1
|
Wetwittayakhlang P, Kotrri G, Bessissow T, Lakatos PL. How close are we to a success stratification tool for improving biological therapy in ulcerative colitis? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:433-441. [PMID: 38903049 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2371049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biological therapies have become the standard treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, clinical remission rates post-induction therapy remain modest at 40-50%, with many initial responders losing response over time. Current treatment strategies frequently rely on a 'trial and error' approach, leading to prolonged periods of ineffective and costly therapies for patients, accompanied by associated treatment complications. AREA COVERED This review discusses current evidence on risk stratification tools for predicting therapeutic efficacy and minimizing adverse events in UC management. Recent studies have identified predictive factors for biologic therapy response. In the context of personalized medicine, the goal is to identify patients at high risk of progression and complications, as well as those likely to respond to specific therapies. Essential risk stratification tools include clinical decision-making aids, biomarkers, genomics, multi-omics factors, endoscopic, imaging, and histological assessments. EXPERT OPINION Employing risk stratification tools to predict therapeutic response and prevent treatment-related complications is essential for precision medicine in the biological management of UC. These tools are necessary to select the most suitable treatment for each individual patient, thereby enhancing efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panu Wetwittayakhlang
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gynter Kotrri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schreiber S, Danese S, Dignass A, Domènech E, Fantini MC, Ferrante M, Halfvarson J, Hart A, Magro F, Lees CW, Leone S, Pierik MJ, Peters M, Field P, Fishpool H, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Defining Comprehensive Disease Control for Use as a Treatment Target for Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice: International Delphi Consensus Recommendations. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:91-105. [PMID: 37586038 PMCID: PMC10821705 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Treatment of ulcerative colitis [UC] requires a patient-centric definition of comprehensive disease control that considers improvements in aspects not typically captured by classical landmark trial endpoints. In an international initiative, we reviewed aspects of UC that affect patients and/or indicate mucosal inflammation, to achieve consensus on which aspects to combine in a definition of comprehensive disease control, using a modified Delphi process. METHODS The Delphi panel comprised 12 gastroenterologists and one patient advocate. Two gastroenterologists were elected as chairs and did not vote. To inform statements, we asked 18 patients and the panel members about their experiences of remission and reviewed published literature. Panel members voted on statements anonymously in three rounds, with a live discussion before Round 3. Consensus was met if ≥67% of the panel agreed. Statements without consensus in Rounds 1 and 2 were revised or discarded after Round 3. RESULTS The panel agreed to measure individual patient benefit using a definition of comprehensive disease control that combines aspects currently measured in trials [rectal bleeding, stool frequency, disease-related quality of life, endoscopy, histological inflammatory activity, inflammatory biomarkers, and corticosteroid use] with additional patient-reported symptoms [bowel urgency, abdominal pain, extraintestinal manifestations, fatigue, and sleep disturbance]. The panel agreed on scoring systems and thresholds for many aspects. CONCLUSIONS Using a robust methodology, we defined comprehensive disease control in UC. Next, we will combine the measurement and scoring of these aspects into a multicomponent tool and will adopt comprehensive disease control as a treatment target in clinical practice and trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Schreiber
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Department of Internal Medicine I, Kiel, Germany
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eugeni Domènech
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and CIBEREHD, Badalona, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Massimo C Fantini
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Halfvarson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ailsa Hart
- IBD Unit, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Fernando Magro
- CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Edinburgh Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Salvo Leone
- European Federation of Crohn’s & Ulcerative Colitis Associations [EFCCA], Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Division Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Michele Peters
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Inserm, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
- INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Groupe Hospitalier privé Ambroise Paré – Hartmann, Paris IBD Center, Neuilly sur Seine, France
