Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Metallic Lateralized-Offset Glenoid Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

Metallic lateralized-offset glenoid reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for cuff tear arthropathy combines the use of a metallic augmented baseplate with a metaphyseally oriented short stem design that can be applied at a 135° or 145° neck-shaft angle, leading to additional lateralization on the humeral side. Lateralization of the center of rotation decreases the risk of inferior scapular notching and improves external rotation, deltoid wrapping, residual rotator cuff tensioning, and prosthetic stability1-4. Metallic increased-offset RSA (MIO-RSA) achieves lateralization and corrects inclination and retroversion while avoiding graft resorption and other complications of bony increased-offset RSA (BIO-RSA)5-8. Reducing the neck-shaft angle from the classical Grammont design, in combination with glenoid lateralization, improves range of motion9,10 by reducing inferior impingement during adduction at the expense of earlier superior impingement during abduction2,11. Lädermann et al.12 investigated how different combinations of humeral stem and glenosphere designs influence range of motion and muscle elongation. They assessed 30 combinations of humeral components, as compared with the native shoulder, and found that the combination that allows for restoration of >50% of the native range of motion in all directions was a 145° onlay stem with a concentric or lateralized tray in conjunction with a lateralized or inferior eccentric glenosphere. In addition, the use of a flush-lay or a slight-onlay stem design (like the one utilized in the presently described technique) may decrease the risk of secondary scapular spine fracture13,14. The goal of this prosthetic design is to achieve an excellent combination of motion and stability while reducing complications.

Description

This procedure is performed via a deltopectoral approach with the patient in the beach-chair position under general anesthesia combined with a regional interscalene nerve block. Subscapularis tenotomy and capsular release are performed, the humeral head is dislocated, and any osteophytes are removed. An intramedullary cutting guide is placed for correct humeral resection. The osteotomy of the humeral head is performed in the anatomical neck with an inclination of 135° and a retroversion of 20° to 40°, depending on the anatomical retroversion. The glenoid is prepared as usual. The lateralized, augmented baseplate is assembled with the central screw and the baseplate-wedge-screw complex is placed by inserting the screw into the central screw hole. Four peripheral screws are utilized for definitive fixation. An eccentric glenosphere with inferior overhang is implanted. The humerus is dislocated, and the metaphysis is prepared. Long compactors are utilized for proper stem alignment, and an asymmetric trial insert is positioned before the humerus is reduced. Stability and range of motion are assessed. The definitive short stem is inserted and the asymmetric polyethylene is impacted, resulting in a neck-shaft angle of 145°. Following reduction, subscapularis repair and wound closure are performed.

Alternatives

BIO-RSA is the main alternative to MIO-RSA. Boileau et al.15 demonstrated satisfactory early and long-term outcomes of BIO-RSA for shoulder osteoarthritis. A larger lateral offset may also be achieved with a thicker glenosphere2,16. Mark A. Frankle developed an implant that addressed the drawbacks of the Grammont design: a lateralized glenosphere combined with a 135° humeral neck-shaft angle. The 135° neck-shaft angle provides lateral humeral offset, preserving the normal length-tension relationship of the residual rotator cuff musculature, which optimizes its strength and function. The lateralized glenosphere displaces the humeral shaft laterally, minimizing the potential for impingement during adduction2,9,17,18. The advantage of BIO-RSA and MIO-RSA over lateralized glenospheres is that the former options provide correction of angular deformities without excessive reaming, which can lead to impingement19.

Rationale

BIO-RSA has been proven to achieve excellent functional outcomes15,20,21; however, the bone graft can undergo resorption, which may result in early baseplate loosening. Bipolar metallic lateralized RSA is an effective strategy for achieving lateralization and correction of multiplanar defects while avoiding the potential complications of BIO-RSA6,7,22-24. MIO-RSA also overcomes another limitation of BIO-RSA, namely that BIO-RSA is not applicable when the humeral head is not available for use (e.g., humeral head osteonecrosis, revision surgery, fracture sequelae).

