Doulaveris G, Igel CM, Estrada Trejo F, Fiorentino D, Rabin-Havt S, Klugman S, Dar P. Impact of introducing cell-free DNA screening into clinical care on first trimester ultrasound.
Prenat Diagn 2022;
42:254-259. [PMID:
34989002 DOI:
10.1002/pd.6086]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
First-trimester ultrasound is an important component of prenatal care. We investigated the impact of introducing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aneuploidy screening into routine care, on performance of first-trimester ultrasound.
METHODS
Retrospective study of patients who had prenatal care at a tertiary referral center. We compared the performance of any first-trimester ultrasound between three different aneuploidy screening protocols, used consecutively during the study period: (1) combined first-trimester screening (FTS); (2) FTS and cfDNA offered together; (3) patients requested to choose between FTS and cfDNA. Secondary outcomes included performance of nuchal translucency (NT), aneuploidy screens and diagnostic genetic procedures.
RESULTS
The number of patients undergoing first-trimester ultrasound remained similar with the second protocol but decreased in the third (68.7% vs. 40.9%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25-0.4, p < 0.001). Diagnostic procedures decreased between protocol 1 and 2 (7.6% vs. 4.4%, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, p = 0.02) while NT scans decreased between protocol 2 and 3 (6.8% vs. 1.3%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.4, p < 0.001). The rate of FTS decreased over the study period and less women had cfDNA when they had to choose one method (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Introducing cfDNA screening as an alternative to FTS, resulted in fewer patients receiving ultrasound in the first-trimester.
Collapse