Factors Associated with Malnutrition and Its Impact on Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients

Relation of Malnutrition on Septic Older Adults in Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Modified Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition in older adults has significant ramifications for surgical outcomes. The incidence of malnutrition is up to 30% in emergent gastrointestinal surgery (EGS). This study aims to investigate malnutrition's correlation on outcomes of older adults with preoperative sepsis undergoing EGS.

METHODS

Adults aged ≥ 65 y who had preoperative sepsis were included. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) introduced criteria to diagnose malnutrition. We used a modified GLIM (mGLIM) using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. The mGLIM includes (1) body mass index ≤ 20 kg/m2 for age ≤ 70 y and body mass index ≤ 22 kg/m2 for age ≥ 71 y, (2) weight loss >10% within the past 6 mo, (3) admission albumin ≤ 3.5 g/dL, and (4) EGS as an acute disease marker. Multivariate regression explored the relationship of malnutrition on mortality, length of stay, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 26,801 patients were included. Demographically, female patients included 58% (n = 15,501). African American patients consisted of 8.0% (n = 2133), and Caucasian patients accounted for 75.7% (n = 20,295) of the study population. Small bowel cases were 32.1% (n = 8609), and colorectal cases represented 76.5% (n = 20,490) of all cases. Malnourished patients made up of 1.8% (n = 481) of all patients. Multivariate regression revealed malnourished patients have higher chance of mortality for small bowel (P = 0.001, confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.69) and colorectal (P < 0.001, CI 1.47-2.39) procedures, and higher likelihood of complications for colorectal (P = 0.001, CI 1.31-2.65) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that malnutrition, as identified by mGLIM criteria, is associated with higher mortality and complication rates after EGS. The mGLIM criteria could be a prognostic tool for adverse outcomes in malnutrition-risk patients.

Malnutrition and perioperative nutritional rehabilitation in major operations

Background

Malnutrition is a potentially preventable risk factor for surgery. This systematic review examines nutritional management strategies aiming to enhance surgical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed for English-language studies published between July 1, 2004, and July 1, 2024, involving adult surgical patients. Study selection focused on four key themes: (1) nutritional screening and assessment, (2) preoperative nutritional therapy, (3) nutritional support in critically ill surgical patients, and (4) postoperative nutritional rehabilitation. Studies in non-surgical cohorts, letters, and case reports were excluded. Reference lists of relevant studies were manually screened for additional sources.

Results

Of 2763 studies identified, 251 met the inclusion criteria and 85 were added after manual screening, contributing to a total of 341 papers for the review. The prevalence of malnutrition varied widely by procedure, with the highest rates observed in pancreatic and esophagogastric operations. Preoperative malnutrition was strongly associated with increased postoperative complications, infections, prolonged hospital stay, and higher mortality. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) was effective in identifying at-risk patients. Preoperative nutritional interventions, including dietitian-led counseling, oral supplementation, and enteral or parenteral nutrition, may reduce complications and improve outcomes. Critically ill patients benefited from structured enteral and parenteral strategies. Early postoperative nutrition within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are linked to less complications and shorter hospital stay.

Conclusion

Malnutrition significantly impacts surgical outcomes, necessitating early identification and intervention. Standardized management is key to improving recovery and reducing complications. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic tools, assessing nutritional requirements, optimizing perioperative nutritional strategies, and establishing long-term nutritional follow-up guidelines for surgical patients.

Association of polypharmacy and perioperative outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Polypharmacy is becoming more prevalent due to an ageing population. As more patients are undergoing surgical procedures, it is important to determine which group of patients are at higher risk of poorer outcomes. This review aimed to provide a summary of existing literature and to determine if polypharmacy is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes and to identify any gaps in the literature. This systematic review was conducted using electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from their inception to December 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using generic inverse variance method. We identified 45 eligible studies from different countries and different surgical populations. Thirty-two studies (71.11%) defined polypharmacy as the use of five or more medications. Polypharmacy is significantly associated with postoperative delirium (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval = 1.32-1.98, I2 = 0%). Although polypharmacy is found to be significantly associated with postoperative delirium, the relationship between polypharmacy and postoperative delirium remains complex.

