Current Management Options in Irvine-Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review

Assessment of the Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer after Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery

(1) Background: This research aimed to evaluate the changes in ganglion cell layer thickness (GCLT) after uncomplicated cataract surgery in patients without previous ocular pathology and the impact of the appearance of cystoid macular edema on the GCLT and visual acuity. (2) Methods: The evaluation of 174 patients was performed with the indication of uncomplicated cataract surgery. The variables analyzed were demographic data, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cataract type and OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) measurements of central macular thickness (CMT), and the presence of cysts and GCLT preoperatively and one day, one and three months after surgery. (3) Results: There was a relationship between the postoperative increase in retinal GCLT and BCVA after uncomplicated cataract surgery. The presence of microcysts reduced the thickness of the GCL, which is significantly related to the loss of BCVA. The appearance of cystoid macular edema one month after surgery was also related to the preoperative CMT. There was a statistically significant decrease in preoperative GCL but a statistically significant increase in preoperative CMT in patients with microcysts one-month post-surgery. (4) Conclusions: There is a relationship between postoperative retinal GCLT and BCVA after uncomplicated cataract surgery. The presence of microcysts significantly reduces the thickness of the GCL, which is significantly related to the loss of BCVA.

Choroidal and Retinal Thicknesses in Healthy Eyes Measured with Ultra-Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography

Ultra-wide-field optical coherence tomography (UWF-OCT) has been recently introduced into clinical ophthalmological practice. To date, there are few data on the reference values of the retinal thickness (RT) and choroidal thickness (CT) measured with this technique. This study aimed to analyze the variance in RT and CT in the healthy eyes of white Caucasian patients with UWF-OCT tests performed with the largest available scan size of 23 × 20 mm. The data were analyzed with reference to the patients' age and gender and the axial length of the eyeball. The results of UWF-OCT scanning enabled us to visualize the shape of the retina and choroid in a large portion of the eyeball. Both anatomical entities became significantly thinner at the periphery. The peripheral CT was greater in the upper and temporal sectors; the RT was higher in the nasal compared to the temporal sectors. Both the choroid and retina showed a reduced thickness with age; however, the CT and RT did not show a statistically significant correlation with the axial length after adjusting for age and gender. Age-related variations in thickness were especially prominent in the choroid. The CT in UWF-OCT testing was significantly greater in females, while the RT was greater in males. UWF-OCT testing provides additional information on the anatomical structure of the retina and choroid compared to standard-field OCT.

FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE CLOSURE WITH TOPICAL MEDICAL THERAPY

PURPOSE

To examine the efficacy and clinical characteristics of successful full-thickness macular hole closure with topical therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of full-thickness macular holes managed by a single retinal physician (DS) diagnosed and treated from 2017 to 22.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients with full-thickness macular holes, 71 patients were started on steroid, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory (NSAID) drops. 49 patients (mean 67 years, 59% women) were included in the analysis, and 22 patients were excluded for poor follow-up. In total, 7/49 were secondary post-PPV holes and 42/49 were idiopathic. In addition, 18/49 eyes (36.7%) achieved closure on topical therapy, of which 13 were idiopathic. Hole size was directly correlated with odds of closure: for every 10 μm decrease in size and odds of closure increased by 1.2× ( P = 0.001, CI 1.1-1.4). Average time to closure was 107.2 days (range 20-512 days) and was not correlated with hole size ( P = 0.217, CI -0.478 to +1.938). The presence of VMT was found to be inversely related to successful closure (OR 6.1, P = 0.029, CI 1.2-31.3). There was no significant difference in final best-corrected visual acuity for eyes undergoing primary pars plana vitrectomy versus those trialing drops before undergoing pars plana vitrectomy ( P = 0.318, CI -0.094 to +0.112).

CONCLUSION

In the first study to date to report the overall efficacy and clinical characteristics of successful macular hole closure with topical therapy, drops achieved an overall closure rate of 36.7%, with higher efficacy in smaller holes and those without VMT. Rates of MH narrowing and reduction in central foveal thickness acted as predictors of effectiveness of drop therapy.

