1
|
Guidi Nissim W, Castiglione S, Guarino F, Pastore MC, Labra M. Beyond Cleansing: Ecosystem Services Related to Phytoremediation. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:1031. [PMID: 36903892 PMCID: PMC10005053 DOI: 10.3390/plants12051031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Phytotechnologies used for cleaning up urban and suburban polluted soils (i.e., brownfields) have shown some weakness in the excessive extent of the timeframe required for them to be effectively operating. This bottleneck is due to technical constraints, mainly related to both the nature of the pollutant itself (e.g., low bio-availability, high recalcitrance, etc.) and the plant (e.g., low pollution tolerance, low pollutant uptake rates, etc.). Despite the great efforts made in the last few decades to overcome these limitations, the technology is in many cases barely competitive compared with conventional remediation techniques. Here, we propose a new outlook on phytoremediation, where the main goal of decontaminating should be re-evaluated, considering additional ecosystem services (ESs) related to the establishment of a new vegetation cover on the site. The aim of this review is to raise awareness and stress the knowledge gap on the importance of ES associated with this technique, which can make phytoremediation a valuable tool to boost an actual green transition process in planning urban green spaces, thereby offering improved resilience to global climate change and a higher quality of life in cities. This review highlights that the reclamation of urban brownfields through phytoremediation may provide several regulating (i.e., urban hydrology, heat mitigation, noise reduction, biodiversity, and CO2 sequestration), provisional (i.e., bioenergy and added-value chemicals), and cultural (i.e., aesthetic, social cohesion, and health) ESs. Although future research should specifically be addressed to better support these findings, acknowledging ES is crucial for an exhaustive evaluation of phytoremediation as a sustainable and resilient technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Werther Guidi Nissim
- Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milan, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Stefano Castiglione
- Department of Chemistry and Biology “A. Zambelli”, University of Salerno, Via G. Paolo II n◦ 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Guarino
- Department of Chemistry and Biology “A. Zambelli”, University of Salerno, Via G. Paolo II n◦ 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Pastore
- Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Via Bonardi 3, 20133 Milano, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Labra
- Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milan, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brilli L, Carotenuto F, Chiesi M, Fiorillo E, Genesio L, Magno R, Morabito M, Nardino M, Zaldei A, Gioli B. An integrated approach to estimate how much urban afforestation can contribute to move towards carbon neutrality. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 842:156843. [PMID: 35750179 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Urban afforestation is considered a promising nature-climate solution that may contribute to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, since it can increase C-storage and C-sequestration, whilst providing further multiple ecosystem services for citizens. However, the quantification of the CO2 sequestration capacity that may be provided by an urban forest as well as the capacity to impact the city-level C-balance and offset anthropogenic emissions is a complex issue. Methodological approaches, quantity and quality of information contained in urban tree database, and the level of detail of the planned urban forest can strongly influence the estimation of C-sequestration potential offered by urban forests. In this work, an integrated framework based on emission inventory, tree species/morphology and ecosystem modelling has been proposed for the city of Prato, Italy, a representative medium size European city to: i) evaluate the current C-sequestration capacity of urban trees; ii) upscale such capacity with different afforestation scenarios, iii) compare the sink capacity offered by ecosystems with current and projected anthropogenic emissions. Results indicated that the green areas within the Municipality of Prato can sequester 33.1 ktCO2 yr-1 under actual conditions and 51.0 ktCO2 yr-1 under the afforestation scenario which maximize the CO2 sequestration capacity, offsetting the 7.1 % and 11 % of the total emissions (465.8 ktCO2 yr-1), respectively. This study proves that, in the various afforestation scenarios tested, the contribution of urban afforestation to the municipality carbon balance is negligible and that carbon neutrality can only be reached by the substantial decarbonization of emission sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Brilli
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
| | - F Carotenuto
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - M Chiesi
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - E Fiorillo
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - L Genesio
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - R Magno
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - M Morabito
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - M Nardino
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - A Zaldei
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - B Gioli
- CNR-IBE, National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Bioeconomy, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50145 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|