Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements

Genetics in reproductive medicine

Thanks to advances in technology, genetic testing is now available to explore the causes of infertility and to assess the risk of a given couple passing on a genetic disorder to their offspring. This allows at-risk couples to make an informed decision when opting for assisted reproduction and allows professionals to offer pre-implantation diagnosis when appropriate. Genetic screening of an infertile couple has thus become standard practice for an appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment. This review aims to highlight the conditions under which genetic screening plays a role in improving reproductive outcomes for infertile couples.

Impact of blastocyst grading and blastocyst biopsy dates on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing

Background

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) allows for the evaluation of embryo genetic information prior to implantation, enabling the selection of normal embryos for transfer and ultimately leading to better pregnancy outcomes. In this study, we explored factors that influence clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PGT. The effects of blastocyst grading and biopsy dates on clinical outcomes were also analyzed.

Methods

The clinical data and pregnancy outcomes of 428 PGT cycles performed in the Reproductive Medicine Department of the Northern Theater General Hospital between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis and nomograms were used to determine factors influencing pregnancy outcomes. The impact of D5 blastocysts (290 cycles) and D6 blastocysts (138 cycles) with different quality levels on clinical outcomes was also compared.

Results

Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that age, BMI, endometrial thickness, and embryo quality of women affected PGT clinical outcomes. Women aged <40 years or with a body mass index (BMI) >18.5 and endometrial thickness>1.0 cm had a significantly higher pregnancy success rate. Compared to that of D6 blastocyst biopsy, D5 blastocyst biopsy was associated with a higher pregnancy success rate but a similar live birth rate. No significant differences were observed in the pregnancy and live birth rates of D5 and D6 high-quality blastocysts.

Conclusion

To achieve better pregnancy outcomes after PGT, considering blastocyst grading and biopsy dates when transferring embryos is essential for improving pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, patients should adjust their BMI, endometrial receptivity, and endometrial thickness and pattern.

Clinical-grade whole genome sequencing-based haplarithmisis enables all forms of preimplantation genetic testing

High-throughput sequencing technologies have increasingly led to discovery of disease-causing genetic variants, primarily in postnatal multi-cell DNA samples. However, applying these technologies to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in nuclear or mitochondrial DNA from single or few-cells biopsied from in vitro fertilised (IVF) embryos is challenging. PGT aims to select IVF embryos without genetic abnormalities. Although genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)-based haplotyping methods enabled PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), and aneuploidies (PGT-A), they are labour intensive, only partially cover the genome and are troublesome for difficult loci and consanguineous couples. Here, we devise a simple, scalable and universal whole genome sequencing haplarithmisis-based approach enabling all forms of PGT in a single assay. In a comparison to state-of-the-art GBS-based PGT for nuclear DNA, shallow sequencing-based PGT, and PCR-based PGT for mitochondrial DNA, our approach alleviates technical limitations by decreasing whole genome amplification artifacts by 68.4%, increasing breadth of coverage by at least 4-fold, and reducing wet-lab turn-around-time by ~2.5-fold. Importantly, this method enables trio-based PGT-A for aneuploidy origin, an approach we coin PGT-AO, detects translocation breakpoints, and nuclear and mitochondrial single nucleotide variants and indels in base-resolution.

Initially categorized 46,XY embryo transfer ending with 45,X products of conception-a case report and a review of discordant result management

Objective

To report a case of an initially categorized euploid male embryo screened using preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) resulting in miscarriage and testing of products of conception consistent with Turner syndrome, and to discuss additional workup and considerations in cases of discrepancy.

Design

Case report.

Setting

University fertility clinic.

Intervention

Frozen single embryo transfer of a euploid male embryo.

Patients

A couple seeking procreative management for a female partner having a balanced translocation 46,XX,t(14;16)(q21;q21) diagnosed after the couple's previous child passed because of segmental duplication in chromosomes 14 and 16 and pursued in vitro fertilization treatment for PGT for structural rearrangements.

Main Outcome Measures

Miscarriage with discordant chromosomal microarray result.

Results

Couple conceived with the transfer of a euploid male embryo. After the initial confirmation of pregnancy, repeat imaging indicated a missed abortion. Dilation and curettage were performed, and the products of conception were sent for chromosomal microarray. Results indicated Turner syndrome (45,X). Follow-up short tandem repeat analysis confirmed the products of conception were from the tested embryo. After reevaluation of the data, copy number variations below the reporting threshold for the sex chromosomes were observable and compatible with mosaic 45,X/46,XY.

Conclusions

The limitations of PGT should be kept in mind when counseling patients because of both the sample provided by biopsy, the sequencing platforms and the laboratory pipeline for diagnosis. We recommend that patients be counseled about these limitations and offered antenatal and postnatal testing as indicated. When discrepancies are seen after PGT, collaboration with the reference laboratory and additional testing with short tandem repeat analysis should be considered when possible.

Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle

Following the advancement of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technology, and the rationale to extend the culture to the blastocyst stage, performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET), gamete quality and assessment have acquired large relevance in ART. Embryo quality is strictly correlated with gametes quality and culture conditions. Oocyte maturity assessment is therefore imperative for fertilization and embryo evolution. Mature oocytes at the metaphase II stage result in a higher fertilization rate compared to immature oocytes. Indeed, oocyte morphology evaluation represents an important and challenging task that may serve as a valuable prognostic tool for future embryo development and implantation potential. Different grading systems have been reported to assess human embryos, however, in many cases, it is still a major challenge to select the single embryo to transfer with the highest implantation potential. Further, eSET has conferred a challenge to embryologists, who must try to enhance embryo culture and selection to provide an adequate success rate, whilst reducing the overall number of embryos transferred. Above the standard morphological assessment, there are several invasive or non-invasive approaches for embryo selection such as preimplantation genetic testing, time-lapse technology, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as oxygen utilization and analysis of oxidative stress in culture medium. This short review is not designed to be a comprehensive review of all possible features that may influence oocyte quality. It does give, however, a brief overview and describes the prognostic value of the morphological characteristics of human oocytes on their developmental capacity following ART treatments.

Role of genetic analysis of products of conception and PGT in managing early pregnancy loss

This article considers the addition of comprehensive 24-chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of products of conception (POC) to a standard evaluation for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) to help direct treatment towards expectant management versus IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). The review included retrospective data from 65,333 miscarriages, a prospective evaluation of 378 couples with RPL who had CMA testing of POC and the standard workup, and data from an additional 1020 couples who were evaluated for RPL but did not undergo CMA testing of POC. Aneuploidy in POC explained the pregnancy loss in 57.7% (218/378) of cases. In contrast, the full RPL evaluation recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine identified a potential cause in only 42.9% (600/1398). Combining the data from the RPL evaluation and the results of genetic testing of POC provides a probable explanation for the loss in over 90% (347/378) of women. Couples with an unexplained loss after the standard evaluation with POC aneuploidy accounted for 41% of cases; PGT-A may be considered after expectant management. Conversely, PGT-A would have a limited role in those with a euploid loss and a possible explanation after the standard workup. Categorizing a pregnancy loss as an explained versus unexplained loss after the standard evaluation combined with the results of CMA testing of POC may help identify patients who would benefit from expectant management versus PGT-A.

Genomic aspects in reproductive medicine

Infertility is a complex disease characterized by extreme genetic heterogeneity, compounded by various environmental factors. While there are exceptions, individual genetic and genomic variations related to infertility are typically rare, often family-specific, and may serve as susceptibility factors rather than direct causes of the disease. Consequently, identifying the cause of infertility and developing prevention and treatment strategies based on these factors remain challenging tasks, even in the modern genomic era. In this review, we first examine the genetic and genomic variations associated with infertility, and subsequently summarize the concepts and methods of preimplantation genetic testing in light of advances in genome analysis technology.

Fetus Conceived via In Vitro Fertilization With Mosaic Uniparental Isodisomy and Two Balanced Translocations

We present a case of a fetus acquiring two different balanced translocations from each parent and subsequent uniparental isodisomy from postzygotic loss of a paternal chromosome. Balanced chromosomal translocations occur in 0.14% of the population and increase the risk of other genetic abnormalities, such as uniparental disomy (UPD) and mosaicism. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) can identify some genetic abnormalities. Translocations t(6;21) and t(5;15) have been reported individually but never together in a viable fetus. A non-consanguineous couple who were known carriers of two different balanced translocations conceived via classic in vitro fertilization (IVF). They had a normal PGT completed. Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) revealed that the fetus had received t(6;21) from the mother and t(5;15) from the father. The probability of the fetus acquiring both translocations was 2.8%. CVS also revealed UPD of chromosome 14. Amniocentesis was performed, which was consistent with the CVS in detecting the balanced translocations but provided more information about the UPD, determining that it was a mosaic maternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 14 (UPD(14)mat). The couple underwent genetic counseling to discuss the above findings and ultimately decided on dilation and evacuation at 17 weeks of gestation. The likelihood of conception of this fetus and survival past the first trimester is extremely rare. These specific chromosomal translocations and (UPD(14)mat) have never been reported before. This case emphasizes the concomitant nature of imprinted genes, resulting in multiple genetically unique alterations. This report also highlights the limitations of PGT, CVS, and amniocentesis in being reproducibly consistent, which is important to discuss prior to IVF conception.

