1
|
Pebole MM, Singleton CR, Hall KS, Petruzzello SJ, Alston R, Gobin RL. Perceived Barriers and Benefits of Exercise Among Women Survivors of Sexual Violence by Physical Activity Level and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Status. Violence Against Women 2024; 30:3726-3750. [PMID: 37350105 DOI: 10.1177/10778012231182412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
An online, cross-sectional survey of women survivors of sexual violence (SV; N = 355) gathered information on perceived barriers and benefits of exercise, along with exercise level and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. This study reports exercise perceptions and provides comparisons by exercise level and PTSD status. Differences by exercise level were found in life enhancement, physical performance, psychological outlook, and social interaction (ps < 0.05; rs = -0.04-0.25). Differences were found by PTSD status in physical performance, social interaction, and preventative health and exercise milieu, time expenditure, and family discouragement (ps < 0.05; rs = -0.39-0.21). Findings provide new information relevant for promoting exercise among women survivors of SV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Pebole
- The Translational Research Center for TBI and Stress Disorders (TRACTS), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Chelsea R Singleton
- Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Tulane School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Katherine S Hall
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steven J Petruzzello
- Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Reginald Alston
- Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Robyn L Gobin
- Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
te Loo LM, Holla JFM, Vrijsen J, Driessen A, van Dijk ML, Linders L, van den Akker-Scheek I, Bouma A, Schans L, Schouten L, Rijnbeek P, Dekker R, de Bruijne M, van der Ploeg HP, van Mechelen W, Jelsma JGM. Implementation barriers and facilitators for referral from the hospital to community-based lifestyle interventions from the perspective of lifestyle professionals: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304053. [PMID: 38935601 PMCID: PMC11210764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A lifestyle front office (LFO) in the hospital is a not yet existing, novel concept that can refer patients under treatment in the hospital to community-based lifestyle interventions (CBLI). The aim of this study was to identify implementation barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of an LFO in the hospital from the perspective of CBLI-professionals and to develop evidence-based implementation strategies to reduce these identified barriers. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews until data saturation, with 23 lifestyle professionals working in the community. A semi-structured topic guide was used, inquiring about (1) community-based lifestyle interventions; (2) their views about referral from the LFO; and (3) their preferences, needs and recommendations for collaboration with the LFO in the hospital. The online interviews lasted on average 46 minutes, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic content analysis was conducted. Found barriers and facilitators regarding the LFO where mapped using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) whereafter evidence based strategies were developed using the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change Strategy Matching Tool V.1.0 (CFIR-ERIC). RESULTS Barriers and facilitators were divided into two main themes: 1) barriers and facilitators related to the referral from LFO to CBLI (i.e. financial, cultural, geographical, quality) and 2) barriers and facilitators related to the collaboration between LFO and CBLI (i.e. referral, communication platform and partnership). Thirty-seven implementation strategies concerning 15 barriers were developed and clustered into six overarching strategies: identify referral options, determine qualifications lifestyle professionals, develop support tools, build networks, facilitate learning collaboratives, and optimize workflow. CONCLUSIONS In this study, barriers and facilitators for the development of the LFO were found and matching implementation strategies were developed. Practical improvements, like identifying specific referral options or develop support tools, can be implemented immediately. The implementation of other strategies, like connecting care pathways in basic services, primary, secondary and tertiary care, will take more time and effort to come to full potential. Future research should evaluate all implemented strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie M. te Loo
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre of Expertise Prevention in Care and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Jasmijn F. M. Holla
- Centre of Expertise Prevention in Care and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Reade, Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Vrijsen
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk Driessen
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlinde L. van Dijk
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lilian Linders
- Centre of Expertise Prevention in Care and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adrie Bouma
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department Policy Development in Healthcare Relations, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leah Schans
- Huis voor de Sport Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Rienk Dekker
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martine de Bruijne
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hidde P. van der Ploeg
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem van Mechelen
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith G. M. Jelsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Irvine KN, Fisher D, Currie M, Colley K, Warber SL. A Nature-Based Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study Using the COM-B Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:843. [PMID: 39063420 PMCID: PMC11276442 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Physical inactivity contributes to over 800,000 deaths annually. Numerous non-pharmacological interventions provide a route to address this behavioural risk factor linked to the growth of non-communicable diseases. Here, we consider a nature-based intervention, specifically group outdoor health walks (GOHW), as a non-pharmacological intervention to increase physical activity and contribute to health and quality of life amongst older adults. We used the theoretically grounded Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) model as a lens to examine interviews with participants in a GOHW with an activity tracker and signposted by health clinics in Scotland, UK. Analysis identified capabilities, opportunities, and motivations, their impact on behaviour, and perceived physical and mental health. The application of the COM-B model to intervention evaluation allowed us to examine two separate behaviours, that of (i) engaging with the intervention itself, and (ii) incorporating the behaviour into one's life that the intervention targets. Analysis identified emerging capabilities, opportunities, and motivations that supported additional health-promoting behaviours, including increased time outdoors in nature and leadership to self-organise continued group walks. We offer insight into the design of nature-based interventions to effectively engage older adults with chronic health conditions and foster personal behaviour change for health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine N. Irvine
- Social, Economic, Geographical Sciences Department, James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK; (D.F.); (M.C.); (K.C.)
