B Cell Kinetics upon Therapy Commencement for Active Extrarenal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Relation to Development of Renal Flares: Results from Three Phase III Clinical Trials of Belimumab

Navigating the landscape of SLE treatment: An expert viewpoint on the rationality and limitations of early biologic intervention

The approval of biologics, namely belimumab and anifrolumab, is being a game-changer in the approach to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Currently we are indeed facing a revolution in the treatment paradigm of SLE, encompassing early combination of biologics with standard treatment in severe manifestations. In this regard, a lively discussion is taking place regarding the better positioning of biologics in the treatment of not necessarily severe, yet refractory and/or disfiguring manifestations which expose patients to worsened quality of life, reduced workability and enhanced risk of organ damage especially related to the misuse of glucocorticoids in the long run. Growing evidence supports the early use of targeted treatments in those patients, including the use of biologics before traditional immunosuppression, to achieve control of disease activity while minimizing treatment-related damage, privileging the timely use of therapeutics selectively impacting on key disease mechanisms in spite of a widespread immunosuppression. Patient profiling on a clinical and endotypical basis is helping in identifying better candidates to targeted drugs. More inflammatory organ involvement including persistent arthritis and infiltrating skin lesions seem likely to respond to anifrolumab, while B-mediated manifestations, a lively serology and a relapsing-remitting SLE course hint at a suitable role for belimumab. This seems at least partially connected to the inner effect of either drug, dampening inflammation through down-regulation of interferon signalling in the case of anifrolumab, while plastically modulating the B cell pool composition and function when coming to belimumab. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of both drugs are immunologically entangled at some extent, thereby requiring careful management especially in patients with longer disease history burdened with mixed manifestations. In this viewpoint we go over pros and cons of anticipatory biologic use in SLE, exploring features linked with better efficacy of either drug and the pathogenic and practical rationale for their positioning before traditional immunosuppression in moderate refractory SLE to be optimally managed in the 21st Century.

Immune Mechanisms and Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The immense heterogeneity of the chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), both with regard to immunological aberrancies and clinical manifestations, poses diagnostic difficulties and challenges in the management of patients [...].

Belimumab and antimalarials combined against renal flares in patients treated for extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus: results from 4 phase III clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of antimalarial agents (AMA) and different doses and pharmaceutical forms of belimumab on preventing renal flares in patients with SLE treated for extra-renal disease.

METHODS

We pooled data from the BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC and BLISS-Northeast Asia trials of belimumab (n = 3225), that included patients with active SLE yet no severe ongoing nephritis. Participants were allocated to receive intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg, intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg, subcutaneous belimumab 200 mg, or placebo in addition to standard therapy. We estimated hazards of renal flare development throughout the study follow-up (52-76 weeks) using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 192 patients developed a renal flare after a median of 197 days. Compared with placebo, the risk of renal flares was lower among patients receiving intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.92; P = 0.018) and intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.79; P = 0.007), while no significant association was found for subcutaneous belimumab 200 mg. AMA use yielded a lower hazard of renal flares (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.78; P < 0.001). The protection conferred was enhanced when belimumab and AMA were co-administered; the lowest flare rate was observed for the combination intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg and AMA (18.5 cases per 1000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

The protection conferred from belimumab against renal flare development in patients treated for extra-renal SLE appears enhanced when belimumab was administered along with AMA. The prominent effect of low-dose belimumab warrants investigation of the efficacy of intermediate belimumab doses.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION

BLISS-52: NCT00424476; BLISS-76: NCT00410384; BLISS-SC: NCT01484496; BLISS-NEA: NCT01345253.

Translational implications of newly characterized pathogenic pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus

Improved characterization of relevant pathogenic pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been further delineated over the last decades. This led to the development of targeted treatments including belimumab and anifrolumab, which recently became available in clinics. Therapeutic targets in SLE encompass interferon (IFN) signaling, B-T costimulation including immune checkpoints, and increasing modalities of B lineage targeting, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against CD19 or sequential anti-B cell targeting. Patient profiling based on characterization of underlying molecular abnormalities, often performed through comprehensive omics analyses, has recently been shown to better predict patients' treatment responses and also holds promise to unravel key molecular mechanisms driving SLE. SLE carries two key signatures, namely the IFN and B lineage/plasma cell signatures. Recent advances in SLE treatments clearly indicate that targeting innate and adaptive immunity is successful in such a complex autoimmune disease. Although those signatures may interact at the molecular level and provide the basis for the first selective treatments in SLE, it remains to be clarified whether these distinct treatments show different treatment responses among certain patient subsets. In fact, notwithstanding the remarkable amount of novel clues for innovative SLE treatment, harmonization of big data within tailored treatment strategies will be instrumental to better understand and treat this challenging autoimmune disorder. This review will provide an overview of recent improvements in SLE pathogenesis, related insights by analyses of big data and machine learning as well as technical improvements in conducting clinical trials with the ultimate goal that translational research results in improved patient outcomes.

Serum profiling identifies CCL8, CXCL13, and IL-1RA as markers of active disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically heterogeneous disease that presents a challenge for clinicians. To identify potential biomarkers for diagnosis and disease activity in SLE, we investigated a selected yet broad panel of cytokines and autoantibodies in patients with SLE, healthy controls (HC), and patients with other autoimmune diseases (AIDs).

Methods

Serum samples from 422 SLE patients, 546 HC, and 1223 other AIDs were analysed within the frame of the European PRECISESADS project (NTC02890121). Cytokine levels were determined using Luminex panels, and autoantibodies using different immunoassays.

