1
|
Krankowska D, Mazzitelli M, Ucak HA, Orviz E, Karakoc HN, Mortimer H, Aebi-Popp K, Gilleece Y. Screening and prevention of HPV-related anogenital cancers in women living with HIV in Europe: Results from a systematic review. HIV Med 2024; 25:769-793. [PMID: 38238990 DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women living with HIV (WLWH) are at increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers. Throughout Europe, there is great heterogeneity among guidelines for screening programmes, access to HPV testing and HPV vaccination. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize available data on screening and prevention measures for HPV-related anogenital cancers in WLWH across the WHO European Region (WER). METHODS The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered on Prospero. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to identify available studies, written in English and published between 2011 and 2022. A metanalysis was conducted using random-effects models to calculate pooled prevalence of HPV. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to country and HPV testing. RESULTS Thirty-four articles involving 10 336 WLWH met the inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogenous in their methodology and presentation of results: 73.5% of studies focused on cervical cancer prevention, and only 4.4% on anal cancer; 76.5% of studies conducted HPV testing as a routine part of screening. The prevalence of high-risk HPV was 30.5-33.9% depending on the detection method used. A total of 77% of WLWH had cervical cytology results reported. Six studies reported the positive association of CD4 cell count <200 cells/μL with HPV prevalence and cervical abnormalities. Anal HPV testing was conducted in <8% of participants. HPV vaccination was completed in 5.6% of women (106/1902) with known vaccination status. There was no information about the vaccination status of the majority of women in the analysed studies (8434/10336). CONCLUSION Data about screening of HPV-related anogenital cancer in WLWH in Europe are heterogenous and lacking, especially in relation to anal cancer. HPV DNA testing is not routinely done as part of screening for HPV-related cancer; guidelines should include indications for when to use this test. Low CD4 count is a risk factor for HPV infection and cytological abnormalities. HPV vaccination data are poor and, when available, vaccination rates are very low among WLWH in Europe. This review concludes that significant improvements are required for data and also consistency on guidelines for HPV screening, prevention and vaccination in WLWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagny Krankowska
- Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
- Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Mazzitelli
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Eva Orviz
- Centro Sanitario Sandoval, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdlSSC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Harriet Mortimer
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School and University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Karoline Aebi-Popp
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yvonne Gilleece
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School and University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lupi M, Tsokani S, Howell AM, Ahmed M, Brogden D, Tekkis P, Kontovounisios C, Mills S. Anogenital HPV-Related Cancers in Women: Investigating Trends and Sociodemographic Risk Factors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2177. [PMID: 38927883 PMCID: PMC11202297 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidences of anogenital HPV-related cancers in women are on the rise; this is especially true for anal cancer. Medical societies are now beginning to recommend anal cancer screening in certain high-risk populations, including high-risk women with a history of genital dysplasia. The aim of this study is to investigate national anogenital HPV cancer trends as well as the role of demographics, deprivation, and ethnicity on anogenital cancer incidence in England, in an attempt to better understand this cohort of women which is increasingly affected by anogenital HPV-related disease. Demographic data from the Clinical Outcomes and Services Dataset (COSD) were extracted for all patients diagnosed with anal, cervical, vulval and vaginal cancer in England between 2014 and 2020. Outcomes included age, ethnicity, deprivation status and staging. An age over 55 years, non-white ethnicity and high deprivation are significant risk factors for late cancer staging, as per logistic regression. In 2019, the incidences of anal and vulval cancer in white women aged 55-74 years surpassed that of cervical cancer. More needs to be done to educate women on HPV-related disease and their lifetime risk of these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micol Lupi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (D.B.); (P.T.); (C.K.); (S.M.)
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK;
| | - Sofia Tsokani
- Laboratory of Hygiene, Social & Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- Cochrane Methods Support Unit, Evidence Production and Methods Department, Cochrane, London W1G 0AN, UK
| | - Ann-Marie Howell
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK;
| | - Mosab Ahmed
- Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| | - Danielle Brogden
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (D.B.); (P.T.); (C.K.); (S.M.)
| | - Paris Tekkis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (D.B.); (P.T.); (C.K.); (S.M.)
