Prehospital Time Interval for Urban and Rural Emergency Medical Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Mediators of the Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with poor outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Patient characteristics, care processes, and other contextual factors may mediate the association between SES and survival after OHCA. Interventions that target these mediating factors may reduce disparities in OHCA outcomes across the socioeconomic spectrum. This systematic review identified and quantified mediators of the SES-survival after OHCA association. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science) and grey literature sources were searched from inception to July or August 2023. Observational studies of OHCA patients that conducted mediation analyses to evaluate potential mediators of the association between SES (defined by income, education, occupation, or a composite index) and survival outcomes were included. A total of 10 studies were included in this review. Income (n = 9), education (n = 4), occupation (n = 1), and composite indices (n = 1) were used to define SES. The proportion of OHCA cases that had bystander involvement, presented with an initial shockable rhythm, and survived to hospital discharge or 30 days increased with higher SES. Common mediators of the SES-survival association that were evaluated included initial rhythm (n = 6), emergency medical services response time (n = 5), and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 4). Initial rhythm was the most important mediator of this association, with a median percent excess risk explained of 37.4% (range 28.6%-40.0%; n = 5; 1 study reported no mediation) and mediation proportion of 41.8% (n = 1). To mitigate socioeconomic disparities in outcomes after OHCA, interventions should target potentially modifiable mediators, such as initial rhythm, which may involve improving bystander awareness of OHCA and the need for prompt resuscitation.

Effective analysis of job satisfaction among medical staff in Chinese public hospitals: a random forest model

Objective

This study explored the factors and influence degree of job satisfaction among medical staff in Chinese public hospitals by constructing the optimal discriminant model.

Methods

The participant sample is based on the service volume of 12,405 officially appointed medical staff from different departments of 16 public hospitals for three consecutive years from 2017 to 2019. All medical staff (doctors, nurses, administrative personnel) invited to participate in the survey for the current year will no longer repeat their participation. The importance of all associated factors and the optimal evaluation model has been calculated.

Results

The overall job satisfaction of medical staff is 25.62%. The most important factors affecting medical staff satisfaction are: Value staff opinions (Q10), Get recognition for your work (Q11), Democracy (Q9), and Performance Evaluation Satisfaction (Q5). The random forest model is the best evaluation model for medical staff satisfaction, and its prediction accuracy is higher than other similar models.

Conclusion

The improvement of medical staff job satisfaction is significantly related to the improvement of democracy, recognition of work, and increased employee performance. It has shown that improving these five key variables can maximize the job satisfaction and motivation of medical staff. The random forest model can maximize the accuracy and effectiveness of similar research.

Rural Emergency Medical Services Clinicians' Perceptions and Preferences in Receiving Clinical Feedback From Hospitals: A Qualitative Needs Assessment

OBJECTIVE

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians experience dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of clinical feedback from hospitals. Satisfaction is further diminished by the lack of a standardized systems approach. The purpose of this study was to identify rural clinicians' perceptions and preferences regarding clinical feedback received from hospitals, the delivery mechanisms, and its impact on their relationships with health care organizations.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study focused on EMS clinicians involved in rural prehospital care at a single Midwestern academic medical center. Using a phenomenological framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical directors, service directors, fire captains, air medical personnel, emergency medical responders, emergency medical technicians, advanced emergency medical technicians, and paramedics, all of whom were selected through purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two trained reviewers.

RESULTS

Twenty participants (11 frontline clinicians and 9 administrative staff members) with a wide range of clinical experience from 14 air and ground EMS agencies were interviewed. Emerging themes included: (1) the value or usefulness of feedback; (2) desired feedback system characteristics; (3) barriers to receiving feedback; (4) utilization and application of feedback; and (5) the feedback's impact on the relationship with health care organizations. Participants felt that clinical feedback from hospitals was especially important as a method of improving quality of care, though was rarely provided. Professional development was seen as a major benefit of receiving clinical feedback from hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that consistent clinical feedback provided by hospitals was valued. Establishing a culture of providing organized feedback to practicing rural EMS clinicians is important for professional development and can strengthen the relationships between EMS clinicians and hospitals. These study findings can assist in the development and implementation of a standardized feedback instrument to benefit rural EMS clinicians, patients, and the health care system as a whole.

