Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, Pneumopericardium and Subcutaneous Emphysema-Not So Uncommon Complications in Patients with COVID-19 Pulmonary Infection-A Series of Cases

Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19: Risk factors and outcomes from a multicentre case-control study

BACKGROUND

An increased incidence of pneumomediastinum has been observed among patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The study aimed to identify risk factors for COVID-19-associated pneumomediastinum and investigate the impact of pneumomediastinum on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective case-control study, we included consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and pneumomediastinum hospitalized from March 2020 to July 2020 at ten centres; then, we identified a similarly sized control group of consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and respiratory failure who did not develop pneumomediastinum during the same period. Clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics, as well as respiratory support and outcomes, were collected and compared between the two groups. Risk factors of pneumomediastinum were assessed by multivariable logistic analysis.

RESULTS

Overall 139 patients with pneumomediastinum and 153 without pneumomediastinum were analysed. Lung involvement ≥75 %, consolidations, body mass index (BMI) < 22 kg/m2, C-reactive protein (CRP) > 150 mg/L, D-dimer >3000 ng/mL FEUs, and smoking exposure >20 pack-year were all independently correlated with the occurrence of pneumomediastinum. Patients with pneumomediastinum had a longer hospital stay (mean ± SD 31.2 ± 20.2 days vs 19.6 ± 14.2, p < 0.001), higher intubation rate (73/139, 52.5 % vs 27/153, 17.6 %, p < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (68/139, 48.9 % vs 36/153, 23.5 %, p < 0.001) compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive lung parenchyma involvement, consolidations, low BMI, high inflammatory markers, and tobacco exposure are associated with a greater risk of pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 pneumonia. This complication significantly worsens the outcomes.

Tube Thoracostomy Complications in Patients With ARDS Requiring ECMO: Worse in COVID-19 Patients?

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and management outcomes of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) requiring chest tubes are not well-described. This study sought to explore differences in tube thoracostomy rates and subsequent complications between patients with and without COVID-19 ARDS on V-V ECMO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a single institution, retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 ARDS requiring V-V ECMO. The control cohort consisted of patients who required V-V ECMO for ARDS-related diagnoses from January 2018 to January 2021. The primary outcome was any complication following initial tube thoracostomy placement. Study approval was obtained from the Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board (C.2017.152d).

RESULTS

Twenty-five COVID-19 patients and 38 controls were included. Demographic parameters did not differ between the groups. The incidence of pneumothorax was not significantly different between the two groups (44% COVID-19 vs. 22% control, OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.95-7.9, P = 0.09). Patients with COVID-19 were as likely to receive tube thoracostomy as controls (36% vs. 24%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.55-5.7). Complications, however, were more likely to occur in the COVID-19 group (89% vs. 33%, OR 16, 95% CI, 1.6-201, P = 0.0498).

CONCLUSIONS

Tube thoracostomy placement in COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring V-V ECMO is common, as are complications following initial placement. Clinicians should anticipate the need for re-intervention in this patient population. Small-bore (14Fr and smaller) pigtail catheters appeared to be safe and efficacious in this setting, but further study on tube thoracostomy management in ECMO patients is needed.

Case Series on Barotrauma in COVID-19 Infection Patients

As COVID-19 emerged in the world, there was a high prevalence of intubation and intensive care admissions. Many cases of barotrauma were reported in those patients. This condition is caused by alveoli rupture, which causes the air to enter the surrounding extra-alveolar spaces. It mainly happens in intubated patients. Here, we report 14 cases of barotrauma in COVID-19 patients, which appeared either spontaneously or after receiving non-invasive ventilation, some of the patients presented initially with mild-moderate forms of the disease in terms of severity. Developing barotrauma causes a management challenge in COVID-19 patients, where the patients might require invasive mechanical ventilation afterwards, which is a difficult situation. Lung protective measures should be used to reduce the risk of barotrauma in all patients as it is associated with increased mortality.