Expected Outcomes

A recent study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants. A total of 42 patients underwent primary RSA. Patients were documented prospectively and underwent follow-up visits at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. That study demonstrated that bipolar metallic lateralized RSA achieves excellent clinical results in terms of shoulder function, pain relief, muscle strength, and patient-reported subjective assessment, without instability or radiographic signs of scapular notching23. Kirsch et al.25 reported the results of primary RSA with an augmented baseplate in 44 patients with a minimum of 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The use of an augmented baseplate resulted in excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial deformity correction in patients with advanced glenoid deformity. No short-term complications and no failure or loosening of the augmented baseplate were observed. Merolla et al.7 compared the results of 44 patients who underwent BIO-RSA and 39 patients who underwent MIO-RSA, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Both techniques provided good clinical outcomes; however, BIO-RSA yielded union between the cancellous bone graft and the surface of the native glenoid in <70% of patients. On the other hand, complete baseplate seating was observed in 90% of MIO-RSA patients.

Important Tips

When performing subscapularis tenotomy, leave an adequate stump to allow end-to-end repair.Tenotomize the superior part of the subscapularis tendon in an L-shape, sparing the portion below the circumflex vessels.As glenoid exposure is critical, perform a 270° capsulotomy.Continuously check the orientation of the baseplate relative to the prepared hole and reamed surface to ensure accurate implantation of the full wedge baseplate to achieve a proper fit.Aim for 70% to 80% seating of the baseplate onto the prepared glenoid surface. Avoid overtightening or excessive advancement of the baseplate into the subchondral bone. Gaps between the baseplate and glenoid surface should also be avoided.In order to avoid varus or valgus malpositioning of the final implant, obtain proper diaphyseal alignment by following "the three big Ls": large, lateral, and long. Use a large metaphyseal component to fill the metaphysis. Place the guide pin for the reaming of the metaphysis slightly laterally into the resected surface of the humerus. Use long compactors for diaphyseal alignment to avoid varus or valgus malpositioning of the final implant.Use an intramedullary cutting guide for correct humeral resection.Utilize the correct liner in order to obtain proper tensioning and avoid instability.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

K wire = Kirschner wireROM = range of motion.

Can we separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) can be measured on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs using 2 previously described angles: lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA). However, these 2 angles measure global lateralization and distalization but do not allow to differentiate how much lateralization or distalization are attributable to the glenoid and the humerus. We hypothesized that new angles could allow us to separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization. A more precise understanding of independent glenoid and humeral contributions to lateralization and distalization may be beneficial in subsequent clinical research.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of postoperative AP radiographs of 100 patients who underwent primary RSA for cuff-tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or glenohumeral osteoarthritis were analyzed. The new angles that we proposed use well-known bony landmarks (the acromion, glenoid, and humerus) and the most lateral point of the glenosphere, which we termed the "glenoid pivot point" (GPP). For lateralization, we used the GPP to split LSA into 2 new angles: glenoid lateralization angle (GLA) and humeral lateralization angle (HLA). For distalization, we introduced the modified distalization shoulder angle (mDSA) that can also be split into 2 new angles: glenoid distalization angle (GDA) and humeral distalization angle (HDA). Three orthopedic surgeons measured the new angles, using the online tool Tyche. Mean values with overall and individual standard deviations as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Because the angles form a triangle, the following equations can be made: LSA = GLA + HLA, and mDSA = GDA + HDA. All angles showed excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.92-0.97) with low means of individual standard deviations that indicate a precision of 2° for each angle.

CONCLUSION

Use of the most lateral part of the glenosphere (termed glenoid pivot point) allows us to separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization. The 4 new angles (HLA, GLA, GDA, HDA) described in the present study can be used on true AP radiographs, routinely obtained after shoulder replacement, and the measured angles may be used with all types of reverse prostheses available.

Global trends and research hotspots of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2022

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been demonstrated to be an effective intervention for various shoulder disorders. The number of rTSA-related studies performed has increased annually over the past three decades. The Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery had the highest number of publications and citations in the rTSA-related research domain and is therefore considered to be the most influential journal in this field. The USA published the most publications and established a high degree of cooperation with many countries worldwide. The University of Florida, the Hospital for Special Surgery, and Rush University, Mayo Clinic were representative and active institutions in this field. It is anticipated that advancements in prosthesis design, specifically with regards to lateralized design concepts, expanding indications for rTSA, a trend toward younger patient populations, and the management of postoperative complications will emerge as research hotspots in the following years. The most valuable publications, influential journals, major researchers, and leading countries were analyzed. The findings of our study will help researchers gain insights into current research hotspots and frontiers and shape their research focus in the field of rTSA.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty design-inlay vs. onlay: does it really make a difference?