Correlation Between Postoperative Complications and Number of Colorectal Liver Metastases Resected

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to describe the relationship between the number of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resected and the rate of postoperative complications and to determine a threshold level, if any, for which the risk of postoperative complications outweighs the benefit of resection of metastatic disease.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2019 to 2021. Patients were divided into three major groups: one to two, three to four, and more than five CRLM.

RESULTS

A total of 5124 patients had CRLM. Compared to patients with one to two and three to four CRLM, patients with 5+ resections were at increased risk of any complication (1655 [50% for one to two CRLM versus 697 [65%] for three to four CRLM versus 437 [76%] for 5+ LM; P = 0.001), surgical complications (1305 [40%] versus 556 [52%] versus 349 [60%]; P = 0.001), and medical complications (350 [10%] versus 141 [13%] versus 88 [16%]; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate a significant increase in any surgical complications with three to four tumors resected and a significant increase in any surgical and medical complications and length of stay >5 ds with five or more tumors resected.

Multicentre prospective study on the diagnostic and prognostic validity of malnutrition assessment tools in surgery

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is a risk factor for postoperative morbidity but the optimal tool for the assessment of malnutrition is unclear.

METHODS

This is a prospective multicentre cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency major abdominal surgery for benign or malignant disease in 12 Greek hospitals between January 2022 and December 2023 were included. Patients unable to provide nutrition history and/or informed consent were excluded. Subjective global assessment (SGA) was used as a reference standard for malnutrition diagnosis. GLIM (global leadership initiative on malnutrition), MNA-SF (mini nutrition assessment short form), MST (malnutrition screening tool), MUST (malnutrition universal screening tool), NRI (nutritional risk index), NRS-2002 (nutrition risk scale 2002), PONS (perioperative nutrition screen) and SNAQ (short nutrition assessment questionnaire) tools were applied for malnutrition risk assessments. Indicators of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve-AUC), construct validity (convergent associations with relevant variables) and prognostic validity (logistic regression) were appraised.

RESULTS

1649 patients were included (58% colorectal, 21% upper gastrointestinal, 14% hepatobiliary operations). SGA defined 562 (34.1%) patients as malnourished with excellent construct and prognostic validity. Malnutrition risk assessments varied from 24.0% using NRS-2002 to 58.6% with the MNA-SF. On their ordinal scales, MNA-SF (AUC = 0.83, 95% c.i. 0.81 to 0.85) and MUST (AUC = 0.79, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 0.82) had the best discriminatory abilities with minimal between-centre heterogeneity. As binary classifiers, MNA-SF (OR = 30.2; 95% c.i. 20.2 to 45.1) and MUST (OR = 16.1; 95% c.i. 12.4 to 21.1) had the highest diagnostic ORs but only MUST had sensitivity and specificity close to 80%. MUST performed well in construct and prognostic validity appraisals.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of the MUST as it is the most valid nutritional screening tool in patients after major abdominal surgery.

Association of Admission Nutritional Status Evaluated by Prognostic Nutritional Index with One-Year Walking Independence after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study Based on 1,152 Patients

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes, but the relevant prognostic assessment is not emphasized in patients who have osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study aimed to assess the association between preoperative nutritional status evaluated by the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and walking independence at one year postoperatively in patients who have ONFH undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital who had ONFH and underwent primary unilateral THA from October 30, 2014 to April 26, 2019. The restricted cubic spline was used to assess the dose-effect relationship between PNI and recovery of walking independence. Propensity score matching was performed to balance potential preoperative confounders, and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the association between malnutrition and losing walking independence (LWI) with perioperative and follow-up factors for further adjustment. Inverse probability treatment weighting and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. Subgroup analyses were used to determine potential population heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We found a negative relationship between admission PNI levels and recovery of walking independence at one year postoperatively, and that low PNI (< 42.2) was independently associated with a 2.35-fold (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.16 to 4.77; P = 0.018) increased risk of LWI. The results were overall robust. Significant heterogeneities were observed in the subgroups of age, labor intensity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, Charlson's comorbidity index, and Association Research Circulation Osseous stage (P for interaction < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative low-level PNI is a significant risk factor for LWI after THA in patients who have ONFH. This finding supports nutritional screening and interventions for surgeons in decision-making for elective surgery and postoperative rehabilitation management.

Impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Frailty, malnutrition and low socioeconomic status may mutually perpetuate each other in a self-reinforcing and interdependent manner. The intertwined nature of these factors may be overlooked when investigating impacts on perioperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A multicentre cohort study involving six Australian tertiary hospitals was undertaken. All consecutive surgical patients who underwent an operation were included. Frailty was defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, malnutrition by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and low socioeconomic status by the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage. Linear mixed-effects and binary logistic generalised estimated equation models were performed for the outcomes: inpatient mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission and re-operation.

RESULTS

A total of 21 976 patients were included. After controlling for confounders, malnutrition and socioeconomic status, patients at high risk of frailty have a mean hospital length of stay 3.46 times longer (mean ratio = 3.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.20, 3.73; P value < .001), odds of 30-day readmission 2.4 times higher (odds ratio = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.19, 2.63; P value < .001) and odds of in-hospital mortality 12.89 times greater than patients with low risk of frailty (odds ratio = 12.89; 95% CI: 4.51, 36.69; P value < .001). Elevated MUST scores were also significantly associated with worse outcomes, but to a lesser extent. Socioeconomic status had no association with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative risk evaluation should consider both frailty and malnutrition as separate, significant risk factors. Despite strong causal links with frailty and malnutrition, socioeconomic disadvantage is not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Additional studies regarding the prospective identification of these patients with implementation of strategies to mitigate frailty and malnutrition and assessment of perioperative risk are required.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and 30-Day Postoperative Mortality in Geriatric Burn Patients

INTRODUCTION

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) can easily identify malnutrition-associated morbidity and mortality. We investigated the association between preoperative GNRI and 30-d mortality in geriatric burn patients who underwent surgery.

METHODS

The study involved geriatric burn patients (aged ≥ 65 y) who underwent burn surgery between 2012 and 2022. The GNRI was computed using the following formula: 1.489 × serum albumin concentration (mg/L) + 41.7 × patient body weight/ideal body weight. Patients were dichotomized into the high GNRI (≥ 82) and low GNRI (< 82) groups. GNRI was evaluated as an independent predictor of 30-d postoperative mortality. The study also evaluated the association between GNRI and sepsis, the need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and pneumonia.

RESULTS

Out of 270 patients, 128 (47.4%) had low GNRI (< 82). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that low GNRI was significantly associated with 30-d postoperative mortality (hazard ratio: 1.874, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.146-3.066, P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the 30-day mortality rate differed significantly between the low and high GNRI groups (log-rank test, P < 0.001). The 30-d postoperative mortality (hazard ratio: 2.677, 95% CI: 1.536-4.667, P < 0.001) and the incidence of sepsis (odds ratio [OR]: 2.137, 95% CI: 1.307-3.494, P = 0.004), need for CRRT (OR: 1.919, 95% CI: 1.101-3.344, P = 0.025), MACE (OR: 1.680, 95% CI: 1.018-2.773, P = 0.043), and pneumonia (OR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.019-2.764, P = 0.044), were significantly higher in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative low GNRI was associated with increased 30-d postoperative mortality, sepsis, need for CRRT, MACE, and pneumonia in geriatric burn patients.

