1
|
Ribalta C, Jensen ACØ, Shandilya N, Delpivo C, Jensen KA, Fonseca AS. Use of the dustiness index in combination with the handling energy factor for exposure modelling of nanomaterials. NANOIMPACT 2024; 33:100493. [PMID: 38219948 DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2024.100493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
The use of modelling tools in the occupational hygiene community has increased in the last years to comply with the different existing regulations. However, limitations still exist mainly due to the difficulty to obtain certain key parameters such as the emission rate, which in the case of powder handling can be estimated using the dustiness index (DI). The goal of this work is to explore the applicability and usability of the DI for emission source characterization and occupational exposure prediction to particles during nanomaterial powder handling. Modelling of occupational exposure concentrations of 13 case scenarios was performed using a two-box model as well as three nano-specific tools (Stoffenmanager nano, NanoSafer and GUIDEnano). The improvement of modelling performance by using a derived handling energy factor (H) was explored. Results show the usability of the DI for emission source characterization and respirable mass exposure modelling of powder handling scenarios of nanomaterials. A clear improvement in modelling outcome was obtained when using derived quartile-3 H factors with, 1) Pearson correlations of 0.88 vs. 0.52 (not using H), and 2) ratio of modelled/measured concentrations ranging from 0.9 to 10 in 75% cases vs. 16.7% of the cases when not using H. Particle number concentrations were generally underpredicted. Using the most conservative H values, predictions with ratios modelled/measured concentrations of 0.4-3.6 were obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Ribalta
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), 10317 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Alexander C Ø Jensen
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Camilla Delpivo
- LEITAT Technological Centre, C/ de Pallars, 179 - 185, 08005 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Keld A Jensen
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Ana Sofia Fonseca
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sørli JB, Sengupta S, Jensen ACØ, Nikiforov V, Clausen PA, Hougaard KS, Højriis S, Frederiksen M, Hadrup N. Risk assessment of consumer spray products using in vitro lung surfactant function inhibition, exposure modelling and chemical analysis. Food Chem Toxicol 2022; 164:112999. [PMID: 35427705 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.112999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Consumer spray products release aerosols that can potentially be inhaled and reach the deep parts of the lungs. A thin layer of liquid, containing a mixture of proteins and lipids known as lung surfactant, coats the alveoli. Inhibition of lung surfactant function can lead to acute loss of lung function. We focused on two groups of spray products; 8 cleaning and 13 impregnation products, and in the context of risk assessment, used an in vitro method for assessing inhibition of lung surfactant function. Original spray-cans were used to generate aerosols to measure aerodynamic particle size distribution. We recreated a real-life exposure scenario to estimate the alveolar deposited dose. Most impregnation products inhibited lung surfactant function at the lowest aerosolization rate, whereas only two cleaning products inhibited function at the highest rates. We used inhibitory dose and estimated alveolar deposition to calculate the margin of safety (MoS). The MoS for the inhibitory products was ≤1 for the impregnation products, while much larger for the cleaning products (>880). This risk assessment focused on the risk of lung surfactant function disruption and provides knowledge on an endpoint of lung toxicity that is not investigated by the currently available OECD test guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Sørli
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - S Sengupta
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - A C Ø Jensen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - V Nikiforov
- Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Tromsø, Norway.
| | - P A Clausen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - K S Hougaard
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Sara Højriis
- COWI, Parallelvej 2, Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark; DHI A/S, Agern Allé 5, Hørsholm, Denmark.
| | - M Frederiksen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - N Hadrup
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ribalta C, López-Lilao A, Fonseca AS, Jensen ACØ, Jensen KA, Monfort E, Viana M. Evaluation of One- and Two-Box Models as Particle Exposure Prediction Tools at Industrial Scale. TOXICS 2021; 9:201. [PMID: 34564352 PMCID: PMC8471509 DOI: 10.3390/toxics9090201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
One- and two-box models have been pointed out as useful tools for modelling indoor particle exposure. However, model performance still needs further testing if they are to be implemented as trustworthy tools for exposure assessment. The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance, applicability and reproducibility of one- and two-box models on real-world industrial scenarios. A study on filling of seven materials in three filling lines with different levels of energy and mitigation strategies was used. Inhalable and respirable mass concentrations were calculated with one- and two-box models. The continuous drop and rotating drum methods were used for emission rate calculation, and ranges from a one-at-a-time methodology were applied for local exhaust ventilation efficiency and inter-zonal air flows. When using both dustiness methods, large differences were observed for modelled inhalable concentrations but not for respirable, which showed the importance to study the linkage between dustiness and processes. Higher model accuracy (ratio modelled vs. measured concentrations 0.5-5) was obtained for the two- (87%) than the one-box model (53%). Large effects on modelled concentrations were seen when local exhausts ventilation and inter-zonal variations where parametrized in the models. However, a certain degree of variation (10-20%) seems acceptable, as similar conclusions are reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Ribalta
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (A.S.F.); (A.C.Ø.J.); (K.A.J.)