BACKGROUND

The design of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants has evolved significantly over the past 50 years. Today there are many options available that differ in design of the glenoid and humeral components, fixation methods, sizes, and modularity. With respect to the humeral component, the literature has generally focused on the differences between inlay and onlay designs and the potential impact on outcomes. However, inlay and onlay design represents only one factor of many.

METHODS

It is our hypothesis that separating onlay and inlay designs into 2 distinct entities is an oversimplification as there can be a wide overlap of the 2 designs, depending on surgical technique and the implant selected. As such, the differences between inlay and onlay designs should be measured in absolute terms-meaning combined distalization and lateralization.

RESULTS

By reviewing the many factors that can contribute to the glenosphere-humerus relationship, the role of inlay and onlay humeral designs as an important distinguishing feature is shown to be limited. Preliminary studies suggest that the amount of distalization and lateralization of the construct may be the most accurate method of describing the differences in the constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

Inlay and onlay humeral component design represents only one factor of many that may impact outcomes. A more accurate method of defining specific design and technique factors in RSA is the degree of lateralization and distalization.

Can Distalisation and Lateralisation Shoulder Angles in Reverse Arthroplasty Interfere with the Functional Results in Patients with Rotator Cuff Arthropathy?

Objective:  To evaluate the influence of radiographic values on clinical and functional results in patients treated with reverse arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) using a lateralized design. Methods:  A retrospective analysis was performed. Patient demographics were recorded, as well as preoperative and postoperative range of motion. Function was calculated using the Constant-Murley score both before and after the procedure. Pre and postoperative anteroposterior and axial radiographs of the affected shoulder were analysed. In the preoperative images, the following was calculated: acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and lateral humeral offset (LHO). Postoperative measurements included: AHD, LHO, distalization shoulder angle (DSA) and lateralisation shoulder angle (LSA). Linear regression and quadratic regression analysis was performed to determine their degree of association with final functional outcomes. By applying a quadratic regression analysis and ROC curves, the cut-off values were determined with respect to the above-mentioned angles and the positive predictive value was calculated. Results:  The greater anterior elevation (AE) ranges were found with DSA between 40-45° and LSA among 80°- 90°, while better ABD was observed with LSA of 90-100°. Preoperative AHD was correlated to RE (r s :0.47; p:0.049). Postoperative AHD was found to be in a directly proportional relationship with AE (r s :0.49; p:0.03). Postoperative ABD showed an inverse linear regression with preoperative AHD (r s : -0.44, p:0.047). LSA and DSA were inversely related. Conclusion:  We found that a DSA between 40-45° and a LSA of 80-100° could lead to better range of motion regarding AE and ABD in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy treated with RSA.

Comparing outcomes of the anterosuperior and deltopectoral approaches in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative glenohumeral arthritis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) improves pain and function in patients with a wide range of shoulder pathology. Anterosuperior (AS) and deltopectoral (DP) approaches are widely used to gain access to the glenohumeral joint in arthroplasty. Our aim was to systematically review the literature comparing outcomes of these two approaches when performing rTSR for degenerative glenohumeral arthritis.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed with an electronic multi-database search (Pubmed, Medline & Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines on 18th September 2022. Data from published studies of any study design that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, reviewed and synthesized.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies were identified for full text review, of which four were included. No significant difference in pain and range of motion were observed between approaches. Scapular notching was more common in the anterosuperior approach. Low rates of instability and intra-operative fracture were observed in both.

CONCLUSION

Both approaches demonstrate similar clinical outcomes with reference to pain, range of motion and complications when performing rTSR indicated for degenerative joint disease. However, further well-designed studies are required.