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK;
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Cancer, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (D.B.); (P.T.); (C.K.); (S.M.)
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK;
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Cancer, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- Evangelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, 106 76 Athens, Greece
| | - Sarah Mills
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; (D.B.); (P.T.); (C.K.); (S.M.)
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsegaye AT, Lin J, Cole AM, Szpiro A, Rao DW, Walson J, Winer RL. Adherence and Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening Among East African Immigrant Women in Washington State. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-02038-5. [PMID: 38849693 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02038-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cervical cancer screening (CCS) among East African immigrants (EAI) in the USA is under explored. This study aimed to investigate adherence to CCS and its correlates among EAI. METHODS We identified 1664 EAI women (25-65 years) with ≥ 1 primary care clinic visit(s) between 2017 and 2018, using University of Washington (UW) Medicine electronic health record data. CCS adherence was defined as Pap testing within 3 years or human papillomavirus/Pap co-testing within 5 years. We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to cross-sectionally estimate associations with correlates of adherence. Twelve-month screening uptake was also evaluated among overdue women. RESULTS CCS adherence was 63%. Factors associated with higher adherence included older age (adjusted prevalence ratios [APRs]:1.47:95%CI:1.14-1.90, 1.38:95%CI:1.05-1.80, respectively, for ages 30-39 and 40-49 vs 25-29 years), longer duration of care at UW Medicine (APR:1.22:95%CI:1.03-1.45, comparing > 10 vs < 5 years), higher visit frequency (APR:1.23:95%CI:1.04-1.44, 1.46:95%CI:1.24-1.72, respectively, for 3-5 and ≥ 6 vs 1-2 visits), index visit in an obstetrics-gynecology clinic (APR:1.26:95%CI:1.03-1.55, vs family practice), having an assigned primary care provider (APR:1.35: 95%CI:1.02-1.79), breast cancer screening adherence (APR:1.66: 95%CI:1.27-2.17), and colorectal cancer screening adherence (APR:1.59:95%CI:1.24-2.03). Low BMI was associated with lower adherence (APR:0.50:95%CI:0.26-0.96, comparing < 18.5 kg/m2 vs 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). Among 608 (37%) overdue women, 9% were screened in the subsequent 12 months. Having commercial health insurance vs Medicare/Medicaid was associated with higher uptake (adjusted risk ratio:2.44:95%CI:1.15-5.18). CONCLUSION CCS adherence among EAI was lower than the national average of 80%. Interventions focused on increasing healthcare access/utilization or leveraging healthcare encounters to address barriers could increase CCS in EAIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adino Tesfahun Tsegaye
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, 3980 15Th Ave NE UW Box # 351619, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - John Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, 3980 15Th Ave NE UW Box # 351619, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Allison M Cole
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Adam Szpiro
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, USA
| | - Darcy W Rao
- Gender Equality Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA
| | - Judd Walson
- Departments of Global Health, Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Pediatrics and Epidemiology University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Rachel L Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, 3980 15Th Ave NE UW Box # 351619, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bøje RB, Bardou M, Mensah K, Rico Berrocal R, Giorgi Rossi P, Bonvicini L, Auzzi N, Taut D, Jiboc N, Tisler A, Reintamm K, Uusküla A, Teixeira M, Firmino-Machado J, Amorim M, Baia I, Lunet N, Michaylova R, Panayotova Y, Kotzeva T, Andersen B, Kirkegaard P. What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079921. [PMID: 38760040 PMCID: PMC11103196 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to map and compare stakeholders' perceptions of barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women in seven European countries. DESIGN In Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to participate to identify barriers towards participation in cervical cancer screening. SETTING The study is nested in the European Union-funded project CBIG-SCREEN which aims to tackle inequity in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania. PARTICIPANTS Participants represented micro-level stakeholders covering representatives of users, that is, vulnerable women, meso-level stakeholders covering healthcare professionals and social workers, and macro-level stakeholders covering programme managers and decision-makers. METHODS Across the seven countries, 25 meetings in Collaborative User Boards with a duration of 2 hours took place between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were video recorded or audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English for a qualitative framework analysis. RESULTS 120 participants took part in the Collaborative User Boards. Context-specific barriers were related to different healthcare systems and characteristics of vulnerable