Integrative Assessment of Seminal Plasma Biomarkers: A Narrative Review Bridging the Gap between Infertility Research and Clinical Practice

Infertility represents a significant global health challenge impacting millions of couples worldwide. Approximately half of all infertile couples exhibit compromised semen quality, indicative of diminished male fertility. While the diagnosis of male infertility traditionally relies on semen analysis, its limitations in providing a comprehensive assessment of male reproductive health have spurred efforts to identify novel biomarkers. Seminal plasma, a complex fluid containing proteins, lipids, and metabolites, has emerged as a rich source of such indicators. Reproduction depends heavily on seminal plasma, the primary transporter of chemicals from male reproductive glands. It provides a non-invasive sample for urogenital diagnostics and has demonstrated potential in the identification of biomarkers linked to illnesses of the male reproductive system. The abundance of seminal proteins has enabled a deeper understanding of their biological functions, origins, and differential expression in various conditions associated with male infertility, including azoospermia, asthenozoospermia, oligozoospermia, teratozoospermia, among others. The true prevalence of male infertility is understated due to the limitations of the current diagnostic techniques. This review critically evaluates the current landscape of seminal plasma biomarkers and their utility in assessing male infertility. Βy bridging the gap between research and clinical practice, the integrative assessment of seminal plasma biomarkers offers a multimodal approach to comprehensively evaluate male infertility.

Preimplantation genetic testing in the current era, a review

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), also referred to as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), is an advanced reproductive technology used during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles to identify genetic abnormalities in embryos prior to their implantation. PGT is used to screen embryos for chromosomal abnormalities, monogenic disorders, and structural rearrangements.

DEVELOPMENT OF PGT

Over the past few decades, PGT has undergone tremendous development, resulting in three primary forms: PGT-A, PGT-M, and PGT-SR. PGT-A is utilized for screening embryos for aneuploidies, PGT-M is used to detect disorders caused by a single gene, and PGT-SR is used to detect chromosomal abnormalities caused by structural rearrangements in the genome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we thoroughly summarized and reviewed PGT and discussed its pros and cons down to the minutest aspects. Additionally, recent studies that highlight the advancements of PGT in the current era, including their future perspectives, were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive review aims to provide new insights into the understanding of techniques used in PGT, thereby contributing to the field of reproductive genetics.

Aneuploidy detection in pooled polar bodies using rapid nanopore sequencing

PURPOSE

Various screening techniques have been developed for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to reduce implantation failure and miscarriages in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Among these methods, the Oxford nanopore technology (ONT) has already been tested in several tissues. However, no studies have applied ONT to polar bodies, a cellular material that is less restrictively regulated for PGT-A in some countries.

METHODS

We performed rapid short nanopore sequencing on pooled first and second polar bodies of 102 oocytes from women undergoing IVF treatment to screen for aneuploidy. An automated analysis pipeline was developed with the expectation of three chromatids per chromosome. The results were compared to those obtained by array-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH).

RESULTS

ONT and aCGH were consistent for 96% (98/102) of sample ploidy classification. Of those samples, 36 were classified as euploid, while 62 were classified as aneuploid. The four discordant samples were assessed as euploid using aCGH but classified as aneuploid using ONT. The concordance of the ploidy classification (euploid, gain, or loss) per chromosome was 92.5% (2169 of 2346 of analysed chromosomes) using aCGH and ONT and increased to 97.7% (2113/2162) without the eight samples assessed as highly complex aneuploid using ONT.

CONCLUSION

The automated detection of the ploidy classification per chromosome and shorter duplications or deletions depending on the sequencing depth demonstrates an advantage of the ONT method over standard, commercial aCGH methods, which do not consider the presence of three chromatids in pooled polar bodies.

Potential Costs and Benefits of Incorporating PGT-A Across Age Groups: A Canadian Clinic Perspective

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential costs and benefits of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) across age groups, considering financial costs, total euploidy rates and the potential for morphology grading to predict a euploid embryo.

METHODS

This study is a blinded retrospective chart review of patients who incorporated PGT-A as part of their in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle at a university-affiliated fertility clinic. Patients between 25-44 years of age undergoing IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and PGT-A with autologous oocytes (n = 220) were included in this study. Number of blastocysts achieved, euploidy rates and PGT-A costs were compared between 3 age groups: <35 years, 35-37, and ≥38. Additionally, agreement on the top-quality embryo based on morphology assessment alone versus PGT-A selection was analyzed and further compared based on the number of blastocysts achieved.

RESULTS

A significant negative correlation between patient age and number of embryos produced, PGT-A costs, and euploidy rates (P < 0.001) was observed. Additionally, morphology alone ratings were able to predict the top-quality euploid embryo 78% of the time in the <35 age group, but only 32% of the time in the ≥38 age group (P < 0.05), with a trend toward even lower agreement when 3 or fewer blastocysts were produced.

CONCLUSION

Based on our cost analysis, it may be advantageous to incorporate PGT-A when maternal age is ≥38, given the lower financial costs associated with each cycle and the low likelihood of transferring a euploid embryo on the first attempt for this age group. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that PGT-A remains a complex decision influenced by a multitude of factors.

Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become a common supplementary diagnοstic/testing tοol for in vitro fertilization (ΙVF) cycles due to a significant increase in cases of PGT fοr mοnogenic cοnditions (ΡGT-M) and de novο aneuplοidies (ΡGT-A) over the last ten years. This tendency is mostly attributable to the advancement and application of novel cytogenetic and molecular techniques in clinical practice that are capable of providing an efficient evaluation of the embryonic chromosomal complement and leading to better IVF/ICSI results. Although PGT is widely used, it requires invasive biopsy of the blastocyst, which may harm the embryo. Non-invasive approaches, like cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing, have lower risks but have drawbacks in consistency and sensitivity. This review discusses new developments and opportunities in the field of preimplantation genetic testing, enhancing the overall effectiveness and accessibility of preimplantation testing in the framework of developments in genomic sequencing, bioinformatics, and the integration of artificial intelligence in the interpretation of genetic data.

Trophectoderm cells of human mosaic embryos display increased apoptotic levels and impaired differentiation capacity: a molecular clue regarding their reproductive fate?

STUDY QUESTION

Are there cell lineage-related differences in the apoptotic rates and differentiation capacity of human blastocysts diagnosed as euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) based on concurrent copy number and genotyping analysis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Trophectoderm (TE) cells of mosaic and aneuploid blastocysts exhibit significantly higher levels of apoptosis and significantly reduced differentiation capacity compared to those of euploid blastocysts.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Embryos diagnosed as mosaic after PGT-A can develop into healthy infants, yet understanding the reasons behind their reproductive potential requires further research. One hypothesis suggests that mosaicism can be normalized through selective apoptosis and reduced proliferation of aneuploid cells, but direct evidence of these mechanisms in human embryos is lacking. Additionally, data interpretation from studies involving mosaic embryos has been hampered by retrospective analysis methods and the high incidence of false-positive mosaic diagnoses stemming from the use of poorly specific PGT-A platforms.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Prospective cohort study performing colocalization of cell-lineage and apoptotic markers by immunofluorescence (IF). We included a total of 64 human blastocysts donated to research on Day 5 or 6 post-fertilization (dpf) by 43 couples who underwent in vitro fertilization treatment with PGT-A at IVI-RMA Valencia between September 2019 and October 2022. A total of 27 mosaic blastocysts were analyzed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study consisted of two phases: Phase I (caspase-3, n = 53 blastocysts): n = 13 euploid, n = 22 mosaic, n = 18 aneuploid. Phase II (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL), n = 11 blastocysts): n = 2 euploid, n = 5 mosaic, n = 4 aneuploid. Following donation for research, vitrified blastocysts were warmed, cultured until re-expansion, fixed, processed for IF, and imaged using confocal microscopy. For each blastocyst, the following cell counts were conducted: total cells (DAPI+), TE cells (GATA3+), inner cell mass (ICM) cells (GATA3-/NANOG+), and apoptotic cells (caspase-3+ or TUNEL+). The incidence of apoptosis was calculated for each blastocyst by dividing the number of caspase-3+ cells (Phase I) or TUNEL+ cells (Phase II) by the number of TE or ICM cells. Statistical analysis was performed according to data type and distribution (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Phase I: Mosaic blastocysts displayed a similar number of total cells (49.6 ± 15 cells at 5 dpf; 58.8 ± 16.9 cells at 6 dpf), TE cells (38.8 ± 13.7 cells at 5 dpf; 49.2 ± 16.2 cells at 6 dpf), and ICM cells (10.9 ± 4.2 cells at 5 dpf; 9.7 ± 7.1 cells at 6 dpf) compared to euploid and aneuploid blastocysts (P > 0.05). The proportion of TE cells retaining NANOG expression increased gradually from euploid blastocysts (9.7% = 63/651 cells at 5 dpf; 0% = 0/157 cells at 6 dpf) to mosaic blastocysts (13.1% = 104/794 cells at 5 dpf; 3.4% = 12/353 cells at 6 dpf) and aneuploid blastocysts (27.9% = 149/534 cells at 5 dpf; 4.6% = 19/417 cells at 6 dpf) (P < 0.05). At the TE level, caspase-3+ cells were frequently observed (39% = 901/2310 cells). The proportion of caspase-3+ TE cells was significantly higher in mosaic blastocysts (44.1% ± 19.6 at 5 dpf; 43% ± 16.8 at 6 dpf) and aneuploid blastocysts (45.9% ± 16.1 at 5 dpf; 49% ± 15.1 at 6 dpf) compared to euploid blastocysts (26.6% ± 16.6 at 5 dpf; 17.5% ± 14.8 at 6 dpf) (P < 0.05). In contrast, at the ICM level, caspase-3+ cells were rarely observed (1.9% = 11/596 cells), and only detected in mosaic blastocysts (2.6% = 6/232 cells) and aneuploid blastocysts (2.5% = 5/197 cells) (P > 0.05). Phase II: Consistently, TUNEL+ cells were only observed in TE cells (32.4% = 124/383 cells). An increasing trend was identified toward a higher proportion of TUNEL+ cells in the TE of mosaic blastocysts (37.2% ± 21.9) and aneuploid blastocysts (39% ± 41.7), compared to euploid blastocysts (23% ± 32.5), although these differences did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The observed effects on apoptosis and differentiation may not be exclusive to aneuploid cells. Additionally, variations in aneuploidies and unexplored factors related to blastocyst development and karyotype concordance may introduce potential biases and uncertainties in the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings demonstrate a cell lineage-specific effect of aneuploidy on the apoptotic levels and differentiation capacity of human blastocysts. This contributes to unravelling the biological characteristics of mosaic blastocysts and supports the concept of clonal depletion of aneuploid cells in explaining their reproductive potential.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by grants from Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial (CDTI) (20190022) and Generalitat Valenciana (APOTIP/2019/009). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Comparing blastocyst euploid rates between the progestin-primed and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols in aneuploidy genetic testing: a randomised trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Progestin can inhibit the pituitary luteinising hormone (LH) surge during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH surge in IVF. More and more centres are using PPOS because this regimen appears simpler and cheaper. This study aims to compare the euploidy rate of blastocysts following the PPOS protocol and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

