Origins of Genetic Coding: Self-Guided Molecular Self-Organisation

A genomic database furnishes minimal functional glycyl-tRNA synthetases homologous to other, designed class II urzymes

The hypothesis that conserved core catalytic sites could represent ancestral aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) drove the design of functional TrpRS, LeuRS, and HisRS 'urzymes'. We describe here new urzymes detected in the genomic record of the arctic fox, Vulpes lagopus. They are homologous to the α-subunit of bacterial heterotetrameric Class II glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GlyRS-B) enzymes. AlphaFold2 predicted that the N-terminal 81 amino acids would adopt a 3D structure nearly identical to our designed HisRS urzyme (HisCA1). We expressed and purified that N-terminal segment and the spliced open reading frame GlyCA1-2. Both exhibit robust single-turnover burst sizes and ATP consumption rates higher than those previously published for HisCA urzymes and comparable to those for LeuAC and TrpAC. GlyCA is more than twice as active in glycine activation by adenosine triphosphate as the full-length GlyRS-B α2 dimer. Michaelis-Menten rate constants for all three substrates reveal significant coupling between Exon2 and both substrates. GlyCA activation favors Class II amino acids that complement those favored by HisCA and LeuAC. Structural features help explain these results. These minimalist GlyRS catalysts are thus homologous to previously described urzymes. Their properties reinforce the notion that urzymes may have the requisite catalytic activities to implement a reduced, ancestral genetic coding alphabet.

Primordial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases preferred minihelices to full-length tRNA

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) and tRNAs translate the genetic code in all living cells. Little is known about how their molecular ancestors began to enforce the coding rules for the expression of their own genes. Schimmel et al. proposed in 1993 that AARS catalytic domains began by reading an 'operational' code in the acceptor stems of tRNA minihelices. We show here that the enzymology of an AARS urzyme•TΨC-minihelix cognate pair is a rich in vitro realization of that idea. The TΨC-minihelixLeu is a very poor substrate for full-length Leucyl-tRNA synthetase. It is a superior RNA substrate for the corresponding urzyme, LeuAC. LeuAC active-site mutations shift the choice of both amino acid and RNA substrates. AARS urzyme•minihelix cognate pairs are thus small, pliant models for the ancestral decoding hardware. They are thus an ideal platform for detailed experimental study of the operational RNA code.

Genomic database furnishes a spontaneous example of a functional Class II glycyl-tRNA synthetase urzyme

The chief barrier to studies of how genetic coding emerged is the lack of experimental models for ancestral aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS). We hypothesized that conserved core catalytic sites could represent such ancestors. That hypothesis enabled engineering functional "urzymes" from TrpRS, LeuRS, and HisRS. We describe here a fourth urzyme, GlyCA, detected in an open reading frame from the genomic record of the arctic fox, Vulpes lagopus. GlyCA is homologous to a bacterial heterotetrameric Class II GlyRS-B. Alphafold2 predicted that the N-terminal 81 amino acids would adopt a 3D structure nearly identical to the HisRS urzyme (HisCA1). We expressed and purified that N-terminal segment. Enzymatic characterization revealed a robust single-turnover burst size and a catalytic rate for ATP consumption well in excess of that previously published for HisCA1. Time-dependent aminoacylation of tRNAGly proceeds at a rate consistent with that observed for amino acid activation. In fact, GlyCA is actually 35 times more active in glycine activation by ATP than the full-length GlyRS-B α-subunit dimer. ATP-dependent activation of the 20 canonical amino acids favors Class II amino acids that complement those favored by HisCA and LeuAC. These properties reinforce the notion that urzymes represent the requisite ancestral catalytic activities to implement a reduced genetic coding alphabet.

Self-Organisation of Prediction Models

Living organisms are active open systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium. The ability to behave actively corresponds to dynamical metastability: minor but supercritical internal or external effects may trigger major substantial actions such as gross mechanical motion, dissipating internally accumulated energy reserves. Gaining a selective advantage from the beneficial use of activity requires a consistent combination of sensual perception, memorised experience, statistical or causal prediction models, and the resulting favourable decisions on actions. This information processing chain originated from mere physical interaction processes prior to life, here denoted as structural information exchange. From there, the self-organised transition to symbolic information processing marks the beginning of life, evolving through the novel purposivity of trial-and-error feedback and the accumulation of symbolic information. The emergence of symbols and prediction models can be described as a ritualisation transition, a symmetry-breaking kinetic phase transition of the second kind previously known from behavioural biology. The related new symmetry is the neutrally stable arbitrariness, conventionality, or code invariance of symbols with respect to their meaning. The meaning of such symbols is given by the structural effect they ultimately unleash, directly or indirectly, by deciding on which actions to take. The early genetic code represents the first symbols. The genetically inherited symbolic information is the first prediction model for activities sufficient for survival under the condition of environmental continuity, sometimes understood as the "final causality" property of the model.