populations. In Romania and Bulgaria, the lack of a continuous screening effort and lack of ways to identify eligible women were identified as barriers for all women rather than being specific for women in vulnerable situations. The participants in Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal identified providers' lack of cultural and social sensitivity towards vulnerable women as barriers. In all countries, vulnerable women's fear, shame and lack of priority to preventive healthcare were identified as psychological barriers. CONCLUSION The study provides an overview of stakeholders' perceived barriers towards vulnerable women's cervical cancer screening participation in seven European countries. The organisation of healthcare systems and the maturity of screening programmes differ between countries, while vulnerable women's psychological barriers had several similarities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Buus Bøje
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Marc Bardou
- CIC-P INSERM 1432, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France
| | - Keitly Mensah
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, IARC, Lyon, France
| | - Raquel Rico Berrocal
- Centre d'Etudes des Mouvements Sociaux, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Servizio Interaziendale Epidemiologia, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Laura Bonvicini
- Servizio Interaziendale Epidemiologia, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Noemi Auzzi
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Osservatorio Nazionale Screening, Florence, Italy
| | - Diana Taut
- Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Anna Tisler
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kerli Reintamm
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Margarida Teixeira
- EPI Unit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Mariana Amorim
- EPI Unit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ines Baia
- EPI Unit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Lunet
- EPI Unit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wearn A, Shepherd L. Determinants of routine cervical screening participation in underserved women: a qualitative systematic review. Psychol Health 2024; 39:145-170. [PMID: 35296200 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2050230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Routine, population-wide cervical screening programmes reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality. However, socioeconomically deprived communities and ethnic minority groups typically have lower uptake in comparison to the general population and thus are described as 'underserved.' A systematic qualitative literature review was conducted to identify relevant determinants of participation for these groups. METHODS Online databases were searched for relevant literature from countries with well-established, call-recall screening programmes. Overall, 24 articles were eligible for inclusion. Data was synthesized via Framework synthesis. Dahlgren & Whitehead's social model of health was used as a broad a priori coding framework. RESULTS Participation was influenced by determinants at multiple levels. Overall, patient-provider relationships and peer support facilitated engagement. Cultural disparities, past healthcare experience and practical barriers hindered service access and exacerbated negative thoughts, feelings and attitudes towards participation. Complex interrelationships between determinants suggest barriers have a cumulative effect on screening participation. CONCLUSIONS These findings present a framework of psychosocial determinants of cervical screening uptake in underserved women and emphasise the role of policy makers and practitioners in reducing structural barriers to screening services. Additional work, exploring the experience of those living within socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, is needed to strengthen understanding in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Wearn
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lee Shepherd
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ojerinde AC, Thorne SE, Howard AF, Kazanjian A. Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Experiences of Black African Immigrant Women in Canada. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2024; 11:23333936241266997. [PMID: 39071450 PMCID: PMC11283654 DOI: 10.1177/23333936241266997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death among African women. Unfortunately, in most sub-Saharan African nations, women are vulnerable if they are unaware that cervical cancer is preventable with frequent screening and early treatment. The aim of this study was to examine Black African immigrant women's perceptions and experiences of cervical screening in British Columbia, Canada. Twenty Black African immigrant women were interviewed using the qualitative research method Interpretive Description. Data collection approaches included indepth interviews and analytic memos. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative technique guided by a socioecologic framework to capture subjective experiences and perceptions. Four key themes were identified, including confusing conceptualizations about cancer and cancer screening, competing priorities, concerns for modesty, and commitment to culture. The study findings point to the need for more active approaches to promoting cervical screening for this population.