| | - Daniel Fisher
- Social, Economic, Geographical Sciences Department, James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK; (D.F.); (M.C.); (K.C.)
- Centre for Public Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 6EW, UK
| | - Margaret Currie
- Social, Economic, Geographical Sciences Department, James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK; (D.F.); (M.C.); (K.C.)
| | - Kathryn Colley
- Social, Economic, Geographical Sciences Department, James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK; (D.F.); (M.C.); (K.C.)
| | - Sara L. Warber
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA;
- NOVA Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jerebine A, Heering T, Barnett LM. Educator-Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Structured-Physical Activity in Early Childhood Centres: A Systematic Review. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT 2024; 95:243-262. [PMID: 37327492 DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2023.2193243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Physical activity (PA) and motor competence development are vital for young children, yet many early childhood education and care (ECEC) centers struggle to successfully implement PA programs, particularly those organized and led by educators. This review aimed to synthesize qualitative literature to (1) identify educator-perceived barriers and facilitators to structured-PA in ECEC centers, and (2) map these to the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of five databases was conducted in April 2021 and updated in August 2022. Records were screened in Covidence software using predefined eligibility criteria. Using the framework synthesis method, data extraction and synthesis were conducted in coding forms in Excel and NVivo. Results: Of 2382 records identified, 35 studies were included, representing 2,365 educators across 268 ECEC centers in 10 countries. Using the COM-B model and TDF, an evidence-informed framework was developed. Findings revealed the greatest barriers concerned educator "opportunity" (e.g. competing time and priorities, policy tensions, indoor/outdoor space constraints) and "capability" (e.g. lack of PA knowledge and practical, hands-on skills) to implement structured-PA. Although fewer studies reported factors that influenced educator "motivation", several themes intersected across the three COM-B components illustrating the complexity of behavioral determinants in this setting. Conclusions: Interventions grounded in theory that utilize a systems approach to target multiple levels of influence on educator behavior, and are flexible and adaptable locally, are recommended. Future work should seek to address societal barriers, structural challenges in the sector, and the PA educational needs of educators. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021247977.
Collapse
|
5
|
Damen MAW, Detaille SI, Engels JA, De Lange AH. Perceived Factors Influencing Blue-Collar Workers' Participation in Worksite Health Promotion Programs in Freight Transport: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:116. [PMID: 38276810 PMCID: PMC10815228 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Blue-collar workers in the freight transport industry report a high risk of developing chronic diseases, partly due to an unhealthy lifestyle. Worksite health promotion programs (WHPPs) may be able to promote a healthier lifestyle, but participation among blue-collar workers in these programs is generally lower than among other workers. The current study aimed to further examine factors that can explain participation of blue-collar workers in these programs. A pragmatic, qualitative study was conducted, and semi-structured interviews were held with 32 blue-collar workers in freight transport in the Netherlands (94% men, 81% driver, mean age 48 (SD = 11)). The interview guide was based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model, and was used to assess perceived determinants that influence participation. A combination of framework analysis and thematic analysis was conducted, which yielded the following nine main themes: (i) not being aware of WHPPs on offer, (ii) no clear picture of what to expect, (iii) (not) giving priority to health, (iv) expecting feedback and practical support, (v) being open and ready to change, (vi) preferring to be self-dependent, (vii) being offered a practical, fun and joint WHPP, (viii) having an employer who cares, thinks along and facilitates participation, and (ix) working and living in an environment in which a healthy lifestyle is not the norm. With these insights we were able to formulate recommendations to enhance the participation of blue-collar workers in WHPPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. W. Damen
- Faculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, P.O. Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands
- School of Organization and Development, Han University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah I. Detaille
- School of Organization and Development, Han University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine A. Engels
- School of Organization and Development, Han University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annet H. De Lange
- Faculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, P.O. Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Hotel School of Management, University of Stavanger, P.O. Box 8600, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Campus de A Coruña, Universidade da Coruña, 15701 A Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|