Analysis of Frailty in Geriatric Patients as a Prognostic Factor in Endovascular Treated Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes

The effect of frailty on mortality and functional outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Limited data in patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH) showed that frailty was associated with mortality; however, there was insufficient data on functional outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of frailty on overall mortality and 90-day functional outcomes in SICH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 1223 patients diagnosed with SICH from January 2014 to December 2020. Frailty was defined as a clinical frailty scale (CFS) score of 4-9. Binary cut-offs were defined using receiver operating curve analysis. 90-day poor functional outcomes (PFO) were defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3, and utility-weighted mRS (UW-mRS) were based on previous validated studies respectively. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between frailty and outcomes. Confounders adjusted for included demographics, cardiovascular risk factors and haematoma characteristics.

RESULTS

1091 patients met the inclusion criterion. 167 (15.3 %) had 30-day mortality and 730 (66.9 %) had 90-day PFO. Frailty was significantly associated with lower overall survival (HR: 1.54; 95 % CI: 1.11-2.14, p=0.010), 90-day PFO (OR: 1.90; 95 % CI: 1.32-2.74; p<0.001) and poorer UW-mRS (β: -0.06; 95 % CI: (-0.08 to -0.04); p<0.001) even after adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was significantly associated with greater mortality and PFO after incident SICH, even after adjusting for a priori confounders. Frail male individuals may be predisposed to poorer outcomes from higher prevalence of cortical atrophy. The use of CFS in younger individuals may aid management by predicting outcomes after incident SICH. Identifying frail individuals with incident SICH could aid in decision-making and the surgical management of SICH.

Mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke in frail patients: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The overall safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in frail patients is not well delineated. This systematic review aims to summarize and compare outcomes in frail and non-frail patients who underwent MT for AIS.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science to identify studies with outcomes-related data for frail patients with MT-treated AIS. The recanalization rate, procedural complications, and clinical outcome at 90-day follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

In the four included studies there were 642 frail patients and 499 non-frail patients. Frail patients had reduced rates of good functional outcomes (29% vs 42%; χ2=22, p<0.01) and increased 90-day mortality (51% vs 25%; χ2=38, p<0.01) compared with non-frail patients.

CONCLUSION

MT for treatment of AIS in frail patients may be associated with worse rates of morbidity and mortality along with reduced efficacy. Given that no studies to date directly compare conservative measures with endovascular management for AIS in frail patients, more studies are required to further evaluate and identify characteristics that may improve outcomes in these patients.

Role of frailty in predicting outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Stroke is considered the second most common cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide. Frailty, characterized by increased vulnerability to stressors, is emerging as a key factor affecting outcomes in older adults and stroke patients. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of frailty in acute stroke patients and assess its association with mortality and poor functional outcome.

Methods

Medline, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases were systematically searched for English-language studies that included adult stroke patients (>16 years), have defined frailty, and reported mortality and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis was done using STATA 14.2, and the results were expressed as pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and the Chi-square test. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

Twenty-five studies were included in the analysis. Frailty prevalence in stroke patients was 23% (95% CI 22% - 23%). Unadjusted analysis showed an OR of 2.66 (95% CI: 1.93 - 3.67) for mortality and 2.04 (95% CI: 1.49 - 2.80) for poor functional outcome. Adjusted estimates indicated an OR of 1.22 (95% CI: 1.1 - 1.35) for mortality and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04 - 1.41) for poor functional outcome, with substantial heterogeneity for both adjusted and unadjusted analyses. No publication bias was detected for the prevalence of frailty. However, there was a publication bias for the association between frailty and mortality.

Conclusions

Frailty was significantly associated with increased mortality and poorer functional outcomes in stroke patients. Our study highlights the need to focus on frailty in stroke patients to improve outcomes and quality of life. Further research should aim to standardize assessment of frailty and reduce heterogeneity in study outcomes.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, CRD42023470325.

Prevalence and outcome of pre-onset frailty in patients with acute stroke

BACKGROUND

Frailty in older individuals is an underappreciated condition that affects the incidence and/or prognosis of stroke.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the prevalence of pre-onset frailty in patients with acute first-onset and recurrent strokes and association between pre-onset frailty and functional disability at hospital discharge.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 210 acute stroke patients admitted to the Stroke Unit of Nippon Medical School Hospital during November 2021-June 2022. The mean participant age was 79.2 ± 7.4 years. Age, sex, pre-onset frailty, body mass index (BMI), stroke type, medical history, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission were evaluated. Frailty was defined as a clinical frailty scale (CFS) score ≥ 5. Frailty prevalence was calculated for all patients, and scores of functional disabilities at discharge were evaluated using modified Rankin scale.