Collapse
|
7
|
Greenley R, Bell S, Rigby S, Legood R, Kirkby V, McKee M. Factors influencing the participation of groups identified as underserved in cervical cancer screening in Europe: a scoping review of the literature. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1144674. [PMID: 37304105 PMCID: PMC10247980 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is a preventable and inequitably distributed disease. Screening plays a vital role in prevention, but many women face barriers to participation. The aims of this scoping review, undertaken to inform the co-design of interventions to equitably increase screening uptake, were to: (1) identify barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening for underserved populations, and (2) identify and describe the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving participation in cervical cancer screening among underserved groups in Europe. Methods Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies focusing on barriers and facilitators to cervical screening participation and interventions to improve uptake undertaken in Europe and published after 2000 were included. Four electronic databases were searched to identify relevant papers. Titles and abstracts were screened, full text reviewed, and key findings extracted. Data were extracted and analyzed according to different health system strata: system-wide (macro), service specific (meso) and individual/community specific (micro). Within these categories, themes were identified, and the population groups impacted were recorded. All findings are presented in accordance with (PRISMA) guidelines. Results 33 studies on barriers and facilitators and eight intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. Collectively, the findings of these studies presented a wide array of screening uptake barriers, facilitators, and interventions, predominantly related to screening service and individual/community factors. However, although diverse, certain core themes around information provision, prompts for participation and the need for inclusive spaces were apparent. Implementation of screening programs should focus on: (1) reducing identifiable barriers, (2) increasing public awareness, and (3) providing patient reminders and measures to promote engagement by healthcare providers. Conclusion There are many barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening and this review, nested within a larger study, will inform work to devise a solution alongside groups identified in three European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Greenley
- Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sadie Bell
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Rigby
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosa Legood
- Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Kirkby
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bolarinwa OA, Holt N. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom: evidence from a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:390. [PMID: 37087506 PMCID: PMC10122823 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09410-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is currently the leading cause of mortality globally, with new cancer cases estimated at 19.3 million and almost 10 million deaths in 2020. Specifically, breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality prevalence among women of the minority group or marginalised populations in Europe have continued to be a public health concern due to the low uptake of cancer screening. Thus, this study utilised a mixed-method systematic review to identify barriers to breast and cervical screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom. METHODS Databases including PubMed, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases, were systematically searched for studies on barriers to breast and cervical screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom published in English between January 2010 to July 2022. This mixed-method systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in reporting the included studies' results. The cluster mapping approach was used to identify and classify the barriers into themes. RESULTS Thirteen eligible studies were included in this current review. Seven of the thirteen studies used quantitative cross-sectional research design, while six used qualitative cross-sectional research design. These studies were conducted across the United Kingdom. Five themes were developed from the cluster mapping, and thirty-four sub-theme barriers to the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom were identified. The developed themes in relation to the barriers include; socio-demographic characteristics, health service delivery, cultural, religious & language, the gap in knowledge & awareness, and emotional, sexual & family support. CONCLUSION The study concluded that barriers in socio-demographic characteristics, health service delivery, cultural, religious and language, the gap in knowledge & awareness, and emotional, sexual & family support were identified as non-uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom. Reducing or eliminating these barriers would improve the benefits of timely breast and cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obasanjo Afolabi Bolarinwa
- Department of Public Health & Well-Being, Faculty of Health & Social Care, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
- Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
- Department of Allied and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.
