Structural Protein Analysis of Driver Gene Mutations in Conjunctival Melanoma

Intrinsic disorder may drive the interaction of PROS1 and MERTK in uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Class 2 uveal melanomas are associated with the inactivation of the BRCA1 ((breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein)-associated protein 1 (BAP1)) gene. Inactivation of BAP1 promotes the upregulation of vitamin K-dependent protein S (PROS1), which interacts with the tyrosine-protein kinase Mer (MERTK) receptor on M2 macrophages to induce an immunosuppressive environment.

METHODS

We simulated the interaction of PROS1 with MERTK with ColabFold. We evaluated PROS1 and MERTK for the presence of intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) and disorder-to-order (DOT) regions to understand their protein-protein interaction (PPI). We first evaluated the structure of each protein with AlphaFold. We then analyzed specific sequence-based features of the PROS1 and MERTK with a suite of bioinformatics tools.

RESULTS

With high-resolution, moderate confidence, we successfully modeled the interaction between PROS1 and MERTK (predicted local distance difference test score (pDLLT) = 70.68). Our structural analysis qualitatively demonstrated IDPRs (i.e., spaghetti-like entities) in PROS1 and MERK. PROS1 was 23.37 % disordered, and MERTK was 23.09 % disordered, classifying them as moderately disordered and flexible proteins. PROS1 was significantly enriched in cysteine, the most order-promoting residue (p-value <0.05). Our IUPred analysis demonstrated that there are two disorder-to-order transition (DOT) regions in PROS1. MERTK was significantly enriched in proline, the most disorder-promoting residue (p-value <0.05), but did not contain DOT regions. Our STRING analysis demonstrated that the PPI network between PROS1 and MERTK is more complex than their assumed one-to-one binding (p-value <2.0 × 10-6).

CONCLUSION

Our findings present a novel prediction for the interaction between PROS1 and MERTK. Our findings show that PROS1 and MERTK contain elements of intrinsic disorder. PROS1 has two DOT regions that are attractive immunotherapy targets. We recommend that IDPRs and DOT regions found in PROS1 and MERTK should be considered when developing immunotherapies targeting this PPI.

Intrinsic disorder in PRAME and its role in uveal melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) protein has been shown to be an independent biomarker for increased risk of metastasis in Class 1 uveal melanomas (UM). Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions of proteins (IDPs/IDPRs) are proteins that do not have a well-defined three-dimensional structure and have been linked to neoplastic development. Our study aimed to evaluate the presence of intrinsic disorder in PRAME and the role these structureless regions have in PRAME( +) Class 1 UM.

METHODS

A bioinformatics study to characterize PRAME's propensity for the intrinsic disorder. We first used the AlphaFold tool to qualitatively assess the protein structure of PRAME. Then we used the Compositional Profiler and a set of per-residue intrinsic disorder predictors to quantify the intrinsic disorder. The Database of Disordered Protein Prediction (D2P2) platform, IUPred, FuzDrop, fIDPnn, AUCpred, SPOT-Disorder2, and metapredict V2 allowed us to evaluate the potential functional disorder of PRAME. Additionally, we used the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) to analyze PRAME's potential interactions with other proteins.

