First Look into the Use of Fish Scales as a Medium for Multi-Hormone Stress Analyses

Cortisol, cortisone and DHEAS in epidermis and scales of fish Aphanius fasciatus: HPLC-MS/MS measurement of stress indicators as proxies for natural and human-induced factors

Fish health can be affected by a multitude of stressors. Acute and chronic stress assessment via specific hormones monitoring has become a trending research topic. Common investigated matrices are blood and plasma, but recently less invasive substrates have been identified. As chemical composition of skin mucus/epidermis has been demonstrated to link with acute stress, and of scales with chronic stress in fish, the aim of the study was firstly to improve the determination of three stress hormones, namely cortisol (COL), cortisone (CON), and dehydroepiandrosterone-3-sulfate (DHEAS), in skin mucus/epidermis and scales of Aphanius fasciatus. Secondly, an evaluation of the impact of different environments on hormones concentrations was carried out. A liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC-MS/MS) and a preanalytical procedure were validated to determine COL, CON and DHEAS. This methodology was applied to compare a pull of field-collected fish with a pull of fish housed in the laboratory for one year. Our results highlighted a significant presence of cortisol and cortisone in epidermis of the latter pull (averagely 0.10 and 0.14 ng mg-1, respectively), while in the first pull both hormones were much less concentrated (averagely 0.006 and 0.008 ng mg-1, respectively). Scales of both pulls showed presence of hormones, with a higher concentration for fish housed in the laboratory, although a relevant difference in concentration was found only for cortisone. DHEAS was always below the limit of detection.

Chronic stress causes cortisol, cortisone and DHEA elevations in scales but not serum in rainbow trout

Fish scales have been reported to incorporate cortisol over long periods of time and thus provide a promising means of assessing long-term stress in many species of teleost fish. However, the quantification of other stress related hormones has only been accomplished in our previous study conducted in goldfish (Carassius auratus). DHEA is a precursory androgen with anti-stress effects used alongside cortisol to diagnose chronic stress via the cortisol:DHEA ratio in mammals. Included in DHEA's anti-stress mechanisms are changes in the metabolism of cortisol to its inactive metabolite cortisone suggesting the relationships between cortisol, DHEA and cortisone may be additionally informative in the assessment of long-term stress. Therefore, to further explore these concepts in a native fish species and generate more comprehensive comparisons between scale and serum hormone concentrations than was possible in our previous study we implemented a 14-day stress protocol in adult rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and quantified resulting scale and serum cortisol, cortisone and DHEA concentrations. As predicted, elevations in scale concentrations of all hormones were observed in stressed trout compared to controls but were not reflected in serum samples. Significant differences in the cortisol:DHEA and cortisone:cortisol ratios were also found between control and stressed group scales but not serum. These results suggest not only that scales provide a superior medium for the assessment of long-term stress but also that the addition of scale cortisone and DHEA may provide additional relevant information for such assessments.

Can scale cortisol concentration be quantified non-lethally in wild fish species?

Cortisol, the primary glucocorticoid in fishes, is secreted into the bloodstream in response to stress. Circulating cortisol accumulates in scales, a durable calcified structure that can be easily sampled from many fish species. As such, the use of scale cortisol concentration (SCC) is currently being explored as a means of chronic stress biomonitoring in wild fishes. Scales serve an important role in fish physiology and thus the number of scales required for reliable cortisol analysis is a limiting factor in the non-lethal collection of such samples. To date, scale cortisol quantification has also only been performed non-lethally in captive fishes and due to differences in stress responsiveness SCCs likely differ in wild species. As such, this study aimed to (1) apply our fish scale processing and analysis protocol to wild fish species and (2) apply it to five north temperate fish species to provide information useful to future non-lethal scale sampling regimes. Cortisol was successfully measured in scales collected from wild northern pike (Esox lucius), walleye (Sander vitreus), whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis), white sucker (Catostomus commersonii) and captive rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). SCCs were significantly different between species and thus the sample mass required for reliable cortisol analysis differed as well. In addition to the size of the fish and the mass of their scales this is an important consideration for future scale cortisol analyses as these factors could make SCC an attainable non-lethal sample matrix in some species of fish but impractical in others.