1
|
Alahmari R, Alamri O, Altashlan AI, Alsheikh AA, Aljaloud M. Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge Regarding Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Among Family Medicine Residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2024; 16:e66301. [PMID: 39238674 PMCID: PMC11376647 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the research is to determine the existing knowledge, perceived practices, and attitudes toward the recombinant Zoster vaccine among family medicine residents (FMR) included in the medical profession. The present study aims to narrow down the identified gap in knowledge and develop vaccinations that will assist the targeted deme to eradicate zoster and the aftermaths that accompany it. Methods This research utilizes a descriptive cross-sectional survey design to assess the knowledge, practices, and attitudes of FMR toward the zoster vaccine in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. By quantifying data at a specific point in time, this design allows for a detailed examination of the current status across various levels of residency programs. Participants from different institutions are interviewed simultaneously, enabling a thorough study of the targeted population group. The study includes 154 FMR from three different levels (R1, R2, R3) enrolled in residency programs at various institutions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. These participants were selected from a group of individuals invited to share their prior knowledge, habits, and beliefs regarding the recombinant Zoster vaccine. The study offers detailed statistical insights into demographics, vaccination attitudes, and knowledge among healthcare professionals. Key findings highlight diverse recommendations for different adult groups, the prevalence of vaccine availability, and the main sources of immunization information. Results The study found diverse recommendations for vaccination among different adult groups, with mean recommendations ranging from 2.50 to 2.94. Nearly all respondents (96.8%) reported having the vaccine available at their place of practice. However, knowledge gaps were evident, particularly concerning vaccination timing and specific requirements, highlighting the need for targeted education and clearer guidelines in vaccination practices among healthcare providers. Conclusion The study highlights the nuanced vaccination recommendations among healthcare professionals, particularly for different adult populations, and the availability of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) vaccines. The reliance on diverse information sources underscores the need for targeted educational efforts to ensure accurate and consistent immunization practices across healthcare settings. Addressing uncertainties and promoting informed decision-making can enhance vaccination uptake and patient care outcomes in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raed Alahmari
- Family Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Osama Alamri
- Family Medicine, Ministry of Health (MOH) 2nd Health Cluster, Riyadh, SAU
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maharani N, Gustriawanto N, Nency YM, Mahati E, Yeremia GF, Anantyo DT, Hapsari R, Mulyono M, Pramudo SG, Farhanah N. Characteristics, attitudes, and the odds for positive attitude toward clinical trial: A study on Indonesian COVID-19 vaccine trial participants. Perspect Clin Res 2023; 14:194-202. [PMID: 38025285 PMCID: PMC10679572 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_71_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims This study was performed to understand the Indonesian population's characteristics and the factors that contribute to a more positive attitude toward participation in a clinical trial. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 402 COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in Semarang, Indonesia, utilizing self-reporting questionnaires consisting of questions related to socio-demographic characteristics and statements in a 5-scaled Likert Scale to assess the attitude toward vaccine trial. The odds for positive attitude were analyzed using Ordinal Logistic Regression to obtain the odd-ratio and 95% confidence interval. The P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Most of the respondents were adults aged 22-64-year-old (89.30%), males (63.68%), married (77.61%), worked as an employee (59.70%), obtained information about the clinical trial from the Public Health Service (41.29%), had a low education level (40.80%), a low monthly income level (68.41%), with no previous participation in a clinical trial (90.80%). All respondents showed a good attitude toward the trial, with low education level, nonemployment status, fewer or no previous participation in clinical trials, and getting the information from the public health centers were the main predictors for better attitude toward vaccine trials. Conclusion There was a positive attitude toward vaccine trials in the Indonesian population. The positive attitude could be driven by having a low education level, nonemployment status, fewer or no previous participation in the clinical trial, and getting information from public health centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nani Maharani
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Nuvi Gustriawanto
- COVID 19 Vaccine Bio Farma – Universitas Diponegoro (COBIU) Study, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Yetty M. Nency
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Endang Mahati
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Glenn F. Yeremia
- COVID 19 Vaccine Bio Farma – Universitas Diponegoro (COBIU) Study, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Dimas T. Anantyo
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Rebriarina Hapsari
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Mulyono Mulyono
