A Potential Indicator for Assessing Patient Blood Management Standard Implementation

Perceptions of the Conditions and Barriers in Implementing the Patient Blood Management Standard by Anesthesiologists and Surgeons

Patient Blood Management (PBM) as a multidisciplinary practice and a standard of care for the anemic surgical patient is playing an increasingly important role in reducing transfusions and optimizing both clinical outcomes and costs. The success of PBM implementation depends on staff awareness and involvement in this approach. The main objective of our study was to explore physicians' perceptions of the conditions for implementing PBM in hospitals and the main obstacles they face in detecting and treating anemic patients undergoing elective surgery. This cross-sectional descriptive study includes 113 Romanian health units, representing 23% of health units with surgical wards nationwide. A 12-item questionnaire was distributed to the participants in electronic format. A total of 413 questionnaires representing the perceptions of 347 surgeons and 66 anesthesia and intensive-care specialists were analyzed. Although a lack of human resources was indicated by 23.70% of respondents as the main reason for not adhering the guidelines, the receptiveness of medical staff to implementing the PBM standard was almost 90%. In order to increase adherence to the standard, additional involvement of anesthesia and intensive-care physicians would be necessary from the perception of 35.70% of the responders: 23.60% of surgeons and 18.40% of hematologists.

Evaluating patient blood management practices using PBM metrics in a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

PBM metrics play a crucial role in assessing and monitoring the effectiveness of PBM programs in healthcare settings. The present study aimed to assess the indicators to achieve effective enforcement of PBM at a tertiary care referral hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

A prospective observational study was conducted on patients admitted for elective surgery at a tertiary care referral centre. PBM metrics were developed and assessed for various parameters, including documentation, patient evaluation, blood ordering schedule, and appropriateness. Experts in transfusion medicine and haematology checked content validity. Eleven different parameters were analysed, and a score was assigned based on the performance. The outcome was categorized as poor, satisfactory, or good.

RESULTS

The study included 612 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and recruited from Orthopaedics, General Surgery, OBG, Urology, and ENT departments. All departments completed pre-operative anaemia tests, with General Surgery and Orthopaedics conducting the most red cell transfusions. During the study, all of the blood units were used, and there was no waste. The C/T ratio was greater in the Departments of General Surgery, Urology, and Otorhinolaryngology. Pre-operative anaemia was found in 44.12% of patients, 44 patients had red cell transfusions, with 65% getting single-unit PRBC transfusions. All departments received a PBM score between 17-19, showing adequate PBM but with room for improvement.

CONCLUSION

The current study utilized Patient Blood Management (PBM) metrics to critically assess the existing practices and identify the key gaps and areas for improvement in a tertiary care centre.