METHODS/ANALYSIS

This is a randomised trial. A total of 400 women undergoing PGT-A will be enrolled and randomised according to a computer-generated randomisation list to either (1) the antagonist group: an antagonist given once daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger; or (2) the PPOS group: dydrogesterone from the first day of ovarian stimulation till the day of ovulation trigger. The primary outcome is the euploidy rate of blastocysts.

ETHICS/DISSEMINATION

An ethical approval was granted from the ethics committee of assisted reproductive medicine in Shanghai JiAi Genetics and IVF institute (JIAIE2020-03). A written informed consent will be obtained from each woman before any study procedure is performed, according to good clinical practice. The results of this randomised trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04414748.

Nanopore sequencing with T2T-CHM13 for accurate detection and preventing the transmission of structural rearrangements in highly repetitive heterochromatin regions in human embryos

BACKGROUND

Structural rearrangements in highly repetitive heterochromatin regions can result in miscarriage or foetal malformations; however, detecting and preventing the transmission of these rearrangements has been challenging. Recently, the completion of sequencing of the complete human genome (T2T-CHM13) has made it possible to accurately characterise structural rearrangements in these regions. We developed a method based on T2T-CHM13 and nanopore sequencing to detect and block structural rearrangements in highly repetitive heterochromatin sequences.

METHODS

T2T-CHM13-based "Mapping Allele with Resolved Carrier Status" was performed for couples who carry structural rearrangements in heterochromatin regions. Using nanopore sequencing and the T2T-CHM13 reference genome, the precise breakpoints of inversions and translocations close to the centromere were detected and haplotypes were constructed using flanking single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Haplotype linkage analysis was then performed by comparing consistent parental SNPs with embryonic SNPs to determine whether the embryos carried hereditary inversions or balanced translocations. Based on copy number variation and haplotype linkage analysis, we transplanted normal embryos, which were further verified by an amniotic fluid test.

RESULTS

To validate this approach, we used nanopore sequencing of families with inversions and reciprocal translocations close to the centromere. Using the T2T-CHM13 reference genome, we accurately detected inversions and translocations in centromeres, constructed haplotypes and prevented the transmission of structural rearrangements in the offspring.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first successful application of T2T-CHM13 in human reproduction and provides a feasible protocol for detecting and preventing the transmission of structural rearrangements of heterochromatin in embryos.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy optimizes reproductive outcomes in recurrent reproductive failure: a systematic review

Introduction

Recurrent reproductive failure (RRF) is a common pregnancy complication, imposing great physical, emotional and financial burden for the suffered couples. The leading cause of RRF is believed to be aneuploid embryo, which could be solved by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in theory. With molecular genetic development, PGT-A based on comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) procedures and blastocyst biopsy is widely applied in clinical practice. However, its effects in RRF were not defined yet.

Methods

A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to June, 2023. Studies about the effects of PGT-A based on CCS procedures and blastocyst biopsy in RRF were included.

Results

Twenty studies about the effects of PGT-A based on CCS procedures and blastocyst biopsy in RRF were included. It revealed that PGT-A could optimise the reproductive outcomes of RRF sufferers, especially in those with advanced age. However, in patients with multiple occurrences of pregnancy losses, the benefits of PGT-A were limited.

Discussion

More randomized controlled trials with large sample size are required to evaluate the benefits of PGT-A in RRF sufferers and identify which population would benefit the most.

The mosaic embryo: what it means for the doctor and the patient

INTRODUCTION

Mosaic embryos are embryos that on preimplantation genetic analysis are found to be composed of euploid and aneuploid cells. Although most of these embryos do not implant when transferred into the uterus following IVF treatment, some may implant and are capable of giving rise to babies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

There is currently an increasing number of reports of live births following the transfer of mosaic embryos. Compared to euploid, mosaic embryos have lower implantation rates and higher rates of miscarriage, and occasionally aneuploid component persists. However, their outcome is better than that obtained after the transfer of embryos consisting entirely of aneuploid cells. After implantation, the ability to develop into a full-term pregnancy is influenced by the amount and type of chromosomal mosaicism present in a mosaic embryo. Nowadays many experts in the reproductive field consider mosaic transfers as an option when no euploid embryos are available. Genetic counseling is an important part of educating patients about the likelihood of having a pregnancy with healthy baby but also on the risk that mosaicism could persist and result in liveborn with chromosomal abnormality. Each situation needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and counseled accordingly.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

So far, the transfers of 2155 mosaic embryos have been documented and 440 live births resulting in healthy babies have been reported. In addition, in the literature to date, there are 6 cases in which embryonic mosaicism persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the available data indicate that mosaic embryos have the potential to implant and develop into healthy babies, albeit with lower success rates than euploids. Further clinical outcomes should be collected to better establish a refined ranking of embryos to transfer.

The detection efficacy of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) for sex chromosome abnormalities and copy number variation and its differentiation in pregnant women of different ages

Objective

To analyze the efficacy of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) in detecting fetal sex chromosome abnormalities and copy number variation (CNV), compare the efficacy between NIPT and serological screening alone, and further analyze the fetal sex chromosome abnormalities and CNV differentiation in pregnant women of different ages, so as to provide a reference for the prevention and control of fetal birth defects.

Methods

Clinical data from 22,692 pregnant women admitted to our hospital from January 2013 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All participants underwent serological screening and NIPT screening to compare fetal chromosomal abnormalities between the two screening modalities. 145 women whose fetus were diagnosed as sex chromosome abnormalities and 36 women whose fetus were diagnosed as CNV abnormalities based on NIPT screening were selected for prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis or karyotyping. Taking prenatal diagnosis as the standard, the four-grid table method was used to detect the positive predictive value of NIPT screening for fetal sex chromosomal abnormalities and CNV. According to the age, pregnant women were divided into 18-30 years old (n = 9844), 31-35 years old (n = 7612), >35 years old (n = 5236), and then the detection rates of sexual fetal chromosomal abnormalities, CNV and total chromosomal abnormalities were compared in pregnant women.

Results

Among the 22,692 pregnant women in this study, the high-risk proportion of serologic screening with 4.38% was higher than that of NIPT screening with 1.93% (P < 0.05). Among the 145 women with fetal sex chromosome abnormalities screened by NIPT, 122 cases of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities were diagnosed prenatally, including 45, X/47, XXX/47, XYY/47, XXY. The positive predictive values of NIPT screening were 25.00%, 58.82%, 85.71%, and 85.71%, respectively, with an overall predictive value of 44.26%. The positive predictive value of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities in NIPT screening was higher than that of serological screening (P < 0.05). Among the 36 pregnant women with fetal CNV, NIPT screening showed that CNVs≤10 Mb and CNVs>10 Mb were 33.33% and 66.67%, respectively. There were 12 cases of prenatal diagnosis of fetal CNV, among which the NIPT-screened positive predictive values of fetal copy number deletion, duplicate, deletion and duplicate were 50.00%, 57.14% and 100.00%, respectively, with an overall predictive value of 58.33%. The positive predictive value of CNV in NIPT screening was higher than that of serological screening without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The results of NIPT screening showed that the detection rate of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities and total abnormalities of pregnant women over 35 years of age was significantly higher than that of pregnant women aged 18-30 and 31-35 years (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

NIPT screening could greatly improve the detection efficacy of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities, CNV and other chromosome abnormalities, and decline the false positive rate. However, the positive predictive value of NIPT screening was relatively low, and further prenatal testing and genetic counseling are still required. In addition, NIPT screening for fetal sex chromosome abnormalities, and the detection rate of total abnormalities in pregnant women older than 35 years old were increased significantly, and pregnancy at an advanced age may be one of the risk factors for fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts