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Setyo G. Pramudo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Nur Farhanah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vest A, Sonn B, Puls R, Arnold C, Devney Z, Ahmed A, Pallisard O, Monte AA. Characteristics of Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank Participants Compared to the Overall Emergency Department Population. West J Emerg Med 2023; 24:312-321. [PMID: 36976586 PMCID: PMC10047721 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biorepositories lack diversity both demographically and with regard to the clinical complaints of patients enrolled. The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank (EMSB) seeks to enroll a diverse cohort of patients for discovery research in acute care conditions. Our objective in this study was to determine the differences in demographics and clinical complaints between participants in the EMSB and the overall emergency department (ED) population. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of participants of the EMSB and the entire UCHealth at University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center (UCHealth AMC) ED population across three periods: peri-EMSB; post-EMSB; and COVID-19. We compared patients consented to the EMSB to the entire ED population to determine differences in age, gender, ethnicity, race, clinical complaints, and severity of illness. We used chi-square tests to compare categorical variables and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to determine differences in the severity of illness between the groups. RESULTS Between February 5, 2018-January 29, 2022, there were 141,670 consented encounters in the EMSB, representing 40,740 unique patients and over 13,000 blood samples collected. In that same time, the ED saw approximately 188,402 unique patients for 387,590 encounters. The EMSB had significantly higher rates of participation from the following: patients 18-59 years old (80.3% vs 77.7%); White patients (52.3% vs 47.8%), and women (54.8% vs 51.1%) compared to the overall ED population. The EMSB had lower rates of participation from patients ≥70 years, Hispanic patients, Asian patients, and men. The EMSB population had higher mean comorbidity scores. During the six months after Colorado's first COVID-19 case, the rate of consented patients and samples collected increased. The odds of consent during the COVID-19 study period were 1.32 (95% CI 1.26-1.39), and the odds of sample capture were 2.19 (95% CI 2.0-2.41). CONCLUSION The EMSB is representative of the overall ED population for most demographics and clinical complaints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Vest
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brandon Sonn
- University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richie Puls
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Cosby Arnold
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Zach Devney
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Arwah Ahmed
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Olivia Pallisard
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andrew A Monte
- University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bonneton M, Sambourg J, Luong Nguyen LB, Trillou C, Dohou J, Saint Lary O, Schuers M, Lachâtre M, Launay O. A national platform for Covid-19 vaccine studies recruitment in France: Covireivac volunteer's characteristics. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2109364. [PMID: 36018773 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2109364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
During the Covid-19 pandemic, the urgent need for safe and effective vaccines has led to many vaccine trials, implying fast and extensive recruitment of volunteers. In France, until 2020, vaccine clinical research participants were usually recruited locally, through center-based pools of volunteers, and local communication plans. Covireivac is a French public online platform launched on 10/01/2020 that enables national, large-scale recruitment of volunteers for Covid-19 vaccine studies. On the Covireivac website, all adult participants registered online, gave their informed consent, and filled out two online forms with information on their identity, health status (comorbidities, treatments), and known exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Since July 2021, volunteers could mention if their children are interested in participating in a Covid-19 vaccine trial. The objective of this work is to describe Covireivac's volunteer characteristics registered from 10/01/2020 to 11/02/2022. To identify independent volunteer characteristics associated with a period of registration we performed a multivariate logistic regression. Among 54,424 registrations, 52,391 (96%) were analysed; 61% were male (n = 31,893), median age was 50 y; 13% (n = 6586) were healthcare workers. At registration, 15,879 volunteers (33%) reported at least one comorbidity, among whom 16% (n = 7349) were obese and 17% (n = 8346) had hypertension. Most volunteers registered during the first month (n = 35,876, 66%). The Covireivac platform allowed quick and large recruitment of potential volunteers for Covid-19 vaccine trials and could be used on a larger scale for vaccine trials in France. It could facilitate recruitment in vaccine trials and provide sponsors with better visibility of the recruitment capacities of clinical research centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Bonneton
- CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), F-CRIN, Paris, France
| | - Jessica Sambourg
- CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liem Binh Luong Nguyen
- CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christine Trillou
- French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (F-CRIN), Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | - Joyce Dohou
- French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (F-CRIN), Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Saint Lary
- Collège National des Enseignants en Médecine Générale, Paris, France.,Primary Care and Prevention, CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le kremlin Bicetre, France
| | - Mathieu Schuers
- Collège National des Enseignants en Médecine Générale, Paris, France.,LIMICS, U1142, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Marie Lachâtre
- CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Odile Launay
- CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), F-CRIN, Paris, France.,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chapagain RH, Adhikari S, Giri BR, Ray P, Shrestha NJ, Prajapati B, Joshi P, Pokharel S, Tamang SM, Gupta BP, Wartel TA, Sahastrabuddhe S, Rai GK, Saluja T. Factors affecting willingness to participate in vaccine clinical trials in an underdeveloped country: perspective from Nepal. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2051413. [PMID: 35353657 PMCID: PMC9225427 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2051413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the inherent complex nature of clinical trials, individual’s willingness to participate and hence, enrollment in a clinical trial maybe challenging. When it comes to vaccine clinical trial in children, informed consent needs to be secured from the parents or legally acceptable representatives (LARs). Some of the factors which contribute to hesitancy in taking part in clinical trials are based on the level of education, living standards, part of the world they live, associated burden of disease, fear of different procedures in clinical trial, side effects, limited understanding, limited time, and mistrust with Investigational product. This study included 201 parents/LARs, who approached Kanti Children Hospital site in Kathmandu with the interest to get their children enrolled in a vaccine clinical trial with objectives of describing the reasons for agreeing or disagreeing to participate in the vaccine clinical trial, factors affecting decision making, and finding the major concerns of parents/LARs. The acceptance for the study vaccine was 136 (67.7%) whereas denial was 65 (32.3%). This study showed that age, education level, family structure, advice from family and friends, and medical guidance play important roles in willingness of parents to get their child enrolled in the trial. If a proper counseling is done, fear of blood sampling is not a big factor which is contrary to the belief among clinical researchers. Safety of vaccine, frequency of injections, and cost of vaccine were the main concerns of the parents, which need to be addressed extensively while planning for any clinical trial in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Santosh Adhikari
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Bishnu Rath Giri
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Pankaj Ray
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | | | - Bina Prajapati
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Prakash Joshi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Sunita Pokharel
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Suresh Man Tamang
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Birendra Prasad Gupta
- Clinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation (CARE), International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - T Anh Wartel
- Clinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation (CARE), International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sushant Sahastrabuddhe
- Clinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation (CARE), International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ganesh Kumar Rai
- Department of Pediatrics, Kanti Children's Hospital, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Tarun Saluja
- Clinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation (CARE), International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu S, Zhang Y, He BJ. Public Willingness to Pay for and Participate in Sanitation Infrastructure Improvement in Western China's Rural Areas. Front Public Health 2022; 9:788922. [PMID: 35071170 PMCID: PMC8774769 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.788922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The suitability and feasibility of public-private partnership (PPP) patterns in a rural context have not been well-documented and understood. To address this research gap and practical plight, this study aims to analyze the rural resident's willingness to pay for and participate in the improvement of rural sanitation facilities, and further explore the drivers and barriers affecting their decisions. This study was performed in rural areas of three western provinces, including Shaanxi, Ningxia, and Inner Mongolia, of western China's rural areas by conducting a survey on 1,248 rural residents. In Inner Mongolia, the proportion of respondents who were willing to pay was highest, while the proportion of respondents who may provide labor was lowest among the three provinces. Respondents from Ningxia had the least willing to pay, and respondents from Shaanxi had the highest willingness to participate. Overall, respondents' rural (living) duration time, personal interest in local government notice, and the latest time when the sanitation facilities were improved could significantly affect their willingness. In Inner Mongolia, occupation and water availability could significantly influence respondents' willingness, and both gender and health conditions had significant impacts. In Ningxia, respondents' personal interest in local government notice had a notable impact on willingness, and low-income respondents showed a more notable willingness to pay and participate. In Shaanxi, occupation and water availability could significantly influence respondents' willingness. Respondents' personal interest in local government notice had a notable impact on their willingness. This study is of significant importance to understand rural resident's participation in sanitation infrastructure improvement to support relevant PPP projects, and is important to solve poverty-caused dilemmas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simei Wu
- School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.,Centre for Climate-Resilient and Low-Carbon Cities, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.,Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China
| | - Bao-Jie He
- Centre for Climate-Resilient and Low-Carbon Cities, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.,Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kitonsa J, Kamacooko O, Bahemuka UM, Kibengo F, Kakande A, Wajja A, Basajja V, Lumala A, Ssemwanga E, Asaba R, Mugisha J, Pierce BF, Shattock R, Kaleebu P, Ruzagira E. Willingness to participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials; a survey among a population of healthcare workers in Uganda. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251992. [PMID: 34043693 PMCID: PMC8158909 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and may therefore be a suitable population for COVID-19 vaccine trials. We conducted a survey to evaluate willingness-to-participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials in a population of HCWs at three hospitals in Uganda. METHODS The survey was conducted between September and November 2020. Using a standardised questionnaire, data were collected on socio-demographics, previous participation in health research, COVID-19 information sources, underlying health conditions, and willingness-to-participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials. Data were analysed descriptively and a binomial generalised linear model with a log link function used to investigate factors associated with unwillingness to participate. RESULTS 657 HCWs (female, 63%) were enrolled with a mean age of 33 years (Standard Deviation, 10). Overall willingness-to-participate was 70.2%. Key motivating factors for participation were: hope of being protected against COVID-19 (81.1%), altruism (73.3%), and the opportunity to get health care (26.0%). Selected hypothetical trial attributes reduced willingness-to-participate as follows: weekly-quarterly study visits over a 12-month period (70.2%-63.2%, P = 0.026); provision of approximately 50ml of blood at each study visit (70.2%-63.2%, P = 0.026); risk of mild-moderate local adverse reactions (70.2%-60.3%, P<0.001); chance of receiving candidate vaccine or placebo (70.2%-56.9%, P<0.001); and delay of pregnancy [Overall, 70.2%-57.1% P<0.001); Female, 62.8%-48.4% (P = 0.002); Male, 82.5%-71.5% (P = 0.003)]. Collectively, these attributes reduced willingness-to-participate from [70.2%-42.2% (P<0.001) overall; 82.5%-58.1% (P<0.001) in men; 62.8%-32.6% (P<0.001) in women]. Among individuals that were unwilling to participate, the commonest barriers were concerns over vaccine safety (54.6%) and fear of catching SARS-CoV-2 (31.6%). Unwillingness to participate was associated with being female (aRR 1.97, CI 1.46-2.67, P<0.001) and having university or other higher-level education (aRR 1.52, CI 1.05-2.2, P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS Willingness-to-participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials among HCWs in Uganda is high but may be affected by vaccine trial requirements and concerns about the safety of candidate vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kitonsa
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Onesmus Kamacooko
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Ubaldo Mushabe Bahemuka
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Freddie Kibengo
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Ayoub Kakande
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Anne Wajja
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Vincent Basajja
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | | | | | - Robert Asaba
- Our Lady of Consolata Kisubi Hospital, Wakiso District, Uganda
| | - Joseph Mugisha
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Benjamin F. Pierce
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robin Shattock
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pontiano Kaleebu
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Eugene Ruzagira
- Medical Research Council / Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Older Adults' Socio-Demographic Determinants of Health Related to Promoting Health and Getting Preventive Health Care in Southern United States: A Secondary Analysis of a Survey Project Dataset. NURSING REPORTS 2021; 11:120-132. [PMID: 33791080 PMCID: PMC8009605 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep11010012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This exploratory survey study examined the relationship between older adults’ five socio-demographic determinants (urban/rural residence, gender, age, marital status, and education) and their self-reported perception of importance, desire to perform, and ability to perform nine self-care behaviors related to promoting health and getting preventive health care. Methods: We reported a secondary analysis of a dataset from an exploratory survey project; we analyzed 2015–2016 retrospective data collected from a cross-sectional survey study, including 123 adults aged 65 years and older living in southern United States. Data were collected from the Patient Action Inventory for Self-Care and a demographic questionnaire and analyzed using binary and multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: Advancing age, marital separation, and holding less than a high school education were significantly associated with at least one of the unfavorable perceptions of the importance, the desire to perform, and the ability to perform three self-care behaviors. These three behaviors were: (1) creating habits that will improve health and prevent disease, (2) discussing the use of health screening tests with healthcare providers, and (3) joining in local health screening or wellness events. Gender and urban/rural residence were not significant. Conclusions: Comprehensive health care should include an individual’s socio-demographic context and self-care perception of importance, desire, and ability.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hodgson SH, Mansatta K, Mallett G, Harris V, Emary KRW, Pollard AJ. What defines an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021; 21:e26-e35. [PMID: 33125914 PMCID: PMC7837315 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30773-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 402] [Impact Index Per Article: 134.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused more than 1 million deaths in the first 6 months of the pandemic and huge economic and social upheaval internationally. An efficacious vaccine is essential to prevent further morbidity and mortality. Although some countries might deploy COVID-19 vaccines on the strength of safety and immunogenicity data alone, the goal of vaccine development is to gain direct evidence of vaccine efficacy in protecting humans against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 so that manufacture of efficacious vaccines can be selectively upscaled. A candidate vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 might act against infection, disease, or transmission, and a vaccine capable of reducing any of these elements could contribute to disease control. However, the most important efficacy endpoint, protection against severe disease and death, is difficult to assess in phase 3 clinical trials. In this Review, we explore the challenges in assessing the efficacy of candidate SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, discuss the caveats needed to interpret reported efficacy endpoints, and provide insight into answering the seemingly simple question, "Does this COVID-19 vaccine work?"
