1
|
Casini B, Pan A, Guarini A, Rivara C, Zullo A, Monica F, Cimbro M, Casarano S, Inglese A, Vaghi A, Schiffino L, Capezzuto E, Da Massa Carrara P, Pasquale L. Multisocieties position paper: Microbiological surveillance on flexible endoscopes. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1105-1111. [PMID: 34266792 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Transmission with endoscopes, particularly duodenoscope, of potential lethal infections prompted different scientific societies to deliver recommendations aimed reducing this risk. Some International societies extended recommendations on microbial surveillance to all the endoscopes and devices used in the reprocessing procedure. Considering the relevance of the topic, 8 Italian scientific societies of physicians, nurses and technical operators prepared a concerted document taking into account Institutional advisories and facilities in Italy. The rules for a correct microbial surveillance on endoscopes were detailed in term of what, how and when to perform the procedure, also suggesting behaviors in case of contamination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Casini
- Dipartimento di Ricerca Traslazionale e Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina e Chirurgia Università di Pisa, Pisa.
| | | | | | - Cinzia Rivara
- Gastroenterologia, S.C. ASL TO4 Ciriè-Chivasso-Cuorgnè, Torino
| | - Angelo Zullo
- Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma
| | - Fabio Monica
- Gastroenterologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Cattinara, Trieste
| | | | | | | | - Adriano Vaghi
- Pneumologia, Ospedale Generale di Garbagnate Milanese, Milano
| | | | | | | | - Luigi Pasquale
- Gastroenterologia, S. O. Ospedale Frangipane, Ariano Irpino, Avellino
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barron S, Kennedy MP. Can single-use bronchoscopes help prevent nosocomial COVID-19 infections? Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:439-443. [PMID: 33891519 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1920924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The reduction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission has been achieved through numerous public health initiatives worldwide. In the hospital environment, certain high-risk procedures have the potential to cause transmission of the virus to health-care workers and nosocomial transmission to patients through different mechanisms including the generation of aerosols and fomite formation via contamination of medical devices.Areas covered: Aerosol-generating procedures such as bronchoscopy are considered high risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. As a result, single-use devices should be used where possible and changing to single-use flexible bronchoscopes has been advised by respiratory societies internationally. In this paper, we outline the rationale for this advice and have analyzed the evidence relating to the reduction in SARS-CoV-2 transmission arising from a switch to these single-use devices and the potential impact that this switch may have on the quality of pulmonology services.Expert opinion: In this paper, we outline the rationale for this advice and have analyzed the evidence relating to the reduction in SARS-CoV-2 transmission arising from a switch to these single-use devices and the potential impact that this switch may have on the quality of pulmonology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Barron
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Marcus Peter Kennedy
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.,ASSERT Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casini B, Tuvo B, Marciano E, Del Magro G, Gemignani G, Luchini G, Cristina ML, Costa AL, Arzilli G, Totaro M, Baggiani A, Privitera G. Improving the Reprocessing Quality of Flexible Thermolabile Endoscopes: How to Learn from Mistakes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:2482. [PMID: 33802350 PMCID: PMC7967619 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: Failure in the reprocessing of thermolabile flexible endoscopes has been reported as one of the most important threats to patient health. Method: A case report and observational study was conducted, from August 2014 to December 2019, in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of a University Hospital in Italy, where two cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography were observed. Following the risk/safety management practices, an epidemiological investigation was started, duodenoscopes were removed from use and the reprocessing practices reviewed. Moreover, microbiological surveillance of endoscopes was carried out according to the CDC guidelines. Results: In the first phase of sampling, 10/10 (100%) endoscopes were found to be non-compliant, of which 7 showed results for high-concern organisms (HCOs), such as KPC-K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. After implementing corrective actions, 12 out of 17 endoscopes were found to be non-compliant (70.5%), of which 8 showed results for HCOs, such as KPC-K. oxytoca and P. aeruginosa. During the last year of regular microbiological surveillance, only 23% of endoscopes (35/152) were found to be non-compliant, of which 7 showed results for HCOs, such as NDM-K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. The crucial issues were related to samples collected from the internal channels of duodenoscopes. Conclusion: Managing the risk associated with the reprocessing of digestive endoscopes, through risk assessment at every stage of the process, is important for the prevention of infections associated with the use of these device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Casini
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Benedetta Tuvo
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Emanuele Marciano
- Endoscopy Service Division, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (E.M.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Giuliana Del Magro
- Endoscopy Service Division, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (E.M.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Giulia Gemignani
- Medical Direction, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.)
| | - Grazia Luchini
- Medical Direction, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.)
| | | | - Anna Laura Costa
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Guglielmo Arzilli
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Michele Totaro
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Angelo Baggiani
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Gaetano Privitera
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|