COVID-19 and Laboratory Markers from Romanian Patients-A Narrative Review

COVID-19 has significantly impacted the whole world, and Romania was no exception. Biomarkers play a crucial role in understanding and managing the disease. However, research regarding laboratory analyses for patients with COVID-19 is fairly limited. For detection, PCR testing is still considered the golden standard, while antibodies are still useful for monitoring both patients and their vaccination status. In our country, biomarkers such as CRP, LDH, transaminases, cardiac, and iron markers have been used to assess the status of patients and even predict illness outcome. CRP, IL-6, LDH, FER, fibrinogen, creatinine, and vitamin D levels have been associated with increased severity, risk of ICU admission, and death. Cardiac markers and D-dimers are also good predictors, but their role seems more important in patients with complications. HDL cholesterol and BUN levels were also suggested as potential biomarkers. Hematological issues in SARS-CoV-2 infections include neutrophilia, lymphopenia and their ratio, while PCT, which is a marker of bacterial infections, is better to be used in patients with co- or supra-infections. The current research is a narrative review that focuses on the laboratory results of Romanian COVID-19 patients. The goal of this article is to provide an update on the research on biomarkers and other laboratory tests conducted inside the borders of Romania and identify gaps in this regard. Secondly, options for further research are discussed and encouraged.

Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Limited data is available on the incidence and outcomes of pneumothorax (PTX), pneumomediastinum (PNM), and subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of these complications in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, involving adult COVID-19 patients admitted to Mayo Clinic Florida from 03/2020-06/2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of PTX/PNM/SCE.

RESULTS

1926 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included, of which 518 were admitted to the ICU. The incidence of PTX/PNM/SCE was 6.3%. Patients with these complications were more likely to be male, Asian, and unvaccinated. Conversely, they were less likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients who developed PTX/PNM/SCE after 72 hours of admission were more likely to receive high-dose corticosteroids and for an extended duration. The affected group had an adjusted odds ratio for in-hospital mortality of 13.32 (95%CI, 8.19-21.59) and ICU admission of 9.14 (95%CI, 5.3-12.78) compared to the unaffected group.

CONCLUSION

Although the occurrence of PTX/PNM/SCE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was rare, it was associated with worse outcomes. Corticosteroids may contribute to the pathogenesis of these complications; however, further studies are needed to investigate this relationship in more detail.

"Pneumomediastinum: A marker of severity in Covid-19 disease"

Objective

The goal of this study was to look at the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and radiological aspects of COVID-19 patients who developed pneumomediastinum and compare these features between those who died and those who survived.

Materials and methods

This retrospective observational study included COVID-19 patients having pneumomediastinum on CT from May 2020 to May 2021 in a COVID-19 care hospital. 1st wave patients were considered between the period of May 2020 to January 2021 and those in the second wave between February 2021 to May 2021. The clinical details were analyzed by a consultant intensivist and CT scans were read by a team of 6 resident radiologists and 5 experienced radiologists. Demographic data, co-morbidities, clinical parameters, hemodynamic markers, radiological involvement and associated complications were analyzed.

Results

During the study period, 10,605 COVID-19 patients were admitted to our hospital of which 5689 underwent CT scan. 66 patients were detected to have pneumomediastinum on CT; 26 of them in the first wave and 40 in the second wave. Out of 66, 28 patients were admitted to ICU, 9 during the first wave and 18 during the second wave. The overall incidence of developing pneumomediastinum was 1.16%. Incidence in the 1st wave was 1.0% and in the 2nd wave was 1.29%. The overall mortality rate in admitted COVID-19 patients was 12.83% while it was 43.9% in COVID-19 patients who developed pneumomediastinum. Incidence of pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax was high in patients with extensive parenchymal involvement. 59/66 (89%) cases of pneumomediastinum had severe CT score on imaging.

Conclusion

We conclude that pneumomediastinum is a marker of poor prognosis. Timely diagnosis of interstitial emphysema or pneumomediastinum will aid in planning early protective ventilation strategies and timely intervention of complications.