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Youssef M, Dong K, Lee SJ, Narula N. Histological Remission Placebo Rates in Ulcerative Colitis Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:125-131. [PMID: 36753516 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High histologic remission rates have been reported with placebos in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ulcerative colitis (UC) therapies and have varied based on trial designs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify placebo histological remission rates and identify factors influencing those rates. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception of the databases until December 2021. We included placebo-controlled RCTs of adult patients with UC treated with aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressives, biologics, and small molecules. We pooled estimates using a random-effects model and performed subgroup analysis and meta-regression to evaluate the effect of different covariates on placebo rates. RESULTS Thirty-three studies (30 induction and 3 maintenance) were included. The overall placebo histological remission rate was 15.7% (95% confidence interval, 12.9%-19%) across all 33 studies. High heterogeneity was observed among studies with I2 = 62.10%. The pooled estimate of histological remission was 15.8% in induction studies and 14.5% in maintenance studies. Subgroup analysis revealed statistically significant differences in placebo rates when accounting for background medications, the intervention drug class, and disease severity (P = .041, .025, and .025, respectively). There was no statistical difference between induction vs maintenance studies or between different histological scales (P = .771, and .075, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Placebo histological remission rates range from 13% to 19% in UC RCTs, but studies are highly heterogeneous. Factors found to influence placebo rates include presence of background medications, the drug used, and the disease severity. These observations inform future trial designs to minimize placebo rates and reduce heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Youssef
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Dong
- Department of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - So Jeong Lee
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Department of Medicine (Division of Gastroenterology) and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pai RK, D'Haens G, Kobayashi T, Sands BE, Travis S, Jairath V, De Hertogh G, Park B, McGinnis K, Redondo I, Lipitz NG, Gibble TH, Magro F. Histologic assessments in ulcerative colitis: the evidence behind a new endpoint in clinical trials. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:73-87. [PMID: 38509826 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2326838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment goals for ulcerative colitis (UC) are evolving from the achievement of clinical remission to more rigorous goals defined by endoscopic and histologic healing. Achievement of deeper remission targets aims to reduce the risk of colectomy, hospitalizations, and colorectal cancer. AREAS COVERED This review covers histologic assessments, histologic remission as a clinical trial endpoint, and the association between histologic disease activity and clinical outcomes. Future directions are also discussed, including the use of advanced imaging and artificial intelligence technologies, as well as potential future treatment targets beyond histologic remission. EXPERT OPINION Histologic assessments are used for their sensitivity in measuring mucosal inflammatory changes in UC. Due to correlation with disease activity, histologic assessments may support clinical decision-making regarding treatment decisions as such assessments can be associated with rates of clinical relapse, hospitalization, colectomy, and neoplasia. While histologic remission is limited by varying definitions and multiple histologic indices, work is ongoing to create a consensus on the use of histologic assessments in clinical trials. As research advances, aspirational targets beyond histologic remission, such as molecular healing and disease clearance, are being explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rish K Pai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Geert D'Haens
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Taku Kobayashi
- Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bruce E Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon Travis
- Kennedy Institute and Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Gert De Hertogh
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bomina Park
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Fernando Magro
- CINTESIS@RISE, Departmento, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chua L, Friedrich S, Zhang XC. Mirikizumab Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Phase III LUCENT Studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2023; 62:1479-1491. [PMID: 37610533 PMCID: PMC10520102 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01281-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Mirikizumab is a humanized anti-interleukin-23-p19 monoclonal antibody being developed for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This analysis characterized mirikizumab pharmacokinetics using phase II and III trial data from patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS Serum pharmacokinetic data in patients receiving mirikizumab 50-1000 mg intravenously every 4 weeks as induction treatment and mirikizumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 or 12 weeks as maintenance treatment across three trials (N = 1362) were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Covariate effects on mirikizumab exposure were evaluated using simulation-based estimations. RESULTS Mirikizumab pharmacokinetics was best described by a linear two-compartment model with first-order absorption. Clearance, volume of distribution for central and peripheral compartments, and half-life were estimated at approximately 0.022 L/h (linear), 3.11 L and 1.69 L, and 9.5 days, respectively. Statistically significant effects of body weight and serum albumin levels on clearance, body weight on central and peripheral volumes of distribution, and body mass index on bioavailability were observed but effects were small relative to random inter-individual variability (% coefficient of variation: 18-64%). The subcutaneous bioavailability of mirikizumab was 48%. CONCLUSIONS Mirikizumab displayed pharmacokinetic characteristics typical of a monoclonal antibody where clearance increased with body weight and decreased with the albumin level, and bioavailability decreased with body mass index. These effects were small relative to random variability, indicating that a dose adjustment for patient factors is not required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02589665 (28 October, 2015), NCT03518086 (8 May, 2018), NCT03524092 (14 May, 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laiyi Chua