| | - Ana López-Lilao
- Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC)-AICE, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castellón, Spain; (A.L.-L.); (E.M.)
| | - Ana Sofia Fonseca
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (A.S.F.); (A.C.Ø.J.); (K.A.J.)
| | | | - Keld Alstrup Jensen
- The National Research Center for Work Environment (NRCWE), DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (A.S.F.); (A.C.Ø.J.); (K.A.J.)
| | - Eliseo Monfort
- Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC)-AICE, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castellón, Spain; (A.L.-L.); (E.M.)
| | - Mar Viana
- Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koivisto AJ, Spinazzè A, Verdonck F, Borghi F, Löndahl J, Koponen IK, Verpaele S, Jayjock M, Hussein T, Lopez de Ipiña J, Arnold S, Furxhi I. Assessment of exposure determinants and exposure levels by using stationary concentration measurements and a probabilistic near-field/far-field exposure model. OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE 2021; 1:72. [PMID: 37645135 PMCID: PMC10446057 DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.13752.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Background: The Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation requires the establishment of Conditions of Use (CoU) for all exposure scenarios to ensure good communication of safe working practices. Setting CoU requires the risk assessment of all relevant Contributing Scenarios (CSs) in the exposure scenario. A new CS has to be created whenever an Operational Condition (OC) is changed, resulting in an excessive number of exposure assessments. An efficient solution is to quantify OC concentrations and to identify reasonable worst-case scenarios with probabilistic exposure modeling. Methods: Here, we appoint CoU for powder pouring during the industrial manufacturing of a paint batch by quantifying OC exposure levels and exposure determinants. The quantification was performed by using stationary measurements and a probabilistic Near-Field/Far-Field (NF/FF) exposure model. Work shift and OC concentration levels were quantified for pouring TiO 2 from big bags and small bags, pouring Micro Mica from small bags, and cleaning. The impact of exposure determinants on NF concentration level was quantified by (1) assessing exposure determinants correlation with the NF exposure level and (2) by performing simulations with different OCs. Results: Emission rate, air mixing between NF and FF and local ventilation were the most relevant exposure determinants affecting NF concentrations. Potentially risky OCs were identified by performing Reasonable Worst Case (RWC) simulations and by comparing the exposure 95 th percentile distribution with 10% of the occupational exposure limit value (OELV). The CS was shown safe except in RWC scenario (ventilation rate from 0.4 to 1.6 1/h, 100 m 3 room, no local ventilation, and NF ventilation of 1.6 m 3/min). Conclusions: The CoU assessment was considered to comply with European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) legislation and EN 689 exposure assessment strategy for testing compliance with OEL values. One RWC scenario would require measurements since the exposure level was 12.5% of the OELV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antti Joonas Koivisto
- Air Pollution Management, Willemoesgade 16, st tv, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
- ARCHE Consulting, Liefkensstraat 35D, Wondelgem, B-9032, Belgium
- Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, PL 64, Helsinki, FI-00014 UHEL, Finland
| | - Andrea Spinazzè
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, Como, IT-22100, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Borghi
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, Como, IT-22100, Italy
| | - Jakob Löndahl
- Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, Lund, SE-22100, Sweden
| | | | - Steven Verpaele
- Nickel Institute, Rue Belliard 12, Brussels, B-1040, Belgium
- Belgian Center for Occupational Hygiene, Technologiepark 122, Zwijnaarde, B-9040, Belgium
| | - Michael Jayjock
- Jayjock Associates, LLC, 168 Millpond Place, Langhorne, PA, USA
| | - Tareq Hussein
- Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, PL 64, Helsinki, FI-00014 UHEL, Finland
- Department of Physics, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan
| | - Jesus Lopez de Ipiña
- TECNALIA Research and Innovation - Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Parque Tecnológico de Alava, Leonardo Da Vinci 11, Miñano, 01510, Spain
| | - Susan Arnold
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Irini Furxhi
- Department of Accounting and Finance, Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland
- Transgero Limited, Cullinagh, Newcastle West, Co. Limerick, Limerick, V42 V384, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Afantitis A, Melagraki G, Isigonis P, Tsoumanis A, Varsou DD, Valsami-Jones E, Papadiamantis A, Ellis LJA, Sarimveis H, Doganis P, Karatzas P, Tsiros P, Liampa I, Lobaskin V, Greco D, Serra A, Kinaret PAS, Saarimäki LA, Grafström R, Kohonen P, Nymark P, Willighagen E, Puzyn T, Rybinska-Fryca A, Lyubartsev A, Alstrup Jensen K, Brandenburg JG, Lofts S, Svendsen C, Harrison S, Maier D, Tamm K, Jänes J, Sikk L, Dusinska M, Longhin E, Rundén-Pran E, Mariussen E, El Yamani N, Unger W, Radnik J, Tropsha A, Cohen Y, Leszczynski J, Ogilvie Hendren C, Wiesner M, Winkler D, Suzuki N, Yoon TH, Choi JS, Sanabria N, Gulumian M, Lynch I. NanoSolveIT Project: Driving nanoinformatics research to develop innovative and integrated tools for in silico nanosafety assessment. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:583-602. [PMID: 32226594 PMCID: PMC7090366 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Nanotechnology has enabled the discovery of a multitude of novel materials exhibiting unique physicochemical (PChem) properties compared to their bulk analogues. These properties have led to a rapidly increasing range of commercial applications; this, however, may come at a cost, if an association to long-term health and environmental risks is discovered or even just perceived. Many nanomaterials (NMs) have not yet had their potential adverse biological effects fully assessed, due to costs and time constraints associated with the experimental assessment, frequently involving animals. Here, the available NM libraries are analyzed for their suitability for integration with novel nanoinformatics approaches and for the development of NM specific Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) for human and environmental risk assessment, all within the NanoSolveIT cloud-platform. These established and well-characterized NM libraries (e.g. NanoMILE, NanoSolutions, NANoREG, NanoFASE, caLIBRAte, NanoTEST and the Nanomaterial Registry (>2000 NMs)) contain physicochemical characterization data as well as data for several relevant biological endpoints, assessed in part using harmonized Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) methods and test guidelines. Integration of such extensive NM information sources with the latest nanoinformatics methods will allow NanoSolveIT to model the relationships between NM structure (morphology), properties and their adverse effects and to predict the effects of other NMs for which less data is available. The project specifically addresses the needs of regulatory agencies and industry to effectively and rapidly evaluate the exposure, NM hazard and risk from nanomaterials and nano-enabled products, enabling implementation of computational 'safe-by-design' approaches to facilitate NM commercialization.
Collapse
Key Words
- (quantitative) Structure–activity relationships
- AI, Artificial Intelligence
- AOPs, Adverse Outcome Pathways
- API, Application Programming interface
- CG, coarse-grained (model)
- CNTs, carbon nanotubes
- Computational toxicology
- Engineered nanomaterials
- FAIR, Findable Accessible Inter-operable and Re-usable
- GUI, Graphical Processing Unit
- HOMO-LUMO, Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital
- Hazard assessment
- IATA, Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment
- Integrated approach for testing and assessment
- KE, key events
- MIE, molecular initiating events
- ML, machine learning
- MOA, mechanism (mode) of action
- MWCNT, multi-walled carbon nanotubes
- Machine learning
- NMs, nanomaterials
- Nanoinformatics
- OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- PBPK, Physiologically Based PharmacoKinetics
- PC, Protein Corona
- PChem, Physicochemical
- PTGS, Predictive Toxicogenomics Space
- Predictive modelling
- QC, quantum-chemical
- QM, quantum-mechanical
- QSAR, quantitative structure-activity relationship
- QSPR, quantitative structure-property relationship
- RA, risk assessment
- REST, Representational State Transfer
- ROS, reactive oxygen species
- Read across
- SAR, structure-activity relationship
- SMILES, Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System
- SOPs, standard operating procedures
- Safe-by-design
- Toxicogenomics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Eugenia Valsami-Jones
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Anastasios Papadiamantis
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Laura-Jayne A. Ellis
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Haralambos Sarimveis
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Philip Doganis
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Pantelis Karatzas
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Periklis Tsiros
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Liampa
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece
| | - Vladimir Lobaskin
- School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | | | | | - Roland Grafström
- Misvik Biology OY, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pekka Kohonen
- Misvik Biology OY, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Penny Nymark
- Misvik Biology OY, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Karolinska Institute, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Egon Willighagen
- Department of Bioinformatics – BiGCaT, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Tomasz Puzyn
- QSAR Lab Ltd., Aleja Grunwaldzka 190/102, 80-266 Gdansk, Poland
- University of Gdansk, Faculty of Chemistry, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Alexander Lyubartsev
- Institutionen för material- och miljökemi, Stockholms Universitet, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keld Alstrup Jensen
- The National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Gerit Brandenburg
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Germany
- Chief Digital Organization, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Stephen Lofts
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Claus Svendsen
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, MacLean Bldg, Benson Ln, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Samuel Harrison
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Dieter Maier
- Biomax Informatics AG, Robert-Koch-Str. 2, 82152 Planegg, Germany
| | - Kaido Tamm
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Jaak Jänes