Autopsy Findings and Inflammatory Markers in SARS-CoV-2: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The systemic inflammatory response related to COVID-19 can be easily investigated in living patients. Unfortunately, not every biomarker is suitable for postmortem analysis since several factors may interfere. The aim of this study was to summarize key histopathological findings within each organ system due to COVID-19 and to assess if serological inexpensive and widely available biomarkers such as CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and d-Dimers, associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19, can be implemented in a post-mortem assessment.

Patients and Methods

A total of 60 subjects divided in 2 groups were included. All subjects died outside a hospital setting and therefore did not receive specific or symptomatic therapies that could have modulated the inflammatory response. The first group included 45 subjects in which mandatory autopsy was performed in order to establish the cause of death and macroscopic examination of the lungs was highly suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As controls (Group 2), 20 subjects who died from polytrauma in high velocity car accidents and suicide were selected. Bronchial fluids collected during the autopsy procedure were used for the RT-PCR diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and serum samples were sent for analysis of IL-6, CRP, d-Dimers and fibrinogen.

Results

Compared with the control group, the subjects of the COVID-19 group were older (59±19.5 vs.38±19.15 years, p=0.0002) and had more underlying comorbidities such as hypertension (60% vs 35%, p=0.06) or were overweight (53.3% vs 30%, p=0.08). The levels of CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and d-Dimers in postmortem plasma samples were significantly higher in COVID-19 subjects than in control group (p< 0.0001). Moreover, the level of IL-6 was significantly higher in overweight patients (r=0.52, P<0.001). In all COVID-19 subjects, the histological examination revealed features corresponding to the exudative and/or proliferative phases of diffuse alveolar damage. Large pulmonary emboli were observed in 7 cases. Gross cardiac enlargement with left ventricular hypertrophy was observed in 19 cases. The most frequent pathological finding of the central nervous system was acute/early-subacute infarction.

Conclusion

Due to the complexity of the inflammatory response, we postulate that a combination of biomarkers, rather than a single laboratory parameter, might be more effective in obtaining a reliable postmortem COVID-19 diagnosis.

Pneumothorax in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Prevalence, Analysis of Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have been conducted to assess pneumothorax. However, few studies were done to assess pneumothorax in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to describe and analyze the prevalence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 pneumothorax patients in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 418 patients, who tested positive for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction test and required ICU admission in King Fahad Hospital of The University from 02/01/2020 to 01/09/2021. A total number of 36 pneumothorax patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

Of 418 patients who were followed up in the intensive care unit as COVID-19 cases, 36 patients developed a pneumothorax (8.61%). The mean age of the patients was 55.6 ± 15.06 years, 23 patients were male, and 13 were female. Seventeen patients were obese, and only one patient was an active smoker. Twenty-four patients had at least one comorbidity; hypertension was the most common. Thirty-two patients were intubated, and the duration of intubation was 23.23 ±15.9 days. The time from intubation to pneumothorax development was 8.8 ± 9.3 days. Six patients were on bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation (BIPAP), 2 patients on continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (CPAP), 3 patients on High-Flow Nasal Cannula ventilation (HFNC), 9 patients on pressure-control ventilation (PC), and 16 patients on pressure regulated volume control ventilation (PRVC). Of 36 patients, 26 died, and the mortality rate was 72.2%.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that risk factors of pneumothorax occurrence in COVID-19 critically ill patients include male patients, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. More efforts should be made to determine the risk factors and assess the outcomes of those patients to develop preventive measures and management guidelines.

Pneumomediastinum and Pneumopericardium as Uncommon Complications of COVID-19 Infection: A Review Article

There is an emerging body of literature describing an increasing incidence of pneumomediastinum and, to a lesser extent, pneumopericardium as a complication of COVID-19. However, the literature lacks information regarding patients' characteristics and a general view of this unusual condition. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the current literature on this phenomenon. In this study, we summarize the risk factors/etiology, imaging modalities, management, and prognosis of known cases in the literature. In total, 48 articles were included in the study, ranging from case reports to case series. Most patients were male (83.3%). The overall mortality rate was 27.1% and the recovery rate was 62.5%.

