Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Associated with Urinary Phthalate Metabolites Levels in Adults with Subclinical Hypothyroidism: Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2012-2014

Persistent effects of di-n-butyl phthalate on liver transcriptome: impaired energy and lipid metabolic pathways

The environmental contaminant dibutyl phthalate (DBP) is reported to be hepatotoxic, but the underlying molecular pathways and pathological processes remain unclear. Here we used RNA-sequencing to characterize persistent hepatic transcriptional effects one week after the conclusion of five weeks oral exposure to 10 mg/kg/day or 100 mg/kg/day DBP in male mice. The exploratory transcriptome analysis demonstrated five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the 10 mg/kg/day group and thirteen in the 100 mg/kg/day group. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), which identifies affected biological pathways rather than focusing solely on individual genes, revealed nine significantly enriched Reactome pathways shared by both DBP treatment groups. Additionally, we found 54 upregulated and one downregulated Reactome pathways in the 10 mg/kg/day DBP group, and 29 upregulated and 13 downregulated pathways in the 100 mg/kg/day DBP group. According to the DEGs and the GSEA findings DBP exposure disrupts several key biological processes, including protein translation, protein folding, apoptosis, hedgehog signaling, degradation of extracellular matrix and alterations in the energy/lipid metabolism. Subsequent liver tissue analysis corroborated these findings, showing that DBP exposure induced tissue disorganization, oxidative stress, lipid accumulation, increased TNF-α, ATP and glucokinase levels. In addition, several proteins central for the metabolic system were affected, mostly in a dose-response pattern. Taken together the results show that DBP can cause hepatic stress and damage and suggest a potential role for DBP in the development of non-alcoholic fat liver disease, the most prevalent liver disease worldwide.

Association between phthalates exposure and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease under different diagnostic criteria: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2017 to 2018

Purpose

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease. Phthalates have been suggested to influence the development of NAFLD due to their endocrine-disrupting properties, but studies based on nationally representative populations are insufficient, and existing studies seem to have reached conflicting conclusions. Due to changes in legislation, the use of traditional phthalates has gradually decreased, and the phthalates substitutes is getting more attention. This study aims to delve deeper into how the choice of diagnostic approach influences observed correlations and concern about more alternatives of phthalates, thereby offering more precise references for the prevention and treatment of NAFLD.

Methods

A cohort of 641 participants, sourced from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 database, was evaluated for NAFLD using three diagnostic methods: the Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI), the US Fatty Liver Indicator (US.FLI), and Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE). The urinary metabolite concentrations of Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), Di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP), Di-isononyl phthalate (DINP), Di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), Di-isobutyl phthalate (DIBP), Di-ethyl phthalate (DEP) and Di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) were detected. The association between NAFLD and urinary phthalate metabolites was evaluated through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, considering different concentration gradients of urinary phthalates.

Results

Univariate logistic regression analysis found significant correlations between NAFLD and specific urinary phthalate metabolites, such as Mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP), Mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP), Mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (MECPP), and Mono-(carboxyisoctyl) phthalate (MCiOP), across different diagnostic criteria. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting only for demographic data, MEOHP (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.19-8.94, p = 0.029), MEHHP (OR = 3.98, 95% CI = 1.43-11.1, p = 0.016), MECPP (OR = 3.52, 95% CI = 1.01-12.2, p = 0.049), and MCiOP (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 1.93-10.7, p = 0.005) were positively related to NAFLD defined by HSI and VCTE. The correlation strength varied with the concentration of phthalates, indicating a potential dose-response relationship. Adjusting for all covariates in multivariate logistic regression, only MCiOP (OR = 4.22, 95% CI = 1.10-16.2, p = 0.044), as an oxidative metabolite of DINP, remained significantly associated with NAFLD under the VCTE criterion, suggesting its potential role as a risk factor for NAFLD.

Conclusion

This research highlights a significant association between DINP and NAFLD. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the role of the phthalates substitutes in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the importance of considering different diagnostic criteria in research.

