A Therapeutic Approach Using the Combined Application of Virtual Reality with Robotics for the Treatment of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Effectiveness of combined robotics and virtual reality on lower limb functional ability in stroke survivors: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Lower limb impairments are common consequences of stroke. Robotics and virtual reality (VR) play crucial roles in improving lower limb function post-stroke. This review aims to assess the effects of combined robot and VR interventions on lower limb functional ability poststroke and to provide recommendations for future studies in the rehabilitation field. PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with a stroke, administering combined robot and VR compared with passive (i.e., rest) or active (any intervention), and including at least one outcome evaluating lower limb function (i.e., balance, gait, mobility, muscle tone, muscle strength, range of motion) or activities of daily living were selected. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 364 stroke survivors (Mean age 55.62 years) were involved in this review. According to the Cochrane Collaboration tool, five studies were classified as "high quality," "moderate quality" (n=3), and "low quality" (n=1). There are mixed findings on the effects of combined robot and VR on lower limb functional ability in stroke survivors. The evidence for the effects of combined robot and VR on lower limb functional ability post-stroke is promising. Further trials with long-term follow-up are strongly warranted to understand the immediate and long-term effect of combined robot and VR intervention on various lower limb impairments and to define the optimal treatment protocols.

Improving Outcomes in People with Spinal Cord Injury: Encouraging Results from a Multidisciplinary Advanced Rehabilitation Pathway

Spinal cord injury (SCI) consists of damage to any segment of the spinal cord extending to potential harm to nerves in the cauda equina. Rehabilitative efforts for SCI can involve conventional physiotherapy, innovative technologies, as well as cognitive treatment and psychological support. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a dedicated, multidisciplinary, and integrated intervention path for SCI, encompassing both conventional and technological interventions, while observing their impact on cognitive, motor, and behavioral outcomes and the overall quality of life for individuals with SCI. Forty-two patients with SCI were included in the analysis utilizing electronic recovery system data. The treatment regimen included multidisciplinary rehabilitation approaches, such as traditional physiotherapy sessions, speech therapy, psychological support, robotic devices, advanced cognitive rehabilitation, and other interventions. Pre-post comparisons showed a significant improvement in lower limb function (Fugl Meyer Assessment-FMA < 0.001), global cognitive functioning (Montreal Cognitive Assessment-MoCA p < 0.001), and perceived quality of life at both a physical and mental level (Short Form-12-SF-12 p < 0.001). Furthermore, we found a significant reduction in depressive state (Beck Depression Inventory-BDI p < 0.001). In addition, we assessed patient satisfaction using the Short Form of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), offering insights into the subjective evaluation of the intervention. In conclusion, this retrospective study provides positive results in terms of improvements in motor function, cognitive functions, and quality of life, highlighting the importance of exploring multidisciplinary approaches.

The Role of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Peripheral Electrotherapy, and Neurophysiology Tests for Managing Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Efforts to find therapeutic methods that support spinal cord functional regeneration continue to be desirable. Natural recovery is limited, so high hopes are being placed on neuromodulation methods which promote neuroplasticity, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and electrical stimulation used as treatment options for managing incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) apart from kinesiotherapy. However, there is still no agreement on the methodology and algorithms for treatment with these methods. The search for effective therapy is also hampered by the use of different, often subjective in nature, evaluation methods and difficulties in assessing the actual results of the therapy versus the phenomenon of spontaneous spinal cord regeneration. In this study, an analysis was performed on the database of five trials, and the cumulative data are presented. Participants (iSCI patients) were divided into five groups on the basis of the treatment they had received: rTMS and kinesiotherapy (N = 36), peripheral electrotherapy and kinesiotherapy (N = 65), kinesiotherapy alone (N = 55), rTMS only (N = 34), and peripheral electrotherapy mainly (N = 53). We present changes in amplitudes and frequencies of the motor units’ action potentials recorded by surface electromyography (sEMG) from the tibialis anterior—the index muscle for the lower extremity and the percentage of improvement in sEMG results before and after the applied therapies. The increase in values in sEMG parameters represents the better ability of motor units to recruit and, thus, improvement of neural efferent transmission. Our results indicate that peripheral electrotherapy provides a higher percentage of neurophysiological improvement than rTMS; however, the use of any of these additional stimulation methods (rTMS or peripheral electrotherapy) provided better results than the use of kinesiotherapy alone. The best improvement of tibialis anterior motor units’ activity in iSCI patients provided the application of electrotherapy conjoined with kinesiotherapy and rTMS conjoined with kinesiotherapy. We also undertook a review of the current literature to identify and summarise available works which address the use of rTMS or peripheral electrotherapy as neuromodulation treatment options in patients after iSCI. Our goal is to encourage other clinicians to implement both types of stimulation into the neurorehabilitation program for subjects after iSCI and evaluate their effectiveness with neurophysiological tests such as sEMG so further results and algorithms can be compared across studies. Facilitating the motor rehabilitation process by combining two rehabilitation procedures together was confirmed.