, passive coping, long working hours, having a chronic disease, and experiencing violence, among other factors, were all risk factors for psychological impairment. Conclusion: Developing and promoting programs to improve mental health among HCWs, and identifying those who might need psychological support is still relevant 1 year after the initial outbreak.

Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Different Populations in Central China: Cross-Sectional Survey

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has threatened the health systems of many countries worldwide. Several studies have suggested that the pandemic affects not only physical health but also all aspects of society. A lot of information has been reported about the disease since the beginning of the outbreak. For that reason, it is essential to investigate the attitudes and level of knowledge and awareness that different populations had regarding COVID-19 during the critical period of the outbreak.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the knowledge and awareness of and attitudes toward the COVID-19 pandemic among different populations in Central China during the critical period of the outbreak.

Methods

A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in Central China from February to March 2020. The study participants included three different populations: medical workers, students, and those with other occupations. In this study, a questionnaire was designed to collect information on the following four aspects: sociodemographic information, knowledge related to COVID-19, awareness of COVID-19, and attitude toward COVID-19. The chi-square test and Fisher test were used for comparison among groups. The level of significance was set at P<.05.

Results

This study enrolled a total of 508 participants. Among them, there were 380 students (74.8%), 39 medical workers (7.7%), and 89 people with other occupations (17.5%). Most of the participants were female (n=272, 53.5%), lived in rural areas (n=258, 50.8%), and were single (n=423, 86.9%). The majority of the respondents had attended college (n=454, 89.4%). Most of the participants said they had heard about COVID-19 by January, and most of them looked for information on social media (Sina Weibo, 84.7%), and WeChat and QQ groups (74.2%). The participants showed an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 with no significant differences among the groups. However, medical workers demonstrated a slightly advanced knowledge in their responses to professional questions such as the potential susceptible population, possible host, treatment of COVID-19, and disease category. A higher proportion of medical workers (71.8%) and those in the other occupations group (52.8%) were highly concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 43% of the participants stated that the lockdown of their village/city had a significant impact on their lives. Nevertheless, the majority of respondents had an overall optimistic attitude toward the control of the disease (92.1% of students [n=350], 94.9% of medical workers [n=37], and 92.3% of those in other occupations [n=83]).

Conclusions

All three groups reported an adequate background knowledge about COVID-19 but medical workers showed a slightly advanced knowledge in their responses to professional questions. Most of the participants were highly concerned about COVID-19 during the critical period of the outbreak. The majority of respondents declared that the village/city lockdown policy had a significant impact on their daily life but most of them held an optimistic attitude toward the control of COVID-19.