Lung Cancer and Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Effectiveness of home-based walking exercise for patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of home-based exercise interventions on walking performance in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication (IC).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomised controlled trials of patients with PAD and IC published in English up to August 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of patients who participated in home-based exercise interventions and were assessed for walking performance were eligible for inclusion. Studies without available data were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We analysed the pooled effect size on walking performance based on the standardised mean differences between groups. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to ensure the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The duration of interventions in the included studies ranged from 6 to 52 weeks. In the pooled analysis, compared with control groups, the home-based exercise intervention groups showed improved pain-free walking distance (standardised mean difference 0.67, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.15), and maximal walking distance (0.47, 0.05 to 0.89). The overall heterogeneity score of pain-free walking distance was I2=83% (p<0.001), and for maximal walking distance, I2=78% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Home-based exercise interventions for patients with PAD and IC were beneficial in improving pain-free walking distance and maximal walking distance. Future studies should consider multiple factors that may affect the effectiveness of home training and intervention compliance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO, CRD42024499020.

Experience of individuals with lung and gastrointestinal cancers undergoing radiation therapy: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Lung cancer remains one of the most diagnosed cancers in Canada and continues to be the leading cause of cancer deaths in Canada, responsible for 25% of all cancer deaths. Prior studies consistently report poor experiences of people with lung cancers. The study purpose was to explore the reasons for consistently poorer reported experience of people with lung cancer compared to people with gastrointestinal cancers, who previously have reported positive cancer care experiences within the same context, and to better understand key differences that influence patient experience.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews of people living with lung cancer (LC) and gastrointestinal cancers (GIC) undergoing radiotherapy at a tertiary cancer centre. Thematic content analysis was conducted to analyse interview transcripts. A person-centred care framework was used to guide the development of the interview guide and data analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 16 participants (10 LC and 6 GIC). Participants with LC reported poor experience leading to and at the time of their cancer diagnosis, including delays in their diagnosis and anxiety related to their diagnosis. Most participants in both groups reported severe symptoms prior to their radiotherapy. However, the symptoms of people living with LC further worsened during the radiation therapy with the addition of treatment side effects, while the symptoms of people living with GIC were better controlled during treatment. Participants living with LC noted poor communication, gaps in coordination and uncertainty. They acknowledged awareness of support services and other resources, but they reported no interest in accessing them.

CONCLUSION

This study identified gaps in patient experience of people living with LC compared to GIC and proposed ideas for quality improvement projects, including expediting the diagnosis process, enhancing communication with patients around their lung cancer diagnosis, improved symptom management, and timing of supportive care services.

Effects of Symptom Burden on Quality of Life in Patients with Lung Cancer

Lung cancer patients suffer from numerous symptoms that impact their quality of life. This study aims to identify the symptom burden on quality of life in lung cancer patients. This survey used a structured questionnaire to collect data from 8 March 2021 to 12 May 2021. Patient demographic information was collected. The data on symptom burden and quality of life (QOL) of patients were obtained from the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-LC13. The stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to estimate lung cancer-related symptom burden in relation to quality of life. The study included 159 patients with lung cancer who completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the patients was 63.12 ± 11.4 years, and 64.8% of them were female. The Global Quality of Life score of the QLQ-C30 was 67.87 ± 22.24, and the top five lung cancer-related symptoms were insomnia, dyspnea, and fatigue from the QLQ-C30, and coughing and dyspnea from the QLQ-LC13. The multiple regression analysis showed that appetite loss was the most frequently associated factor for global QOL (β = -0.32; adjusted R2: 27%) and cognitive function (β = -0.15; adjusted R2: 11%), while fatigue was associated with role function (β = -0.35; adjusted R2: 43%), emotional function (β = -0.26; adjusted R2: 9%), and social function (β = -0.26; adjusted R2: 27%). Dyspnea was associated with physical function (β = -0.45; adjusted R2: 42%). Appetite loss, fatigue, and dyspnea were the main reasons causing symptom burdens on quality of life for lung cancer patients. Decreasing these symptoms can improve the quality of life and survival for patients with lung cancer.