Analysis of the factors that affect survival among patients who developed subcutaneous emphysema monitored on COVID-19 diagnosis: single-centred research

Aim: The COVID-19 patients with pulmonary involvement frequently develop pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema due to barotrauma. Reviewing the literature, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema it can be observed among ICU patients due to the pulmonary involvement of the COVID-19 disease, and therefore, can cause mortality and morbidity. This study aims to analyse the factors that affect mortality in COVID-19 patients in ICUs who develop subcutaneous emphysema. Material and Method: A total of 854 COVID-19 patients who were consulted from all branches in the Chest Surgery Clinic of Ankara City Hospital between September 1, 2020 - March 1, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, comorbid diseases and COVID-related tests (LDH, D-dimer, procalcitonin, ferritin, CRP, IL-6, lymphocyte percentage and neutrophil and lymphocyte ratio) imaging results and survival of 66 patients with subcutaneous emphysema were analyzed. Results: Of the patients, 41 (62%) were male and 25 (38%) were female. The mean age was 63 years. 55 (83%) of these patients were followed up with invasive ventilation support due to general health impairment, increased oxygen demand and heart problems. Age, intubation and NLR were found to be statistically significant in terms of survival and death, on survival. It was discovered that age and intubation variables could be risk factors. The mortality rates were 1.01 times higher for the elderly compared to the younger patients and 13.8 times higher for the intubated compared to the non-intubated patients. Conclusion: Age of patient and intubation can be regarded as risk factors for mortality in COVID-19 patients with subcutaneous emphysema, monitored in ICUs. Furthermore, comorbid diseases increase mortality rates.

Pneumomediastinum: a rare complication in COVID-19 patients

A 62-year-old man with COVID-19 had PS for fever, coughing, and breathlessness. Two days after therapy, the patient's clinical condition worsened. X-ray and CT showed pneumomediastinum, emphysema and pneumothorax. The patient was intubated and subjected to conservative therapy. The patient was discharged after about 20 days. Radiological imaging plays a key role in the proper diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients with related complications.

Pneumomediastinum in the COVID-19 era: to drain or not to drain?

Pneumomediastinum (PNM) is a rare clinical finding, usually with a benign course, which is managed conservatively in the majority of cases. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, an increased incidence of PNM has been observed. Several reports of PNM cases in COVID-19 have been reported in the literature and were managed either conservatively or surgically. In this study, we present our institutional experience of COVID-19 associated PNM, propose a management algorithm, and review the current literature. In total, 43 Case Series were identified, including a total of 747 patients, of whom 374/747 (50.1%) were intubated at the time of diagnosis, 168/747 (22.5%) underwent surgical drain insertion at admission, 562/747 (75.2%) received conservative treatment (observation or mechanical ventilation. Inpatient mortality was 51.8% (387/747), while 45.1% of the population recovered and/or was discharged (337/747). In conclusion, with increased incidence of PNM in COVID-19 patients reported in the literature, it is still difficult to assign a true causal relationship between PNM and mortality. We can, however, see that PMN plays an important role in disease prognosis.  Due to increased complexity, high mortality, and associated complications, conservative management may not be sufficient, and a surgical approach is needed.

Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19: a phenotype of severe COVID-19 pneumonitis? The results of the United Kingdom (POETIC) survey

BACKGROUND

There is an emerging understanding that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased incidence of pneumomediastinum. We aimed to determine its incidence among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and describe factors associated with outcome.

METHODS

A structured survey of pneumomediastinum and its incidence was conducted from September 2020 to February 2021. United Kingdom-wide participation was solicited via respiratory research networks. Identified patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection and radiologically proven pneumomediastinum. The primary outcomes were to determine incidence of pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 and to investigate risk factors associated with patient mortality.

RESULTS

377 cases of pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 were identified from 58 484 inpatients with COVID-19 at 53 hospitals during the study period, giving an incidence of 0.64%. Overall 120-day mortality in COVID-19 pneumomediastinum was 195/377 (51.7%). Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 was associated with high rates of mechanical ventilation. 172/377 patients (45.6%) were mechanically ventilated at the point of diagnosis. Mechanical ventilation was the most important predictor of mortality in COVID-19 pneumomediastinum at the time of diagnosis and thereafter (p<0.001) along with increasing age (p<0.01) and diabetes mellitus (p=0.08). Switching patients from continuous positive airways pressure support to oxygen or high flow nasal oxygen after the diagnosis of pneumomediastinum was not associated with difference in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumomediastinum appears to be a marker of severe COVID-19 pneumonitis. The majority of patients in whom pneumomediastinum was identified had not been mechanically ventilated at the point of diagnosis.