Assessing the Predictive Value of Different Nutritional Indexes for Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

The link between malnutrition and poor prognosis in cardiovascular disease has been established but the association between malnutrition and contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), a common complication of coronary procedures, remains poorly understood. In this study we investigated the predictive value of 3 nutritional indexes for CA-AKI in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included a total of 6,049 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between May 2012 and September 2020, among whom 352 (5.8%) developed CA-AKI. We used the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) to assess the association between malnutrition risk and CA-AKI after PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that malnutrition, as identified by GNRI and PNI, was significantly associated with a higher risk of CA-AKI (moderate-severe malnutrition in GNRI: odds ratio [OR]=1.92, [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-2.85]; malnutrition in PNI: OR=1.87, [95% CI, 1.39-2.50]), whereas the CONUT score did not demonstrate a significant difference (P>0.05). Furthermore, GNRI (∆AUC=0.115, P<0.001) and PNI (∆AUC=0.101, P<0.001) exhibited superior predictive ability than the CONUT score for CA-AKI and significantly improved reclassification and discrimination in the fully adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition, especially identified by the GNRI and PNI, was associated with a higher risk of CA-AKI after PCI. GNRI and PNI performed better than the CONUT score in predicting CA-AKI.

Malnutrition risk, outcomes, and costs among older adults undergoing elective surgical procedures: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We examine here the association between malnutrition risk and adverse health outcomes among older adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using linked clinical and administrative databases. Malnutrition risk was assessed prior to surgery, defined by unintentional weight loss and decreased food intake. We performed a logistic regression analysis of the primary outcome, a composite adverse outcome measure, including death, bleeding, pneumonia, and other surgical complications. We conducted Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression analysis of hospital length of stay (LOS). We performed a generalized linear regression analysis of in-hospital cost data. All regression analyses controlled for frailty, age, sex, surgical category, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of a total of 3457 older adult elective surgical patients (65-102 years), 310 (9.0%) screened positive for malnutrition risk. In multivariable regression analyses, malnutrition risk was associated with an increased risk of the composite adverse outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.25-2.39), higher hospitalization costs (relative cost = 1.84; 95% CI = 1.59-2.13), and a decreased risk of discharge from the hospital (hazard ratio = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.59-0.77) compared with those who screened negative.

CONCLUSION

Older adult patients with malnutrition risk were at an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes, had longer LOS in the hospital, and incurred higher costs of care. It is important to screen for malnutrition risk and refer older adults for dietetic consults prior to elective surgery.

Racial disparities in time to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Disparities in healthcare exist, yet few data are available on racial differences in time from admission to surgery. This study aimed to compare time from admission to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from 2010 to 2020 were identified using NSQIP. Time to surgery and additional preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, 19.4% of Black patients experienced a time to surgery >1 day compared with 13.4% of White patients (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, controlling for potential confounding factors, Black patients were found to be more likely than White patients to experience a time to surgery >1 day (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.17-1.30, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation is indicated to better define the nature and significance of gender, race, and other biases in surgical care. Surgeons should be aware that biases may adversely impact patient care and should strive to identify and proactively address them to promote health equity in surgery.

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score for Prediction of Microvascular Flap Complications in Reconstructive Surgery

Microvascular flap surgery is a widely acknowledged procedure for significant defect reconstruction. Multiple flap complication risk factors have been identified, yet there are limited data on laboratory biomarkers for the prediction of flap loss. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score has demonstrated good postoperative outcome assessment ability in diverse surgical populations. We aim to assess the predictive value of the CONUT score for complications in microvascular flap surgery. This prospective cohort study includes 72 adult patients undergoing elective microvascular flap surgery. Preoperative blood draws for analysis of full blood count, total plasma cholesterol, and albumin concentrations were collected on the day of surgery before crystalloid infusion. Postoperative data on flap complications and duration of hospitalization were obtained. The overall complication rate was 15.2%. True flap loss with vascular compromise occurred in 5.6%. No differences in flap complications were found between different areas of reconstruction, anatomical flap types, or indications for surgery. Obesity was more common in patients with flap complications (p = 0.01). The CONUT score had an AUC of 0.813 (0.659-0.967, p = 0.012) for predicting complications other than true flap loss due to vascular compromise. A CONUT score > 2 was indicated as optimal during cut-off analysis (p = 0.022). Patients with flap complications had a longer duration of hospitalization (13.55, 10.99-16.11 vs. 25.38, 14.82-35.93; p = 0.004). Our findings indicate that the CONUT score has considerable predictive value in microvascular flap surgery.