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kushal Mansatta
- University of Oxford Clinical Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Garry Mallett
- University of Oxford Clinical Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Victoria Harris
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Katherine R W Emary
- Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Pollard
- Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vaccination adjuvated against hepatitis B in Spanish National Healthcare System (SNS) workers typed as non-responders to conventional vaccines. Vaccine 2020; 39:554-563. [PMID: 33334613 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
TRIAL DESIGN An interventional, phase 4, single group assignment, without masking (open label), preventive clinical trial was carried out in health workers with biological risk in their tasks, who have been filed as non-responders to conventional vaccination against Hepatitis B. METHODS 67 health workers with biological risk in their tasks, who have been filed as non-responders to conventional vaccination against Hepatitis B, were enrolled in the Clinical Trial. All participants were from 18 years up to 64 years old. INCLUSION CRITERIA NHS workers -including university students doing their internships in health centres dependent on the National Health System (inclusion of students is regulated and limited by specific instructions on labour prevention in each autonomous community)- classified as non-responders. The criteria defining them as non-responders to the conventional hepatitis B vaccine is anti HBsAb titers < 10 mUI/ml following the application of six doses of conventional vaccine at 20 μg doses (two complete guidelines). The objective of this study was to provide Health workers-staff with an additional protection tool against hepatitis B infection, and to evaluate the efficacy of the adjuvanted vaccine in healthy non-responders to conventional hepatitis B vaccine. The primary outcome was the measurement of antibody antiHBs before the first Fendrix® dose and a month after the administration of each dose. Other outcome was collection of adverse effects during administration and all those that could be related to the vaccine and that occur within 30 days after each dose. In this study, only one group was assigned. There was no randomization or masking. RESULTS The participants were recruited between April 13, 2018 and October 31, 2019. 67 participants were enrolled in the Clinical Trial and included the analyses. The primary immunisation consists of 4 separate 0.5 ml doses of Fendrix®, administered at the following schedule: 1 month, 2 months and 6 months from the date of the first dose. Once the positivity was reached in any of the doses, the participant finished the study and was not given the following doses. 68.66% (46 out 67) had a positive response to first dose of Fendrix®. 57.14% (12 out 21) had a positive response to second dose of Fendrix®. 22.22% (2 out 9) had a positive response to third dose of Fendrix and 42.96% (3 out 7) had a positive response to last dose of Fendrix®. Overall, 94.02% (64 out 67) of participants had a positive response to Fendrix®. No serious adverse event occurred. CONCLUSIONS The use of Fendrix®, is a viable vaccine alternative for NHS workers classified as "non-responders". Revaccination of healthy non-responders with Fendrix®, resulted in very high proportions of responders without adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered in the Spanish National Trial Register (REEC), ClinicalTrials.gov and inclusion has been stopped (identifier NCT03410953; EudraCT-number 2016-004991-23). FUNDING GRS 1360/A/16: Call for aid for the financing of research projects in biomedicine, health management and socio-health care to be developed in the centres of the Regional Health Management of Autonomous Community of Castile-Leon. In addition, this work has been supported by the Spanish Platform for Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, SCReN (Spanish Clinical Research Network), funded by the Subdirectorate General for Research Evaluation and Promotion of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII), through the project PT13/0002/0039 and project PT17/0017/0023 integrated in the State Plan for R&D&I 2013-2016 and co-financed by and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
Collapse
|
11
|
Langford AT. Health Communication and Decision Making about Vaccine Clinical Trials during a Pandemic. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:780-789. [PMID: 33719877 PMCID: PMC8765457 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1864520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified the importance of clinical trials for finding a safe and effective vaccine to protect against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19. Although communication about vaccines and vaccine hesitancy were challenges long before COVID-19, the twin facts of a pandemic and an "infodemic" of health information, misinformation, and disinformation have raised new challenges for vaccine-related communication and decision-making. The goal of this commentary is to highlight strategies to improve communication and decision-making for adults considering participation in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. First, I present a general conceptual model for clinical trial participation that can be applied to various vaccine and other clinical trial contexts. Next, I introduce the ASK (Assume, Seek, Know) approach for enhancing clinical trial participation: (1) assume that all patients will want to know their options, (2) seek the counsel of stakeholders, and (3) know your numbers. The ideas presented in this commentary are intended to enhance vaccine-specific clinical trial communication, decision-making, and literacy, while dually offering strategies and resources that may help reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha T Langford
