The Role of β-Arrestins in Regulating Stem Cell Phenotypes in Normal and Tumorigenic Cells

Targeted therapies in bladder cancer: signaling pathways, applications, and challenges

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in men. Understanding molecular characteristics via studying signaling pathways has made tremendous breakthroughs in BC therapies. Thus, targeted therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) have markedly improved advanced BC outcomes over the last few years. However, the considerable patients still progress after a period of treatment with current therapeutic regimens. Therefore, it is crucial to guide future drug development to improve BC survival, based on the molecular characteristics of BC and clinical outcomes of existing drugs. In this perspective, we summarize the applications and benefits of these targeted drugs and highlight our understanding of mechanisms of low response rates and immune escape of ICIs, ADCs toxicity, and TKI resistance. We also discuss potential solutions to these problems. In addition, we underscore the future drug development of targeting metabolic reprogramming and cancer stem cells (CSCs) with a deep understanding of their signaling pathways features. We expect that finding biomarkers, developing novo drugs and designing clinical trials with precisely selected patients and rationalized drugs will dramatically improve the quality of life and survival of patients with advanced BC.

β-Arrestin2 promotes docetaxel resistance of castration-resistant prostate cancer via promoting hnRNP A1-mediated PKM2 alternative splicing

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of β-arrestin2 on the docetaxel resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

PC3 and DU145 cells with stable β-arrestin2 overexpression and C4-2 cells with stable β-arrestin2 knockdown, were constructed via using lentivirus and puromycin selection. MTT and colony formation assays were carried out to investigate the effect of β-arrestin2 expression on the docetaxel resistance of CRPC cells. Glycolysis analysis was used to assess the glycolytic capacity modulated by β-arrestin2. GO enrichment analysis, gene set enrichment analysis and Spearman correlation test were carried out to explore the potential biological function and mechanism via using public data from GEO and TCGA. The expressions of PKM2, Phospho-PKM2, Phospho-ERK1/2 and hnRNP A1 were detected by western blot. Functional blocking experiments were carried out to confirm the roles of PKM2 and hnRNP A1 in the regulation of β-arrestin2's biological functions via silencing PKM2 or hnRNP A1 expression in cells with stable β-arrestin2 overexpression. Finally, nude mice xenograft models were established to confirm the experimental results of cell experiments.

RESULTS

β-Arrestin2 significantly decreased the sensitivity of CRPC cells to docetaxel stimulation, through enhancing the phosphorylation and expression of PKM2. Additionally, β-arrestin2 increased PKM2 phosphorylation via the ERK1/2 signaling pathway and induced PKM2 expression in a post-transcriptional manner through an hnRNP A1-dependent PKM alternative splicing mechanism, rather than by inhibiting its ubiquitination degradation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the β-arrestin2/hnRNP A1/PKM2 pathway could be a promising target for treating docetaxel-resistant CRPC.

Endothelial deletion of PTBP1 disrupts ventricular chamber development

The growth and maturation of the ventricular chamber require spatiotemporally precise synergy between diverse cell types. Alternative splicing deeply affects the processes. However, the functional properties of alternative splicing in cardiac development are largely unknown. Our study reveals that an alternative splicing factor polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) plays a key role in ventricular chamber morphogenesis. During heart development, PTBP1 colocalizes with endothelial cells but is almost undetectable in cardiomyocytes. The endothelial-specific knockout of Ptbp1, in either endocardial cells or pan-endothelial cells, leads to a typical phenotype of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). Mechanistically, the deletion of Ptbp1 reduces the migration of endothelial cells, disrupting cardiomyocyte proliferation and ultimately leading to the LVNC. Further study shows that Ptbp1 deficiency changes the alternative splicing of β-arrestin-1 (Arrb1), which affects endothelial cell migration. In conclusion, as an alternative splicing factor, PTBP1 is essential during ventricular chamber development, and its deficiency can lead to congenital heart disease.