STUDY QUESTION

Does the diagnosis of mosaicism affect ploidy rates across different providers offering preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Our analysis of 36 395 blastocyst biopsies across eight genetic testing laboratories revealed that euploidy rates were significantly higher in providers reporting low rates of mosaicism.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Diagnoses consistent with chromosomal mosaicism have emerged as a third category of possible embryo ploidy outcomes following PGT-A. However, in the era of mosaicism, embryo selection has become increasingly complex. Biological, technical, analytical, and clinical complexities in interpreting such results have led to substantial variability in mosaicism rates across PGT-A providers and clinics. Critically, it remains unknown whether these differences impact the number of euploid embryos available for transfer. Ultimately, this may significantly affect clinical outcomes, with important implications for PGT-A patients.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In this international, multicenter cohort study, we reviewed 36 395 consecutive PGT-A results, obtained from 10 035 patients across 11 867 treatment cycles, conducted between October 2015 and October 2021. A total of 17 IVF centers, across eight PGT-A providers, five countries and three continents participated in the study. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and next-generation sequencing. Both autologous and donation cycles were assessed. Cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements were excluded from the analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The PGT-A providers were randomly categorized (A to H). Providers B, C, D, E, F, G, and H all reported mosaicism, whereas Provider A reported embryos as either euploid or aneuploid. Ploidy rates were analyzed using multilevel mixed linear regression. Analyses were adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, oocyte source, number of embryos biopsied, day of biopsy, and PGT-A provider, as appropriate. We compared associations between genetic testing providers and PGT-A outcomes, including the number of chromosomally normal (euploid) embryos determined to be suitable for transfer.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The mean maternal age (±SD) across all providers was 36.2 (±5.2). Our findings reveal a strong association between PGT-A provider and the diagnosis of euploidy and mosaicism. Amongst the seven providers that reported mosaicism, the rates varied from 3.1% to 25.0%. After adjusting for confounders, we observed a significant difference in the likelihood of diagnosing mosaicism across providers (P < 0.001), ranging from 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2-7.4%) for Provider B to 35.6% (95% CI: 32.6-38.7%) for Provider E. Notably, adjusted euploidy rates were highest for providers that reported the lowest rates of mosaicism (Provider B: euploidy, 55.7% (95% CI: 54.1-57.4%), mosaicism, 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2-7.4%); Provider H: euploidy, 44.5% (95% CI: 43.6-45.4%), mosaicism, 9.9% (95% CI: 9.2-10.6%)); and Provider D: euploidy, 43.8% (95% CI: 39.2-48.4%), mosaicism, 11.0% (95% CI: 7.5-14.5%)). Moreover, the overall chance of having at least one euploid blastocyst available for transfer was significantly higher when mosaicism was not reported, when we compared Provider A to all other providers (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.13-1.50). Differences in diagnosing and interpreting mosaic results across PGT-A laboratories raise further concerns regarding the accuracy and relevance of mosaicism predictions. While we confirmed equivalent clinical outcomes following the transfer of mosaic and euploid blastocysts, we found that a significant proportion of mosaic embryos are not used for IVF treatment.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Due to the retrospective nature of the study, associations can be ascertained, however, causality cannot be established. Certain parameters such as blastocyst grade were not available in the dataset. Furthermore, certain platform-related and clinic-specific factors may not be readily quantifiable or explicitly captured in our dataset. As such, a full elucidation of all potential confounders accounting for variability may not be possible.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings highlight the strong need for standardization and quality assurance in the industry. The decision not to transfer mosaic embryos may ultimately reduce the chance of success of a PGT-A cycle by limiting the pool of available embryos. Until we can be certain that mosaic diagnoses accurately reflect biological variability, reporting mosaicism warrants utmost caution. A prudent approach is imperative, as it may determine the difference between success or failure for some patients.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by the Torres Quevedo Grant, awarded to M.P. (PTQ2019-010494) by the Spanish State Research Agency, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain. M.P., L.B., A.R.L., A.L.R.d.C.L., N.P.P., M.P., D.S., F.A., A.P., B.M., L.D., F.V.M., D.S., M.R., E.P.d.l.B., A.R., and R.V. have no competing interests to declare. B.L., R.M., and J.A.O. are full time employees of IB Biotech, the genetics company of the Instituto Bernabeu group, which performs preimplantation genetic testing. M.G. is a full time employee of Novagen, the genetics company of Cegyr, which performs preimplantation genetic testing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Preimplantation genetic testing using comprehensive genomic copy number analysis is beneficial for balanced translocation carriers

Balanced chromosomal translocation is one of chromosomal variations. Carriers of balanced chromosomal translocations have an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage. To avoid the risk, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) using comprehensive genomic copy number analysis has been developed. This study aimed to verify whether and how embryos from couples in which one partner is a balanced translocation carrier have a higher ratio of chromosomal abnormalities. A total of 894 biopsied trophectoderms (TEs) were obtained from 130 couples in which one partner was a balanced translocation carrier (Robertsonian translocation, reciprocal translocation, or intrachromosomal inversion) and grouped as PGT-SR. Conversely, 3269 TEs from 697 couples who experienced recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss were included in the PGT-A group. The transferable blastocyst ratio was significantly lower in the PGT-SR group, even when bias related to the sample number and patient age was corrected. Subgroup analysis of the PGT-SR group revealed that the transferable blastocyst ratio was higher in the Robertsonian translocation group. Because the PGT-SR group had a higher proportion of untransferable embryos than the PGT-A group, PGT using comprehensive genomic copy number analysis was more beneficial for balanced translocation carriers than for infertility patients without chromosomal translocations. The frequencies of de novo aneuploidies were further analyzed, and the frequency in the PGT-SR group was lower than that in the PGT-A group. Therefore, we could not confirm the existence of interchromosomal effects in this study.

Current Applications and Controversies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) in In Vitro Fertilization

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has evolved over recent years, including improvements in embryo culture, biopsy, transfer, and genetic testing. The application of new comprehensive chromosome screening analysis has improved the accuracy in determining the chromosomal status of the analyzed sample, but it has brought new challenges such as the management of partial aneuploidies and mosaicisms. For the past two decades, PGT-A has been involved in a controversy regarding its efficiency in improving IVF outcomes, despite its widespread worldwide implementation. Understanding the impact of embryo aneuploidy in IVF (in vitro fertilization) should theoretically allow improving reproductive outcomes. This review of the literature aims to describe the impact of aneuploidy in human reproduction and how PGT-A was introduced to overcome this obstacle in IVF (in vitro fertilization). The article will try to analyze and summarize the evolution of the PGT-A in the recent years, and its current applications and limitations, as well as the controversy it generates. Conflicting published data could indicate the lacking value of a single biopsied sample to determine embryo chromosomal status and/or the lack of standardized methods for embryo culture and management and genetic analysis among other factors. It has to be considered that PGT-A may not be a universal test to improve the reproductive potential in IVF patients, rather each clinic should evaluate the efficacy of PGT-A in their IVF program based on their population, skills, and limitations.

Identifying risk variants for embryo aneuploidy using ultra-low coverage whole-genome sequencing from preimplantation genetic testing

Aneuploidy frequently arises during human meiosis and is the primary cause of early miscarriage and in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. Individuals undergoing IVF exhibit significant variability in aneuploidy rates, although the exact genetic causes of the variability in aneuploid egg production remain unclear. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using next-generation sequencing is a standard test for identifying and selecting IVF-derived euploid embryos. The wealth of embryo aneuploidy data and ultra-low coverage whole-genome sequencing (ulc-WGS) data from PGT-A have the potential to discover variants in parental genomes that are associated with aneuploidy risk in their embryos. Using ulc-WGS data from ∼10,000 PGT-A biopsies, we imputed genotype likelihoods of genetic variants in embryo genomes. We then used the imputed variants and embryo aneuploidy calls to perform a genome-wide association study of aneuploidy incidence. Finally, we carried out functional evaluation of the identified candidate gene in a mouse oocyte system. We identified one locus on chromosome 3 that is significantly associated with meiotic aneuploidy risk. One candidate gene, CCDC66, encompassed by this locus, is involved in chromosome segregation during meiosis. Using mouse oocytes, we showed that CCDC66 regulates meiotic progression and chromosome segregation fidelity, especially in older mice. Our work extended the research utility of PGT-A ulc-WGS data by allowing robust association testing and improved the understanding of the genetic contribution to maternal meiotic aneuploidy risk. Importantly, we introduce a generalizable method that has potential to be leveraged for similar association studies that use ulc-WGS data.

Challenges experienced by genetic counselors while they provided counseling about mosaic embryos

Objective

To survey genetic counselors (GCs) who have counseled about mosaic embryos regarding the challenges they faced in counseling this patient population and assess their need for more resources to support their practice.

Design

Self-administered online survey.

Setting

Academic university.

Study Population

Seventy-eight GCs primarily from the United States and Canada.

Interventions

Genetic counselors completed a quantitative survey with an embedded qualitative component. Quantitative data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. An inductive thematic analysis was performed on open-text responses.

Main Outcome Measures

Genetic counselors were asked what clinical activities relating to mosaic embryos they performed. They were then asked to rate how challenging each activity was to perform using a 5-point scale; a rating of 4 or 5 was defined as highly challenging. Open-text questions enabled GCs to describe factors that they felt contributed to these challenges.