The association between endocrine disrupting chemicals and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Epidemiological studies have reported that exposure of the population to environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is associated with NAFLD. However, EDCs are of different types, and there are inconsistencies in the relevant evidence and descriptions, which have not been systematically summarized so far. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the association between population exposure to EDCs and NAFLD. Three databases, including PubMed, Web of science, and Embase were searched, and 27 articles were included in this study. Methodological quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias of the included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, I2 statistics, Begg's test, and Egger's test. The estimated effect sizes of the included studies were pooled and evaluated using the random-effects model (I2 > 50 %) and the fixed-effects model ( I2 < 50 %). The pooled-estimate effect sizes showed that population exposure to Phthalates (PAEs) (OR = 1.18, 95 % CI:1.03-1.34), cadmium (Cd) (OR = 1.37, 95 % CI:1.09-1.72), and bisphenol A (OR = 1.43, 95 % CI:1.24-1.65) were positively correlated with the risk of NAFLD. Exposure to mercury (OR =1.46, 95 % CI:1.17-1.84) and Cd increased the risk of "elevated alanine aminotransferase". On the contrary, no significant association was identified between perfluoroalkyl substances (OR =0.99, 95 % CI:0.93-1.06) and NAFLD. However, female exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (OR =1.82, 95 % CI:1.01-3.26) led to a higher risk of NAFLD than male exposure. In conclusion, this study revealed that EDCs were risk factors for NAFLD. Nonetheless, the sensitivity analysis results of some of the meta-analyses were not stable and demonstrated high heterogeneity. The evidence for these associations is limited, and more large-scale population-based studies are required to confirm these findings.

Plastic compounds and liver diseases: Whether bisphenol A is the only culprit

Plastics, while providing modern conveniences, have become an inescapable source of global concern due to their role in environmental pollution. Particularly, the focus on bisphenol A (BPA) reveals its biohazardous nature and association with liver issues, specifically steatosis. However, research indicates that BPA is just one facet of the problem, as other bisphenol analogues, microplastics, nanoplastics and additional plastic derivatives also pose potential risks. Notably, BPA is implicated in every stage of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) onset and progression, surpassing hepatitis B virus as a primary cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. As plastic contamination tops the environmental contaminants list, urgent action is needed to assess causative factors and mitigate their impact. This review delves into the molecular disruptions linking plastic pollutant exposure to liver diseases, emphasizing the broader connection between plastics and the rising prevalence of NAFLD.

Hypothyroidism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A coincidence or a causal relationship?

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global problem. It may be caused by metabolic and hormonal disorders, including hypothyroidism. However, non-thyroid causes of NAFLD in people with hypothyroidism, including improper eating behavior and low physical activity, should be acknowledged. This study aimed to present the current literature on whether the development of NAFLD is related to hypothyroidism or a typical consequence of an unhealthy lifestyle in people with hypothyroidism. The results of previous studies do not allow for an unequivocal determination of the pathogenetic relationship between hypothyroidism and NAFLD. Important non-thyroid-initiating factors include providing too many calories in relation to requirements, consuming excessive amounts of monosaccharides and saturated fats, being overweight, and maintaining low physical activity levels. The recommended nutritional model for both hypothyroidism and NAFLD may be the Mediterranean diet, which is rich in fruits and vegetables, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamin E.

Endocrine disrupting chemicals: A promoter of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disorder. With the improvement in human living standards, the prevalence of NAFLD has been increasing in recent years. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are a class of exogenous chemicals that simulate the effects of hormones in the body. There has been growing evidence regarding the potential effects of EDCs on liver health, especially in NAFLD. This paper aims to summarize the major EDCs that contribute to the growing burden of NAFLD and to raise public awareness regarding the hazards posed by EDCs with the objective of reducing the incidence of NAFLD.

Associations of phthalates with NAFLD and liver fibrosis: A nationally representative cross-sectional study from NHANES 2017 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

Although phthalates are common environmental pollutants, few studies have focused on the relationship of phthalates exposure with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or liver fibrosis, and especially, the alternative phthalates have been questioned in recent years about whether they are better choices. Thus, this study aimed to explore the associations of exposure to major phthalates or alternative phthalates with NAFLD and liver fibrosis.

METHODS

Data of 1450 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 were collected. The urinary metabolite concentrations of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP) and diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP) were detected. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and median liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were acquired for quantitative diagnosis of NAFLD and liver fibrosis by vibration-controlled transient elastography. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to examine the associations between phthalates and NAFLD and liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

After adjustment of the potential factors, the prevalence of NAFLD was significantly elevated among those in the fourth quartile of mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (OR, 95%CI = 2.719, 1.296, 5.700, P = 0.016), mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (OR, 95%CI = 2.073, 1.111, 3.867, P = 0.037). No significant association was found between the alternative phthalates and NAFLD. The similar result was gained by linear regression analysis that MECPP was still significantly associated with Ln CAP (Q4 vs. Q1: β, 95%CI = 0.067, 0.017, 0.118, P = 0.027). After adjustment for the same covariates, no significant association between phthalates and liver fibrosis was found in logistics regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

All in all, higher prevalence of NAFLD is correlated with DEHP but not DINP or DIDP in American adults. There is no significant relationship between phthalates and liver fibrosis defined as LSM ≥ 8 Kpa. Nevertheless, further research is needed to provide evidence of causality.