Deciphering the signaling mechanisms of β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2 in regulation of cancer cell cycle and metastasis

β-Arrestins are ubiquitously expressed intracellular proteins with many functions which interact directly and indirectly with a wide number of cellular partners and mediate downstream signaling. Originally, β-arrestins were identified for their contribution to GPCR desensitization to agonist-mediated activation, followed by receptor endocytosis and ubiquitylation. However, current investigations have now recognized that in addition to GPCR arresting (hence the name arrestin). β-Arrestins are adaptor proteins that control the recruitment, activation, and scaffolding of numerous cytoplasmic signaling complexes and assist in G-protein receptor signaling, thus bringing them into close proximity. They have participated in various cellular processes such as cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and transcription via canonical and noncanonical pathways. Despite their significant recognition in several physiological processes, these activities are also involved in the onset and progression of various cancers. This review delivers a concise overview of the role of β-arrestins with a primary emphasis on the signaling processes which underlie the mechanism of β-arrestins in the onset of cancer. Understanding these processes has important implications for understanding the therapeutic intervention and treatment of cancer in the future.

Reduced RBPMS Levels Promote Cell Proliferation and Decrease Cisplatin Sensitivity in Ovarian Cancer Cells

Worldwide, the number of cancer-related deaths continues to increase due to the ability of cancer cells to become chemotherapy-resistant and metastasize. For women with ovarian cancer, a staggering 70% will become resistant to the front-line therapy, cisplatin. Although many mechanisms of cisplatin resistance have been proposed, the key mechanisms of such resistance remain elusive. The RNA binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS) binds to nascent RNA transcripts and regulates splicing, transport, localization, and stability. Evidence indicates that RBPMS also binds to protein members of the AP-1 transcription factor complex repressing its activity. Until now, little has been known about the biological function of RBPMS in ovarian cancer. Accordingly, we interrogated available Internet databases and found that ovarian cancer patients with high RBPMS levels live longer compared to patients with low RBPMS levels. Similarly, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in a tissue array of ovarian cancer patient samples showed that serous ovarian cancer tissues showed weaker RBPMS staining when compared with normal ovarian tissues. We generated clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-mediated RBPMS knockout vectors that were stably transfected in the high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell line, OVCAR3. The knockout of RBPMS in these cells was confirmed via bioinformatics analysis, real-time PCR, and Western blot analysis. We found that the RBPMS knockout clones grew faster and had increased invasiveness than the control CRISPR clones. RBPMS knockout also reduced the sensitivity of the OVCAR3 cells to cisplatin treatment. Moreover, β-galactosidase (β-Gal) measurements showed that RBPMS knockdown induced senescence in ovarian cancer cells. We performed RNAseq in the RBPMS knockout clones and identified several downstream-RBPMS transcripts, including non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and protein-coding genes associated with alteration of the tumor microenvironment as well as those with oncogenic or tumor suppressor capabilities. Moreover, proteomic studies confirmed that RBPMS regulates the expression of proteins involved in cell detoxification, RNA processing, and cytoskeleton network and cell integrity. Interrogation of the Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter database identified multiple downstream-RBPMS effectors that could be used as prognostic and response-to-therapy biomarkers in ovarian cancer. These studies suggest that RBPMS acts as a tumor suppressor gene and that lower levels of RBPMS promote the cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer cells.

N6-Methyladenosine RNA Methylation Regulator-Related Alternative Splicing (AS) Gene Signature Predicts Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Prognosis

Aberrant N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation regulatory genes and related gene alternative splicing (AS) could be used to predict the prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma. This study focused on 13 m6A regulatory genes (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, KIAA1429, RBM15, ZC3H13, YTHDC1, YTHDC2, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, HNRNPC, FTO, and ALKBH5) and expression profiles in TCGA-LUAD (n = 504) and TCGA-LUSC (n = 479) datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The data were downloaded and bioinformatically and statistically analyzed, including the gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. There were 43,948 mRNA splicing events in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 46,020 in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and the data suggested that m6A regulators could regulate mRNA splicing. Differential HNRNPC and RBM15 expression was associated with overall survival (OS) of LUAD and HNRNPC and METTL3 expression with the OS of LUSC patients. Furthermore, the non-small cell lung cancer prognosis-related AS events signature was constructed and divided patients into high- vs. low-risk groups using seven and 14 AS genes in LUAD and LUSC, respectively. The LUAD risk signature was associated with gender and T, N, and TNM stages, but the LUSC risk signature was not associated with any clinical features. In addition, the risk signature and TNM stage were independent prognostic predictors in LUAD and the risk signature and T stage were independent prognostic predictors in LUSC after the multivariate Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses. In conclusion, this study revealed the AS prognostic signature in the prediction of LUAD and LUSC prognosis.