Results

The challenges reported by GCs included the uncertainty of outcomes in offspring after mosaic embryo transfer, limited guidelines available to assist clinicians with counseling about mosaic embryos, and ranking mosaic embryos by suitability for transfer. The contributing factors suggested by participants included limited outcome data, limited GC involvement in pretest counseling for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and perceived inconsistency in counseling practices across clinics. Genetic counselors differed in their genetic testing recommendations for pregnancies conceived after mosaic embryo transfer. Amniocentesis and postnatal assessment were recommended by 85% and 49% of GCs, respectively, and 15% recommended chorionic villus sampling and noninvasive prenatal testing. Almost all (92%) reported a need for more resources, such as standardized guidelines, more outcome data, and continuing education on PGT-A and mosaicism.

Conclusions

This study describes challenges experienced by GCs while they counseled about mosaic embryos. Our findings demonstrate a need for more outcome data on mosaic embryo pregnancies and for evidence-based clinical guidelines. The differing recommendations for prenatal genetic testing among GCs in the study warrant further research into contributing factors. We strongly recommend that pretest counseling, including a discussion regarding mosaicism, is provided to all couples considering PGT-A to reduce counseling challenges and to promote patients' informed decision-making.

Oocyte cryopreservation in mosaic Turner syndrome with polycystic ovaries

Objective

To report a case of a patient with Turner syndrome (TS) mosaicism and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), who underwent successful ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and cryopreservation.

Design

Case report.

Subjects

A female patient with mosaic TS (45,X [24%]/46,XX [76%]) and a paternally inherited balanced reciprocal translocation t(2:6) diagnosed with PCOS.

Interventions

Controlled ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and cryopreservation.

Main outcome measures

Successful oocyte retrieval and cryopreservation.

Results

We report an interesting case of a patient with TS mosaicism 45,X [24%]/46,XX [76%] and a paternally inherited t(2:6) balanced reciprocal translocation, who was diagnosed with PCOS on the basis of oligomenorrhea and ultrasound polycystic ovary morphology (antral follicle count of 17 and >20, left and right ovaries, respectively), underwent 2 cycles of ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and cryopreservation, resulting in 19 cryopreserved oocytes.

Conclusions

Our case highlights the importance of early counseling regarding fertility options in patients with mosaic TS and the need for careful monitoring of ovarian reserve during this process, which could be done by measuring the anti-müllerian hormone or antral follicle count. It also underscores the possibility of women with mosaic TS being affected by PCOS.

Embryo Culture Medium Has No Impact on Mosaicism Rates: a Sibling Oocyte Study

Human embryos cultured in vitro can contain two or more cytogenetically distinct cell lineages known as "chromosomal mosaicism". Since mosaicism is produced by mitotic errors after fertilization occurs, culture conditions might contribute to mosaicism origins. Many studies demonstrated that euploidy rates are not affected by culture media; however, whether oocytes cultured under continuous culture media (CCM) or sequential culture media (SCM) has a higher risk of mosaicism occurring remains unsolved. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether mosaicism rates differ when sibling oocytes are cultured in CCM or SCM. A single center observational study was performed including 6072 sibling oocytes. Mature oocytes (MII) were inseminated and cultured in CCM (n = 3,194) or SCM (n = 2,359) until blastocyst stage for trophectoderm (TE) biopsy on day (D) 5, D6, or D7 for preimplantation genetic testing analysis with a semi-automated next-generation sequencing. Mosaicism was classified as low (30-50%) or high (50-80%) based on the percentage of abnormal cells constitution detected in TE samples. As a result, 426 women with a mean age of 34.7 ± 6.4 years were included in the study. Fertilization rates were comparable between CCM and SCM (74.0% vs 72.0%, p = 0.091). Although total blastulation rate and usable blastocyst rate (biopsied blastocysts) were significantly higher in CCM than SCM (75.3 % vs. 70.3%, p < 0.001 and 58.0% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.026), euploidy rates did not differ significantly (45.2% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.810, respectively). Mosaicism rate was not significantly different for blastocysts cultured in CCM or SCM (4.7% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.650), neither the proportion of low or high mosaic rates (3.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.353 and 1.0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.355, respectively). Hence, it was concluded that CCM or SCM does not have an impact on mosaicism rate of embryos cultured until the blastocyst stage.

Impact of maternally derived meiotic aneuploidies on early embryonic development in vitro

PURPOSE

To assess early embryonic developmental potential of embryos affected by maternally inherited meiotic aneuploidies.

METHODS

This observational, descriptive study includes 930 oocytes from 151 patients which were retrospectively analyzed by combining the morphological assessment with the genetic results from polar body diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 930 oocytes examined, 566 (60.9%) were tested aneuploid. Developmental potential until cleavage stage was not affected by trisomies or monosomies (69.6% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.75). However, trisomies significantly more often resulted in top quality cleavage stage embryos compared to monosomies (20% vs. 17.6%, p =  < 0.01). Top quality blastocysts were more likely to be euploid than aneuploid (52.4% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.032). Additionally, significantly more aneuploid embryos resulted in developmental arrest compared to euploid embryos (15.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.003). Overall, there was no significant difference in the frequency of trisomies and monosomies in blastocyst stage embryos. (28.3% vs. 28.2%; p = 0.81). In contrast to earlier developmental stages, distribution of trisomies and monosomies did not differ in top quality blastocysts (8.3% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.32). However, certain chromosomal abnormalities showed a higher potential to develop into a top-rated blastocyst. These included monosomies 2, 5, 8, 10, 16, 17, 20, 21, and 22 and trisomies 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18 and 20.

CONCLUSION

Meiotically induced maternal aneuploidies have different effects on early embryonic development. While no difference in developmental potential between monosomies and trisomies could be observed in blastocysts, cleavage stage quality was significantly affected by chromosomal aneuploidies.

Analysis of copy number variations and possible candidate genes in spontaneous abortion by copy number variation sequencing

Introduction

Embryonic chromosomal abnormalities represent a major causative factor in early pregnancy loss, highlighting the importance of understanding their role in spontaneous abortion. This study investigates the potential correlation between chromosomal abnormalities and spontaneous abortion using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology.

Methods

We analyzed Copy Number Variations (CNVs) in 395 aborted fetal specimens from spontaneous abortion patients by CNV-seq. And collected correlated data, including maternal age, gestational week, and Body Mass Index (BMI), and analyzed their relationship with the CNVs.

Results

Out of the 395 cases, 67.09% of the fetuses had chromosomal abnormalities, including numerical abnormalities, structural abnormalities, and mosaicisms. Maternal age was found to be an important risk factor for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, with the proportion of autosomal trisomy in abnormal karyotypes increasing with maternal age, while polyploidy decreased. The proportion of abnormal karyotypes with mosaic decreased as gestational age increased, while the frequency of polyploidy and sex chromosome monosomy increased. Gene enrichment analysis identified potential miscarriage candidate genes and functions, as well as pathogenic genes and pathways associated with unexplained miscarriage among women aged below or over 35 years old. Based on our study, it can be inferred that there is an association between BMI values and the risk of recurrent miscarriage caused by chromosomal abnormalities.

Discussion

Overall, these findings provide important insights into the understanding of spontaneous abortion and have implications for the development of personalized interventions for patients with abnormal karyotypes.

Before Is Better: Innovative Multidisciplinary Preconception Care in Different Clinical Contexts

CONTEXT

Implementation of pre-conception care units is still very limited in Italy. Nowadays, the population's awareness of the reproductive risks that can be reduced or prevented is very low. Purpose and main findings: We presented a new personalized multidisciplinary model of preconception care aimed at identifying and possibly reducing adverse reproductive events. We analyzed three cohorts of population: couples from the general population, infertile or subfertile couples, and couples with a previous history of adverse reproductive events. The proposal involves a deep investigation regarding family history, the personal histories of both partners, and reproductive history.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Preconception care is still neglected in Italy and under-evaluated by clinicians involved in natural or in vitro reproduction. Adequate preconception counseling will improve maternal and fetal obstetrical outcomes.

