Evaluating the Prognostic Value of Islet Autoantibody Monitoring in Islet Transplant Recipients with Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Outcomes Stratified by Autoantibodies Status and Pretransplant Fasting C-peptide

Backgrounds

Pancreatic beta cell function and islet autoantibodies classically distinguish types of diabetes (type 1 diabetes mellitus [DM] or type 2 DM). Here, we sought to evaluate simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant outcomes stratified by the presence or absence of beta cell function and autoantibodies.

Methods

SPK recipients were eligible if pretransplant autoantibodies were measured against insulin, islet cell, or glutamic acid decarboxylase 65-kD isoform. Recipients were categorized as A+ or A- based on the detection of ≥1 autoantibodies. Recipients were similarly categorized on the basis of detectable pretransplant fasting C-peptide of ≥2 ng/mL (β+) or <2 ng/mL (β-). Thus, recipients were categorized into 4 groups: A+β-, A-β-, A-β+, and A+β+. Outcomes of interest were overall pancreas graft failure (non-death-censored), death-censored pancreas, or kidney graft failure (death-censored pancreas graft failure [DCGF]; kidney DCGF), composite outcomes with any of the 3 outcomes as pancreas DCGF, use of an antidiabetic agent, or hemoglobin A1c >6.5.

Results

One hundred eighty-three SPK recipients were included: A+β- (n = 72), A-β- (n = 42), A-β+ (n = 49), and A+β+ (n = 20). We did not detect a statistical difference in non-death-censored pancreas graft failure for A+β- recipients compared with other groups: A-β- (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-1.42), A-β+ (aHR: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.37-2.85), and A+β+ (aHR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.13-3.33) in adjusted analyses. Similar outcomes were observed for other outcomes.

Conclusions

In SPK recipients, outcomes were similar among recipients with classic features of type 1 DM and various other types of DM.

Advances and challenges of the cell-based therapies among diabetic patients

Diabetes mellitus is a significant global public health challenge, with a rising prevalence and associated morbidity and mortality. Cell therapy has evolved over time and holds great potential in diabetes treatment. In the present review, we discussed the recent progresses in cell-based therapies for diabetes that provides an overview of islet and stem cell transplantation technologies used in clinical settings, highlighting their strengths and limitations. We also discussed immunomodulatory strategies employed in cell therapies. Therefore, this review highlights key progresses that pave the way to design transformative treatments to improve the life quality among diabetic patients.

Impact of GAD65 and IA2 autoantibodies on islet allograft survival

Introduction

Islet transplantation (ITx) shows promise in treating T1D, but the role of islet autoantibodies on graft survival has not been clearly elucidated. We aimed to analyze the effect of GAD65 and IA2 autoantibody status on graft survival and attainment of insulin independence in subjects with T1D who underwent ITx.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 47 ITx recipients from 2000 to 2018. Islet infusion was performed via intrahepatic portal (n=44) or onto the omentum via laparoscopic approach (n=3). Immunosuppression involved anti-IL2 receptor antibody, anti-TNF, and dual combinations of sirolimus, tacrolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil (Edmonton-like) in 38 subjects (80.9%). T-cell depletion induction with Edmonton-like maintenance was used in 9 subjects (19%). GAD65 and IA2 autoantibodies were assessed pre-transplant and post-transplant (monthly) until graft failure, and categorized as persistently negative, persistently positive, or seroconverters. Graft survival was analyzed using U-Mann-Whitney test, and Quade's nonparametric ANCOVA adjusted for confounders. Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank tests were employed to analyze attainment of insulin independence. P value <0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

ITx recipients with persistent autoantibody negativity (n = 21) showed longer graft function (98 [61 - 182] months) than those with persistent autoantibody positivity (n = 18; 38 [13 - 163] months), even after adjusting for immunosuppressive induction protocol (P = 0.027). Seroconverters (n=8) had a median graft survival time of 73 (7.7 - 167) months, which did not significantly differ from the other 2 groups. Subjects with persistently single antibody positivity to GAD65 (n = 8) had shorter graft survival compared to negative islet autoantibody (GAD65/IA2) subjects (n = 21; P = 0.016). Time of graft survival did not differ in subjects with single antibody positivity to IA2. The proportion of insulin independence attainment was similar irrespective of autoantibody status.

Conclusion

The persistence of islet autoantibodies, as markers of islet autoimmunity, may represent an underappreciated contributing factor to the failure of transplanted β cells. Whether induction with T-cell depletion may lead to improved graft survival, independent of islet autoantibody status, could not be evaluated in our cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to further address the role of islet autoantibody status on islet graft survival.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

Cell Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes: From Islet Transplantation to Stem Cells

The field of cell therapy of type 1 diabetes is a particularly interesting example in the scenario of regenerative medicine. In fact, β-cell replacement has its roots in the experience of islet transplantation, which began 40 years ago and is currently a rapidly accelerating field, with several ongoing clinical trials using β cells derived from stem cells. Type 1 diabetes is particularly suitable for cell therapy as it is a disease due to the deficiency of only one cell type, the insulin-producing β cell, and this endocrine cell does not need to be positioned inside the pancreas to perform its function. On the other hand, the presence of a double immunological barrier, the allogeneic one and the autoimmune one, makes the protection of β cells from rejection a major challenge. Until today, islet transplantation has taught us a lot, pioneering immunosuppressive therapies, graft encapsulation, tissue engineering, and test of different implant sites and has stimulated a great variety of studies on β-cell function. This review starts from islet transplantation, presenting its current indications and the latest published trials, to arrive at the prospects of stem cell therapy, presenting the latest innovations in the field.