Exploring Central and Bridge Symptoms in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Network Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify symptom clusters in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and the central and bridge symptoms within each symptom cluster.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 1,255 patients with lung cancer were recruited through convenience sampling at Nanfang Hospital. Patient symptom burden was assessed using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and the Lung Cancer module of the MDASI (MDASI-LC). Symptom clusters were identified using the Walktrap algorithm, and central and bridge symptoms in the symptom clusters were identified by network analysis.

RESULTS

The patients included 818 (65.18%) males and 437 (34.82%) females with a mean age of 56.56 ± 11.78 years. Four symptom clusters were identified: fatigue, gastrointestinal, psychoneurological and respiratory. Their central symptoms were fatigue, vomiting, distress and hemoptysis, respectively, and their bridge symptoms were pain, vomiting, dry mouth and shortness of breath.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer symptoms show certain strong correlations with each other, resulting in symptom clusters. Central symptoms may influence other symptoms within a symptom cluster, and bridge symptoms might impact the density of the symptom network. This study identified central and bridge symptoms in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Targeting these symptoms with interventions for symptom clusters could make symptom management more precise and effective.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

In clinical settings, the burden of symptom clusters may be reduced by intervening against the central symptoms of these symptom clusters. Alternatively, if the objective is to diminish the connections between different symptom clusters and holistically alleviate the overall burden, interventions focused on bridge symptoms may be employed.

The effect of a fatigue self-management program based on individual and family self-management theory in cancer patients: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the Fatigue Self-Management Program based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory on fatigue, daily living activities, and well-being in cancer patients.

METHODS

This randomized controlled single-blind experimental study was carried out between November 2020 and April 2022. A total of 94 patients with advanced cancer, 47 in each group, were included in the study, and 57 participants completed the study. Data were collected using the Brief Fatigue Inventory, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, and Well-Being Questionnaire-22. The Fatigue Self-Management Program based on Individual and Family Self-Management Theory was delivered to the intervention group with two face-to-face and two tele-monitoring sessions. No intervention was applied to the control group, who received only routine care.

RESULTS

The mean score of fatigue in the intervention group compared to the control group decreased, and the difference was statistically significant (p < .05); daily living activities mean scores were higher than the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference (p > .05). The mean scores of depression and anxiety in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group; energy, positive well-being, and general well-being mean scores were found to be higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Fatigue Self-Management Program effectively reduces the fatigue experienced by cancer patients and increases their well-being but it does not increase their independence in daily living activities.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT04822220.

Symptom clusters and their impact on quality of life among Chinese patients with lung cancer: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To investigate the symptom clusters of Chinese patients with lung cancer, and explore their impact on quality of life (QoL) and each of its functioning.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2022 and April 2023 among 219 lung cancer patients at a general hospital in Sichuan Province. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and the EORTC QLQ-C30. R within the RStudio platform was used to conduct descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Psychoneurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal and fatigue-related symptom clusters were identified, each of which was significantly negatively correlated with overall QoL, global health status/QoL and each functioning. The respiratory (β = -0.60, P = 0.02) and fatigue-related symptom cluster (β = -0.86, P = 0.02) were predictors of global health status/QoL; the fatigue-related symptom cluster predicted physical (β = -1.68, P < 0.01), role (β = -1.63, P < 0.01) and cognitive functioning (β = -1.45, P < 0.01); the psychoneurological symptom cluster was a predictor of patients' emotional functioning (β = -1.26, P < 0.01); and the psychoneurological (β = -0.81, P < 0.01) and gastrointestinal symptom cluster (β = -0.60, P = 0.05) predicted social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory and fatigue-related symptom clusters were strong predictors of global health status/QoL; fatigue-related, psychoneurological and gastrointestinal symptom clusters had a negative impact on patients' functioning. Nurse practitioners should pay more attention to monitoring respiratory and fatigue-related symptom clusters to identify high-risk populations in time, and tailored interventions based on symptom clusters are needed to synergistically reduce the symptom burden, thereby improving patients' QoL.

Cognitive appraisal and depression in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: mediation by perceived stress and self-efficacy

PURPOSE

Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy are prone to suffering a higher incidence rate of depression, leading to poor quality of life. However, how cancer affects depression is unclear. This study aimed to examine whether the relationship between cognitive appraisal and depression is mediated by perceived stress and self-efficacy in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 421 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy participated in this cross-sectional survey. Cognitive appraisal of cancer, perceived stress, self-efficacy, and depression were measured with the Perceived Life Threat Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, General Self-efficacy Scale and Hospital Anxiety, and Depression Scale-Depression Scale, respectively. Path analysis was performed to analyze the mediating effects of perceived stress and self-efficacy on the relationship between cognitive appraisal of cancer and depression.