RESULTS

Overall frailty prevalence was 31% in all stroke patients, with 24% and 47% of first-onset and recurrent strokes, respectively. Pre-onset frailty, NIHSS score at admission, age, stroke type, previous stroke, sex, BMI, dyslipidemia, and atrial fibrillation were significantly associated with functional disability at discharge. Logistic regression analysis revealed that CFS score, NIHSS score at admission, and previous stroke were independent predictors of functional disability at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-fourth of patients with first-onset stroke had pre-onset frailty; the rate doubled in recurrent stroke; these rates appear to be much larger than rate in healthy individuals. Pre-onset frailty, a negative independent factor affecting functional disability at discharge, is important for pre-onset frailty evaluation and rehabilitation intervention in acute stroke patients.

The impact of frailty on short-term prognosis in discharged adult stroke patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Frailty is commonly observed in stroke patients and it is associated with adverse outcomes. However, there remains a gap in longitudinal studies investigating the causal relationship between baseline frailty and short-term prognosis in discharged adult stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the causal impact of frailty on non-elective readmission and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, and investigate its associations with cognitive impairment and post-stroke disability.

DESIGN

A multicenter prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary hospitals in Central and Northwest China.

PARTICIPANTS

667 adult stroke patients in stroke units were included from January 2022 to June 2022.

METHODS

Baseline frailty was assessed by the Frailty Scale. Custom-designed questions were utilized to assess non-elective readmission and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events as primary outcomes. Cognitive impairment, assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE), and post-stroke disability, measured with the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), were considered secondary outcomes at a 3-month follow-up. The impact of baseline frailty on non-elective readmission and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events was examined using bivariate and multiple Cox regression analyses. Furthermore, associations between baseline frailty and cognitive impairment, or post-stroke disability, were investigated through generalized linear models.

RESULTS

A total of 5 participants died, 12 had major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, and 57 had non-selective readmission among 667 adult stroke patients. Frailty was an independent risk factor for non-selective readmission (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.71, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.59, 4.62) and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (HR: 3.77, 95 % CI: 1.07, 13.22) for stroke patients. Baseline frailty was correlated with cognitive impairment (regression coefficient [β]: -2.68, 95 % CI: -3.78, -1.58) adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical factors and follow-up interval. However, the relationship between frailty and cognitive impairment did not reach statistical significance when further adjusting for baseline MMSE (β: -0.39, 95 % CI: -1.43, 0.64). Moreover, baseline frailty was associated with post-stroke disability (β: 0.36, 95 % CI: 0.08, 0.65) adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical variables, follow-up interval, and baseline mRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding highlights the importance of assessing baseline frailty in discharged adult stroke patients, as it is significantly associated with non-elective readmission, major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, and post-stroke disability at 3 months. These results highlight the crucial role of screening and evaluating frailty status in improving short-term prognosis for adult stroke patients. Interventions should be developed to address baseline frailty and mitigate the short-term prognosis of stroke.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Baseline frailty predicts non-elective readmission, major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, and post-stroke disability in adult stroke patients. @haiyanhexyyy.

The Limited Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score as a Frailty Assessment Tool in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is an International Classification of Disease 10th Revision-based scale that was originally designed for, and validated in, the assessment of patients 75 years or older presenting in an acute care setting. This study highlights central tenets inherent to the concept of frailty; questions the logic behind, and utility of, HFRS' recent implementation in the neurosurgical literature; and discusses why there is no useful role for HFRS as a frailty-based neurosurgical risk assessment (FBNRA) tool.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including all cranial and spinal studies that used HFRS as their primary frailty tool. Seventeen (N = 17) studies used HFRS to assess frailty's impact on neurosurgical outcomes. Thirteen total journals, 10 of which were neurosurgical journals, including the highest impact factor journals, published the 17 papers.

RESULTS

Increasing HFRS score was associated with adverse outcomes, including prolonged length of stay (11 of 17 studies), nonroutine discharge (10 of 17 studies), and increased hospital costs (9 of 17 studies). Four different HFRS studies, of the 17, predicted one of the following 4 adverse outcomes: worse quality of life, worse functional outcomes, reoperation, or in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Despite its rapid acceptance and widespread proliferation through the leading neurosurgical journals, HFRS lacks any conceptual relationship to the frailty syndrome or FBNRA for individual patients. HFRS measures acute conditions using International Classification of Disease 10th Revision codes and awards "frailty" points for symptoms and examination findings unrelated to the impaired baseline physiological reserve inherent to the very definition of frailty. HFRS lacks clinical utility as it cannot be deployed point-of-care at the bedside to risk stratify patients. HFRS has never been validated in any patient population younger than 75 years or in any nonacute care setting. We recommend HFRS be discontinued as an individual FBNRA tool.