Spontaneous pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients

Aim:

Pneumothorax (PNX), pneumomediastinum (PMD) and subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) are COVID-19 complications related to positive-pressure ventilation. We analyzed the pathophysiology of these complications without ventilation.

Patients & methods:

Out of 1845 admitted COVID-19 patients, we retrospectively collected data for 15 patients, from a tertiary medical center, from 1 October 2020 to 31 March 2021.

Results:

Five patients suffered from spontaneous PNX, 8/15 developed PMD and 8/15 developed SCE. The mean BMI was 29.7, as most patients were obese or overweight. Most patients had lymphocytopenia and increased C-reactive protein, ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase levels. Eleven patients succumbed to the disease.

Conclusion:

Risk factors of spontaneous PNX, PMD and SCE in COVID-19 patients need further investigations by conducting more comprehensive case–control studies.

We have investigated spontaneous alveolar rupture as a complication in 15 COVID-19 patients. Manifested as pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema, these complications are less common in patients without mechanical ventilation. Management of these patients was either conservative or by insertion of a chest tube. Eventually, 11 out of 15 patients have passed away due to respiratory failure.

Risk Factors, Characteristics, and Outcome in Non-Ventilated Patients with Spontaneous Pneumothorax or Pneumomediastinum Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Background and Objectives

Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) and spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) have frequently been cited as complications associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, with especially poor prognosis in mechanically ventilated patients. The current literature is controversial regarding the potential risk factors for developing SP or SPM (SP-SPM) in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients. Our research addressed a twofold objective: (a) to investigate the characteristics of patients with SP-SPM (both with and without COVID-19) and compare them to patients with sole COVID-19; (b) to quantify the risk of in-hospital mortality associated with SP-SPM and COVID-19.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective case–control study was conducted in the emergency departments (ED) of two tertiary hospitals in Timisoara, Romania, over one year (1st April 2020‒31st March 2021; 64,845 records in total) and 70 cases of SP-SPM were identified (both SARS-CoV-2 positives and negatives). The control group comprised COVID-19 patients with no SP-SPM, included at a 2:1 ratio. Logistic regression was employed to quantify the in-hospital mortality risk associated with age, SP-SPM, and COVID-19.

Results

SP-SPM and COVID-19 were connected with prolonged hospitalization, a higher percentage of intensive care admission, and a higher mortality. SP-SPM increased the odds of death by almost four times in patients of the same age, gender, smoking status, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: OR = 3.758, 95% CI (1.443–9.792). Each additional year of age added 9.4% to the mortality risk: OR = 1.094, 95% CI (1.054–1.135).

Conclusion

ED physicians should acknowledge these potential risks when attending COVID-19 patients with SP-SPM.

Asymptomatic Spontaneous Pneumopericardium, Pneumomediastinum, and Subcutaneous Emphysema: A Case Report of an Incidental Rare Presentation

Pneumopericardium (PP), pneumomediastinum (PM), epidural pneumatosis, and subcutaneous emphysema (SE) are identified by the existence of free air or gas in the associated spaces. They are normally self-limited unless tension pneumothorax, tension PM, cardiac herniation, air tamponade, and esophageal rupture accompany these disorders. PM and PP can be divided into "spontaneous" or "secondary" based on the preceding etiologies. Spontaneous PM is often extremely rare and benign in course. On the other hand, secondary PM and PP are more common and result from intrathoracic infections, trauma-related esophageal rupture, or tears along the tracheobronchial tree. Our patient presented four days after a fall from a chair and was found to have suffered a stroke, with complete left side paralysis. CT imaging on arrival was significant for PM, PP, and SE, the cause of which remains unclear. The patient was diagnosed with COVID-pneumonia approximately six months prior to presentation. As the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved, several scientific papers have been published reporting infected patients who had developed spontaneous PT, PM, or even PP, in the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation. Is it possible that the spontaneous findings in our patient were COVID-related? Or could the spontaneous PP, PM, and SE be a sequel to the trauma of her fall from a chair? The answer still remains unclear.