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Lauri Sikk
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, 50090 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Maria Dusinska
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Eleonora Longhin
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Elise Rundén-Pran
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Espen Mariussen
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Naouale El Yamani
- NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, 2002 Kjeller, Norway
| | - Wolfgang Unger
- Federal Institute for Material Testing and Research (BAM), Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Radnik
- Federal Institute for Material Testing and Research (BAM), Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Tropsha
- Eschelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100K Beard Hall, CB# 7568, Chapel Hill, NC 27955-7568, USA
| | - Yoram Cohen
- Samueli School Of Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 5531 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Jerzy Leszczynski
- Interdisciplinary Nanotoxicity Center, Jackson State University, 1400 J. R. Lynch Street, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
| | - Christine Ogilvie Hendren
- Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnologies, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708-0287, USA
| | - Mark Wiesner
- Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnologies, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708-0287, USA
| | - David Winkler
- La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Plenty Rd & Kingsbury Dr, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
- Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville 3052, Australia
- CSIRO Data61, Clayton 3168, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Noriyuki Suzuki
- National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0053, Japan
| | - Tae Hyun Yoon
- Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang-Sik Choi
- Institute of Next Generation Material Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Natasha Sanabria
- National Health Laboratory Services, 1 Modderfontein Rd, Sandringham, Johannesburg 2192, South Africa
| | - Mary Gulumian
- National Health Laboratory Services, 1 Modderfontein Rd, Sandringham, Johannesburg 2192, South Africa
- Haematology and Molecular Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nymark P, Bakker M, Dekkers S, Franken R, Fransman W, García-Bilbao A, Greco D, Gulumian M, Hadrup N, Halappanavar S, Hongisto V, Hougaard KS, Jensen KA, Kohonen P, Koivisto AJ, Dal Maso M, Oosterwijk T, Poikkimäki M, Rodriguez-Llopis I, Stierum R, Sørli JB, Grafström R. Toward Rigorous Materials Production: New Approach Methodologies Have Extensive Potential to Improve Current Safety Assessment Practices. SMALL (WEINHEIM AN DER BERGSTRASSE, GERMANY) 2020; 16:e1904749. [PMID: 31913582 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201904749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Advanced material development, including at the nanoscale, comprises costly and complex challenges coupled to ensuring human and environmental safety. Governmental agencies regulating safety have announced interest toward acceptance of safety data generated under the collective term New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), as such technologies/approaches offer marked potential to progress the integration of safety testing measures during innovation from idea to product launch of nanomaterials. Divided in overall eight main categories, searchable databases for grouping and read across purposes, exposure assessment and modeling, in silico modeling of physicochemical structure and hazard data, in vitro high-throughput and high-content screening assays, dose-response assessments and modeling, analyses of biological processes and toxicity pathways, kinetics and dose extrapolation, consideration of relevant exposure levels and biomarker endpoints typify such useful NAMs. Their application generally agrees with articulated stakeholder needs for improvement of safety testing procedures. They further fit for inclusion and add value in nanomaterials risk assessment tools. Overall 37 of 50 evaluated NAMs and tiered workflows applying NAMs are recommended for considering safer-by-design innovation, including guidance to the selection of specific NAMs in the eight categories. An innovation funnel enriched with safety methods is ultimately proposed under the central aim of promoting rigorous nanomaterials innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Nymark
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Karjakatu 35 B, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - Martine Bakker
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Susan Dekkers
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Remy Franken
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, P.O. Box 96800, NL-2509 JE, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter Fransman
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, P.O. Box 96800, NL-2509 JE, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Amaia García-Bilbao
- GAIKER Technology Centre, Parque Tecnológico, Ed. 202, 48170, Zamudio, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 6, 33720, Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mary Gulumian
- National Institute for Occupational Health, 25 Hospital St, Constitution Hill, 2000, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Haematology and Molecular Medicine Department, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Niels Hadrup
