1
|
Pelizzola M, Tanderup K, Chopra S, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Nout R, Kirchheiner K, Spampinato S. Co-occurrence of symptoms after radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer patients: a cluster analysis. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1479-1487. [PMID: 37906286 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2271252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND State of the art combined radiochemotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has shown improved disease control and survival as well as a significant reduction of organ related morbidity. However, LACC cancer survivors are still experiencing a spectrum of symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify co-occurring symptoms in cervix cancer survivors by using patient-reported outcome and physician assessed morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHOD EMBRACE I is a multicenter prospective observational study with 1416 LACC patients (2008-2015). Information on physician-assessed morbidity and patient-reported outcome was assessed at baseline and at regular follow-ups up with the CTCAE v.3 and EORTC-C30/CX24, respectively. Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included and data from 3 months to 2 years was used in the analysis. Factor analysis was used on both EORTC and CTCAE data with symptoms and follow-ups as observations. The extracted factors represent clusters of symptoms. Subsequently, regression models were built to investigate associations between the symptom clusters and QOL. RESULTS The analysis included 742 patients. Despite the differences in the definition of physician-assessed and patient-reported symptoms, similar clusters are identified by the two assessment methods. Three main organ-related clusters are recognized for urinary, gastro-intestinal and vaginal morbidity. Furthermore, a general symptoms cluster where fatigue, pain, insomnia, neuropathy, and hot flashes have large weights is found. Lastly, a cluster with nausea, vomit and lack of appetite is also identified. The general, gastrointestinal and nausea clusters show significant associations with general QOL. CONCLUSIONS This analysis on both PRO and physician-assessed morbidity found a cluster associated with general symptoms and organ-related symptom clusters (urinary, gastrointestinal, vaginal). This shows that LACC survivors experience a variety of co-occurring symptoms. Our analysis also shows that the cluster of general symptoms is associated with a decrease in QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Pelizzola
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, CX, The Netherlands
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sofia Spampinato
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spampinato S, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Schmid MP, Sturdza A, Segedin B, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, De Leeuw A, Bruheim K, Mahantshetty U, Chargari C, Rai B, Cooper R, van der Steen-Banasik E, Sundset M, Wiebe E, Villafranca E, Van Limbergen E, Pieters BR, Tee Tan L, Lutgens LCHW, Hoskin P, Smet S, Pötter R, Nout R, Chopra S, Kirchheiner K. Association of persistent morbidity after radiotherapy with quality of life in locally advanced cervical cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol 2023; 181:109501. [PMID: 36720348 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the association of persistent morbidity with different aspects of quality of life (QOL) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Longitudinal outcome from the EMBRACE-I study was evaluated. Patient-reported symptoms and QOL were prospectively scored (EORTC-C30/CX24) at baseline and regular follow-ups. Physician-assessed symptoms were also reported (CTCAEv.3). Persistent symptoms were defined if present in at least half of the follow-ups. QOL items were linearly transformed into a continuous scale. Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were applied to evaluate and quantify the association of persistent symptoms with QOL. Overall QOL deterioration was evaluated by calculating the integral difference in QOL over time obtained with LMM for patients without and with persistent symptoms. RESULTS Out of 1416 patients enrolled, 741 with baseline and ≥ 3 late follow-ups were analyzed (median 59 months). Proportions of persistent EORTC symptoms ranged from 21.8 % to 64.9 % (bowel control and tiredness). For CTCAE the range was 11.3-28.6 % (limb edema and fatigue). Presence of any persistent symptom was associated with QOL, although with varying magnitude. Role functioning and Global health/QOL were the most impaired aspects. Fatigue and pain showed large differences, with reductions of around 20 % for most of the QOL aspects. Among organ-related symptoms, abdominal cramps showed the largest effect. CONCLUSION Persistent symptoms are associated with QOL reductions in LACC survivors. Organ-related symptoms showed smaller differences than general symptoms such as fatigue and pain. In addition to optimizing treatment to minimize organ-related morbidity, effort should be directed towards a more comprehensive and targeted morbidity management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Spampinato
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jacob C Lindegaard
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Maximilian P Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Astrid De Leeuw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Kjersti Bruheim
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530053, India.
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| | - Bhavana Rai
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
| | - Rachel Cooper
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7LP, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Marit Sundset
- Clinic of Oncology and Women's Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Ericka Wiebe
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.
| | - Elena Villafranca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Li Tee Tan
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Ludy C H W Lutgens
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO) clinic, 6229 ET Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
| | - Stéphanie Smet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Turnhout, 2300 Turnhout, Belgium.
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai 410210, India.
| | - Kathrin Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Model of Social Support for Patients Treated for Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194786. [PMID: 34638270 PMCID: PMC8507879 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Social support can be one of the main factors in better assessing the quality of life at any stage of the recovery process. It should meet the patient's needs so that they can develop constructive methods of coping with the disease. In order to explain the factors influencing social support for cancer patients, a theoretical research model was formulated. It is presented in a graphic form in this article. In order to verify the model, the authors' questionnaire and other standardised questionnaires were used. The experimental group consisted of 170 hospitalised oncological patients being treated for cancer. Personality structure, through its relationship with state of health (0.40) and attitude developed to the disease (0.64), influenced the support experienced by the treated patients (0.40). The surveyed patients, who were characterised by positive self-esteem and experience of life satisfaction despite various difficult situations, perceived to a greater degree the emotional and instrumental support provided to them. During cancer treatment, those patients who showed a need for help and did not experience negative emotions were characterised by an increased need for support. The research results can be introduced into evidence-based medical practice, which could significantly improve the quality of nursing and medical care for patients.
Collapse
|