Health System Performance and Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Adapted Conceptual Framework

Strengthening Primary Health Care for Epidemic and Pandemic Response: A Scoping Review

AIMS

Epidemics strain healthcare systems and reduce care quality, making primary healthcare a crucial frontline component in combating pandemics. The aim of this paper was to explore the experiences of countries in strengthening primary health care to address epidemics and pandemics of infectious diseases.

DESIGN

It was a scoping review conducted in 2024. The research was qualitative in nature.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched including PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest. Upon screening the references, the Boyatzis approach to thematic analysis was utilised to analyse and categorise the acquired data based on the fundamental building blocks of healthcare systems as presented by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies were included in the study, reporting widespread strategies and interventions implemented in primary healthcare systems around the globe. The majority of these strategies and interventions were within the context of service delivery, leadership/governance, and health workforce.

CONCLUSION

The strategies and interventions implemented by primary healthcare systems worldwide during the pandemic crisis are extensive and varied. Further research is required to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential impacts of such interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

There are numerous strategies and interventions reported in the literature for epidemic and pandemic response, which healthcare policymakers and managers can utilise to improve patient care during times of crisis.

IMPACT

The study examined challenges in primary healthcare during crises, such as pandemics. It identified various strategies and interventions aimed at addressing these challenges, primarily in service delivery, leadership/governance, and health workforce management. Healthcare policymakers and managers can leverage these findings to enhance patient care during crises.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA 2020 guideline for review studies.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution.

Longitudinal trajectories of psychosocial functioning in patients with pre-existing mental disorders after one year of COVID-19 pandemic

Aims of the present study were to prospectively assess psychosocial functioning trajectories during the COVID pandemic and the possible impact of sociodemographic variables, as well as of COVID-19 pandemic-related factors, on these trajectories, in a sample of patients with pre-existing severe mental disorders. Moreover, we aimed at identifying predictors of impairment in psychosocial functioning over a period of 9 months of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were recruited during the 3rd wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (T0, March-April 2021) while strict containment measures were applied in Italy, and reassessed after 3 months (T1, June-July 2021), and after 6 months from T1 (T2- November-December 2021), during the 4th wave of COVID pandemic. A sample of 300 subject (out of the 527 subjects recruited at baseline) completed the T2 evaluation. Patients were assessed by: Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) for psychosocial functioning, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) for anxiety symptoms, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depressive symptoms and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised, for post-traumatic symptoms. Cluster analyses identified 4 trajectories of functioning: the High, Stable Functioning group (N = 77), the Improvement Functioning group (N = 62), the Progressive Impairment group (N = 83) and the Persistent Severe Impairment group (N = 78) respectively. We found that predictors of higher WSAS score at T2 were higher WSAS score at T0 (B = 0.43, p < .001), PHQ scores at baseline >10 (B = 2.89, p < .05), while not living alone was found to be a protective factor (B = -2.5, p < .05). Results of the present study provides insights into the vulnerability of individuals with psychiatric disorders during times of crisis. Study findings can contribute to a better understanding of the specific needs of this population and inform interventions and support strategies.

The Israeli health system's rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic posed numerous challenges to health systems around the world. In addressing many of those challenges, Israel responded quite rapidly. While quick action is not an end in it itself, it can be important in responding to disease outbreaks. Some of Israel's rapid responses to the pandemic contributed significantly to population health and provided important learning opportunities for other countries.

MAIN BODY

Some of the most prominent Israeli rapid responses were related to vaccination. Israel led the world in the pace of its initial vaccine rollout, and it was also the first country to approve and administer booster vaccines to broad segments of the population. In addition, Israeli scholars published a series of timely reports analyzing vaccination impact, which informed policy in Israel and other countries. Israel was a rapid responder in additional areas of public health. These include the partial closure of its borders, the adoption of physical distancing measures, the use of digital surveillance technology for contact tracing, the use of wastewater surveillance to monitor viral spread, and the use of vaccine certificates ("green passes") to facilitate a return to routine in the face of the ongoing pandemic. Many factors contributed to Israel's capacity to repeatedly respond rapidly to a broad array of COVID-19 challenges. These include a national health insurance system that promotes public-private coordination, a system of universal electronic health records, a high level of emergency preparedness, a culture of focusing on goal attainment, a culture of innovation, and the presence of a strong scientific community which is highly connected internationally. In addition, some of the rapid responses (e.g., the rapid initial vaccination rollout) facilitated rapid responses in related areas (e.g., the analysis of vaccination impact, the administration of boosters, and the adoption of green passes). While rapid response can contribute to population health and economic resilience, it can also entail costs, risks, and limitations. These include making decisions and acting before all the relevant information is available; deciding without sufficient consideration of the full range of possible effects, costs, and benefits; not providing enough opportunities for the involvement of relevant groups in the decision-making process; and depleting non-renewable resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we encourage leaders in the Israeli government to ensure that its emergency response system will continue to have the capacity to respond rapidly to large-scale challenges, whether of a military or civilian nature. At the same time, the emergency response systems should develop mechanisms to include more stakeholders in the fast-paced decision-making process and should improve communication with the public. In addition, they should put into place mechanisms for timely reconsideration, adjustment, and-when warranted-reversal of decisions which, while reasonable when reached, turn out to have been ill-advised in the light of subsequent developments and evidence. These mechanisms could potentially involve any or all branches of government, as well as the public, the press, and professional organizations. Our findings also have implications for health system leaders in other countries. The Israeli experience can help them identify key capacities to develop during non-emergency periods, thus positioning themselves to respond more rapidly in an emergency. Finally, health system leaders in other countries could monitor Israel's rapid responses to future global health emergencies and adopt selected actions in their own countries.