Clostridium Difficile and COVID-19: General Data, Ribotype, Clinical Form, Treatment-Our Experience from the Largest Infectious Diseases Hospital in Western Romania

Background and Objectives: In Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by the infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the clinical manifestations are primarily related to the pulmonary system. Under 10% of cases also develop gastrointestinal events such as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Materials and Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective study in the Infectious Diseases Clinic of "Victor Babes" Hospital, Timis County, in order to assess the incidence, outcome and risk factors for clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in COVID-19 patients. Results: Out of 2065 COVID-19 cases, hospitalized between 1st September 2020 and 30th April 2021, 40 cases of CDI were identified with 32 cases of hospital-onset of CDI and eight cases of community-onset and healthcare-associated CDI. By randomization, polymerase chain reaction ribotyping of Clostridium Difficile was performed in six cases. All the randomized cases tested positive for ribotype 027. The percentage of cases recovered with complications at discharge was higher among COVID-19 patients and CDI (p = 0.001). The in-hospital stay, 36 days versus 28 days, was longer among COVID-19 patients and CDI (p = 0.01). The presence of previous hospitalization (p = 0.004) and administration of antibiotics during the hospital stay, increased the risk of CDI among COVID-19 patients. The mean adjusted CCI at admission was lower among controls (p = 0.01). In two cases, exitus was strictly CDI-related, with one case positive for 027 ribotype. Conclusions: CDI has complicated the outcome of COVID-19 patients, especially for those with comorbidities or previously exposed to the healthcare system. In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and the widespread, extensive use of antibiotics, clinicians should remain vigilant for possible CDI and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection.

Cutaneous Manifestations in SARS-CoV-2 Infection-A Series of Cases from the Largest Infectious Diseases Hospital in Western Romania

(1) Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection, which appeared as an isolated epidemic outbreak in December 2019, proved to be so contagious that, within 3 months, the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. For one year (pre-vaccination period), the virus acted unhindered and was highly contagious, with a predominantly respiratory-oriented aggression. Although this lung damage, responsible for the more than 3,090,025 deaths, has provided sufficient data to facilitate the understanding of pathogenic mechanisms, other observation data, which meet the quality of emerging clinical aspects, such as rashes, remain without well-defined etiopathogenic support or a well-contoured clinical framework. (2) Methods and Results: We followed the occurrence of cutaneous manifestations in patients hospitalized during the second and third outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in the main clinics of infectious diseases of our county, Timis, and recorded laboratory investigations and clinical evolution for five suggestive cases. (3) Conclusions: The presented cases, added to many other present and future clinical observations, will allow for better knowledge and understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection, a requirement that has become a global priority for the entire medical and scientific community.

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum and COVID-19 pneumonia: Report of three cases with emphasis on CT imaging

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is a rare complication of coronavirus disease 2019. The published literature consists mainly of case reports and small case series. There are still many questions regarding the pathogenesis, the prognostic significance and the implications on patient management. In our hospital, 3 coronavirus disease 2019 patients developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum: 1 on admission at the emergency department and the other 2 during hospitalization. In this study we describe their clinical course and computed tomography (CT) findings. All of them had severe disease according to the total severity score on admission CT. The management of pneumomediastinum was conservative and follow-up CT showed resolution in all patients. As the correlation between extension of parenchymal lung lesions and development of pneumomediastinum is still under investigation, we highlight the importance of reporting the severity score on chest CT in order to obtain more comparable results between different studies. Furthermore, in this tragic circumstance we also had the opportunity to familiarize ourselves with the otherwise uncommon occurrence of air along the bronchovascular sheaths (Macklin effect) and evaluate the ability of CT to detect it.