Comparison of Robotic and Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves functional outcomes, complications, and revisions

Aims

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA) has been proposed as an approach to improve the results of the conventional manual UKA (C-UKA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the studies comparing R-UKA and C-UKA in terms of clinical outcomes, radiological results, operating time, complications, and revisions.

Methods

The literature search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science) on 20 February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were comparative studies, written in the English language, with no time limitations, on the comparison of R-UKA and C-UKA. The quality of each article was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Quality.

Results

Among the 3,669 articles retrieved, 21 studies on 19 series of patients were included. A total of 3,074 patients (59.5% female and 40.5% male; mean age 65.2 years (SD 3.9); mean BMI 27.4 kg/m2 (SD 2.2)) were analyzed. R-UKA obtained a superior Knee Society Score improvement compared to C-UKA (mean difference (MD) 4.9; p < 0.001) and better Forgotten Joint Score postoperative values (MD 5.5; p = 0.032). The analysis of radiological outcomes did not find a statistically significant difference between the two approaches. R-UKA showed longer operating time (MD 15.6; p < 0.001), but reduced complication and revision rates compared to C-UKA (5.2% vs 10.1% and 4.1% vs 7.2%, respectively).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that the robotic approach for UKA provided a significant improvement in functional outcomes compared to the conventional manual technique. R-UKA showed similar radiological results and longer operating time, but reduced complication and revision rates compared to C-UKA. Overall, R-UKA seems to provide relevant benefits over C-UKA in the management of patients undergoing UKA.

Robotic Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Robotic-assisted surgery is a computer-controlled technique that may improve the accuracy and outcomes of unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a partial knee replacement surgery. The purpose of a meta-analysis about robotic-assisted versus conventional surgery for unicompartmental TKA is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods based on the current evidence. Our meta-analysis can help inform clinical decisions and guidelines for surgeons and patients who are considering unicompartmental TKA as a treatment option. We searched four online databases for studies that compared the two methods until March 2023. We used RevMan software to combine the data from the studies. We calculated the mean difference (MD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome, which are statistical measures of the difference and the uncertainty between the two methods. We included 16 studies in our analysis. We found that robotic-assisted surgery had a better hip-knee-ankle angle, which is a measure of how well the knee is aligned, than conventional surgery (MD = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.16-1.56). We also found that robotic-assisted surgery had a better Oxford Knee score, which is a measure of how well the knee functions, than conventional surgery (MD = 3.03, 95% CI = 0.96-5.110). This study compared the results of conventional and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in 12 studies. We concluded that robotic-assisted surgery may have some benefits over conventional surgery in terms of alignment and function of the knee. However, we did not find any significant difference between the two methods in terms of other outcomes, such as pain, range of motion, health status, and joint awareness. Therefore, we suggest that more research is needed to confirm these results and evaluate the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery.

Mutation of Beclin1 acetylation site at K414 alleviates high glucose-induced podocyte impairment in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting hyperactivated autophagy

BACKGROUND

Our group recently reported that a mutation of the novel Beclin1 K414R acetylation site impacts the stability of Beclin1 protein, which decreases autophagy in adipocytes and further impedes adipocyte differentiation and lipolysis. This study was to explore whether Beclin1 acetylation plays a role in the early renal injury induced by high glucose and to further investigate the K414R mutation site in podocytes.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to con (control) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) groups. The DN group was induced by a single 55 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin and fed a high-fat and high-sugar diet (the con group received an equal volume of the vehicle and fed a plain diet), after 3 days of induction, blood glucose levels were measured to confirm the onset of diabetes. Then, at weeks 0 and 4, the biochemical index was assayed and renal cortex tissues were harvested. MPC5 podocytes were cultured in vitro. Beclin1 (K414R)-pLVX-ZsGreen1-N1(wild-type or mutant) lentiviral plasmids were transfected into podocytes. Western blot or immunoprecipitation was used to test proteins or the acetylation levels respectively, and immunohistochemistry was used to analyze morphological changes of podocytes. Immunofluorescence was used to detect the aggregation of LC3 puncta.

RESULTS

The acetylation level of Beclin1 was upregulated with podocyte injury exacerbated in high glucose at 24 h and that a mutation at K414R could inhibit hyperactivated autophagy, which ameliorated podocyte impairment.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the acetylation site at K414 is a critical molecule and drug target and that further research into this area is warranted.