Systematic Review of the Association of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score with Mortality in Patients with Cerebrovascular and Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

There is limited systematic data on the association between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and characteristics and mortality in patients with cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This systematic review aimed to summarise the use of the HFRS in describing the prevalence of frailty in patients with CVD, the clinical characteristics of patients with CVD, and the association between frailty on the likelihood of mortality in patients with CVD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for observational studies using terms related to CVD, cerebrovascular disease, and the HFRS was conducted using 6 databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Seventeen observational studies were included, all rated 'good' quality according to the NOS. One study investigated 5 different CVD cohorts (atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), hypotension, hypertension, and chronic ischemic heart disease), 1 study investigated 2 different CVD cohorts (AF and acute myocardial infarction (AMI)), 6 studies investigated HF, 3 studies investigated AMI, 4 studies investigated stroke, 1 study investigated AF, and 1 study investigated cardiac arrest. Increasing frailty risk category was associated with increased age, female sex, and non-white racial group across all CVD. Increasing frailty risk category is also associated with increased length of hospital stay, total costs, and increased odds of 30-day all-cause mortality across all CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

The HFRS is an efficient and effective tool for stratifying frailty in patients with CVD and predicting adverse health outcomes.

Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations

Among the high prevalence of cerebrovascular diseases nowadays, acute ischemic stroke stands out, representing a significant worldwide health issue with important socio-economic implications. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are important milestones for the management of this multifaceted pathology, making understanding the various stroke-onset symptoms crucial. A key role in acute ischemic stroke management is emphasizing the essential role of a multi-disciplinary team, therefore, increasing the efficiency of recognition and treatment. Neuroimaging and neuroradiology have evolved dramatically over the years, with multiple approaches that provide a higher understanding of the morphological aspects as well as timely recognition of cerebral artery occlusions for effective therapy planning. Regarding the treatment matter, the pharmacological approach, particularly fibrinolytic therapy, has its merits and challenges. Endovascular thrombectomy, a game-changer in stroke management, has witnessed significant advances, with technologies like stent retrievers and aspiration catheters playing pivotal roles. For select patients, combining pharmacological and endovascular strategies offers evidence-backed benefits. The aim of our comprehensive study on acute ischemic stroke is to efficiently compare the current therapies, recognize novel possibilities from the literature, and describe the state of the art in the interdisciplinary approach to acute ischemic stroke. As we aspire for holistic patient management, the emphasis is not just on medical intervention but also on physical therapy, mental health, and community engagement. The future holds promising innovations, with artificial intelligence poised to reshape stroke diagnostics and treatments. Bridging the gap between groundbreaking research and clinical practice remains a challenge, urging continuous collaboration and research.

Higher Hospital Frailty Risk Score Is Associated With Increased Risk of Stroke: Observational and Genetic Analyses

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a prevalent state associated with several aging-related traits and conditions. The relationship between frailty and stroke remains understudied. Here we aim to investigate whether the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) is associated with the risk of stroke and determine whether a significant association between genetically determined frailty and stroke exists.

DESIGN

Observational study using data from All of Us research program and Mendelian Randomization analyses.

METHODS

Participants from All of Us with available electronic health records were selected for analysis. All of Us began national enrollment in 2018 and is expected to continue for at least 10 years. All of Us is recruiting members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented in research. All participants provided informed consent at the time of enrollment, and the date of consent was recorded for each participant. Incident stroke was defined as stroke event happening on or after the date of consent to the All of Us study HFRS was measured with a 3-year look-back period before the date of consent for stroke risk. The HFRS was stratified into 4 categories: no-frailty (HFRS=0), low (HFRS ≥1 and <5), intermediate (≥5 and <15), and high (HFRS ≥15). Last, we implemented Mendelian Randomization analyses to evaluate whether genetically determined frailty is associated with stroke risk.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three thousand two hundred twenty-six participants were at risk of stroke. In multivariable analyses, frailty status was significantly associated with risk of any (ischemic or hemorrhagic) stroke following a dose-response way: not-frail versus low HFRS (HR, 4.9 [CI, 3.5-6.8]; P<0.001), not-frail versus intermediate HFRS (HR, 11.4 [CI, 8.3-15.7]; P<0.001) and not-frail versus high HFRS (HR, 42.8 [CI, 31.2-58.6]; P<0.001). We found similar associations when evaluating ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke separately (P value for all comparisons <0.05). Mendelian Randomization confirmed this association by indicating that genetically determined frailty was independently associated with risk of any stroke (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.15-1.84]; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty, based on the HFRS was associated with higher risk of any stroke. Mendelian Randomization analyses confirmed this association providing evidence to support a causal relationship.