A pilot investigation of low-pass genome sequencing identifying site-specific variation in chromosomal mosaicisms by a multiple site sampling approach in first-trimester miscarriages

STUDY QUESTION

Can multiple-site low-pass genome sequencing (GS) of products of conception (POCs) improve the detection of genetic abnormalities, especially heterogeneously distributed mosaicism and homogeneously distributed mosaicism in first-trimester miscarriage?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Multiple-site sampling combined with low-pass GS significantly increased genetic diagnostic yield (77.0%, 127/165) of first-trimester miscarriages, with mosaicisms accounting for 17.0% (28/165), especially heterogeneously distributed mosaicisms (75%, 21/28) that are currently underappreciated.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Aneuploidies are well known to cause first-trimester miscarriage, which are detectable by conventional karyotyping and next-generation sequencing (NGS) on a single-site sampling basis. However, there are limited studies demonstrating the implications of mosaic genetic abnormalities in first-trimester miscarriages, especially when genetic heterogeneity is present in POCs.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a cross-sectional cohort study carried out at a university-affiliated public hospital. One hundred seventy-four patients diagnosed with first-trimester miscarriage from December 2018 to November 2021 were offered ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) treatment. Products of conception were subjected to multiple-site low-pass GS for the detection of chromosomal imbalances.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

For each POC, multiple sites of villi (three sites on average) were biopsied for low-pass GS. Samples with maternal cell contamination (MCC) and polyploidy were excluded based on the quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) results. The spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities, including mosaicism (heterogeneously distributed and homogeneously distributed) and constitutional abnormalities was investigated. Chromosomal microarray analysis and additional DNA fingerprinting were used for validation and MCC exclusion. A cross-platform comparison between conventional karyotyping and our multiple-site approach was also performed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

One hundred sixty-five POCs (corresponding to 490 DNA samples) were subjected to low-pass GS. Genetic abnormalities were detected in 77.0% (127/165) of POCs by our novel approach. Specifically, 17.0% (28/165) of cases had either heterogeneously distributed mosaicism (12.7%, 21/165) or homogeneously distributed mosaicism (6.1%, 10/165) (three cases had both types of mosaicism). The remaining 60.0% (99/165) of cases had constitutional abnormalities. In addition, in the 71 cases with karyotyping performed in parallel, 26.8% (19/71) of the results could be revised by our approach.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Lack of a normal gestational week-matched cohort might hinder the establishment of a causative link between mosaicisms and first-trimester miscarriage.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Low-pass GS with multiple-site sampling increased the detection of chromosomal mosaicisms in first-trimester miscarriage POCs. This innovative multiple-site low-pass GS approach enabled the novel discovery of heterogeneously distributed mosaicism, which was prevalent in first-trimester miscarriage POCs and frequently observed in preimplantation embryos, but is currently unappreciated by conventional single-site cytogenetic investigations.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported partly by Research Grant Council Collaborative Research Fund (C4062-21GF to K.W.C), Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (202102010005 to K.W.C), Guangdong-Hong Kong Technology Cooperation Funding Scheme (TCFS), Innovation and Technology Fund (GHP/117/19GD to K.W.C), HKOG Direct Grant (2019.050 to J.P.W.C), and Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund (05160406 to J.P.W.C). The authors have no competing interests to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Identifying risk genes for embryo aneuploidy using ultra-low coverage whole-genome sequencing

Background

Aneuploidy, the state of a cell containing extra or missing chromosomes, frequently arises during human meiosis and is the primary cause of early miscarriage and maternal age-related in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. IVF patients exhibit significant variability in aneuploidy rates, although the exact genetic causes of the variability in aneuploid egg production remain unclear. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using ultra-low coverage whole-genome sequencing (ulc-WGS) is a standard test for identifying and selecting IVF-derived embryos with a normal chromosome complement. The wealth of embryo aneuploidy data and ulc-WGS data from PGT-A has potential for discovering variants in paternal genomes that are associated with aneuploidy risk in their embryos.

Methods

Using ulc-WGS data from ∼10,000 PGT-A biopsies, we imputed genotype likelihoods of genetic variants in parental genomes. We then used the imputed variants and aneuploidy calls from the embryos to perform a genome-wide association study of aneuploidy incidence. Finally, we carried out functional evaluation of the identified candidate gene in a mouse oocyte system.

Results

We identified one locus on chromosome 3 that is significantly associated with maternal meiotic aneuploidy risk. One candidate gene, CCDC66, encompassed by this locus, is involved in chromosome segregation during meiosis. Using mouse oocytes, we showed that CCDC66 regulates meiotic progression and chromosome segregation fidelity, especially in older mice.

Conclusions

Our work extended the research utility of PGT-A ulc-WGS data by allowing robust association testing and improved the understanding of the genetic contribution to maternal meiotic aneuploidy risk. Importantly, we introduce a generalizable method that can be leveraged for similar association studies using ulc-WGS data.

Chromosomal Aberrations As a Biological Phenomenon in Human Embryonic Development

Frequent chromosomal abnormalities are a distinctive feature of early embryonic development in mammals, especially humans. Aneuploidy is considered as a contributing factor to failed embryo implantation and spontaneous abortions. In the case of chromosomal mosaicism, its effect on the potency of embryos to normally develop has not been sufficiently studied. Although, a significant percentage of chromosomal defects in early human embryos are currently believed to be associated with the features of clinical and laboratory protocols, in this review, we focus on the biological mechanisms associated with chromosomal abnormalities. In particular, we address the main events in oocyte meiosis that affects not only the genetic status of an unfertilized oocyte, but also further embryo viability, and analyze the features of first cleavage divisions and the causes of frequent chromosomal errors in early embryonic development. In addition, we discuss current data on self-correction of the chromosomal status in early embryos.

Identification of complex and cryptic chromosomal rearrangements by optical genome mapping

BACKGROUND

Optical genome mapping (OGM) has developed into a highly promising method for detecting structural variants (SVs) in human genomes. Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) and cryptic translocations are rare events that are considered difficult to detect by routine cytogenetic methods. In this study, OGM was applied to delineate the precise chromosomal rearrangements in three cases with uncertain or unconfirmed CCRs detected by conventional karyotyping and one case with a cryptic translocation suggested by fetal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).

RESULTS

In the three cases with CCRs, OGM not only confirmed or revised the original karyotyping results but also refined the precise chromosomal structures. In the case with a suspected translocation not detected by karyotyping, OGM efficiently identified the cryptic translocation and defined the genomic breakpoints with relatively high accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed OGM as a robust alternative approach to karyotyping for the detection of chromosomal structural rearrangements, including CCRs and cryptic translocations.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) Reveals High Levels of Chromosomal Errors in In Vivo-Derived Pig Embryos, with an Increased Incidence When Produced In Vitro

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widespread, but controversial, in humans and improves pregnancy and live birth rates in cattle. In pigs, it presents a possible solution to improve in vitro embryo production (IVP), however, the incidence and origin of chromosomal errors remains under-explored. To address this, we used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based PGT-A algorithms in 101 in vivo-derived (IVD) and 64 IVP porcine embryos. More errors were observed in IVP vs. IVD blastocysts (79.7% vs. 13.6% p < 0.001). In IVD embryos, fewer errors were found at blastocyst stage compared to cleavage (4-cell) stage (13.6% vs. 40%, p = 0.056). One androgenetic and two parthenogenetic embryos were also identified. Triploidy was the most common error in IVD embryos (15.8%), but only observed at cleavage, not blastocyst stage, followed by whole chromosome aneuploidy (9.9%). In IVP blastocysts, 32.8% were parthenogenetic, 25.0% (hypo-)triploid, 12.5% aneuploid, and 9.4% haploid. Parthenogenetic blastocysts arose from just three out of ten sows, suggesting a possible donor effect. The high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in general, but in IVP embryos in particular, suggests an explanation for the low success of porcine IVP. The approaches described provide a means of monitoring technical improvements and suggest future application of PGT-A might improve embryo transfer success.

Double vitrification-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, impair live birth but do not affect neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether the transfer of blastocysts that have been vitrified, thawed, biopsied, revitrified, and subsequently rethawed affects clinical outcome and neonatal outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a single assisted reproduction technology center from September 2016 to March 2021. Women undergoing single frozen euploid blastocysts transfer were stratified into two groups based on number of vitrification-thawing cycles: single vitrification coupled with single biopsy (group A, n = 177) and double vitrification coupled with single biopsy (group B, n = 30). Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups. Group B was associated with an increased likelihood of live birth when compared with group A by different multivariable analysis models (model 1: odds ratio, 0.42 [95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.97], P = 0.041; model 2: odds ratio, 0.38 [95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.92], P = 0.033). No major obstetrical complication was reported in the two groups and only one malformation live birth was reported in group A.

CONCLUSION

The procedure of double vitrification-warming cycles, coupled with single biopsy, increases pregnancy loss and ultimately diminishes live birth but does not affect perinatal outcome. Future studies with a larger sample size would help to validate the results.

Selected Genetic Factors Associated with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a heterogeneous disease resulting from non-functional ovaries in women before the age of 40. It is characterized by primary amenorrhea or secondary amenorrhea. As regards its etiology, although many POI cases are idiopathic, menopausal age is a heritable trait and genetic factors play an important role in all POI cases with known causes, accounting for approximately 20% to 25% of cases. This paper reviews the selected genetic causes implicated in POI and examines their pathogenic mechanisms to show the crucial role of genetic effects on POI. The genetic factors that can be found in POI cases include chromosomal abnormalities (e.g., X chromosomal aneuploidies, structural X chromosomal abnormalities, X-autosome translocations, and autosomal variations), single gene mutations (e.g., newborn ovary homeobox gene (NOBOX), folliculogenesis specific bHLH transcription factor (FIGLA), follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), forkhead box L2 (FOXL2), bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15), etc., as well as defects in mitochondrial functions and non-coding RNAs (small ncRNAs and long ncRNAs). These findings are beneficial for doctors to diagnose idiopathic POI cases and predict the risk of POI in women.