| | - Nicole Holt
- Department of Allied and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chandrakumar A, Hoon E, Benson J, Stocks N. Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening for women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds; a qualitative study of GPs. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062823. [PMID: 36375978 PMCID: PMC9664274 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening (CCS) for women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews, with interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. SETTING Adelaide, South Australia. PARTICIPANTS Twelve GPs with experience in providing CCS to women from CALD backgrounds participated. RESULTS Four main themes emerged: 'importance of clinician-patient relationship', 'patients' cultural understanding regarding health care and CCS', 'communication and language' and 'health system related'. Each theme had several subthemes. GPs' professional relationship with their patients and repeated advice from other clinicians, together with the provision of opportunistic CCS, were described as facilitators, and encompassed the theme of 'importance of clinician-patient relationship'. This theme also raised the possibility of self-collection human papilloma virus tests. Lack of awareness and knowledge, lower priority for cancer screening and patients' individual circumstances contributed to the theme of 'patients' cultural understanding regarding health care and CCS', and often acted as barriers to CCS. 'Communication and language' consisted of language difficulties, interpreter use and use of appropriate resources. Language difficulties were a barrier to the provision of CCS, and GPs used interpreters and written handouts to help overcome this. The theme of 'health system related' involved the increased time needed for CCS consults for CALD women, access to appointments, funding, health promotion and effective use of practice management software. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights that multiple, inter-related barriers and facilitators influence CALD women's engagement with CCS, and that GPs needed to manage all of these factors in order to encourage CCS participation. More efforts are needed to address the barriers to ensure that GPs have access to appropriate resources, and CALD patients have access to GPs they trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abira Chandrakumar
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- GPEx Ltd, Unley, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Hoon
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Nigel Stocks
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Cervical Dysplasia Among Women With Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2021; 25:210-215. [PMID: 34176912 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of cervical dysplasia among migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) at a specialized clinic in Switzerland. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all women who attended a specialized FGM/C clinic at the Geneva University Hospitals between 2010 and 2016. We examined sociodemographic data, sexually transmitted infections, FGM/C types, Pap smear results, and follow-up in women diagnosed with cervical dysplasia. RESULTS Three hundred sixty records were reviewed and 338 women were included. The average age was 33 years (SD = 7.47 years). Most women were from Eritrea and Somalia (n = 204, 60.4%) and had FGM/C type III (n = 188, 55.6%). A total of 12.4% (n = 42) of the patients had abnormal Pap smears: 1.5% (n = 5) with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), 7.9% (n = 27) with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and 2.9% (n = 10) with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or higher (HSIL +). Of the 37 patients with dysplasia, 22 (59.4%) completed follow-up and 15 (40.5%) received incomplete follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion+ among migrant women with FGM/C is high (2.95%) compared with the general Swiss population (0.58%). Follow-up for cervical dysplasia must be improved by increasing provider knowledge of this patient population and by addressing barriers to care.
Collapse
|
11
|
Idehen EE, Virtanen A, Lilja E, Tuomainen TP, Korhonen T, Koponen P. Cervical Cancer Screening Participation among Women of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish Origin Compared with the General Finnish Population: A Register-Based Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17217899. [PMID: 33126544 PMCID: PMC7663516 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Migrant-origin women are less prone to cervical screening uptake compared with host populations. This study examined cervical cancer screening participation and factors associated with it in the Finnish mass screening program during 2008–2012 in women of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin compared with the general Finnish population (Finns) in Finland. The study population consists of samples from the Finnish Migrant Health and Well-being Study 2010–2012 and Health 2011 Survey; aged 30–64 (n = 2579). Data from the Finnish screening register linked with other population-based registry data were utilized. For statistical analysis we employed logistic regression. Age-adjusted screening participation rates were Russians 63% (95% CI: 59.9–66.6), Somalis 19% (16.4–21.6), Kurds 69% (66.6–71.1), and Finns 67% (63.3–69.8). In the multiple-adjusted model with Finns as the reference; odds ratios for screening were among Russians 0.92 (0.74–1.16), Somalis 0.16 (0.11–0.22), and Kurds 1.37 (1.02–1.83). Among all women, the substantial factor for increased screening likelihood was hospital care related to pregnancy/birth 1.73 (1.27–2.35), gynecological 2.47 (1.65–3.68), or other reasons 1.53 (1.12–2.08). Screening participation was lower among students and retirees. In conclusion, screening among the migrant-origin women varies, being significantly lowest among Somalis compared with Finns. Efforts using culturally tailored/population-specific approaches may be beneficial in increasing screening participation among women of migrant-origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther E. Idehen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +358-503678612
| | - Anni Virtanen
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland;
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki, University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00029 HUS Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Lilja
- Department of Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland;
| | - Tellervo Korhonen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 20, 00014 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Päivikki Koponen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|