The Complex Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Spectrum of Neuroendocrine Tumors-An Overview of the Latest Classifications

Safety and Efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in Children and Young Adult Population : A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

This single-center retrospective study explores the safety and efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in children and young adult population with metastatic/inoperable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of all children and young adult patients (≤29 years) with advanced inoperable/metastatic epithelial or nonepithelial NETs who were administered a median of 4 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE therapy and low-dose oral capecitabine as a radiosensitizer every 8-12 weeks, except 2 patients who received CAPTEM chemotherapy. The radiological response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 on interim and end-of-treatment 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, whereas disease control rate, toxicity profile, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Nineteen biopsy-proven NET patients (median age, 22 ± 10 years) with 8 of them adolescents (10-18 years) and the remaining young adults (19-29 years) were included. Fourteen patients had gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pancreas being most common primary site), whereas the rest had non-gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. A total of 65 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE (range, 1-6 cycles) were administered with a median cumulative activity of 600 mCi (range, 100-1000 mCi). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 41% and 94%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 adverse events were observed in 14 (74%) and 5 (26%) of 19 patients, respectively. In a total of 8 events (42%), 4 events each of disease progression and death occurred during a median follow-up of 80.1 months with an estimated 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival of 54% (95% confidence interval, 30-78) and 63% (95% confidence interval, 39-87), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

177 Lu-DOTATATE appears safe and effective in children and young adults with metastatic/inoperable NETs. Large prospective trials are required to validate these results.

[Current WHO classification (2022) of neuroendocrine neoplasms]

CLINICAL ISSUE

After the first description of the "carcinoid tumors" by the pathologist Siegfried Oberndorfer in Munich, the classification system of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is still a challenge and an evolving concept.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

The new WHO classification system proposed a framework for universal classification.

ACHIEVEMENTS

The new WHO classification system recognizes two distinct families distinguished by genetic, morphology and clinical behaviour: Well differentiated NENs are defined as neuroendocrine tumor (NET G1, G2, G3), while poorly differentiated ones are defined as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC, G3) and further subdivided into small and large cell carcinoma. All NENs are characterized by the expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A, Ki-67 and morphology.

MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY

The morphological NEN dichotomy is supported by genetic alterations. NECs show TP53 and RB1 alterations that are absent in NETs and are therefore useful for differentiating between NETs and NECs.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

All NENs are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET G1, G2, G3) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC, G3). They are categorized by morphology, mitotic count and immunohistochemistry with synaptophysin, chromogranin and Ki-67.

A Rare Case of Concurrent Chromophobe Renal Cell Cancer with Lung Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

Multiple primary malignancies (MPM) may be in one organ or in multiple separate organs. They are categorized into synchronous and metachronous according to the time interval between the two malignancies. Multiple risk factors could be attributed to the development of second primary malignancy.

Case presentation

The authors report a case of a 51-year-old male patient with renal cell carcinoma. During his evaluation, he seemed to have a lung mass which revealed to be a carcinoid tumour. As the patient had two primary malignancies, he was managed according to the treatment options for each tumour.

Discussion

Although MPMs have been reported increasingly in the past decade, overall incidence is still very rare. Appropriate management and survival depend on distinguishing between dual primary tumours from metastatic disease.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary approach is very crucial for diagnosis and management such rare cases.

Predicting the survival probability of functional neuroendocrine tumors treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Serbian experience

Introduction

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor positive, unresectable or/and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although high disease control rates seen with PRRT a significant number NET patients have a short progression-free interval, and currently, there is a deficiency of effective biomarkers to pre-identify these patients. This study is aimed at determining the prognostic significance of biomarkers on survival of patients with NETs in initial PRRT treatment.