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Detoc M, Launay O, Dualé C, Mutter C, Le Huec JC, Lenzi N, Lucht F, Gagneux-Brunon A, Botelho-Nevers E. Barriers and motivations for participation in preventive vaccine clinical trials: Experience of 5 clinical research sites. Vaccine 2019; 37:6633-6639. [PMID: 31543417 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Recruitment in preventive vaccine trials (PVT) is challenging due to common barriers to clinical research and lack of vaccine confidence. Identifying determinants of participation can help to improve recruitment. A prospective survey was conducted in 5 French clinical investigational sites. People asked to participate in a PVT were given a questionnaire whether they decided to participate or not in the trial. A total of 341 people answered the survey: 210 accepting and 131 declining to participate in a PVT. Acceptors were significantly younger (38.5 vs 54.9 years old), more likely to be involved in early phase trials, had a higher level of education (p < 0.005) and a significantly better general opinion concerning vaccines (92.3% versus 72.3%, p < 0.005) compared with those who declined. Factors associated with acceptance or refusal were evaluated in 224 people in the 4 sites where both groups were included. In a multivariate analysis, three factors: older age, having heard about PVT through multiple sources and financial incentives were significantly associated with refusal to participate in the PVT. A generally favourable opinion of vaccines was associated with acceptance. The main motivation for participation was altruism (93.2%) whereas fear of side effects was at the forefront of the barriers (36.6%). Information given by the physician was a key point for decision-making in 70.2% of those who accepted. In brief, vaccine hesitancy may decrease recruitment in PVTs; reinforcing altruism and quality of information given are key points in acceptance of participation in PVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Detoc
- Clinical Trial Center, INSERM CIC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France; Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, France; Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France
| | - O Launay
- Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France; Inserm, CIC 1417, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
| | - C Dualé
- Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France; Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique (INSERM CIC1405), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - C Mutter
- Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France; CIC Inserm 1434, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - J-C Le Huec
- Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Unité Rachis, Université Bordeaux Deterca Lab, 15 rue Boucher, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - N Lenzi
- Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France
| | - F Lucht
- Clinical Trial Center, INSERM CIC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France; Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, France; Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France
| | - A Gagneux-Brunon
- Clinical Trial Center, INSERM CIC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France; Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, France; Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France
| | - E Botelho-Nevers
- Clinical Trial Center, INSERM CIC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42055 Saint-Etienne, France; Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, France; Inserm, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Detoc M, Touche C, Charles R, Lucht F, Gagneux-Brunon A, Botelho-Nevers E. Primary physicians' attitudes toward their patients receiving a proposal to participate in a vaccine trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15:2969-2979. [PMID: 31241393 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1625646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A trustworthy relationship between primary physicians (PPs) and their patients is crucial for vaccine acceptance. Little is known about attitudes of PPs toward participation of their patients in a preventive vaccine trial (PVT) proposed by investigation sites.A cross-sectional study was conducted in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region (France) including an anonymous questionnaire for general practitioners (GPs) and other specialists as well as face-to-face interviews. A scenario of a patient, with chronic medical conditions, invited to participate in a PVT and reporting this situation to his/her PP was drawn up. PPs' attitudes were assessed in quantitative approach by a 5-point Likert scale and in qualitative approach by semi-directed individual interviews.Among the 521 respondents to the questionnaire, 429 (82.3%) were GPs and 92 (17.7%) were other specialists. Only 7.5% (39/521) of respondents regularly practice clinical research. Confronted with the scenario, 312 respondents (59.8%) declared they would give their opinion spontaneously. Before giving their opinion, PPs would like more information about the trial (91.4%, n = 476). Whatever their attitude, 488 (93.7%) would be influenced by available safety data. Face-to-face interviews confirmed that PPs lack of knowledge about clinical research, and would like to obtain information from investigators, particularly about safety.PPs seem to be concerned by the decision of their patients to participate or not in a PVT but would like more information about the trial and clinical research before giving their opinion. Getting PPs to be more involved in the enrollment of patients in PVT may improve recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maelle Detoc
