1
|
Geys M, Sijgers L, Dobrev I, Dalbert A, Röösli C, Pfiffner F, Huber A. ZH-ECochG Bode Plot: A Novel Approach to Visualize Electrocochleographic Data in Cochlear Implant Users. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3470. [PMID: 38929998 PMCID: PMC11205027 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Various representations exist in the literature to visualize electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings along the basilar membrane (BM). This lack of generalization complicates comparisons within and between cochlear implant (CI) users, as well as between publications. This study synthesized the visual representations available in the literature via a systematic review and provides a novel approach to visualize ECochG data in CI users. Methods: A systematic review was conducted within PubMed and EMBASE to evaluate studies investigating ECochG and CI. Figures that visualized ECochG responses were selected and analyzed. A novel visualization of individual ECochG data, the ZH-ECochG Bode plot (ZH = Zurich), was devised, and the recordings from three CI recipients were used to demonstrate and assess the new framework. Results: Within the database search, 74 articles with a total of 115 figures met the inclusion criteria. Analysis revealed various types of representations using different axes; their advantages were incorporated into the novel visualization framework. The ZH-ECochG Bode plot visualizes the amplitude and phase of the ECochG recordings along the different tonotopic regions and angular insertion depths of the recording sites. The graph includes the pre- and postoperative audiograms to enable a comparison of ECochG responses with the audiometric profile, and allows different measurements to be shown in the same graph. Conclusions: The ZH-ECochG Bode plot provides a generalized visual representation of ECochG data, using well-defined axes. This will facilitate the investigation of the complex ECochG potentials generated along the BM and allows for better comparisons of ECochG recordings within and among CI users and publications. The scripts used to construct the ZH-ECochG Bode plot are provided by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies Geys
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Panario J, Bester C, O'Leary S. Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear 2024:00003446-990000000-00289. [PMID: 38816899 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Electrocochleography (ECochG) appears to offer the most accurate prediction of post-cochlear implant hearing outcomes. This may be related to its capacity to interrogate the health of underlying cochlear tissue. The four major components of ECochG (cochlear microphonic [CM], summating potential [SP], compound action potential [CAP], and auditory nerve neurophonic [ANN]) are generated by different cochlear tissue components. Analyzing characteristics of these components can reveal the state of hair and neural cell in a cochlea. There is limited evidence on the characteristics of intracochlear (IC) ECochG recordings measured across the array postinsertion but compared with extracochlear recordings has better signal to noise ratio and spatial specificity. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between ECochG components recorded from an IC approach and postoperative speech perception or audiometric thresholds. DESIGN In 113 human subjects, responses to 500 Hz tone bursts were recorded at 11 IC electrodes across a 22-electrode cochlear implant array immediately following insertion. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the CM and added to one another to emphasize the SP, ANN, and CAP. Maximum amplitudes and extracochlear electrode locations were recorded for each of these ECochG components. These were added stepwise to a multi-factor generalized additive model to develop a best-fit model predictive model for pure-tone audiometric thresholds (PTA) and speech perception scores (speech recognition threshold [SRT] and consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme [CVC-P]) at 3- and 12-month postoperative timepoints. This best-fit model was tested against a generalized additive model using clinical factors alone (preoperative score, age, and gender) as a null model proxy. RESULTS ECochG-factor models were superior to clinical factor models in predicting postoperative PTA, CVC-P, and SRT outcomes at both timepoints. Clinical factor models explained a moderate amount of PTA variance ( r2 = 45.9% at 3-month, 31.8% at 12-month, both p < 0.001) and smaller variances of CVC-P and SRT ( r2 range = 6 to 13.7%, p = 0.008 to 0.113). Age was not a significant predictive factor. ECochG models explained more variance at the 12-month timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 52.9%, CVC-P = 39.6%, SRT = 36.4%) compared with the 3-month one timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 49.4%, CVC-P = 26.5%, SRT = 22.3%). The ECochG model was based on three factors: maximum SP deflection amplitude, and electrode position of CM and SP peaks. Adding neural (ANN and/or CAP) factors to the model did not improve variance explanation. Large negative SP deflection was associated with poorer outcomes and a large positive SP deflection with better postoperative outcomes. Mid-array peaks of SP and CM were both associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Postinsertion IC-ECochG recordings across the array can explain a moderate amount of postoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds. Maximum SP deflection and its location across the array appear to have a significant predictive value which may reflect the underlying state of cochlear health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared Panario