Results

Of the 83 cytokines analysed, 29 differed significantly between patients with SLE and HC. Specifically, CCL8, CXCL13, and IL-1RA levels were elevated in patients with active, but not inactive, SLE versus HC, as well as in patients with SLE versus other AIDs. The levels of these cytokines also correlated with SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores, among five other cytokines. Overall, the occurrence of autoantibodies was similar across SLEDAI-2K organ domains, and the correlations between autoantibodies and activity in different organ domains were weak.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that, upon validation, CCL8, CXCL13, and IL-1RA could serve as promising serum biomarkers of activity in SLE.

Decipher the Immunopathological Mechanisms and Set Up Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Traditionally, LN is regarded as an immune complex (IC) deposition disease led by dsDNA-anti-dsDNA-complement interactions in the subendothelial and/or subepithelial basement membrane of glomeruli to cause inflammation. The activated complements in the IC act as chemoattractants to chemically attract both innate and adaptive immune cells to the kidney tissues, causing inflammatory reactions. However, recent investigations have unveiled that not only the infiltrating immune-related cells, but resident kidney cells, including glomerular mesangial cells, podocytes, macrophage-like cells, tubular epithelial cells and endothelial cells, may also actively participate in the inflammatory and immunological reactions in the kidney. Furthermore, the adaptive immune cells that are infiltrated are genetically restricted to autoimmune predilection. The autoantibodies commonly found in SLE, including anti-dsDNA, are cross-reacting with not only a broad spectrum of chromatin substances, but also extracellular matrix components, including α-actinin, annexin II, laminin, collagen III and IV, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Besides, the glycosylation on the Fab portion of IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies can also affect the pathogenic properties of the autoantibodies in that α-2,6-sialylation alleviates, whereas fucosylation aggravates their nephritogenic activity. Some of the coexisting autoantibodies, including anti-cardiolipin, anti-C1q, anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies, may also enhance the pathogenic role of anti-dsDNA antibodies. In clinical practice, the identification of useful biomarkers for diagnosing, monitoring, and following up on LN is quite important for its treatments. The development of a more specific therapeutic strategy to target the pathogenic factors of LN is also critical. We will discuss these issues in detail in the present article.

Distinct gene dysregulation patterns herald precision medicine potentiality in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

We aimed at investigating the whole-blood transcriptome, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and levels of selected serological markers in patients with SLE versus healthy controls (HC) to gain insight into pathogenesis and identify drug targets.

METHODS

We analyzed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and dysregulated gene modules in a cohort of 350 SLE patients and 497 HC from the European PRECISESADS project (NTC02890121), split into a discovery (60%) and a replication (40%) set. Replicated DEGs qualified for eQTL, pathway enrichment, regulatory network, and druggability analysis. For validation purposes, a separate gene module analysis was performed in an independent cohort (GSE88887).

RESULTS

Analysis of 521 replicated DEGs identified multiple enriched interferon signaling pathways through Reactome. Gene module analysis yielded 18 replicated gene modules in SLE patients, including 11 gene modules that were validated in GSE88887. Three distinct gene module clusters were defined i.e., "interferon/plasma cells", "inflammation", and "lymphocyte signaling". Predominant downregulation of the lymphocyte signaling cluster denoted renal activity. By contrast, upregulation of interferon-related genes indicated hematological activity and vasculitis. Druggability analysis revealed several potential drugs interfering with dysregulated genes within the "interferon" and "PLK1 signaling events" modules. STAT1 was identified as the chief regulator in the most enriched signaling molecule network. Drugs annotated to 15 DEGs associated with cis-eQTLs included bortezomib for its ability to modulate CTSL activity. Belimumab was annotated to TNFSF13B (BAFF) and daratumumab was annotated to CD38 among the remaining replicated DEGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Modulation of interferon, STAT1, PLK1, B and plasma cell signatures showed promise as viable approaches to treat SLE, pointing to their importance in SLE pathogenesis.

The Role of New 3D Pathology and Lymphocyte Expression of Interstitial Inflammation in Pediatric-Onset Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and severe manifestation of pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE). It is one of the major causes of long-term glucocorticoid/immune suppressants use in pSLE. It causes long-term glucocorticoid/immune suppressants use and even end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in pSLE. It is now well known that high chronicity, especially the tubulointerstitial components in the renal biopsy, predicts a poor renal outcome. Interstitial inflammation (II), a component of activity in LN pathology, can be an early predictor for the renal outcome. With the advent of 3D pathology and CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy in the 2020s, the present study focuses on detailed pathology and B cell expression in II. We recruited 48 pSLE patients with class III/IV LN to analyze the risk of ESRD based on different II scores. We also studied 3D renal pathology and immunofluorescence (IF) staining of CD3, 19, 20, and 138 in patients with a high II score but low chronicity. Those pSLE LN patients with II scores of 2 or 3 showed a higher risk for ESRD (p = 0.003) than those with II scores of 0 or 1. Excluding patients with chronicity >3, high II scores still carried a higher risk for ESRD (p = 0.005). Checking the average scores from the renal specimens from different depths, the II, and chronicity showed good consistency between 3D and 2D pathology (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC], II = 0.91, p = 0.0015; chronicity = 0.86, p = 0.024). However, the sum of tubular atrophy plus interstitial fibrosis showed no good consistency (ICC = 0.79, p = 0.071). The selected LN patients with negative CD19/20 IF stains showed scattered CD3 infiltration and a different IF pattern of Syndecan-1 expression. Our study provides unique data in LN, including 3D pathology and different in situ Syndecan-1 patterns in LN patients.