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer for External Rotation Deficit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) has been purported to restore motion in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) who have preoperative combined loss of forward elevation (FE) and external rotation (ER). This systematic review summarizes the available evidence for the functional outcomes and complications after RSA with LDT. Furthermore, the effect of implant design and whether a concomitant teres major transfer (TMT) was performed were studied.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting on LDT with RSA to restore ER. Our primary outcomes were ER, FE, Constant score, and complication incidence. Secondarily, we reported postoperative internal rotation (IR) and compared ER, FE, and Constant score based on lateralized versus medialized global implant design and whether concomitant TMT was performed.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were evaluated; functional outcomes were assessed in 16 articles reporting on 258 RSAs (123 LDT, 135 LDT-TMT). Surgical indication was most commonly cuff tear arthropathy and massive irreparable cuff tear. Mean ER was -12° preoperatively and 25° postoperatively, FE was 72° preoperatively and 141° postoperatively. Mean postoperative Constant score was 65. Of 138 patients (8 studies) describing IR, only 25% reported a mean postoperative IR ≥L3. Subanalysis comparing lateralized versus medialized implants and whether TMT was concomitantly performed demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative ER, FE, and Constant score, nor preoperative to postoperative improvement in ER and FE. The complication rate was 14.1% (of 291 shoulders from 16 studies), including tear in the tendon transfer (n = 3), revision tendon repair (n = 1), nerve-related complication (n = 9), and dislocation (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

RSA with LDT is a reliable option to restore motion, with a comparable complication rate with standard RSA. The use of medialized versus lateralized implants and whether the TM was concomitantly transferred may not influence clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Translated article] Influence of lateralized reverse shoulder prosthesis design on tuberosity union in proximal humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most frequent type of fracture in elderly patients. Nowadays, surgical treatment is indicated one third of the time, being the reverse shoulder prosthesis an option especially in complex comminuted patterns. In this study we analyzed the effects of a lateralized reverse prosthesis in tuberosity union and its relationship with the functional results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective case study of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a lateralized design reverse shoulder prosthesis with one-year minimum follow-up. Tuberosity nonunion was defined as a radiological concept: absence of tuberosity, distance >1cm from the tuberosity fragment to the humeral shaft or tuberosity above the humeral tray. Subgroup analysis was performed, group 1 (n=16) tuberosity union vs. group 2 (n=19) tuberosity nonunion. Groups were compared with the following functional scores: Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Subjective Shoulder Value.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in this study with a median age of 72.65 years. Postoperative radiographic analysis at one year after surgery revealed a tuberosity nonunion rate of 54%. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of range of motion or functional scores. However, there were differences regarding the Patte sign (p=0.03) which was positive in a larger proportion of patients in the group with tuberosity nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Even though there was a large percentage of tuberosity nonunion with the use of a lateralized prosthesis design, patients obtained good results in a similar manner to those found in the union group in terms of range of motion, scores, and patient satisfaction.

The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-Where Do We Stand and What Comes Next?

Over 35 years ago, the pioneer Paul Grammont from Lyon published his ideas of a reversed semi-constraint prosthesis improving the moment arm of the deltoid by medializing the center of rotation and lengthening of the arm and thus increasing deltoid muscle tension [...].

Challenges for Optimization of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Part I: External Rotation, Extension and Internal Rotation

A detailed overview of the basic science and clinical literature reporting on the challenges for the optimization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is presented in two review articles. Part I looks at (I) external rotation and extension, (II) internal rotation and the analysis and discussion of the interplay of different factors influencing these challenges. In part II, we focus on (III) the conservation of sufficient subacromial and coracohumeral space, (IV) scapular posture and (V) moment arms and muscle tensioning. There is a need to define the criteria and algorithms for planning and execution of optimized, balanced RSA to improve the range of motion, function and longevity whilst minimizing complications. For an optimized RSA with the highest function, it is important not to overlook any of these challenges. This summary may be used as an aide memoire for RSA planning.

Challenges for Optimization of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Part II: Subacromial Space, Scapular Posture, Moment Arms and Muscle Tensioning

In part II of this comprehensive review on the optimization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), we focus on three other challenges: 1. "Conservation of sufficient subacromial and coracohumeral space"; 2. "Scapular posture"; and 3. "Moment arms and muscle tensioning". This paper follows a detailed review of the basic science and clinical literature of the challenges in part I: 1. "External rotation and extension" and 2. "Internal rotation". "Conservation of sufficient subacromial and coracohumeral space" and "Scapular posture" may have a significant impact on the passive and active function of RSA. Understanding the implications of "Moment arms and muscle tensioning" is essential to optimize active force generation and RSA performance. An awareness and understanding of the challenges of the optimization of RSA help surgeons prevent complications and improve RSA function and raise further research questions for ongoing study.

Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Glenoid defects can be addressed traditionally by asymmetric reaming or by bone-preserving correction to a more lateral joint line by bone or metal augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. While there is more evidence in literature regarding the outcome and complications of Bony Increased Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA), there is minimal reported experience with the outcome after metal glenoid augments. The aim of this study was to determine whether a metal augment can correct the glenoid deformity in an anatomic manner.

METHODS

Glenoid morphology and deformity were determined in 50 patients with Walch type B1, B2, D and Favard type E0-E3 glenoid defects using preoperative radiographic and computed tomography (CT) analysis. All patients received a preoperative planning CT with 3D planning, and measurements of glenoid inclination (in 3 planes proximal, middle, distal), reversed shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA) and glenoid version were obtained. All patients had a pathologic inclination in the coronal or frontal planes of > 10°. Above the threshold of 10° pathological glenoid version or inclination metal hemi-augments of 10°, 20°, or 30° were used which allow an individual 360° augment positioning according to the patient glenoid deformity.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative numbers of the glenoid version demonstrate that most glenoids were in retroversion and superior inclination. In total 2410° wedges, 1820° wedges and 8 30° wedges were used. In the majority of cases, the wedge was positioned posteriorly and/or cranially between 10:00 and 12:00 o'clock, which allows a correction in a 3D manner of the glenoid inclination and version. The mean RSA angle could be corrected from 22.76 ± 6.06 to 0.19° ± 2.7 (p < 0.0001). The highest retroversion of the glenoid is evidenced in the proximal section and it could be corrected from - 23.32° ± 4.56 to - 6.74° ± 7.75 (p < 0.0001) and in the middle section from - 18.93° ± 3.35 to - 7.66° ± 5.28 (p < 0.0001). A mean sphere bone overhang distance (SBOD) of 5.70 ± 2.04 mm was found in order to avoid or minimize relevant scapular notching.

CONCLUSION

By using a new 360° metal-augmented baseplate, the preoperative pathological inclination and retroversion can be corrected without medialization of the joint line. Future clinical results will show whether this bone-preserving procedure improves also the clinical outcomes as compared to asymmetric medialized reaming or wedged BIO-RSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series.

Posteroinferior relevant scapular neck offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: key player for motion and friction-type impingement in a computer model

BACKGROUND

Range of motion (ROM) and prevention of notching remain a challenge for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Both may be affected by the morphology of the scapula. The purpose of this study was to define anteroinferior (a) and posteroinferior (p) relevant scapular neck offset (RSNO) and to examine the hypothesis that pRSNO is significantly smaller than aRSNO, and influences rigid body motion (RBM). Adapting glenosphere implantation strategies may therefore be of value.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this computer model study, we used deidentified computed tomographic scans of 22 patients (11 male and 11 female; mean age: 72.9 years) with massive cuff tears without joint space narrowing. Eight RSA glenoid configurations were tested with a constant neck-shaft angle (145°). Two baseplate types (25 mm; 25 + 3 mm lateralized) and 4 glenospheres (GS) (36 mm; 36 +2 mm of eccentricity; 39 mm; 39 + 3 mm) were used. RSNO was defined as the standardized measurement of the horizontal distance from the inferior extent of the GS to the bony margin of the scapula after baseplate positioning (flush to inferior glenoid extent; neutral position: 0° inclination and 0° version-both software computed).