RESULTS

Cognitive appraisal of cancer exerted direct (b = 0.066, SE = 0.020, p < 0.001, bias-corrected 95% CI = [0.027, 0.106]) and indirect (mediated by depression and insomnia) (b = 0.136, SE = 0.015, p < 0.001, bias-corrected 95% CI = [0.107, 0.167]) effects on depression. Perceived stress and self-efficacy were significant in mediating the relationship between cognitive appraisal of cancer and depression (b = 0.101, SE = 0.014, p < 0.001, bias-corrected 95% CI = [0.074, 0.132]; b = 0.021, SE = 0.006, p < 0.001, bias-corrected 95% CI = [0.006, 0.028], respectively). Additionally, a sequential mediating effect of perceived stress via self-efficacy was found, and the mediating effect size was 0.014 (p < 0.01, bias-corrected 95% CI = [0.010,0.034]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that medical staff could prevent or relieve depression through improving self-efficacy or reducing perceived stress in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

The effectiveness of an accelerometer-based physical activity enhancement intervention for patients undergoing lung resection - A pilot randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Increasing physical activity after lung resection is important for maintaining quality of life. It is unclear whether accelerometer-based exercise instruction contributes to increasing daily physical activity after lung resection. We examine whether accelerometer-based exercise instruction will lead to increased physical activity in patients undergoing lung resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients undergoing lung resection were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 22) or the control group (n = 24). Twelve participants dropped out. Ultimately, 16 participants in the intervention group and 18 participants in the control group were eligible for analysis. Each group allocation was only known to the person in charge of allocation. The physiotherapists and assessors were not blinded in this study. The intervention group participated in a postoperative rehabilitation program and received physical activity instruction preoperatively and at discharge. The control group participated in a postoperative rehabilitation program only. The primary outcomes was physical activity such as the number of daily steps, light intensity physical activity (LPA) and moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) at the two month postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-four participants were enrolled in this study. Sixteen participants in the intervention group and 18 participants in the control group were included for analysis. Although there was no significant difference in physical activity at baseline, the number of daily steps in the intervention group at the two month postoperative follow-up was significantly higher than that in the control group (8039.2 ± 3480.8 vs. 4887.0 ± 2376.5 steps/day, p = 0.004). Compared to the control group, the intervention group also had greater increases in LPA (63.8 ± 25.1 vs. 44.5 ± 24.5 min/day, p = 0.030) and MVPA (20.2 ± 19.6 vs. 9.6 ± 8.6 min/day, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that accelerometer-based exercise instruction led to an increase in physical activity after lung resection in an unsupervised setting.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN trial No. UMIN000039369).

Self-care behaviors in patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer agents: a systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Continuous progress in cancer care has led to its increased use in oral anticancer agents that are easily managed by patients at home with fewer costs and hospitalizations. However, correct self-care behaviors are needed for the safe use of these medications. This review aimed to synthesize studies on self-care behaviors in patients treated with oral anticancer agents.

METHODS

This systematic review used a convergent qualitative synthesis design for mixed studies. Studies on adult patients with cancer using any kind of oral anticancer agent and describing self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and/or self-care management behaviors were searched on PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. After data extraction, the findings were retained for qualitative synthesis.

FINDINGS

Of 3419 records, 19 studies were included in this review. From the qualitative synthesis, all the retrieved behaviors were synthesized in the three self-care dimensions. Five themes and 18 subthemes were identified. Self-care maintenance included "adherence to the medications" and "prevention." Self-care monitoring consisted of "health surveillance and recognition of illness changes." Self-care management included "seeking help" and "autonomous management of side effects." Overall, most of the behaviors described focused only on adherence.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review could guide future studies on self-care and drive future interventions aimed at improving self-care in this vulnerable population. Nurses and other healthcare professionals should provide self-care support to patients taking oral anticancer agents. In particular, they should promote behaviors aimed at improving well-being, preserving health, or managing side effects.