- National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sabina Halappanavar
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Driveway, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Vesa Hongisto
- Department of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Karjakatu 35 B, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - Karin Sørig Hougaard
- National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Keld Alstrup Jensen
- National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pekka Kohonen
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Karjakatu 35 B, 20520, Turku, Finland
| | - Antti Joonas Koivisto
- National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Miikka Dal Maso
- Aerosol Physics Laboratory, Physics Unit, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 6, 33720, Tampere, Finland
| | - Thies Oosterwijk
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, P.O. Box 96800, NL-2509 JE, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mikko Poikkimäki
- Aerosol Physics Laboratory, Physics Unit, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 6, 33720, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Rob Stierum
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, P.O. Box 96800, NL-2509 JE, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jorid Birkelund Sørli
- National Research Center for the Work Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roland Grafström
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nobels väg 13, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Karjakatu 35 B, 20520, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17020383. [PMID: 31936022 PMCID: PMC7013818 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Model tools for estimating hazardous substance exposure are an accepted part of regulatory risk assessments in Europe, and models underpin control banding tools used to help manage chemicals in workplaces. Of necessity the models are simplified abstractions of real-life working situations that aim to capture the essence of the scenario to give estimates of actual exposures with an appropriate margin of safety. The basis for existing inhalation exposure assessment tools has recently been discussed by some scientists who have argued for the use of more complex models. In our opinion, the currently accepted tools are documented to be the most robust way for workplace health and safety practitioners and others to estimate inhalation exposure. However, we recognise that it is important to continue the scientific development of exposure modelling to further elaborate and improve the existing methodologies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Belut E, Sánchez Jiménez A, Meyer-Plath A, Koivisto AJ, Koponen IK, Jensen ACØ, MacCalman L, Tuinman I, Fransman W, Domat M, Bivolarova M, van Tongeren M. Indoor dispersion of airborne nano and fine particles: Main factors affecting spatial and temporal distribution in the frame of exposure modeling. INDOOR AIR 2019; 29:803-816. [PMID: 31206776 DOI: 10.1111/ina.12579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
A particle exposure experiment inside a large climate-controlled chamber was conducted. Data on spatial and temporal distribution of nanoscale and fine aerosols in the range of mobility diameters 8-600 nm were collected with high resolution, for sodium chloride, fluorescein sodium, and silica particles. Exposure scenarios studied included constant and intermittent source emissions, different aggregation conditions, high (10 h-1 ) and low (3.5 h-1 ) air exchange rates (AERs) corresponding to chamber Reynolds number, respectively, equal to 1 × 105 and 3 × 104 . Results are presented and analyzed to highlight the main determinants of exposure and to determine whether the assumptions underlying two-box models hold under various scenarios. The main determinants of exposure found were the source generation rate and the ventilation rate. The effect of particles nature was indiscernible, and the decrease of airborne total number concentrations attributable to surface deposition was estimated lower than 2% when the source was active. A near-field/far-field structure of aerosol concentration was always observed for the AER = 10 h-1 but for AER = 3.5 h-1 , a single-field structure was found. The particle size distribution was always homogeneous in space but a general shift of particle diameter (-8% to +16%) was observed between scenarios in correlation with the AER and with the source position, presumably largely attributable to aggregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Belut
- INRS, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Vandoeuvre, France
| | | | - Asmus Meyer-Plath
- BAuA, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ismo K Koponen
- NRCWE, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alexander C Ø Jensen
- NRCWE, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laura MacCalman
- Centre for Human Exposure, IOM, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Maidá Domat
- ITENE, Instituto Tecnológico del Embalaje, Transporte y Logística, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mariya Bivolarova
- Department of Civil Engineering, DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Martie van Tongeren
