Directly and Simultaneously Expressing Absolute and Relative Treatment Effects in Medical Data Models and Applications

The Initial COVID-19 Reliable Interactive DNA Methylation Markers and Biological Implications

Earlier research has established the existence of reliable interactive genomic biomarkers. However, reliable DNA methylation biomarkers, not to mention interactivity, have yet to be identified at the epigenetic level. This study, drawing from 865,859 methylation sites, discovered two miniature sets of Infinium MethylationEPIC sites, each having eight CpG sites (genes) to interact with each other and disease subtypes. They led to the nearly perfect (96.87-100% accuracy) prediction of COVID-19 patients from patients with other diseases or healthy controls. These CpG sites can jointly explain some post-COVID-19-related conditions. These CpG sites and the optimally performing genomic biomarkers reported in the literature become potential druggable targets. Among these CpG sites, cg16785077 (gene MX1), cg25932713 (gene PARP9), and cg22930808 (gene PARP9) at DNA methylation levels indicate that the initial SARS-CoV-2 virus may be better treated as a transcribed viral DNA into RNA virus, i.e., not as an RNA virus that has concerned scientists in the field. Such a discovery can significantly change the scientific thinking and knowledge of viruses.

Genomic Biomarker Heterogeneities between SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

Genes functionally associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and genes functionally related to the COVID-19 disease can be different, whose distinction will become the first essential step for successfully fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, this first step has not been completed in all biological and medical research. Using a newly developed max-competing logistic classifier, two genes, ATP6V1B2 and IFI27, stand out to be critical in the transcriptional response to SARS-CoV-2 infection with differential expressions derived from NP/OP swab PCR. This finding is evidenced by combining these two genes with another gene in predicting disease status to achieve better-indicating accuracy than existing classifiers with the same number of genes. In addition, combining these two genes with three other genes to form a five-gene classifier outperforms existing classifiers with ten or more genes. These two genes can be critical in fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic as a new focus and direction with their exceptional predicting accuracy. Comparing the functional effects of these genes with a five-gene classifier with 100% accuracy identified and tested from blood samples in our earlier work, the genes and their transcriptional response and functional effects on SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the genes and their functional signature patterns on COVID-19 antibodies, are significantly different. We will use a total of fourteen cohort studies (including breakthrough infections and omicron variants) with 1481 samples to justify our results. Such significant findings can help explore the causal and pathological links between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 disease, and fight against the disease with more targeted genes, vaccines, antiviral drugs, and therapies.

Lift the Veil of Breast Cancers Using 4 or Fewer Critical Genes

Known genes in the breast cancer study literature could not be confirmed whether they are vital to breast cancer formations due to lack of convincing accuracy, although they may be biologically directly related to breast cancer based on present biological knowledge. It is hoped vital genes can be identified with the highest possible accuracy, for example, 100% accuracy and convincing causal patterns beyond what has been known in breast cancer. One hope is that finding gene-gene interaction signatures and functional effects may solve the puzzle. This research uses a recently developed competing linear factor analysis method in differentially expressed gene detection to advance the study of breast cancer formation. Surprisingly, 3 genes are detected to be differentially expressed in TNBC and non-TNBC (Her2, Luminal A, Luminal B) samples with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 1 study of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC, with 54 675 genes and 265 samples). These 3 genes show a clear signature pattern of how TNBC patients can be grouped. For another TNBC study (with 54 673 genes and 66 samples), 4 genes bring the same accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Four genes are found to have the same accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 1 breast cancer study (with 54 675 genes and 121 samples), and the same 4 genes bring an accuracy of 100% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity in the fourth breast cancer study (with 60 483 genes and 1217 samples). These results show the 4-gene-based classifiers are robust and accurate. The detected genes naturally classify patients into subtypes, for example, 7 subtypes. These findings demonstrate the clearest gene-gene interaction patterns and functional effects with the smallest numbers of genes and the highest accuracy compared with findings reported in the literature. The 4 genes are considered to be essential for breast cancer studies and practice. They can provide focused, targeted researches and precision medicine for each subtype of breast cancer. New breast cancer disease types may be detected using the classified subtypes, and hence new effective therapies can be developed.