Two clinical case reports of embryonic mosaicism identified with PGT-A persisting during pregnancy as true fetal mosaicism

The health risks associated with transferring embryos classified as mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) are currently unknown. Such embryos produce PGT-A results indicating the presence of both euploid and aneuploid cells and have historically been deselected from transfer and grouped with uniformly aneuploid embryos as 'abnormal'. In recent years, numerous groups have reported the intentional transfer of mosaic embryos in the absence of uniformly euploid embryos, largely observing births of seemingly healthy babies. However, it remains to be understood whether the embryonic mosaicism invariably becomes resolved during the ensuing pregnancy, or whether the placenta and/or fetal tissues retain aneuploid cells, and if so to what potential clinical effect. Here, we report two cases of mosaicism persisting from the embryonic stage to the established pregnancy. Case 1 involved an embryonic low-level segmental mosaic loss in Chromosome (Chr) 1, which was confirmed in amniocentesis as well as in brain tissue of the products of conception. This pregnancy was terminated due to the chromosomal pathologies associated with 1p36 deletion syndrome, such as severe intellectual disability. Case 2 involved a low-level mosaic Chr 21 trisomy, which was confirmed with chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The ensuing pregnancy was terminated after ultrasound identification of severe abnormalities in the placenta and fetus. Together, these two cases should be taken into account for risk-benefit assessments of prospective mosaic embryo transfers.

ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XXI: PGT analyses in 2018

STUDY QUESTION

What are the trends and developments in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2018 as compared to previous years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The main trends observed in this 21st dataset on PGT are that the implementation of trophectoderm biopsy with comprehensive whole-genome testing is most often applied for PGT-A and concurrent PGT-M/SR/A, while for PGT-M and PGT-SR, single-cell testing with PCR and FISH still prevail.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 20 datasets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using an online platform, which is based on genetic analysis and has been in use since 2016.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology, and clinical outcome were submitted by 44 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality, were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included, enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, and preparation of figures and tables were carried out by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The current data collection from 2018 covers a total of 1388 analyses for PGT-M, 462 analyses for PGT-SR, 3003 analyses for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A), and 338 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A.The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 19% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018), is status quo for PGT-SR (from 30% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018) and has become the most used biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 87% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (96%). The use of comprehensive, whole-genome amplification (WGA)-based diagnostic technology showed a small decrease for PGT-M (from 15% in 2016-2017 to 12% in 2018) and for PGT-SR (from 50% in 2016-2017 to 44% in 2018). Comprehensive testing was, however, the main technology for PGT-A (from 93% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018). WGA-based testing was also widely used for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, as a standalone technique (74%) or in combination with PCR or FISH (24%). Trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive testing strategies are linked with higher diagnostic efficiencies and improved clinical outcomes per embryo transfer.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings apply to the data submitted by 44 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The Consortium datasets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The study has no external funding, and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Segmental aneuploid hotspots identified across the genome concordant on reanalysis

The aim of this study was to characterize a large set of full segmental aneuploidies identified in trophectoderm (TE) biopsies and evaluate concordance in human blastocysts. Full segmental aneuploid errors were identified in TE biopsies (n = 2766) from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploid (PGT-A) cycles. Full segmental deletions (n = 1872; 66.1%) presented twice as many times as duplications (n = 939; 33.9%), mapped more often to the q-arm (n = 1696; 61.3%) than the p-arm (n = 847; 31.0%) or both arms (n = 223; 8.1%; P < 0.05), and were eight times more likely to include the distal end of a chromosome than not (P < 0.05). Additionally, 37 recurring coordinates (each ≥ 10 events) were discovered across 17 different chromosomes, which were also significantly enriched for distal regions (P = 4.1 × 10-56). Blinded concordance analysis of 162 dissected blastocysts validated the original TE PGT-A full segmental result for a concordance of 96.3% (n = 156); remaining dissected blastocysts were identified as mosaic (n = 6; 3.7%). Origin of aneuploid analysis revealed full segmental aneuploid errors were mostly paternally derived (67%) in contrast to whole chromosome aneuploid errors (5.8% paternally derived). Errors from both parental gametes were observed in 6.5% of aneuploid embryos when multiple whole chromosomes were affected. The average number of recombination events was significantly less in paternally derived (1.81) compared to maternally derived (3.81) segmental aneuploidies (P < 0.0001). In summary, full segmental aneuploidies were identified at hotspots across the genome and were highly concordant upon blinded analysis. Nevertheless, future studies assessing the reproductive potential of full (non-mosaic) segmental aneuploid embryos are critical to rule out potential harmful reproductive risks.

SARS-CoV-2 can infect human embryos

The spread of SARS-CoV-2 has led to a devastating pandemic, with infections resulting in a range of symptoms collectively known as COVID-19. The full repertoire of human tissues and organs susceptible to infection is an area of active investigation, and some studies have implicated the reproductive system. The effects of COVID-19 on human reproduction remain poorly understood, and particularly the impact on early embryogenesis and establishment of a pregnancy are not known. In this work, we explore the susceptibility of early human embryos to SARS-CoV-2 infection. By using RNA-seq and immunofluorescence, we note that ACE2 and TMPRSS2, two canonical cell entry factors for SARS-CoV-2, are co-expressed in cells of the trophectoderm in blastocyst-stage preimplantation embryos. For the purpose of viral entry studies, we used fluorescent reporter virions pseudotyped with Spike (S) glycoprotein from SARS-CoV-2, and we observe robust infection of trophectoderm cells. This permissiveness could be attenuated with blocking antibodies targeting S or ACE2. When exposing human blastocysts to the live, fully infectious SARS-CoV-2, we detected cases of infection that compromised embryo health. Therefore, we identify a new human target tissue for SARS-CoV-2 with potential medical implications for reproductive health during the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath.

ESHRE survey results and good practice recommendations on managing chromosomal mosaicism

STUDY QUESTION

How should ART/preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) centres manage the detection of chromosomal mosaicism following PGT?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Thirty good practice recommendations were formulated that can be used by ART/PGT centres as a basis for their own policy with regards to the management of ‘mosaic’ embryos.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The use of comprehensive chromosome screening technologies has provided a variety of data on the incidence of chromosomal mosaicism at the preimplantation stage of development and evidence is accumulating that clarifies the clinical outcomes after transfer of embryos with putative mosaic results, with regards to implantation, miscarriage and live birth rates, and neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, a large survey evaluating current practice and published guidance documents. The literature search was performed using PubMed and focused on studies published between 2010 and 2022. The survey was performed through a web-based questionnaire distributed to members of the ESHRE special interest groups (SIG) Reproductive Genetics and Embryology, and the ESHRE PGT Consortium members. It included questions on ART and PGT, reporting, embryo transfer policy and follow-up of transfers. The final dataset represents 239 centres.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The working group (WG) included 16 members with expertise on the ART/PGT process and chromosomal mosaicism. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the WG, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Eighty percent of centres that biopsy three or more cells report mosaicism, even though only 66.9% of all centres have validated their technology and only 61.8% of these have validated specifically for the calling of chromosomal mosaicism. The criteria for designating mosaicism, reporting and transfer policies vary significantly across the centres replying to the survey. The WG formulated recommendations on how to manage the detection of chromosomal mosaicism in clinical practice, considering validation, risk assessment, designating and reporting mosaicism, embryo transfer policies, prenatal testing and follow-up. Guidance is also provided on the essential elements that should constitute the consent forms and the genetic report, and that should be covered in genetic counselling. As there are several unknowns in chromosomal mosaicism, it is recommended that PGT centres monitor emerging data on the topic and adapt or refine their policy whenever new insights are available from evidence.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Rather than providing instant standardized advice, the recommendations should help ART/PGT centres in developing their own policy towards the management of putative mosaic embryos in clinical practice.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This document will help facilitate a more knowledge-based approach for dealing with chromosomal mosaicism in different centres. In addition to recommendations for clinical practice, recommendations for future research were formulated. Following up on these will direct research towards existing research gaps with direct translation to clinical practice. Emerging data will help in improving guidance, and a more evidence-based approach of managing chromosomal mosaicism.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The WG received technical support from ESHRE. M.D.R. participated in the EQA special advisory group, outside the submitted work, and is the chair of the PGT WG of the Belgian society for human genetics. D.W. declared receiving salary from Juno Genetics, UK. A.C. is an employee of Igenomix, Italy and C.R. is an employee of Igenomix, Spain. C.S. received a research grant from FWO, Belgium, not related to the submitted work. I.S. declared being a Co-founder of IVFvision Ltd, UK. J.R.V. declared patents related to ‘Methods for haplotyping single-cells’ and ‘Haplotyping and copy number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies’, and being a board member of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) and International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD). K.S. reported being Chair-elect of ESHRE. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. 

ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type. 

Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE. 

Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF

STUDY QUESTION

Can an artificial intelligence (AI) model predict human embryo ploidy status using static images captured by optical light microscopy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Results demonstrated predictive accuracy for embryo euploidy and showed a significant correlation between AI score and euploidy rate, based on assessment of images of blastocysts at Day 5 after IVF.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Euploid embryos displaying the normal human chromosomal complement of 46 chromosomes are preferentially selected for transfer over aneuploid embryos (abnormal complement), as they are associated with improved clinical outcomes. Currently, evaluation of embryo genetic status is most commonly performed by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), which involves embryo biopsy and genetic testing. The potential for embryo damage during biopsy, and the non-uniform nature of aneuploid cells in mosaic embryos, has prompted investigation of additional, non-invasive, whole embryo methods for evaluation of embryo genetic status.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A total of 15 192 blastocyst-stage embryo images with associated clinical outcomes were provided by 10 different IVF clinics in the USA, India, Spain and Malaysia. The majority of data were retrospective, with two additional prospectively collected blind datasets provided by IVF clinics using the genetics AI model in clinical practice. Of these images, a total of 5050 images of embryos on Day 5 of in vitro culture were used for the development of the AI model. These Day 5 images were provided for 2438 consecutively treated women who had undergone IVF procedures in the USA between 2011 and 2020. The remaining images were used for evaluation of performance in different settings, or otherwise excluded for not matching the inclusion criteria.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The genetics AI model was trained using static 2-dimensional optical light microscope images of Day 5 blastocysts with linked genetic metadata obtained from PGT-A. The endpoint was ploidy status (euploid or aneuploid) based on PGT-A results. Predictive accuracy was determined by evaluating sensitivity (correct prediction of euploid), specificity (correct prediction of aneuploid) and overall accuracy. The Matthew correlation coefficient and receiver-operating characteristic curves and precision-recall curves (including AUC values), were also determined. Performance was also evaluated using correlation analyses and simulated cohort studies to evaluate ranking ability for euploid enrichment.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Overall accuracy for the prediction of euploidy on a blind test dataset was 65.3%, with a sensitivity of 74.6%. When the blind test dataset was cleansed of poor quality and mislabeled images, overall accuracy increased to 77.4%. This performance may be relevant to clinical situations where confounding factors, such as variability in PGT-A testing, have been accounted for. There was a significant positive correlation between AI score and the proportion of euploid embryos, with very high scoring embryos (9.0-10.0) twice as likely to be euploid than the lowest-scoring embryos (0.0-2.4). When using the genetics AI model to rank embryos in a cohort, the probability of the top-ranked embryo being euploid was 82.4%, which was 26.4% more effective than using random ranking, and ∼13-19% more effective than using the Gardner score. The probability increased to 97.0% when considering the likelihood of one of the top two ranked embryos being euploid, and the probability of both top two ranked embryos being euploid was 66.4%. Additional analyses showed that the AI model generalized well to different patient demographics and could also be used for the evaluation of Day 6 embryos and for images taken using multiple time-lapse systems. Results suggested that the AI model could potentially be used to differentiate mosaic embryos based on the level of mosaicism.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

While the current investigation was performed using both retrospectively and prospectively collected data, it will be important to continue to evaluate real-world use of the genetics AI model. The endpoint described was euploidy based on the clinical outcome of PGT-A results only, so predictive accuracy for genetic status in utero or at birth was not evaluated. Rebiopsy studies of embryos using a range of PGT-A methods indicated a degree of variability in PGT-A results, which must be considered when interpreting the performance of the AI model.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These findings collectively support the use of this genetics AI model for the evaluation of embryo ploidy status in a clinical setting. Results can be used to aid in prioritizing and enriching for embryos that are likely to be euploid for multiple clinical purposes, including selection for transfer in the absence of alternative genetic testing methods, selection for cryopreservation for future use or selection for further confirmatory PGT-A testing, as required.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Life Whisperer Diagnostics is a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company, Presagen Holdings Pty Ltd. Funding for the study was provided by Presagen with grant funding received from the South Australian Government: Research, Commercialisation, and Startup Fund (RCSF). 'In kind' support and embryology expertise to guide algorithm development were provided by Ovation Fertility. 'In kind' support in terms of computational resources provided through the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Activate Program. J.M.M.H., D.P. and M.P. are co-owners of Life Whisperer and Presagen. S.M.D., M.A.D. and T.V.N. are employees or former employees of Life Whisperer. S.M.D, J.M.M.H, M.A.D, T.V.N., D.P. and M.P. are listed as inventors of patents relating to this work, and also have stock options in the parent company Presagen. M.V. sits on the advisory board for the global distributor of the technology described in this study and also received support for attending meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Long-read Oxford nanopore sequencing reveals a de novo case of complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 2, 7, and 13

Background

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are associated with high reproductive risk, infertility, abnormalities in offspring, and recurrent miscarriage in women. It is essential to accurately characterize apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements in unaffected individuals.

Methods

A CCR young couple who suffered two spontaneous abortions and underwent labor induction due to fetal chromosomal abnormalities was studied using long‐read sequencing(LRS), single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, G‐banding karyotype analysis (550‐band resolution), and Sanger sequencing.

Results

SNP analysis of the amniotic fluid cells during the third pregnancy revealed a 9.9‐Mb duplication at 7q21.11q21.2 and a 24.8‐Mb heterozygous deletion at 13q21.1q31.1. The unaffected female partner was a carrier of a three‐way CCR [46,XX,? ins(7;13)(q21.1;q21.1q22)t(2;13)(p23;q22)]. Subsequent LRS analysis revealed the exact breakpoint locations on the derivative chromosomes and the specific method of chromosome rearrangement, indicating that the CCR carrier was a more complex structural rearrangement comprising five breakpoints. Furthermore, LRS detected an inserted fragment of chromosome 13 in chromosome 7.

Conclusions

LRS is effective for analyzing the complex structural variations of the human genome and may be used to clarify the specific CCRs for effective genetic counseling and appropriate intervention.

Genetic counseling decisions in gestational carrier pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancies conceived as contracted gestational carriers are a relatively new phenomenon for reproductive. Since the intended parents control genetic screening decisions, there may be differences in genetic decisions made for gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies as compared to traditional non-gestational carrier IVF pregnancies. Our goal was to investigate the frequency and types of these genetic testing decisions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of GC pregnancies counseled at a private maternal-fetal medicine practice between January 2006 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were pregnancies that completed counseling with a certified genetic counselor and obtained high-resolution imaging. Controls were non-GC IVF pregnancies seen in the same period matched by parity, estimated delivery date (EDD), and the oocyte age utilized in conception. Statistical analysis included patient demographics, pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT-A) frequency and results, ultrasound imaging results, and the frequency with results of prenatal genetic screening (first or second-trimester serum screens), non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), or diagnostic testing (chorionic venous sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis).

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety one gestational carrier pregnancies were identified and 167 met inclusion criteria. Gestational carrier pregnancies were significantly more likely to pursue PGT-A, PGT-A with NIPT, first-trimester screening, and second-trimester screening. There were no differences in rates of amniocentesis or CVS over controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding genetic counseling and screening options, our series is the first to demonstrate that gestational carrier parents seek additional genetic counseling resources, even with reassuring PGT-A and ultrasound.

Preimplantation chromosomal mosaics, chimaeras and confined placental mosaicism

Some human preimplantation embryos are chromosomally mosaic. For technical reasons, estimates of the overall frequency vary widely from <15 to >90% and the true frequency remains unknown. Aneuploid/diploid and aneuploid/aneuploid mosaics typically arise during early cleavage stages before the embryonic genome is fully activated and when cell cycle checkpoints are not operating normally. Other mosaics include chaotic aneuploid mosaics and mixoploids, some of which arise by abnormal chromosome segregation at the first cleavage division. Chimaeras are similar to mosaics, in having two genetically distinct cell populations, but they arise from more than one zygote and occur less often. After implantation, the frequency of mosaic embryos declines to about 2% and most are trisomic/diploid mosaics, with trisomic cells confined to the placenta. Thus, few babies are born with chromosomal mosaicism. This review discusses the origin of different types of chromosomal mosaics and chimaeras; their fate and the relationship between preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism and confined placental mosaicism in human conceptuses and animal models. Abnormal cells in mosaic embryos may be depleted by cell death, other types of cell selection or cell correction but the most severely affected mosaic embryos probably die. Trisomic cells could become restricted to placental lineages if cell selection or correction is less effective in placental lineages and/or they are preferentially allocated to a placental lineage. However, the relationship between preimplantation mosaicism and confined placental mosaicism may be complex because the specific chromosome(s) involved will influence whether chromosomally abnormal cells survive predominately in the placental trophoblast and/or placental mesenchyme.

Lay summary

Human cells normally have 23 pairs of chromosomes, which carry the genes. During the first few days of development, some human embryos are chromosomal mosaics. These mosaic embryos have both normal cells and cells with an abnormal number of chromosomes, which arise from the same fertilised egg. (More rarely, the different cell populations arise from more than one fertilised egg and these embryos are called chimaeras.) If chromosomally abnormal cells survive to term, they could cause birth defects. However, few abnormal cells survive and those that do are usually confined to the placenta, where they are less likely to cause harm. It is not yet understood how this restriction occurs but the type of chromosomal abnormality influences which placental tissues are affected. This review discusses the origin of different types of chromosomally abnormal cells, their fate and how they might become confined to the placenta in humans and animal models.

Comparison of chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification products of embryos that resulted in miscarriages or live births: a blinded, nonselection case-control study

Objective

To analyze chromosomal status in reserved multiple displacement amplification (MDA) products of embryos that result in miscarriages or live births.

Methods

Patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-Ms) without aneuploidy screening were included. The case group included 28 cycles that resulted in miscarriages. Controls included 56 cycles with live births. Comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on reserved MDA products from previous blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies. The incidence and type of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos resulting in miscarriages or live births were analyzed.

Results

Of 28 embryos resulting in miscarriages in the case group, the rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 53.6%, which was significantly greater than 14.3% for those resulting in live births in control group (P < 0.001). Whole-chromosome aneuploidy was not found in the control group but was noted in 25.0% of embryos in the case group. Although the rates of segmental abnormality and mosaicism were also greater in the case group, no significant differences were detected. One chaotic embryo in the control group progressed to live birth.

Conclusion

Chromosomal abnormalities were the main reason leading to early pregnancy loss. However, abnormalities, such as segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, should be managed cautiously, considering their undermined reproductive potential.