RESULTS

Our structural analysis showed that PRAME contains intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs), which are structureless and flexible. We found that PRAME is significantly enriched with serine (p-value < 0.05), a disorder-promoting amino acid. PRAME was found to have an average disorder score of 16.49% (i.e., moderately disordered) across six per-residue intrinsic disorder predictors. Our IUPred analysis revealed the presence of disorder-to-order transition (DOT) regions in PRAME near the C-terminus of the protein (residues 475-509). The D2P2 platform predicted a region from approximately 140 and 175 to be highly concentrated with post-translational modifications (PTMs). FuzDrop predicted the PTM hot spot of PRAME to be a droplet-promoting region and an aggregation hotspot. Finally, our analysis using the STRING tool revealed that PRAME has significantly more interactions with other proteins than expected for randomly selected proteins of the same size, with the ability to interact with 84 different partners (STRING analysis result: p-value < 1.0 × 10-16; model confidence: 0.400).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that PRAME has IDPRs that are possibly linked to its functionality in the context of Class 1 UM. The regions of functionality (i.e., DOT regions, PTM sites, droplet-promoting regions, and aggregation hotspots) are localized to regions of high levels of disorder. PRAME has a complex protein-protein interaction (PPI) network that may be secondary to the structureless features of the polypeptide. Our findings contribute to our understanding of UM and suggest that IDPRs and DOT regions in PRAME may be targeted in developing new therapies for this aggressive cancer. Video Abstract.

Genetic Aspects of Conjunctival Melanoma: A Review

Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a rare but aggressive cancer. Over the past decade, molecular studies using rapidly advancing technologies have increasingly improved our understanding of CM genetics. CMs are mainly characterized by dysregulated MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, driven by commonly mutated (BRAF, NRAS, NF1) or less commonly mutated (KIT, PTEN) genes. Another group of genes frequently mutated in CMs include TERT and ATRX, with known roles in telomere maintenance and chromatin remodeling/epigenetic regulation. Uveal melanoma-related genes (BAP1, SF3B1, GNAQ/11) can also be mutated in CMs, albeit infrequently. Additional CM-related mutated genes have increasingly been identified using more comprehensive genetic analyses, awaiting further confirmation in additional/larger studies. As a tumor arising in a partly sun-exposed mucosal tissue, CM exhibits a distinct genomic profile, including the frequent presence of an ultraviolet (UV) signature (and high mutational load) and also the common occurrence of large structural variations (distributed across the genome) in addition to specific gene mutations. The knowledge gained from CM genetic studies to date has led to new therapeutic avenues, including the use of targeted and/or immuno-therapies with promising outcomes in several cases. Accordingly, the implementation of tumor genetic testing into the routine clinical care of CM patients holds promise to further improve and personalize their treatments. Likewise, a growing knowledge of poor prognosis-associated genetic changes in CMs (NRAS, TERT, and uveal melanoma signature mutations and chromosome 10q deletions) may ultimately guide future strategies for prognostic testing to further improve clinical outcomes (by tailoring surveillance and considering prophylactic treatments in patients with high-risk primary tumors).

Genetics and Genomics of Melanoma: Current Progress and Future Directions

Melanoma is a form of skin cancer that develops in the skin's pigment cells, known as melanocytes, and can spread via blood and the lymphatic system to nearby tissues or distant organs in the body [...].

Intrinsic Disorder in BAP1 and Its Association with Uveal Melanoma

Background: Specific subvariants of uveal melanoma (UM) are associated with increased rates of metastasis compared to other subvariants. BRCA1 (BReast CAncer gene 1)-associated protein-1 (BAP1) is encoded by a gene that has been linked to aggressive behavior in UM. Methods: We evaluated BAP1 for the presence of intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) and its protein−protein interactions (PPI). We evaluated specific sequence-based features of the BAP1 protein using a set of bioinformatic databases, predictors, and algorithms. Results: We show that BAP1’s structure contains extensive IDPRs as it is highly enriched in proline residues (the most disordered amino acid; p-value < 0.05), the average percent of predicted disordered residues (PPDR) was 57.34%, and contains 9 disorder-based binding sites (ie. molecular recognition features (MoRFs)). BAP1’s intrinsic disorder allows it to engage in a complex PPI network with at least 49 partners (p-value < 1.0 × 10−16). Conclusion: These findings show that BAP1 contains IDPRs and an intricate PPI network. Mutations in UM that are associated with the BAP1 gene may alter the function of the IDPRs embedded into its structure. These findings develop the understanding of UM and may provide a target for potential novel therapies to treat this aggressive neoplasm.