Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Central Corneal Thickness in Glaucoma Patients, Glaucoma Suspects, and a Healthy Population

The Effect of Diabetic Retinopathy and Blood Glucose Regulation on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and metabolic control of blood glucose levels on corneal biomechanical parameters.

METHODS

Diabetic patients were categorized into three groups: no DR group, nonproliferative DR (NPDR) group, and proliferative DR (PDR) group. Of the 141 eyes examined, 40 belonged to the control group, 34 to no DR group, 34 to NPDR group, and 33 to PDR group. Using an Ocular Response Analyzer to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc). IOP was assessed using a Tono-Pen, while central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined using an ultrasonic pachymeter. HbA1c levels were also recorded. We conducted comparisons among these groups across biomechanical parameters and IOP (tonopen), and CCT, while also investigating the impact of HbA1c levels on these parameters.

RESULTS

Among any groups show a statistically significant difference in CCT, IOP (tonopen), CH, CRF, IOPg, and IOPcc. In diabetic patients, CRF, CTT, and IOPg values were significantly higher in those with HbA1c levels ≥ 7 mg/dl than in those with HbA1c levels < 7 mg/dl (p = 0.009, p = 0.013, p = 0.038), respectively, while there was no statistically significant difference in IOPcc, CH, and IOP (tonopen). Linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with IOPcc (p < 0.001), while CRF was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001), HbA1c (p < 0.05), and negatively associated with diagnosis of DR (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the influence of metabolic control, as reflected by HbA1c levels, on corneal biomechanical parameters in diabetic patients, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and managing glycemic control in this population.

Corneal retardation time as an ocular hypertension disease indicator

Objective.A detailed analysis of the corneal retardation timeτas a highly related parameter to the intraocular pressure (IOP), and its plausible role as an indicator of ocular hypertension disease.Approach.A simple theoretical expression forτis derived within the corneal viscoelastic model of Kelvin-Voigt with 3 elements. This retardation time can be easily calculated from the well-known signal and pressure amplitudes of non-contact tonometers like the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Then, a population-based study was performed where 100 subjects aged from 18 to 30 were analyzed (within this group, about 10% had an elevated IOP with more than 21 mmHg).Main results.A clear relationship between the corneal retardation time and the corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) was found, underlying the risk for ocular hypertensive (OHT) subjects with lowerτvalues to develop hypertension illnesses (due to the inability of poorly viscoelastic corneas to absorb IOP fluctuations, resulting in probable optic nerve damage).Significance.Our results might provide an useful tool to systematically discern which OHT patients (and even those with normal IOP values) are more likely to suffer glaucoma progression and, consequently, ensure an early diagnosis.

Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach

Over the last two decades, there has been growing interest in assessing corneal biomechanics in different diseases, such as keratoconus, glaucoma, and corneal disorders. Given the interaction and structural continuity between the cornea and sclera, evaluating corneal biomechanics may give us further insights into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, progression, and management of glaucoma. Therefore, some authorities have recommended baseline evaluations of corneal biomechanics in all glaucoma and glaucoma suspects patients. Currently, two devices (Ocular Response Analyzer and Corneal Visualization Schiempflug Technology) are commercially available for evaluating corneal biomechanics; however, each device reports different parameters, and there is a weak to moderate agreement between the reported parameters. Studies are further limited by the inclusion of glaucoma subjects taking topical prostaglandin analogues, which may alter corneal biomechanics and contribute to contradicting results, lack of proper stratification of patients, and misinterpretation of the results based on factors that are confounded by intraocular pressure changes. This review aims to summarize the recent evidence on corneal biomechanics in glaucoma patients and insights for future studies to address the current limitations of the literature studying corneal biomechanics.