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koivisto AJ, Kling KI, Hänninen O, Jayjock M, Löndahl J, Wierzbicka A, Fonseca AS, Uhrbrand K, Boor BE, Jiménez AS, Hämeri K, Maso MD, Arnold SF, Jensen KA, Viana M, Morawska L, Hussein T. Source specific exposure and risk assessment for indoor aerosols. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 668:13-24. [PMID: 30851679 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Poor air quality is a leading contributor to the global disease burden and total number of deaths worldwide. Humans spend most of their time in built environments where the majority of the inhalation exposure occurs. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) is challenged by outdoor air pollution entering indoors through ventilation and infiltration and by indoor emission sources. The aim of this study was to understand the current knowledge level and gaps regarding effective approaches to improve IAQ. Emission regulations currently focus on outdoor emissions, whereas quantitative understanding of emissions from indoor sources is generally lacking. Therefore, specific indoor sources need to be identified, characterized, and quantified according to their environmental and human health impact. The emission sources should be stored in terms of relevant metrics and statistics in an easily accessible format that is applicable for source specific exposure assessment by using mathematical mass balance modelings. This forms a foundation for comprehensive risk assessment and efficient interventions. For such a general exposure assessment model we need 1) systematic methods for indoor aerosol emission source assessment, 2) source emission documentation in terms of relevant a) aerosol metrics and b) biological metrics, 3) default model parameterization for predictive exposure modeling, 4) other needs related to aerosol characterization techniques and modeling methods. Such a general exposure assessment model can be applicable for private, public, and occupational indoor exposure assessment, making it a valuable tool for public health professionals, product safety designers, industrial hygienists, building scientists, and environmental consultants working in the field of IAQ and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antti Joonas Koivisto
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
| | - Kirsten Inga Kling
- National Centre for Nano Fabrication and Characterization, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej 307, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Otto Hänninen
- National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Jakob Löndahl
- Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
| | - Aneta Wierzbicka
- Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
| | - Ana Sofia Fonseca
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Katrine Uhrbrand
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Brandon E Boor
- Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States; Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Center for High Performance Buildings, Purdue University, 177 South Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States
| | - Araceli Sánchez Jiménez
- Centre for Human Exposure Science (CHES), Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
| | - Kaarle Hämeri
- University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), PL 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Miikka Dal Maso
- Aerosol Physics, Faculty of Natural Science, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Susan F Arnold
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Keld A Jensen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Mar Viana
- Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), C/ Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lidia Morawska
- International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Tareq Hussein
- University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), PL 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland; The University of Jordan, Department of Physics, Amman 11942, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Modeling of High Nanoparticle Exposure in an Indoor Industrial Scenario with a One-Box Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16101695. [PMID: 31091807 PMCID: PMC6572703 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16101695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Mass balance models have proved to be effective tools for exposure prediction in occupational settings. However, they are still not extensively tested in real-world scenarios, or for particle number concentrations. An industrial scenario characterized by high emissions of unintentionally-generated nanoparticles (NP) was selected to assess the performance of a one-box model. Worker exposure to NPs due to thermal spraying was monitored, and two methods were used to calculate emission rates: the convolution theorem, and the cyclic steady state equation. Monitored concentrations ranged between 4.2 × 104–2.5 × 105 cm−3. Estimated emission rates were comparable with both methods: 1.4 × 1011–1.2 × 1013 min−1 (convolution) and 1.3 × 1012–1.4 × 1013 min−1 (cyclic steady state). Modeled concentrations were 1.4-6 × 104 cm−3 (convolution) and 1.7–7.1 × 104 cm−3 (cyclic steady state). Results indicated a clear underestimation of measured particle concentrations, with ratios modeled/measured between 0.2–0.7. While both model parametrizations provided similar results on average, using convolution emission rates improved performance on a case-by-case basis. Thus, using cyclic steady state emission rates would be advisable for preliminary risk assessment, while for more precise results, the convolution theorem would be a better option. Results show that one-box models may be useful tools for preliminary risk assessment in occupational settings when room air is well mixed.
Collapse
|