- Global PK/PD and Pharmacometrics, Eli Lilly and Company, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA
| | - Stuart Friedrich
- Global PK/PD and Pharmacometrics, Eli Lilly and Company, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA
| | - Xin Cindy Zhang
- Global PK/PD and Pharmacometrics, Eli Lilly and Company, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim KY, Raja Ali RA, Wong Z, Mohd Zaki F, Maktar JF, Nawawi KNM. Evaluation of intestinal ultrasound for disease activity assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional study at a tertiary centre in Malaysia. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:300-308. [PMID: 36876618 PMCID: PMC10644995 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_531_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is emerging. We aim to determine the performance of IUS in the assessment of disease activity in IBD. Methods This is a prospective cross-sectional study of IUS performed on IBD patients in a tertiary centre. IUS parameters including intestinal wall thickness, loss of wall stratification, mesenteric fibrofatty proliferation, and increased vascularity were compared with endoscopic and clinical activity indices. Results Among the 51 patients, 58.8% were male, with a mean age of 41 years. Fifty-seven percent had underlying ulcerative colitis with mean disease duration of 8.4 years. Against ileocolonoscopy, IUS had a sensitivity of 67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41-86) for detecting endoscopically active disease. It had high specificity of 97% (95% CI: 82-99) with positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 84%, respectively. Against clinical activity index, IUS had a sensitivity of 70% (95% CI: 35-92) and specificity of 85% (95% CI: 70-94) for detecting moderate to severe disease. Among individual IUS parameters, presence of bowel wall thickening (>3 mm) had the highest sensitivity (72%) for detecting endoscopically active disease. For per-bowel segment analysis, IUS (bowel wall thickening) was able to achieve 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity when examining the transverse colon. Conclusions IUS has moderate sensitivity with excellent specificity in detecting active disease in IBD. IUS is most sensitive in detecting a disease at transverse colon. IUS can be employed as an adjunct in the assessment of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan Yee Lim
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Raja Affendi Raja Ali
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- GUT Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Faizah Mohd Zaki
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Juliana Fairuz Maktar
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Khairul Najmi Muhammad Nawawi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- GUT Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singla S, Jena G. Intervention of 3-aminobenzamide against Dextran Sulphate Sodium induced colitis in mice: Investigations on molecular mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol 2022; 920:174861. [PMID: 35219730 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Various preclinical and clinical studies reported that Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 plays significant role in all acute and chronic inflammatory diseases with different etiopathogenesis. The present study aims to investigate the protective effect of 3-aminobenzamide in Dextran Sulphate Sodium induced ulcerative colitis and associated molecular mechanisms. Ulcerative colitis in male BALB/c mice was induced using Dextran sulphate sodium (3 %w/v) for 3 cycles with 7 days recovery period in-between. 3-aminobenzamide was administered at the doses of 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg starting from the Ist week of remission period and was continued till the termination of the experiment. The effect of 3-aminbenzamide was evaluated using biochemical parameters, histopathological evaluations, ELISA, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis. All the doses of 3-aminobenzamide (5 mg/kg; 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) ameliorated the severity of ulcerative colitis by modulating various molecular targets such as poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase 1, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase-recruitment domain, cysteine aspartases, interleukin-1β, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, sirtuin 1, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, tumour necrosis factor-α and catalase. However, the lower doses (5 and 10 mg/kg) exerted more prominent effects in comparison to the high dose (20 mg/kg). Further, 3-aminobenzamide treatment restored the intestinal integrity by increasing the expression of occludin and significantly ameliorated ulcerative colitis associated elevated lipopolysaccharides, oxidative and nitrosative stress, cellular damage and apoptosis. Lower doses of 3-aminobenzamide showed more prominent protective effects against ulcerative colitis associated damage as compared to higher dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Singla
- Facility for Risk Assessment and Intervention Studies, Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Punjab, 160062, S.A.S Nagar, India.