- Department Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christofer Bester
- Department Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen O'Leary
- Department Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tessler I, Gecel NA, Glicksberg BS, Shivatzki S, Shapira Y, Zimlichman E, Alon EE, Klang E, Wolfovitz A. A Five-Decade Text Mining Analysis of Cochlear Implant Research: Where We Started and Where We Are Heading. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1891. [PMID: 38003940 PMCID: PMC10673015 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Since its invention in the 1970s, the cochlear implant (CI) has been substantially developed. We aimed to assess the trends in the published literature to characterize CI. Materials and Methods: We queried PubMed for all CI-related entries published during 1970-2022. The following data were extracted: year of publication, publishing journal, title, keywords, and abstract text. Search terms belonged to the patient's age group, etiology for hearing loss, indications for CI, and surgical methodological advancement. Annual trends of publications were plotted. The slopes of publication trends were calculated by fitting regression lines to the yearly number of publications. Results: Overall, 19,428 CIs articles were identified. Pediatric-related CI was the most dominant sub-population among the age groups, with the highest rate and slope during the years (slope 5.2 ± 0.3, p < 0.001), while elderly-related CIs had significantly fewer publications. Entries concerning hearing preservation showed the sharpest rise among the methods, from no entries in 1980 to 46 entries in 2021 (slope 1.7 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Entries concerning robotic surgery emerged in 2000, with a sharp increase in recent years (slope 0.5 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). Drug-eluting electrodes and CI under local-anesthesia have been reported only in the past five years, with a gradual rise. Conclusions: Publications regarding CI among pediatrics outnumbered all other indications, supporting the rising, pivotal role of CI in the rehabilitation of children with sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing-preservation publications have recently rapidly risen, identified as the primary trend of the current era, followed by a sharp rise of robotic surgery that is evolving and could define the next revolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idit Tessler
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; (E.Z.); (E.K.)
| | - Nir A. Gecel
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Benjamin S. Glicksberg
- Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Shaked Shivatzki
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Yisgav Shapira
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Eyal Zimlichman
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; (E.Z.); (E.K.)
| | - Eran E. Alon
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Eyal Klang
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; (E.Z.); (E.K.)
- Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Amit Wolfovitz
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wagner L, Plontke SK, Rahne T. An analysis of the spread of electric field within the cochlea for different devices including custom-made electrodes for subtotal cochleoectomy. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287216. [PMID: 37682960 PMCID: PMC10490913 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implants (CIs) can restore hearing not only in patients with profound hearing loss and deafness, but also in patients following tumour removal of intra-cochlear schwannomas. In such cases, design and placement differ from conventional electrode insertion, in which the cochlea remains filled with fluid. Despite these technical and surgical differences, previous studies have tended to show positive results in speech perception in tumour patients. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the ability to predict speech recognition outcomes using individual electric field spreads and to investigate worldwide unique tumour cases. STUDY DESIGN In a retrospective analysis in a university tertiary center electric field spreads were compared between two groups of electrode designs implanted between 2009 and 2020 i.e., between lateral wall electrodes and custom-made perimodiolar electrode carriers from the same company. The voltage gradients were analysed and grouped with speech recognition results. RESULTS Differences in electrical field spreads were found between lateral wall electrodes and the custom-made perimodiolar electrodes, whereas a significant influence of electric fields on scores in speech recognition cannot be demonstrated. CONCLUSION Prediction of speech recognition outcome based on electric field propagation results seems not feasible. Significant differences in field spread between electrode arrays can be clearly demonstrated. This observation and its relevance to hearing treatment and speech recognition should therefore be further investigated in upcoming studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luise Wagner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Halle Hearing and Implant Center, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stefan K. Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Halle Hearing and Implant Center, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Torsten Rahne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Halle Hearing and Implant Center, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee DS, Herzog JA, Walia A, Firszt JB, Zhan KY, Durakovic N, Wick CC, Buchman CA, Shew MA. External Validation of Cochlear Implant Screening Tools Demonstrates Modest Generalizability. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e1000-e1007. [PMID: 36047695 PMCID: PMC9481700 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical application of five recently published cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluation (CICE) referral screening tools through external validation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary otology/neurotology practice. PATIENTS Adults who underwent CICE between December 2020 and September 2021. INTERVENTIONS CICE referral screening tools versus CI candidacy criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CICE screening tool performance, based on the ability to identify patients who met the CI candidacy criteria, was evaluated. CI candidacy criteria were defined as best-aided AzBio sentences at +10 signal-to-noise ratio and either 60% or less accuracy to reflect traditional criteria used in clinical settings or 40% or less accuracy (only patients 65 years or older) to reflect Medicare-eligible criteria. RESULTS Screening criteria of proposed CICE referral tools vary widely across pure-tone average and word recognition scores. When screened by traditional criteria, the sensitivities and specificities of these referral tools varied from 40 to 77% and from 22 to 86%, respectively. When screened by Medicare-eligible criteria, sensitivities and specificities varied from 41 to 81% and from 24 to 91%, respectively. The screening tool proposed by Zwolan et al. ( Otol Neurotol 2020;41(7):895-900) demonstrated the best overall performance for traditional (Youden's J , 0.37; sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 75%) and Medicare-eligible patients (Youden's J , 0.44; sensitivity, 66%; specificity, 78%). All screening tools performed worse on the validation cohort compared with their respective development cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Current tools for determining CICE referral have diverse screening criteria. These combinations of pure-tone average and word recognition score are modestly successful at identifying CI candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Torres R, Daoudi H, Lahlou G, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Mosnier I, Nguyen Y. Restoration of High Frequency Auditory Perception After Robot-Assisted or Manual Cochlear Implantation in Profoundly Deaf Adults Improves Speech Recognition. Front Surg 2021; 8:729736. [PMID: 34568420 PMCID: PMC8461256 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Robot-assisted cochlear implantation has recently been implemented in clinical practice; however, its effect on hearing outcomes is unknown. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate hearing performance 1 year post-implantation whether the electrode array was inserted manually or assisted by a robot. Methods: Forty-two profoundly deaf adults were implanted either manually (n = 21) or assisted by a robot (RobOtol®, Collin, Bagneux, France) with three different electrode array types. Participants were paired by age, and electrode array type. The scalar position of the electrode array in the cochlea was assessed by 3D reconstruction from the pre- and post-implantation computed tomography. Pure-tone audiometry and speech perception in silence (percentage of disyllabic words at 60 dB) were tested on the implanted ear 1 year post-implantation in free-field conditions. The pure-tone average was calculated at 250–500–750 Hz, 500–1,000–2,000–3,000 Hz, and 3,000–4,000–8,000 Hz for low, mid, and high frequencies, respectively. Results: One year after cochlear implantation, restoration of the high-frequency thresholds was associated with better speech perception in silence, but not with low or mid frequencies (p < 0.0001; Adjusted R2 = 0.64, polynomial non-linear regression). Although array translocation was similar using either technique, the number of translocated electrodes was lower when the electrode arrays had been inserted with the assistance of the robot compared with manual insertion (p = 0.018; Fisher's exact test). Conclusion: The restoration of high-frequency thresholds (3,000–4,000–8,000 Hz) by cochlear implantation was associated with good speech perception in silence. The numbers of translocated electrodes were reduced after a robot-assisted insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Torres
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France.,Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru
| | - Hannah Daoudi
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Ghizlene Lahlou
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Sterkers
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Evelyne Ferrary
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Mosnier
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Yann Nguyen
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|