Navigated yellow subthreshold micropulse laser for refractory cystoid macular edema following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery

Purpose

To report the efficacy and safety of navigated 577nm yellow subthreshold micropulse laser (YSML) treatment in a case of refractory cystoid macular edema (CME) following combined phaco-vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Observations

A 69-year-old male patient complained a slow and progressive visual loss in the right eye (RE) since two months. A complete ophthalmological evaluation was performed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was hand motion and slit lamp examination revealed a nuclear cataract and a total macula-off RRD in the RE. Patient underwent a combined phaco +25 gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with 5000 cSt silicon oil (SO) tamponade. At the 3-month follow up BCVA was 20/250, retina was completely flat but a macular proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) was detected with swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and a second 23 G PPV with PVR peeling and SO removal was performed. At 1 month visit from the second surgery retina was flat and BCVA was 20/200 due to a persistent CME. Oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and topical steroids were administered for 2 months without any improvements. At this point, YSML was applied with a macular grid pattern and at three months follow up visit SS-OCT showed a complete resolution of CME, BCVA was 20/100 and these anatomical and functional outcomes were maintained at 6 months follow-up.

Conclusions and importance

YSML treatment may be considered a safe and effective treatment strategy for the management of refractory CME following complex RRD surgery cases.

Real-world treatment patterns and economic burden of post-cataract macular edema

BACKGROUND

Post-cataract macular edema (PCME) is a condition that can occur in patients following cataract surgery without risk factors and complications. Although 80% of patients experience spontaneous resolution after 3 to 12 months, in persistent cases, it can lead to permanent vision loss if left untreated. There are currently no standardized treatment guidelines for PCME, and there have been limited studies showing the impact of PCME on annual Medicare spending and ophthalmology-related outpatient visits per case compared to those without the complication. This study aims to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and the economic burden of patients with PCME.

METHODS

This retrospective claims analysis identified patients from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients with (n = 2430) and without (n = 7290) PCME 1 year post cataract surgery were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, geographic region, diabetes presence, cataract surgery type, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Treatment pattern analysis for each PCME patient summarized the distribution of medications across lines of therapy. Economic burden analysis compared the mean number and costs of eye-related outpatient visits, optical coherence tomography imaging scans, and ophthalmic medications between the 2 groups using linear regression models.

RESULTS

Treatment pattern analysis found 27 different treatment combinations across 6 treatment lines. The most common first-line treatments were topical steroid drops (372 [30%]), topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug drops (321 [27%]), and intraocular or periocular injectable steroids (189 [15%]). Compared to match controls, PCME patients averaged 6 additional eye-related outpatient office visits (95% CI: 5.7-6.2) resulting in an additional $3,897 (95% CI: $3,475 - $4,319) in total costs. Patients filled 3 more ophthalmology-related outpatient prescription medications (95% CI: 2.8-3.2), adding $371 in total cost (95% CI: $332 - $410).

CONCLUSIONS

PCME treatment patterns showed wide clinical variability in treatments and time, specifically regarding injectable treatments and combination therapy. Additionally, significantly higher healthcare resource use and economic burden were found for both patients and payers when comparing PCME patients to non-PMCE controls. These results highlight the need for treatment standardization and demonstrate that interventions targeted at preventing PCME may be valuable.

Correlation between Severity of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane and Irvine-Gass Syndrome

A higher risk of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) has been reported in patients with preoperative idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM); however, whether the formation of PCME depends on the grade of ERM has not been well established. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 87 eyes of 78 patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with idiopathic ERM and had undergone cataract surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: PCME and non-PCME groups. After cataract surgery, the ERM status was graded using the Gass and Govetto classifications. Both the central macular thickness (CMT) and ERM grade increased after surgery, and higher preoperative CMT and ERM grades were found in the PCME group. The association between higher-grade ERM and the development of PCME was significant in the Govetto classification (grade 2, odds ratio (OR): 3.13; grade 3, OR: 3.93; and grade 4, OR: 16.07). The study results indicate that close attention should be given to patients with ERM with the presence of an ectopic inner foveal layer before cataract surgery.

Management of inflammation after the cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review most recent studies and clinical trials regarding pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of inflammation after the cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

FLACS gave opportunity to evaluate inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour right after the laser procedure, which led to acknowledging the inflammation pathogenesis during the phacoemulsification. Although there is still a lack of evidence, which would prove the long-term benefit of NSAIDs, they are indicated and effective when risk factors for PCME are present. PREMED studies showed that combination of NSAID and steroids after the surgery for healthy subjects is cost-effective. The triamcinolone injection together with topical steroids and NSAIDs for diabetic patients after the cataract surgery was the most cost-effective in preventing PCME according to the PREMED. Dropless cataract surgery is another emerging topic: dexamethasone implants and suspensions look promising as we await more clinical trials with drug-loaded IOLs.

