The Impact of Nursing Staffs’ Working Conditions on the Quality of Care Received by Older Adults in Long-Term Residential Care Facilities: A Systematic Review of Interventional and Observational Studies

Intent to stay, moral distress, and nurse practice environment among long-term care nurses: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey study

BACKGROUND

Many long-term care facilities in the United States face significant problems with nurse retention and turnover. These challenges are attributed, at least in part, to moral distress and a negative nurse practice environment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was divided into two parts: first, to investigate the relationships among nurse practice environment, moral distress, and intent to stay; second, to explore the potential mediating effect of the nurse practice environment on the intent to stay among those with high levels of moral distress.

DESIGN

This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey using targeted sampling.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 215 participants completed the surveys. Participants were nationally representative of long-term care nurses by age, years of experience, employment status, and type of health setting.

METHODS

This study was an online national survey of long-term care nurses' perceptions of their intent to stay, moral distress level (Moral Distress Questionnaire), and nurse practice environment (Direct Care Staff Survey). Structural equation modeling analysis explored intent to stay, moral distress, and the nurse practice environment among long-term care nurses.

RESULTS

The mean moral distress score was low, while the mean nurse practice environment and intent to stay scores were high. Moral distress had a significant, moderately negative association with the nurse practice environment (β = -0.41), while the nurse practice environment had a significant, moderately positive association with intent to stay (β = 0.46). The moral distress had a significant, moderately negative association with intent to stay (β = -0.20). The computed structural equation modeling suggested a partially mediated model (indirect effect = -0.19, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Since the nurse practice environment partially mediates the relationship between moral distress and intent to stay, interventions to improve the nurse practice environment are crucial to alleviating moral distress and enhancing nurses' intent to stay in their jobs, organizations, and the nursing profession.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our study demonstrated that the nurse practice environment mediates moral distress and intent to stay. Interventions to improve the nurse practice environment are crucial to alleviating moral distress and enhancing nurses' intent to stay in their jobs, organizations, and the nursing profession.

The relationship between nursing home staffing and resident safety outcomes: A systematic review of reviews

BACKGROUND

Resident safety is an important topic for nursing home practice with up to 33 % of residents subjected to an adverse event. In spite of a large evidence base examining the relationship between nursing home staffing and resident outcomes, the findings of several systematic reviews remain inconclusive and contradicting, possibly due to methodological shortcomings.

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on nursing home staffing and its relationship with resident safety outcomes.

DESIGN

We undertook a systematic review of reviews. We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase by the end of November 2022. Reviews were included if they assessed the relationship between nursing home staffing and resident safety outcomes using objective measures and data at resident level. Quality appraisal was conducted using the SIGN-checklist, but we did not exclude any reviews based on quality assessment. We used a narrative approach, tables and figures to summarize the findings.

RESULTS

We included 13 systematic reviews published between 2006 and 2022 building on primary evidence from 1977 to 2022. Twelve reviews investigated the relationship between nurse staffing and resident safety outcomes (187 unique primary studies), and one review focused on allied health professionals (28 primary studies). Five reviews originated as work to inform governmental recommendations on staffing. We found diverse approaches used to investigate the staffing-outcome relationship with regard to design, timeframe, operationalization, data-source and theoretical rationales guiding the studies. The most prominently reported resident safety outcomes were pressure ulcers and urinary tract infections. Commonly reported staffing measures included number and level of education of nursing home staff. Based on narrative summaries, staffing seems to have a favorable relationship with resident safety outcomes, but logic models explaining the mechanisms of this relationship were sparsely reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing literature shows methodological limitations that demand a change in research on the staffing-outcome relationship in the nursing home setting. Our work highlights the need for carefully designed primary studies that address the pertinent shortcomings by design, timeframe, operationalization, data-source and theoretical rationales. These future studies will allow to carefully examine the causal relationship between selected staffing measures and resident safety outcomes in further detail and serve as legitimate evidence bases to inform action plans for clinical practice and to evaluate staffing policies.

Resident Impact of the Single Site Order Restricting Staff Mobility across Long-Term Care Homes in British Columbia, Canada

The Single Site Order (SSO)-a policy restricting staff from working at multiple long-term care (LTC) homes-was mandated by the Public Health Agency of Canada to control the spread of COVID-19 in LTC homes, where nearly 70% of COVID-19-related deaths in Canada occurred. This mixed methods study assesses the impact of the SSO on LTC residents in British Columbia. Interviews were conducted (residents (n = 6), family members (n = 9), staff (n = 18), and leadership (n = 10) from long-term care homes (n = 4)) and analyzed using thematic analysis. Administrative data were collected between April 2019 and March 2020 and between April 2020 and March 2021 and analyzed using descriptive statistics and data visualization. Qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated and demonstrated that staffing challenges became worse during the implementation of the SSO, resulting in the mental and physical health deterioration of LTC residents. Qualitative data demonstrated decreased time for personalized and proactive care, increased communication challenges, and increased loneliness and isolation. Quantitative data showed a decline in activities of daily living, increased antipsychotic medication use, pressure ulcers, behavioural symptoms, and an increase in falls. Addressing staff workload and staffing shortages during SSO-related policy implementation is essential to avoid resident health deterioration.

Comparing Preferred and Actual Clinical Learning Environments and Perceptions of First-Year Nursing Students in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

The clinical learning environment, which includes the culture of clinical units, the mentoring process, and the different health organizations, influences the learning process of nursing students. However, scarce literature has been published on the impact of the clinical learning environment on first-year nursing students in long-term care. We aimed to assess first-year nursing students 'preferred' and 'actual' clinical learning environments when conducting their first placements in nursing homes within an innovative placement model that comprised the active participation of academic mentors. The validated Spanish version of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) instrument was used in our study, and 99 first-year nursing students participated. The highest mean scores for the CLEI-Actual were found for the Satisfaction (22.7) and Involvement scales (19.09). The lowest mean scores were found for the Personalization (17) and Individualization (17.27) scales. The multiple correlation (R) between the Satisfaction and the other CLEI scales was 0.61 (p > 0.001), which means that in this study the association between student satisfaction and their perception of the clinical learning environment was strong. First-year students conducting their first clinical placements in nursing homes can have a positive learning experience considering a well-designed and organized pedagogical strategy, including constant support and feedback from academic and clinical mentors.