The role of malnutrition universal screening tool in predicting outcomes after radical cystectomy

PURPOSE

The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool integrates body mass index, unintentional weight loss and present illness to assess risk for malnutrition. The predictive role of 'MUST' among patients undergoing radical cystectomy is unknown. We investigated the role of 'MUST' in predicting postoperative outcomes and prognosis among patients after RC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 291 patients who underwent radical cystectomy in 6 medical centers between 2015 and 2019. Patients were stratified to risk groups according to the 'MUST' score [low risk (n = 242) vs. medium-to-high risk (n = 49)]. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups. Endpoints were 30-day postoperative complications rate, cancer-specific-survival and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression analyses were used to evaluate survival and identify predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age of the study cohort was 69 years (IQR 63-74). Median duration of follow up for survivors was 33 months (IQR 20-43). Thirty-day major postoperative complications rate was 17%. Baseline characteristics were not different between the 'MUST' groups, and there was no difference in early post-operative complication rates. CSS and OS were significantly lower (p ≤ 0.02) in the medium-to-high-risk group ('MUST' score≥1) with estimated 3-year CSS and OS rates of 60% and 50% compared to 76% and 71% in the low-risk group, respectively. On multivariable analysis, 'MUST'≥1 was an independent predictor of overall- (HR = 1.95, p = 0.006) and cancer-specific-mortality (HR = 1.74, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High 'MUST' scores are associated with decreased survival in patients after radical cystectomy. Thus, the 'MUST' score may serve as a preoperative tool for patient selection and nutritional intervention.

Can the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) predict unfavorable clinical outcome in hospitalized elderly patients?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized elderly patients (HEP) is high.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the behavior of several nutritional indicators and predictors of unfavorable clinical outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective study with hospitalized elderly patients (N = 322). Nutritional instruments, indicators and outcome were investigated. Chi-square, Fisher and Mann-Whitney tests and univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

The variables that, jointly, were associated with hospital stay longer than 7 days, include: the presence of complications (p = 0.0328; OR 1.946; IC95% 1.056; 3.585) and nutritional risk according to the NRS-2002 (p = 0.0016; OR 2.080; IC95% 1.322; 3.275). The variable that remained associated with complications in the multiple model was the nutritional risk according to the NRS-2002 (p = 0.0018; OR 2.587; IC95% 1.423; 4.703).

CONCLUSION

Nutritional risk using the NRS-2002 is a predictor of clinical outcome in hospitalized elderly patients.

A Comparison of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) Tool for Older Patients Undergoing General Surgery

The optimal malnutrition screening tool in geriatric surgery has yet to be determined. Herein, we compare two main tools in older patients undergoing general surgery operations. Older patients (>65 years old) who underwent general surgery operations between 2012 and 2017 in a tertiary centre were included. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) were used for nutritional risk assessment. Preoperative variables as well as postoperative outcomes were recorded prospectively. Agreement between tools was determined with the weighted kappa (κ) statistic. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association of the screening tools with postoperative outcomes. A total of 302 patients (median age 74 years, range: 65-92) were included. A similar number of patients were classified as medium/high risk for malnutrition with the MNA-SF and MUST (26% vs. 36%, p = 0.126). Agreement between the two tools was moderate (weighted κ: 0.474; 95%CI: 0.381-0.568). In the multivariate analysis, MNA-SF was associated significantly with postoperative mortality (p = 0.038) and with postoperative length of stay (p = 0.001). MUST was associated with postoperative length of stay (p = 0.048). The MNA-SF seems to be more consistently associated with postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing general surgery compared with the MUST tool.