SUMMARY

Inflammation after the cataract surgery can be prevented, and these methods are one of the most essential topics with growing phacoemulsification rate. Topical NSAIDs are cost-effective not only for patients with risk factors for PCME but also for healthy subjects. New dropless techniques are being successfully introduced in the clinical practice.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents for treating cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Cataract surgery is the most common ambulatory incisional surgery performed in the USA. Cystoid macular edema (CME), the accumulation of fluid in the central retina due to leakage from dilated capillaries, is the most common cause of vision impairment following cataract surgery. Acute CME, defined as CME of less than four months' duration, often resolves spontaneously. CME that persists for four months or longer is termed chronic CME. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used to treat CME. This update adds new evidence and analyses to the previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of NSAIDs in the treatment of CME following cataract surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL (2022, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; LILACS; mRCT (discontinued in 2014, last searched August 2011), ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP databases. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 20 March 2022.   SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of NSAIDs for CME following cataract surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts, reviewed full-text publications against eligibility criteria, independently extracted data from newly included trials and assessed risk of bias for each included trial. We contacted trial authors for clarification or to request missing information. We provided a narrative synthesis of all included trials and their results. For continuous and dichotomous outcomes, we separately performed pooled analysis and reported mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) as well as the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) whenever feasible. Two review authors independently graded the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine trials with a total of 390 participants (393 eyes). Study participants' mean age was 72.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 68.8 to 73.6) and 72% were women (IQR 69% to 74%). Three trials included participants with acute CME, and four included participants with chronic CME; the remaining two trials enrolled both participants with acute and chronic CME or participants with unknown CME duration. We assessed trials as having unclear (33%) or high risk of bias (67%). Visual improvement of two or more lines at the end of treatment  Data from one trial in participants with acute CME show no treatment effect of topical ketorolac compared to placebo (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.46 to 8.76; 22 participants). Data from a three-arm trial in participants with acute CME demonstrate that, when compared with topical prednisolone, topical ketorolac (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.07; 17 participants) or topical ketorolac and prednisolone combination therapy (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.69; 17 participants) may have little or no effect on visual improvement. Results of subgroup analysis from two studies in participants with chronic CME suggest that, after treatment for 90 days or longer, NSAIDs may increase participants' likelihood of visual improvement by 1.87 fold (RR 2.87, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.22; I2 = 33%; 2 trials, 121 participants) relative to placebo. However, there was no evidence of treatment effects in the subgroup with two months of treatment or less (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.73; P = 0.19, I2 = 41%; 2 trials, 34 participants). Overall, this evidence is very low certainty.  A single-study estimate in patients with mixed CME indicates that topical diclofenac may increase the likelihood of visual improvement by 40% when compared to topical ketorolac (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.94; 68 participants). However, the same trial reported no difference between the groups in mean final visual acuity in Snellen lines (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.93 to 1.73). A three-arm trial in patients with mixed CME reporting visual changes in ETDRS letters in comparisons between ketorolac and diclofenac (34 participants) or bromfenac (34 participants) suggests no evidence of effects. Overall, NSAIDs may slightly improve visual acuity in participants with mixed CME but the evidence is very uncertain. Persistence of improvement of vision one month after discontinuation of treatment One trial of participants with chronic CME tested oral indomethacin (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.60; 20 participants) and the other compared topical ketorolac to placebo (RR 4.00, 95% CI 0.51 to 31.1; 26 participants). While there is no evidence of treatment effects, evidence suggests substantial between-group heterogeneity (P = 0.07, I2 = 69.9%; very low-certainty evidence). None of the trials in patients with acute or mixed CME reported this outcome. Proportion of participants with improvement in leakage on fundus fluorescein angiography One three-arm trial in participants with acute CME shows that, when compared with topical prednisolone, there is no treatment benefit of topical ketorolac (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.75; 17 participants) or topical ketorolac and topical prednisolone combination therapy (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.38; 17 participants). This evidence is very low certainty. The combined estimate from two trials in participants with chronic CME indicates NSAIDs have little to no effect over placebo on improving leakage (RR 1.93, 95% CI 0.62 to 6.02; 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Neither of the trials in patients with mixed CME reported this outcome. Proportion of participants with improved contrast sensitivity Very low-certainty evidence from one trial in participants with acute CME shows no treatment benefit of ketorolac (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.75; 17 participants) or ketorolac and prednisolone combination therapy (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.69; 17 participants) compared with topical prednisolone. None of the trials in patients with chronic or mixed CME reported this outcome. Proportion of participants with improved central macular thickness on optical coherence tomography; measures of quality of life No included trial reported these outcomes. Adverse effects Most trials observed no differences in ocular adverse events, such as corneal toxicity or elevated intraocular pressure, between comparison groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on effects of NSAIDs in patients with CME is very uncertain and further investigation is warranted. Our findings are limited by small sample sizes, and heterogeneity in interventions, assessments, and reporting of clinically important outcomes.