1
|
Checcucci E, Veccia A, Puliatti S, De Backer P, Piazza P, Kowalewski KF, Rodler S, Taratkin M, Belenchon IR, Baekelandt L, De Cillis S, Piana A, Eissa A, Rivas JG, Cacciamani G, Porpiglia F. Metaverse in surgery - origins and future potential. Nat Rev Urol 2024:10.1038/s41585-024-00941-4. [PMID: 39349948 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00941-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
The metaverse refers to a collective virtual space that combines physical and digital realities to create immersive, interactive environments. This space is powered by technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain. In healthcare, the metaverse can offer many applications. Specifically in surgery, potential uses of the metaverse include the possibility of conducting immersive surgical training in a VR or AR setting, and enhancing surgical planning through the adoption of three-dimensional virtual models and simulated procedures. At the intraoperative level, AR-guided surgery can assist the surgeon in real time to increase surgical precision in tumour identification and selective management of vessels. In post-operative care, potential uses of the metaverse include recovery monitoring and patient education. In urology, AR and VR have been widely explored in the past decade, mainly for surgical navigation in prostate and kidney cancer surgery, whereas only anecdotal metaverse experiences have been reported to date, specifically in partial nephrectomy. In the future, further integration of AI will improve the metaverse experience, potentially increasing the possibility of carrying out surgical navigation, data collection and virtual trials within the metaverse. However, challenges concerning data security and regulatory compliance must be addressed before the metaverse can be used to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pieter De Backer
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Mark Taratkin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ines Rivero Belenchon
- Urology and Nephrology Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Manuel Siurot s/n, Seville, Spain
| | - Loic Baekelandt
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Urology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ahmed Eissa
- Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piana A, Amparore D, Sica M, Volpi G, Checcucci E, Piramide F, De Cillis S, Busacca G, Scarpelli G, Sidoti F, Alba S, Piazzolla P, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Di Dio M. Automatic 3D Augmented-Reality Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Using Machine Learning: Our Pioneer Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1047. [PMID: 38473404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of "Precision Surgery" is to reduce the impact of surgeries on patients' global health. In this context, over the last years, the use of three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) of organs has allowed for intraoperative guidance, showing hidden anatomical targets, thus limiting healthy-tissue dissections and subsequent damage during an operation. In order to provide an automatic 3DVM overlapping in the surgical field, we developed and tested a new software, called "ikidney", based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). From January 2022 to April 2023, patients affected by organ-confined renal masses amenable to RAPN were enrolled. A bioengineer, a software developer, and a surgeon collaborated to create hyper-accurate 3D models for automatic 3D AR-guided RAPN, using CNNs. For each patient, demographic and clinical data were collected. A total of 13 patients were included in the present study. The average anchoring time was 11 (6-13) s. Unintended 3D-model automatic co-registration temporary failures happened in a static setting in one patient, while this happened in one patient in a dynamic setting. There was one failure; in this single case, an ultrasound drop-in probe was used to detect the neoplasm, and the surgery was performed under ultrasound guidance instead of AR guidance. No major intraoperative nor postoperative complications (i.e., Clavien Dindo > 2) were recorded. The employment of AI has unveiled several new scenarios in clinical practice, thanks to its ability to perform specific tasks autonomously. We employed CNNs for an automatic 3DVM overlapping during RAPN, thus improving the accuracy of the superimposition process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amparore D, Sica M, Verri P, Piramide F, Checcucci E, De Cillis S, Piana A, Campobasso D, Burgio M, Cisero E, Busacca G, Di Dio M, Piazzolla P, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Computer Vision and Machine-Learning Techniques for Automatic 3D Virtual Images Overlapping During Augmented Reality Guided Robotic Partial Nephrectomy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241229368. [PMID: 38374643 PMCID: PMC10878218 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241229368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The research's purpose is to develop a software that automatically integrates and overlay 3D virtual models of kidneys harboring renal masses into the Da Vinci robotic console, assisting surgeon during the intervention. INTRODUCTION Precision medicine, especially in the field of minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy, aims to use 3D virtual models as a guidance for augmented reality robotic procedures. However, the co-registration process of the virtual images over the real operative field is performed manually. METHODS In this prospective study, two strategies for the automatic overlapping of the model over the real kidney were explored: the computer vision technology, leveraging the super-enhancement of the kidney allowed by the intraoperative injection of Indocyanine green for superimposition and the convolutional neural network technology, based on the processing of live images from the endoscope, after a training of the software on frames from prerecorded videos of the same surgery. The work-team, comprising a bioengineer, a software-developer and a surgeon, collaborated to create hyper-accuracy 3D models for automatic 3D-AR-guided RAPN. For each patient, demographic and clinical data were collected. RESULTS Two groups (group A for the first technology with 12 patients and group B for the second technology with 8 patients) were defined. They showed comparable preoperative and post-operative characteristics. Concerning the first technology the average co-registration time was 7 (3-11) seconds while in the case of the second technology 11 (6-13) seconds. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no differences in terms of functional outcomes between the groups at every time-point considered. CONCLUSION The first technology allowed a successful anchoring of the 3D model to the kidney, despite minimal manual refinements. The second technology improved kidney automatic detection without relying on indocyanine injection, resulting in better organ boundaries identification during tests. Further studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto (KR), Italy
| | - Davide Campobasso
- Urology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
- 2 Level Master Degree Program in Advanced Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology, Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi, Italy
| | - Mariano Burgio
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Edoardo Cisero
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Department of Management and Production Engineer, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| |
Collapse
|