1
|
Akalin I, Kalkisim A, Gunay BO, Esenulku CM. Retinal Findings in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients, Is Routine Ophthalmological Examination Required after Discharge? Prospective Case-Control Study. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2023; 240:169-179. [PMID: 36634686 DOI: 10.1055/a-1964-7596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate retinal findings by comparing patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with the control group. METHODS In this prospective study, 188 eyes of 94 recovered COVID-19 patients and 108 eyes of 54 healthy participants as a control group were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups, those with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19. Refractometry, tonometry, optical biometry, optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements, and complete ophthalmological examinations were performed on healthy volunteers and COVID-19 patients on average 2 weeks after discharge. Pulse O2 and vital parameters were also assessed. Primary outcomes were evaluated, such as retinal findings, and secondary outcomes as retinal thickness, choroidal thickness (CT), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and ganglion cell layer thickness. RESULTS There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, ocular biometry, and intraocular pressure (p > 0.05). Pulse O2 was lower in the study group (p < 0.001). Retinal findings were detected in 68 (36.1%) of 188 eyes in the study group and 28 (25.9%) of 108 eyes in the control group (p = 0.07). The two most common retinal findings were hypertensive retinopathy and retinal pigment epithelium alterations and/or drusen in both groups. In OCT measurements, significant thinning was observed in nasal macular thickness and superior 2 mm CT in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In patients divided into subgroups according to disease severity, no significant difference was found between the groups in any OCT parameter (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION It has been observed that COVID-19 infection does not cause a specific and sensitive finding in the ocular tissues, especially the retina, and does not produce a reproducible measurement result. Recommending routine eye exam after COVID-19 does not seem cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan Akalin
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Kalkisim
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Betul Onal Gunay
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Cenap Mahmut Esenulku
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coco-Martín MB, Leal-Vega L, Alcoceba-Herrero I, Molina-Martín A, de-Fez D, Luque MJ, Dueñas-Gutiérrez C, Arenillas-Lara JF, Piñero DP. Visual perception alterations in COVID-19: a preliminary study. Int J Ophthalmol 2023; 16:1-9. [PMID: 36659948 PMCID: PMC9815973 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare the visual perception (color and chromatic-achromatic contrast vision) of a small cohort of COVID-19 patients at the time of infection and after 6mo with that of a healthy population matched for sex and age. METHODS A total of 25 patients (9 females, 16 males, mean age: 54±10y) with COVID-19 hospitalized in the COVID-19 Unit of the University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid were recruited for this preliminary study. Visual perception, as determined by monocular measurement of contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and color vision was assessed in each patient using the Optopad test. The results obtained were then compared with those of a sample of 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (5 females, 11 males, mean age: 50±6y) in which the same measurement procedure was repeated. Statistically significant differences between groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Measurements were repeated after a minimum follow-up period of 6mo and statistically significant differences between the two time points in each group were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS Discrimination thresholds (color and chromatic-achromatic contrast vision) and their corresponding sensitivity, calculated as the inverse of the discrimination threshold, were evaluated. Analysis of the data revealed higher contrast threshold results (i.e., worse contrast sensitivity) in the COVID-19 group than in the control group for all spatial frequencies studied in the Optopad-CSF achromatic test and most of the spatial frequencies studied in the Optopad-CSF chromatic test for the red-green and blue-yellow mechanisms. In addition, color threshold results in the COVID-19 group were also significantly higher (i.e., worse color sensitivity) for almost all color mechanisms studied in the Optopad-Color test. At 6mo, most of the differences found between the groups were maintained despite COVID-19 recovery. CONCLUSION The present results provide preliminary evidence that visual perception may be impaired in COVID-19, even when the infection has passed. Although further research is needed to determine the precise causes of this finding, analysis of CSF and color vision could provide valuable information on the visual impact of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Begoña Coco-Martín
- Group of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47005, Spain
| | - Luis Leal-Vega
- Group of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47005, Spain
| | - Irene Alcoceba-Herrero
- Group of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47005, Spain
| | - Ainhoa Molina-Martín
- Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante 03690, Spain
| | - Dolores de-Fez
- Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante 03690, Spain
| | - María José Luque
- Department of Optics, and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, Valencia 46100, Spain
| | - Carlos Dueñas-Gutiérrez
- COVID-19 Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid 47003, Spain
| | - Juan Francisco Arenillas-Lara
- Group of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47005, Spain,Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid 47003, Spain
| | - David P. Piñero
- Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante 03690, Spain,Clinical Optometry Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, Alicante 03016, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wan KH, Lui GCY, Poon KCF, Ng SSS, Young AL, Hui DSC, Tham CCY, Chan PKS, Pang CP, Chong KKL. Ocular surface disturbance in patients after acute COVID-19. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 50:398-406. [PMID: 35218134 PMCID: PMC9111848 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background We investigated the ocular surface disturbances in COVID‐19 patients discharged from the hospital. Methods One hundred and seventy‐nine eyes of 109 healthy participants and 456 eyes of 228 post‐COVID‐19 patients received comprehensive eye examinations; the latter were interviewed with questionnaires on ocular symptoms before and after COVID‐19 diagnosis. Associations of ocular surface manifestations with virological and ophthalmic parameters were evaluated by multivariable mixed linear or logistic regression models. Results Mean interval between COVID‐19 diagnosis and ophthalmic evaluation was 52.23 ± 16.12 days. The severity of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) based on clinical staging was higher in post‐COVID‐19 than healthy eyes (1.14 ± 0.67 vs. 0.92 ± 0.68, p = 0.002) and so was ocular surface staining score (0.60 ± 0.69 vs. 0.49 ± 0.68, p = 0.044). Patients requiring supplementary oxygen during hospitalisation had shorter tear break‐up time (β −1.63, 95% CI ‐2.61 to −0.65). Cycle threshold (Ct) value from upper respiratory samples (inversely correlated with viral load) at diagnosis had an OR = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.98) with new ocular surface symptoms 4 weeks after diagnosis. The presence of ocular surface symptoms 1 week prior to COVID‐19 diagnosis showed an OR of 20.89 (95% CI 6.35–68.66) of persistent or new ocular symptoms 4 weeks afterward. Conclusions MGD and ocular surface staining are more common and severe in post‐COVID‐19 patients. Patients with higher viral loads have greater risks of ocular surface symptoms. Patients requiring supplementary oxygen are more likely to show tear film instability. Ocular surface evaluation should be considered 1–3 months following hospital discharge for any COVID‐19 patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin H Wan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Grace C Y Lui
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ken C F Poon
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Susanna S S Ng
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alvin L Young
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - David S C Hui
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Clement C Y Tham
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Paul K S Chan
- Department of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi Pui Pang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kelvin K L Chong
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|