Implications of frailty in acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a state of cumulative degeneration of bodily functions that is consistently associated with poor outcomes in older people following illness. Combined stroke intervention and frailty may yield additive and synergistic effects adults with stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) in frail patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the relationship between debilitation and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after EVT. Until August 2022, researchers have searched three databases (Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane). Random-effects meta-analysis, combined ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to assess efficacy values. The I² statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We ultimately included eight studies including 3662 non-overlapping participants. Four studies used the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), two studies used the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), a study used frailty index and a study used the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Frailty prevalence: 35%; 95% CI, 0.27-0.43; low quality evidence, downgraded due to heterogeneity, bias. Random effects showed that poor functional outcome (5 studies, OR 1.956, 95% CI 1.256-3.048) and mortality (9 studies, OR 2.320, 95% CI 1.680-3.205) was significantly associated with frailty. In adjusted analyses, poor functional outcome (4 studies, OR_adj 1.189, 95% CI 1.043-1.357), and mortality (3 studies, OR_adj 1.036, 95% CI 1.008-1.065) were significantly associated with frailty.

CONCLUSION

Pre-stroke frailty is an important predictor of poor prognosis assessed by EVT and can be added to the classical predictors of stroke outcome. Routine assessment of pre-stroke frailty can help patients to make decisions about the efficacy of their choice of EVT.

Advance of Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Globally, stroke remains the second leading cause of death, and the third-leading cause of death and disability, in the world [...].

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Frailty in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Summarize the existing evidence regarding the prevalence and risk factors of frailty in stroke patients.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis and systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke patients in hospitals or communities.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis using articles available in 8 databases, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Weipu Database (VIP) from January 1990 to April 2022. Studies were quality rated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies involving 30,423 participants were identified. The prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty in stroke patients was 27% (95%CI: 0.23-0.31) and 47.9% (95%CI: 0.43-0.53). Female gender (OR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.63-1.91), advanced age (MD = 6.73, 95%CI: 3.55-9.91), diabetes (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.06-1.69), hyperlipidemia (OR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.04-2.04), atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.01-1.82), National Institutes of Stroke Scale (NIHSS) admission scores (MD = 2.27, 95%CI: 1.72-2.81) were risk factors of frailty in stroke patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was more prevalent in stroke patients. Female gender, advanced age, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and National Institutes of Stroke Scale (NIHSS) admission scores were identified as risk factors for frailty in stroke patients. In the future, medical staff should pay attention to the early screening of frailty in high-risk groups and provide information on its prevention.

Effect of frailty on outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in older patients

BACKGROUND

frailty has been shown to be a better predictor of clinical outcomes than age alone across many diseases. Few studies have examined the relationship between frailty, stroke and stroke interventions such as endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

OBJECTIVE

we aimed to investigate the impact of frailty measured by clinical frailty scale (CFS) on clinical outcomes after EVT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in older patients ≥70 years.

METHODS

in this retrospective cohort study, we included all consecutive AIS patients age ≥ 70 years receiving EVT at a single comprehensive stroke centre. Patients with CFS of 1-3 were defined as not frail, and CFS > 3 was defined as frail. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalisation, in-hospital mortality, carer requirement, successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and haemorrhagic transformation.

RESULTS

a total of 198 patients were included. The mean age was 78.1 years and 52.0% were female. Frail patients were older, more likely to be female, had more co-morbidities. CFS was significantly associated with poor functional outcome after adjustment for age, NIHSS and time to intervention (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.28, P = 0.032). There was trend towards higher mortality rate in frail patients (frail: 18.3%; non-frail: 9.6%; P = 0.080). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes except increased carer requirement post discharge in frail patients (frail: 91.6%; non-frail: 72.8%; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

frailty was associated with poorer functional outcome at 90 days post-EVT in patients ≥ 70 years.

Prevalence and implications of frailty in acute stroke: systematic review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

frailty is common in older adults and associated with poor outcomes following illness. Although stroke is predominantly a disease of older people, our knowledge of frailty in stroke is limited. We aimed to collate the literature on acute stroke and frailty to estimate the prevalence of pre-stroke frailty and its associations with outcomes.