RESULTS

There was a highly significant difference between pRSNO and aRSNO for both genders (P < .001). pRSNO was always smaller than aRSNO. pRSNO was strongly correlated with external rotation (ERO: 0.84) and extension (EXT: 0.74) and moderately correlated with global ROM (GROM: 0.68). There was a moderately strong correlation between aRSNO and internal rotation (IRO: 0.69). pRSNO was strongly correlated with aRSNO, EXT, ERO, IRO, adduction (ADD) and GROM (0.82, 0.72, 0,8, 0.71, 0.82, 0.76) in female patients and with EXT and ERO (0.82, 0.89) in male patients. The median pRSNO allowing for at least 45° ERO and 40° EXT was 14.2 mm for men and 13.8 mm for women. For all patients and models, pRSNO ≥14 mm increased EXT, ERO, and GROM significantly compared with pRSNO <14 mm (P < .001). The combination of lateralization and inferior overhang (eccentricity) led to the most significant increase of pRSNO for each GS size (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This is one of the first RSA modeling studies evaluating nonarthritic glenoids of both genders. The lateral scapular extent to glenoid relationship is asymmetric. pRSNO is always smaller than aRSNO for both genders and was a critical variable for EXT and ERO, demonstrating additional strong correlation with aRSNO, IRO, ADD, and GROM in female patients. pRSNO ≥14 mm was a safe value to prevent friction-type impingement. Combining increased glenosphere size, lateralization, and inferior overhang gives the best results in this computer-simulated setting.

Reverse total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Optimal implant placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) remains controversial. Specifically, the optimal glenoid inclination is unknown. Therefore, a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimentional human motion specific to rTSA was used to study joint contact and muscle forces as a function of glenoid component inclination.

METHODS

Eight human cadaver shoulders were tested before and after rTSA implantation. Scapular plane abduction kinematics from control subjects and those with rTSA drove a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimentional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion. Glenoid inclination varied from -20° to +20°. Outputs included compression, superior-inferior (S/I) shear, and anterior-posterior shear forces from a 6° of freedom load cell in the joint, and deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces. Data were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping and t-tests.

RESULTS

Inferior glenoid inclination (-) reduced S/I shear by up to 125% relative to superior inclination, with similar compression to the neutral condition (0°). Superior inclinations (+) increased the S/I shear force by approximately the same magnitude, yet decreased compression by 25% in the most superior inclination (+20°). There were few differences in deltoid or rotator cuff forces due to inclination. Only the middle deltoid decreased by approximately 7% for the most inferior inclination (-20°). Compared with native shoulders, the neutral (0°) rTSA inclination showed reduced forces of 30%-75% in the anterior deltoid and a trend toward decreased forces in the middle deltoid. Force demands on the rotator cuff varied as a function of elevation, with a trend toward increased forces in rTSA at peak glenohumeral elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior inclination reduces superior shear forces, without influencing compression. Superior inclination increased S/I shear, while decreasing compression, which may be a source of component loosening and joint instability after rTSA. Inferior inclination of the rTSA glenoid may reduce the likelihood of glenoid loosening by reducing the magnitude of cyclic shear and compressive loading during arm elevation activities, although this may be altered by specific-subject body habitus and motion. These factors are especially important in revision rTSA or glenoid bone grafting where there is already a 3-fold increase in glenoid baseplate loosening vs. primary rTSA.

Influence of lateralized reverse shoulder prosthesis design on tuberosity union in proximal humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most frequent type of fracture in elderly patients. Nowadays, surgical treatment is indicated one third of the time, being the reverse shoulder prosthesis an option especially in complex comminuted patterns. In this study we analyzed the effects of a lateralized reverse prosthesis in tuberosity union and its relationship with the functional results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective case study of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a lateralized design reverse shoulder prosthesis with one-year minimum follow-up. Tuberosity nonunion was defined as a radiological concept: absence of tuberosity, distance>1cm from the tuberosity fragment to the humeral shaft or tuberosity above the humeral tray. Subgroup analysis was performed, group 1 (n=16) tuberosity union vs. group 2 (n=19) tuberosity nonunion. Groups were compared with the following functional scores: Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Subjective Shoulder Value.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in this study with a median age of 72.65 years. Postoperative radiographic analysis at one year after surgery revealed a tuberosity nonunion rate of 54%. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of range of motion or functional scores. However, there were differences regarding the Patte sign (p=0.03) which was positive in a larger proportion of patients in the group with tuberosity nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Even though there was a large percentage of tuberosity nonunion with the use of a lateralized prosthesis design, patients obtained good results in a similar manner to those found in the union group in terms of range of motion, scores, and patient satisfaction.