- Clinical trial center, INSERM CICEC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.,Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Camille Touche
- General Practice Department, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Rodolphe Charles
- General Practice Department, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Frédéric Lucht
- Clinical trial center, INSERM CICEC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.,Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Amandine Gagneux-Brunon
- Clinical trial center, INSERM CICEC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.,Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers
- Clinical trial center, INSERM CICEC 1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.,Groupe Immunité Muqueuse et Agents Pathogènes (GIMAP), EA3064 - Medical School of Saint-Etienne, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Harapan H, Mudatsir M, Yufika A, Nawawi Y, Wahyuniati N, Anwar S, Yusri F, Haryanti N, Wijayanti NP, Rizal R, Fitriani D, Maulida NF, Syahriza M, Ikram I, Fandoko TP, Syahadah M, Asrizal FW, Jamil KF, Rajamoorthy Y, Wagner AL, Groneberg DA, Kuch U, Müller R, Sasmono RT, Imrie A. Willingness to Participate and Associated Factors in a Zika Vaccine Trial in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Viruses 2018; 10:E648. [PMID: 30453663 PMCID: PMC6266114 DOI: 10.3390/v10110648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the crucial steps during trials for Zika and other vaccines is to recruit participants and to understand how participants' attitudes and sociodemographic characteristics affect willingness to participate (WTP). This study was conducted to assess WTP, its explanatory variables, and the impact of financial compensation on WTP in Indonesia. A health facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in eleven regencies in the Aceh and West Sumatra provinces of Indonesia. Participants were recruited via a convenience sampling method and were interviewed. The associations between explanatory variables and WTP were assessed using a two-step logistic regression analysis. A total of 1,102 parents were approached, and of these 956 (86.8%) completed the interview and were included in analysis. Of those, 144 (15.1%) were willing to participate in a Zika vaccine trial without a financial compensation. In the multivariate analysis, WTP was tied to an age of more than 50 years old, compared to 20⁻29 years (odds ratio (OR): 5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37⁻10.53), to being female (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.11⁻4.37), and to having heard about Zika (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.59⁻3.65). Participants' WTP increased gradually with higher financial compensation. The rate of WTP increased to 62.3% at the highest offer (US$ 350.4), and those who were still unwilling to participate (37.7%) had a poorer attitude towards childhood vaccination. This study highlights that pre-existing knowledge about Zika and attitudes towards childhood vaccination are important in determining community members being willing to participate in a vaccine trial. Financial incentives are still an important factor to enhance participant recruitment during a vaccine trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harapan Harapan
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
- Tropical Disease Centre, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
| | - Mudatsir Mudatsir
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
- Tropical Disease Centre, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Amanda Yufika
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Yusuf Nawawi
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Nur Wahyuniati
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Samsul Anwar
- Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Fitria Yusri
- School of Medicine, Malikussaleh University, Lhokseumawe, Aceh 24352, Indonesia.
| | - Novi Haryanti
- Community Health Centre of Meurah Mulia, North Aceh, Aceh 24372, Indonesia.
| | | | - Rizal Rizal
- Bunda Hospital, Lhokseumawe, Aceh 24351, Indonesia.
| | - Devi Fitriani
- Community Health Centre of Teunom, Aceh Jaya, Aceh 23653, Indonesia.
| | | | - Muhammad Syahriza
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Ikram Ikram
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Try Purwo Fandoko
- Community Health Centre of Gunung, Padang Panjang, West Sumatera 27122, Indonesia.
| | - Muniati Syahadah
- Community Health Centre of Lima Kaum, Tanah Datar, West Sumatera 27211, Indonesia.
| | | | - Kurnia F Jamil
- Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia.
| | - Yogambigai Rajamoorthy
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Accountancy and Management, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor 43000, Malaysia.
| | - Abram Luther Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - David Alexander Groneberg
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60323, Germany.
| | - Ulrich Kuch
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60323, Germany.
| | - Ruth Müller
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60323, Germany.
- Unit of Medical Entomology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp 2000, Belgium.
| | - R Tedjo Sasmono
- Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
| | - Allison Imrie
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|