| | - Gopabandhu Jena
- Facility for Risk Assessment and Intervention Studies, Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Punjab, 160062, S.A.S Nagar, India.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Histological Scores in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The State of the Art. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11040939. [PMID: 35207211 PMCID: PMC8880199 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11040939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The histological assessment has been advocated as a detailed and accurate measure of disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In ulcerative colitis (UC), histological activity has been demonstrated to be associated with higher rates of relapse, prolonged corticosteroid use and long-term complications, even when endoscopic remission is achieved. Therefore, histological healing may represent a potential treatment target. Several histological scores have been developed and are available today. The Robarts histopathology index (RHI) and the Nancy index (NI) are the only two recommended by the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO) for use in patients with UC. Conversely, in Crohn’s disease (CD), the discontinuous nature of lesions has limited standardized histological assessment. Most of the available histological scoring systems in CD are complex and not validated. The aim of this review is to comprehensively summarize the latest evidence regarding histological scoring systems in IBD. We guide the reader through understanding the importance of an accurate microscopic evaluation using validated scoring systems, highlighting the strengths and pitfalls of each score. The priorities of future research needs are also addressed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Deng F, Wu Z, Xu M, Xia P. YAP Activates STAT3 Signalling to Promote Colonic Epithelial Cell Proliferation in DSS-Induced Colitis and Colitis Associated Cancer. J Inflamm Res 2022; 15:5471-5482. [PMID: 36164660 PMCID: PMC9508680 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s377077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Yes-associated protein (YAP) is a key transcriptional coactivator of cell proliferation and differentiation. In this study, we sought to identify the roles of YAP in colonic epithelial regeneration and tumourigenesis. METHODS Murine DSS-induced colitis and YAP overexpression models were constructed via lentiviral intraperitoneal injection. Stable YAP-overexpressing cells, protein immunoprecipitation, and ChIP were used to deeply explore the molecular mechanism. RESULTS We found that the expression of YAP was dramatically diminished in the colonic crypts during the acute colitis phase, while YAP was strikingly enhanced to initiate tissue repair after DSS withdrawal. Overexpressing YAP in mice drastically accelerated epithelial regeneration, presenting with more intact structural integrity and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration in the mucosa. Further mechanistic studies showed that the expression of YAP in the nucleus was significantly increased by 2 h post-DSS removal, accompanied by upregulated protein levels of activated STAT3. Overexpression of YAP (YAPWT) elevated the expression of activated STAT3 and its transcriptional targets and strengthened the proliferation and "wound healing" ability of colonic cells. However, these effects were reversed when STAT3 was silenced in YAPWT cells. Moreover, YAP could directly interact with STAT3 in the nucleus, and c-Myc and CyclinD1 were the transcriptional targets. Finally, during colitis-associated cancer (CAC), YAPWT promoted the progression of CAC, while the phosphomimetic YAP downregulated the expression of STAT3 and inhibited the development and progression of CAC. CONCLUSION YAP activates STAT3 signalling to facilitate mucosal regeneration after DSS-induced colitis. However, excessive YAP activation in the colonic epithelium promotes CAC development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feihong Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Feihong Deng, Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China, Email
| | - Zengrong Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mengmeng Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pianpian Xia
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|