Methodology

We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with NETs treated with PRRT at the Department for nuclear medicine, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Serbia, with a five-year follow-up. Eligible patients with confirmed inoperable NETs, were retrospectively evaluated hematological, blood-based inflammatory markers, biochemical markers and clinical characteristics on disease progression. In accordance with the progression og the disease, the patients were divided into two groups: progression group (n=18) and a non-progression group (n=33). Clinical data were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 51 patients (Md=60, age 25-75 years) were treated with PRRT, of whom 29 (56.86%) demonstrated stable disease, 4 (7.84%) demonstrated a partial response, and 14 (27.46%) demonstrated progressive disease and death was recorded in 4 (7.84%) patients. The mean PFS was a 36.22 months (95% CI 30.14-42.29) and the mean OS was 44.68 months (95% CI 37.40-51.97). Univariate logistic regression analysis displayed that age (p<0.05), functional tumors (p<0.05), absolute neutrophil count (p<0.05), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio-NLR (p<0.05), C-reactive protein-CRP (p<0.05), CRP/Albumin (p<0.05), alanine aminotransferase-ALT (p<0.05), were risk factors for disease progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited that functional tumors (p<0.001), age (p<0.05), CRP (p<0.05), and ALT (p<0.05), were independent risk factors for the disease progression in patients with NETs. Tumor functionality was the most powerful prognostic factor. The median PFS (11.86 ± 1.41 vs. 43.38 ± 3.16 months; p=0.001) and OS (21.81 ± 2.70 vs 53.86 ± 3.70, p=0.001) were significantly shorter in patients with functional than non-functional NETs respectively.

Conclusion

The study's results suggest that tumor functionality, and certain biomarkers may serve as prognostic survival indicators for patients with NETs undergoing PRRT. The findings can potentially help to identify patients who are at higher risk of disease progression and tailor treatment strategies accordingly.

Primary Pituitary Carcinoids Do Not Exist: A Reappraisal in the Era of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours

The World Health Organization classification of pituitary tumours, published in 2022, supported a change in the terminology from "pituitary adenoma" to "pituitary neuroendocrine tumour" (PitNET). The neuroendocrine cells represent an integral part of the diffuse neuroendocrine system, including, among others, thyroid C cells, the parathyroid chief cells, and the anterior pituitary. Normal and neoplastic adenohypophyseal neuroendocrine cells have light microscopic, ultrastructural features and an immunoprofile compatible with the neuroendocrine cells and neuroendocrine tumours from other organs. Moreover, neuroendocrine cells of pituitary origin express transcription factors which indicate their cell-lineage origin. Thus, pituitary tumours are now considered as a continuum with other neuroendocrine tumours. PitNETs may occasionally be aggressive. In this context, the term "pituitary carcinoid" has no specific meaning: it either represents a PitNET, or a metastasis to the pituitary gland of a neuroendocrine tumour (NET). An accurate pathological evaluation, combined where necessary with functional radionuclide imaging, can define the origin of the tumour. We recommend that clinicians liaise with patient groups to understand the terminology to define primary tumours of adenohypophyseal cells. It is incumbent upon the responsible clinician to explain the use of the word "tumour" in a given clinical context.

[Unification of pathomorphological examination of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pituitary gland. Controversial issues of the new classification]

The progressive improvement of the classification using modern analytical methods is an essential tool for the development of precise and personalized approaches to the treatment of pituitary adenomas. In recent years, endocrinologists have witnessed evolutionary changes that have occurred in the histopathological identification of pituitary neoplasms, revealing new possibilities for studying tumorigenesis and predicting biological behavior.The paper considers the historical aspects of the gradual improvement of the classification of pituitary adenomas, as well as the new international 2022 WHO classification, according to which pituitary adenomas are included in the list of neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) to reflect the biological aggressiveness of some non-metastatic pituitary adenomas. The characteristics of pituitary adenoma are presented, as well as a list of histological subtypes of aggressive neuroendocrine tumors of the pituitary gland, marked by the main potentials for invasive growth, an increased risk of recurrence and a negative clinical prognosis.The expediency of changing the definition of «pituitary adenoma» to «neuroendocrine tumor» is discussed. It is emphasized that the introduction of a unified clinical, laboratory and morphological protocol into national clinical practice will help provide comparable comparative studies on the prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of secondary therapy and also contribute to adequate management of potentially aggressive PitNETs.

Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: New Approaches in Classification, Diagnosis and Therapy

Adenohypophysal pituitary tumors account for 10-15% of all intracranial tumors, and 25-55% display signs of invasiveness. Nevertheless, oncology still relies on histopathological examination to establish the diagnosis. Considering that the classification of pituitary tumors has changed significantly in recent years, we discuss the definition of aggressive and invasive tumors and the latest molecular criteria used for classifying these entities. The pituitary tumor microenvironment (TME) is essential for neoplastic development and progression. This review aims to reveal the impact of TME characteristics on stratifying these tumors in view of finding appropriate therapeutic approaches. The role of the pituitary tumor microenvironment and its main components, non-tumoral cells and soluble factors, has been addressed. The variable display of different immune cell types, tumor-associated fibroblasts, and folliculostellate cells is discussed in relation to tumor development and aggressiveness. The molecules secreted by both tumoral and non-tumoral cells, such as VEGF, FGF, EGF, IL6, TNFα, and immune checkpoint molecules, contribute to the crosstalk between the tumor and its microenvironment. They could be considered potential biomarkers for diagnosis and the invasiveness of these tumors, together with emerging non-coding RNA molecules. Therefore, assessing this complex network associated with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors could bring a new era in diagnosing and treating this pathology.

Lesion-based indicators predict long-term outcomes of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma- SIZEPASS

Aim

We seek a simple and reliable tool to predict malignant behavior of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).

Methods

This single-center prospective cohort study assessed size of primary PPGLs on preoperative cross-sectional imaging and prospectively scored specimens using the Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal Gland Scaled Score (PASS). Multiplication of PASS points with maximum lesion diameter (in mm) yielded the SIZEPASS criterion. Local recurrence, metastasis or death from disease were surrogates defining malignancy.

Results

76 consecutive PPGL patients, whereof 58 with pheochromocytoma and 51 female, were diagnosed at a mean age of 52.0 ± 15.2 years. 11 lesions (14.5%) exhibited malignant features at a median follow-up (FU) of 49 months (range 4-172 mo). Median FU of the remaining cohort was 139 months (range 120-226 mo). SIZEPASS classified malignancy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95%CI 0.93-1.01; p<0.0001). Across PPGL, SIZEPASS >1000 outperformed all known predictors of malignancy, with sensitivity 91%, specificity 94%, and accuracy 93%, and an odds ratio of 72 fold (95%CI 9-571; P<0.001). It retained an accuracy >90% in cohorts defined by location (adrenal, extra-adrenal) or mutation status.

Conclusions

The SIZEPASS>1000 criterion is a lesion-based, clinically available, simple and effective tool to predict malignant behavior of PPGLs independently of age, sex, location or mutation status.

Middle Ear Neuroendocrine Tumor Mimicking As Chronic Otitis Media

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the head and neck are a rare and diverse group of tumors. Here, we report a case of a 40-year-old man presenting with symptoms resembling chronic left otitis media, including left ear otorrhea, otalgia, and reduced hearing. Otoscopic examination revealed a whitish mass located behind the tympanic membrane. The patient underwent examination under anesthesia and left cortical mastoidectomy, and a histopathological examination of the middle ear biopsy indicated the presence of an epithelial tumor with neuroendocrine differentiation, suggestive of middle ear adenoma. A staging CT scan performed three months after the mastoidectomy showed a hypodensity in the middle ear cavity, with no significant bony erosion, which could potentially indicate a residual or recurrent tumor. Consequently, a radical mastoidectomy was performed. The histopathological examination confirmed the presence of middle ear adenoma with neuroendocrine differentiation.