METHODS

paired researchers searched multidisciplinary electronic databases for papers describing frailty and acute stroke. We assessed risk of bias using Newcastle-Ottawa tools appropriate to study design. We created summary estimates of pre-stroke frailty using random effects models. We collated whether studies reported significant positive associations between frailty and clinical outcomes in adjusted models.

RESULTS

we included 14 studies (n = 27,210 participants). Seven studies (n = 8,840) used a frailty index approach, four studies (n = 14,924) used Hospital Frailty Risk Scores. Pooled prevalence of pre-stroke frailty was 24.6% (95% confidence interval, CI: 16.2-33.1%; low quality evidence, downgraded due to heterogeneity, bias). Combining frailty and pre-frailty (nine studies, n = 23,827), prevalence of any frailty syndrome was 66.8% (95%CI: 49.9-83.7%). Seven studies were at risk of bias, from participant selection or method of frailty assessment. Pre-stroke frailty was associated with all adverse outcomes assessed, including longer-term mortality (positive association in 6 of 6 studies reporting this outcome; odds ratio: 3.75 [95%CI: 2.41-5.70]), length of admission (3 of 4 studies) and disability (4 of 6 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

despite substantial heterogeneity, whichever way it is measured, frailty is common in patients presenting with acute stroke and associated with poor outcomes. This has implications for the design of stroke services and pathways.

Frailty and stroke thrombectomy outcomes-an observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can improve outcomes following ischaemic stroke. Patient selection for MT is predominantly based on physiological and imaging parameters. We assessed whether people living with pre-stroke frailty had differing outcomes following MT.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients undergoing MT at a UK comprehensive stroke centre. We calculated a cumulative deficits frailty index to identify pre-stroke frailty in those patients presenting directly to the centre. Frailty was defined as an index score ≥ 0.24. We assessed univariable and multivariable association between pre-stroke frailty and stroke outcomes. Our primary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 175 patients who underwent MT (2014-2018), we identified frailty in 49 (28%). Frail and non-frail patients had similar rates of thrombolysis administration, successful recanalization and onset to recanalization times. Those with pre-stroke frailty had higher 24 hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (12(IQR: 8-17) versus 3(IQR: 2-13); P = 0.001); were less likely to be independent (mRS 0-2: 18% versus 61%; P < 0.001) and more likely to die (47% versus 14%; P < 0.001) within 90 days. Adjusting for age, baseline NIHSS and thrombolysis, frailty remained a strong, independent predictor of poor clinical outcome at 90 days (Death OR: 3.12 (95% CI: 1.32-7.4); dependency OR: 3.04 (95%CI: 1.10-8.44). Age was no longer a predictor of outcome when adjusted for frailty.

CONCLUSION

Pre-stroke frailty is prevalent in real-world patients eligible for MT and is an important predictor of poor outcomes. Routine assessment of pre-stroke frailty could help decision-making around patient selection for MT.

Frailty and cerebrovascular disease: Concepts and clinical implications for stroke medicine

Frailty is a distinctive health state in which the ability of older people to cope with acute stressors is compromised by an increased vulnerability brought by age-associated declines in physiological reserve and function across multiple organ systems. Although closely associated with age, multimorbidity, and disability, frailty is a discrete syndrome that is associated with poorer outcomes across a range of medical conditions. However, its role in cerebrovascular disease and stroke has received limited attention. The estimated rise in the prevalence of frailty associated with changing demographics over the coming decades makes it an important issue for stroke practitioners, cerebrovascular research, clinical service provision, and stroke survivors alike. This review will consider the concept and models of frailty, how frailty is common in cerebrovascular disease, the impact of frailty on stroke risk factors, acute treatments, and rehabilitation, and considerations for future applications in both cerebrovascular clinical and research settings.

[Nonaretritic central retinal artery occlusion as marker for the generalized vascular risk]

BACKGROUND

Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) represents a limiting visual perception for affected patients. In all efforts to improve function it must not be forgotten that in the vast majority of cases the cause is one or more severe vascular or cardiac diseases, which can cause RAO just as ischemic stroke and can also be life-threatening.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to present the available literature and to explain the importance of an intensive neurological internal medical clarification in RAO patients.

CONCLUSION

Although cardiovascular diseases are already known in most patients at the onset of an RAO, further risk factors are detected in almost 80% of cases. Therefore, and because of the high risk for recurrent thromboembolism, immediate and standardized neurological internal medical clarification of the cause is urgently recommended after an acute RAO in the context of an inpatient stay.