Early influence of endotamponade on corneal biomechanical parameters, central corneal thickness and accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement

To define the influence of air, SF6 gas and silicon oil 1000cs tamponade injection and oil tamponade removal on corneal biomechanics, central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure. 77 eyes referred to vitrectomy were divided into 4 groups: 19 to air tamponade, 21 to SF6 tamponade, 19 to oil tamponade, 18 to oil tamponade removal. Pre- and postoperative corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, corneal thickness, Goldman intraocular pressure (GAT) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were analysed. GAT and IOPcc did not change after the air or SF6 tamponade. The oil tamponade injection caused increase in GAT and IOPcc, while the oil removal caused reduction in those parameters. In all groups, preoperative and postoperative values of GAT and IOPcc did not differ. There was no change in corneal thickness and biomechanics after air, SF6 or oil tamponade while after removal of oil those parameters are decreased. The air, SF6 and oil tamponade does not change the corneal thickness and corneal biomechanics. The removal of oil causes decrease in corneal thickness and biomechanics which can lead to bias in intraocular pressure measurement. GAT and IOPcc did not differ in eyes pre- and post-vitrectomy, being similarly reliable measure.

Correlation between radial peripapillary vascular density and reduced central corneal thickness in glaucoma suspect patients

Background

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) provides a quantitative assessment of the microcirculation of the retina and choroid. It may precede the retinal nerve layer (RNFL) and optic disc head defects. Retinal nerve fiber layer defects and reduced central corneal thickness (CCT) are important parameters in the assessment of a glaucoma suspect patients. The aim of this study is to investigate any possible relationship between the reduced central corneal thickness and the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density defect in glaucoma suspect.

Methods

In this cross sectional study, 92 eyes were incorporated. Peripapillary OCT angiography (4.5 mm) and Anterior segment OCT for corneal pachymetry were done. C/D Ratio, thickness of nerve fiber layer, the blood flow indices and central corneal thickness also were evaluated.

Results

In eyes of glaucoma suspect patients; a significant positive correlation between CCT and total RPC density was detected (r = 0.38, P < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was also found between total RPC and peripapillary RNFL thickness (r = 0.55, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Reduced central corneal thickness and peripapillary capillary density are two screening parameters for glaucoma suspect patients. The radial peripapillary capillary density is a valid diagnostic tool for glaucoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02628-z.

Corneal hysteresis: ready for prime time?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This review summarizes recent findings on corneal hysteresis, a biomechanical property of the cornea. Corneal hysteresis measurements can be easily acquired clinically and may serve as surrogate markers for biomechanical properties of tissues in the back of the eye, like the lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera, which may be related to the susceptibility to glaucomatous damage.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have provided evidence of the associations between corneal hysteresis and clinically relevant outcomes in glaucoma. Corneal hysteresis has been shown to be predictive of glaucoma development in eyes suspected of having the disease. For eyes already diagnosed with glaucoma, lower corneal hysteresis has been associated with higher risk of progression and faster rates of visual field loss over time. Such associations appear to be stronger than those for corneal thickness, suggesting that corneal hysteresis may be a more important predictive factor. Recent evidence has also shown that cornealcorrected intraocular pressure measurements may present advantages compared to conventional Goldmann tonometry in predicting clinically relevant outcomes in glaucoma.

SUMMARY

Given the evidence supporting corneal hysteresis as an important risk factor for glaucoma development and its progression, practitioners should consider measuring corneal hysteresis in all patients at risk for glaucoma, as well as in those already diagnosed with the disease.

Modification of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy

Changes in the cornea can influence outcomes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients undergoing non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with the Esnoper V2000 implant^® (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Gasteiz, Spain). We included 42 eyes of 42 patients with POAG scheduled for NPDS with the Esnoper V2000 implant. Biomechanical properties were measured by Ocular Response Analyzer^® G3 (ORA; Reichert Inc., Depew, NY, USA). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were measured the day before surgery and on day 1, 7, and 30 and 2 and 3 months after surgery. CH initially increased, fell below the presurgical value at 30 days after the surgery, and increased again at 2 and 3 months. CRF, IOPcc, and IOPg decreased on the first day after surgery, then followed a trend of increasing but stayed below pre-surgery levels. All values reached statistical significance. While observed changes in corneal biomechanics after NPDS and Esnoper V2000 implant were significant, more studies are needed if we are to understand their influence on corneal biomechanics and their clinical relevance in POAG.

Updates in Clinical and Translational Glaucoma Research

Glaucoma is a sight-threatening disease and the primum mobile of irreversible blindness worldwide [...].