Factors Associated with Gaps in Naloxone Knowledge: Evidence from a 2022 Great Plains Survey

Background

The rising prevalence of fast-acting opioids in the United States suggests the increased need for non-first responder administration of naloxone. Effective administration of naloxone during an overdose requires that bystanders are familiar with, have access to, and know how to use naloxone.

Methods

Drawing on the 2022 Nebraska Annual Social Indicators survey, we analyzed naloxone familiarity, access, and competency to administer among a statewide, address-based sample of Nebraskan adults.

Results

There were significant gaps in naloxone knowledge in Nebraska. Although 75.6% of respondents were familiar with naloxone, only 18.6% knew how to access naloxone and 17.6% knew how to use naloxone. We find that more frequent religious service attendance is associated with lower odds of naloxone familiarity. Among those familiar with naloxone, a higher perception of community stigma towards opioids generally is associated with lower odds of naloxone access and competency. Higher perception of community stigma towards heroin, methamphetamines, and cocaine, however, is associated with higher odds of naloxone access. Finally, past overdose experience, lifetime illicit opioid use, being close to a person who uses opioids, and having access to illicit opioids was not significantly associated with naloxone familiarity, access, or competency among respondents in Nebraska's two largest cities, Omaha and Lincoln. Outside of these cities, past overdose experience and access to illicit opioids was associated with higher odds of naloxone access and competency, but lifetime opioid use and being close to a person who uses opioids had no effect.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the continued need for education on naloxone with a specific focus on access and competency to further reduce opioid-related overdose deaths. Education campaigns targeted at places of worship or individuals close to people who use opioids may further serve those with a lower likelihood of naloxone familiarity and promote knowledge of naloxone among those with higher odds of encountering an overdose. Further work is needed to understand differences in the relationship between substance-specific perceived stigma and its association with naloxone access.

EMS Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids to Pediatric Asthma Patients: An Analysis by Severity and Transport Interval

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric asthma exacerbations are a common cause of emergency medical services (EMS) encounters. Bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids are mainstays of asthma exacerbation therapy, yet data on the efficacy of EMS administration of systemic corticosteroids are mixed. This study's objective was to assess the association between EMS administration of systemic corticosteroids to pediatric asthma patients on hospital admission rates based on asthma exacerbation severity and EMS transport intervals.

METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of the Early Administration of Steroids in the Ambulance Setting: An Observational Design Trial (EASI AS ODT). EASI AS ODT is a non-randomized, stepped wedge, observational study examining outcomes one year before and one year after seven EMS agencies incorporated an oral systemic corticosteroid option into their protocols for the treatment of pediatric asthma exacerbations. We included EMS encounters for patients ages 2-18 years confirmed by manual chart review to have asthma exacerbations. We compared hospital admission rates across asthma exacerbation severities and EMS transport intervals using univariate analyses. We geocoded patients and created maps to visualize the general trends of patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 841 pediatric asthma patients met inclusion criteria. While most patients were administered inhaled bronchodilators by EMS (82.3%), only 21% received systemic corticosteroids, and only 19% received both inhaled bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids. Overall, there was no significant difference in hospitalization rates between patients who did and did not receive systemic corticosteroids from EMS (33% vs. 32%, p = 0.78). However, although not statistically significant, for patients who received systemic corticosteroids from EMS, there was an 11% decrease in hospitalizations for mild exacerbation patients and a 16% decrease in hospitalizations for patients with EMS transport intervals greater than 40 min.

CONCLUSION

In this study, systemic corticosteroids were not associated with a decrease in hospitalizations of pediatric patients with asthma overall. However, while limited by small sample size and lack of statistical significance, our results suggest there may be a benefit in certain subgroups, particularly patients with mild exacerbations and those with transport intervals longer than 40 min. Given the heterogeneity of EMS agencies, EMS agencies should consider local operational and pediatric patient characteristics when developing standard operating protocols for pediatric asthma.